Phase II Study of Preoperative Intra-Arterial Epirubicin, Etoposide, and Oxaliplatin Combined with Oral S-1 Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Borrmann Type 4 Gastric Cancer

Xiao-Song Xiang, Yu Su, Guo-Li Li, Long Ma, Chang-Sheng Zhou, Ru-Feng Ma, Xiao-Song Xiang, Yu Su, Guo-Li Li, Long Ma, Chang-Sheng Zhou, Ru-Feng Ma

Abstract

Purpose: A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative, intra-arterial perfusion of epirubicin, etoposide, and oxaliplatin combined with oral chemotherapy S-1 (SEEOX) for the treatment of type 4 gastric cancer.

Materials and methods: A single-center, single-arm phase II trial was conducted on 36 patients with histologically proven type 4 gastric cancer without distant peritoneal or organ metastasis. Patients received 3, 21-day courses of SEEOX preoperative chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcomes assessed were chemotherapeutic response, radical resection rate, pathological regression, toxicities, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.

Results: All patients were at an advanced stage of cancer (stage III or IV) and completed the entire course of treatment. Based on changes in tumor volume and peritoneal metastasis, the objective response rate was 55.6% (20/36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38.5%-72.6%) and the disease control rate was 69.4% (25/36; 95% CI, 53.6%-85.3%). The radical resection rate was 75% (27/36; 95% CI, 60.1%-89.9%) and the proportion of R0 resections was 66.7% (21/36; 95% CI, 50.5%-82.8%). The pathological response rate was 33.3%, of which 13.9% showed complete pathological regression. The median survival was 27.1 months (95% CI, 22.24-31.97 months), and the 2-year OS was 48.5% (95% CI, 30.86%-66.1%).

Conclusions: Preoperative SEEOX is a safe and effective treatment for type 4 gastric cancer. Based on these preliminary data, a phase III study will be conducted to confirm the superiority of this regimen over standard treatment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02949258.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; Linitis plastica; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Copyright © 2020. Korean Gastric Cancer Association.

Figures

Fig. 1. The CONSORT flow chart.
Fig. 1. The CONSORT flow chart.
Fig. 2. Waterfall plot of tumor volume…
Fig. 2. Waterfall plot of tumor volume changes and typical CT graphs. (A) Waterfall plot showing changes in tumor volume, peritoneal metastasis and peritoneal lavage cytology. Patients 1–3 did not undergo laparoscopy due to disease progression, and patient 4 due to the large amount of ascites. (B) Typical CT images of patients who received SEEOX preoperative chemotherapy. Patient A is a 71-year-old surviving male diagnosed with P0CY1. After preoperative treatment, CT evaluation indicated CR, re-laparoscopy revealed P0CY0 and histological examination showed complete pathological regression. Patient B was a 45-year-old male diagnosed with P0CY1. CT evaluation and re-laparoscopy respectively indicated PR (−90%) and P0CY0. The histological subtype of this tumor was signet ring cell carcinoma, T4aN2M0, TRG3. The patient passed away 17 months post-surgery due to peritoneal metastasis. Patient C is a surviving 67-year-old male diagnosed with P1CY0. CT evaluation showed PR (−60%), re-laparoscopy indicated P0CY0 and the histological subtype indicated poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, T4bN3M0, TRG3. Patient D is a surviving 65-year-old female diagnosed with P0CY1. CT evaluation showed PR (−30%), re-laparoscopy revealed P0CY0 and a complete pathological regression was seen.
CT = computed tomography; SEEOX = S-1, etoposide, oxaliplatin and epirubicin; CR = complete response; PR = partial response.
Fig. 3. (A) Kaplan-Meier OS curve of…
Fig. 3. (A) Kaplan-Meier OS curve of 36 enrolled patients. (B) Kaplan-Meier OS curves of resected (n=27) and unresected (n=9) patients (P
OS = overall survival.

