Breast shield design impacts milk removal dynamics during pumping: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Vanessa S Sakalidis, Lennart Ivarsson, Alan G Haynes, Linda Jäger, Nania G Schärer-Hernández, Leon R Mitoulas, Danielle K Prime, Vanessa S Sakalidis, Lennart Ivarsson, Alan G Haynes, Linda Jäger, Nania G Schärer-Hernández, Leon R Mitoulas, Danielle K Prime

Abstract

Introduction: While many studies have investigated the importance of optimizing pumping patterns for milk removal, the influence of breast shield design on milk removal has not been the focus of extensive investigation. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of breast shields with either a 105° or a 90° flange opening angle on breast drainage and milk volume expressed during pumping.

Material and methods: This study was a cross-over, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial (Registration; NCT03091985). Mothers (n = 49) of breastfeeding infants participated in the study over two study sessions. Participants were randomly assigned to pump both breasts simultaneously for 15 minutes with either the 105