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.
    1. An JY, Kang TH, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S. Borrmann type IV: an independent prognostic factor for survival in gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1364–1369.
    1. Ahn JB, Ha TK, Lee HR, Kwon SJ. An insufficient preoperative diagnosis of Borrmann type 4 gastric cancer in spite of EMR. J Gastric Cancer. 2011;11:59–63.
    1. Miki Y, Tokunaga M, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Staging laparoscopy for patients with cM0, type 4, and large type 3 gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2015;39:2742–2747.
    1. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. Berlin: Springer; 2010.
    1. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 7th ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101–112.
    1. Blackham AU, Swords DS, Levine EA, Fino NF, Squires MH, Poultsides G, et al. Is linitis plastica a contraindication for surgical resection: a multi-institution study of the U.S. Gastric Cancer Collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1203–1211.
    1. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.
    1. Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, Goetze TO, Meiler J, Kasper S, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1948–1957.
    1. Terashima M, Iwasaki Y, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Nakamura K, Katai H, et al. Randomized phase III trial of gastrectomy with or without neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin for type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer, the short-term safety and surgical results: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG0501) Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:1044–1052.
    1. He Q, Li Y, Ma L, Ji X, Li G. Application of FLEEOX preoperative chemotherapy via intra-arterial and intravenous administration in treatment of unresectable locally advanced gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:1421–1427.
    1. Li Y, Chen J, He Q, Ji X, Wang X, Fan C, et al. Clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens FLEEOX vs. XELOX in patients with initially unresectable advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:86886–86896.
    1. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. 1st ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co. Ltd.; 1995.
    1. Becker K, Mueller JD, Schulmacher C, Ott K, Fink U, Busch R, et al. Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2003;98:1521–1530.
    1. Iwasaki Y, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Nakamura K, Sano T, Katai H, et al. Phase II study of preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin followed by gastrectomy for clinically resectable type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancers (JCOG0210) J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:741–745.
    1. Nazli O, Derici H, Tansug T, Yaman I, Bozdag AD, Isgüder AS, et al. Survival analysis after surgical treatment of gastric cancer: review of 121 cases. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:625–629.
    1. Liang C, Chen G, Zhao B, Qiu H, Li W, Sun X, et al. Borrmann type IV gastric cancer: focus on the role of gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:1026–1032.
    1. Otsuji E, Kuriu Y, Okamoto K, Ochiai T, Ichikawa D, Hagiwara A, et al. Outcome of surgical treatment for patients with scirrhous carcinoma of the stomach. Am J Surg. 2004;188:327–332.
    1. Takahashi I, Matsusaka T, Onohara T, Nishizaki T, Ishikawa T, Tashiro H, et al. Clinicopathological features of long-term survivors of scirrhous gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:1485–1488.
    1. Park SH, Sohn TS, Lee J, Lim DH, Hong ME, Kim KM, et al. Phase III trial to compare adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer: final report of the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in stomach tumors trial, including survival and subset analyses. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3130–3136.
    1. Smalley SR, Benedetti JK, Haller DG, Hundahl SA, Estes NC, Ajani JA, et al. Updated analysis of SWOG-directed intergroup study 0116: a phase III trial of adjuvant radiochemotherapy versus observation after curative gastric cancer resection. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2327–2333.
    1. Janjigian YY, Bendell J, Calvo E, Kim JW, Ascierto PA, Sharma P, et al. CheckMate-032 study: efficacy and safety of nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2836–2844.
    1. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as first-line monotherapy and combination therapy for treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (MK-3475-062/KEYNOTE-062) [Internet] Bethesda (MD): U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2020. [cited 2020 Jun 8]. Available from: .
    1. Yashiro M, Hirakawa K. Cancer-stromal interactions in scirrhous gastric carcinoma. Cancer Microenviron. 2010;3:127–135.
    1. Ilson DH. Advances in the treatment of gastric cancer: 2019. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2019;35:551–554.
    1. Ong ES, Poirier M, Espat NJ. Hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:142–149.
    1. Yasufuku I, Nunobe S, Ida S, Kumagai K, Ohashi M, Hiki N, et al. Conversion therapy for peritoneal lavage cytology-positive type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer patients selected as candidates for R0 resection by diagnostic staging laparoscopy. Gastric Cancer. 2020;23:319–327.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner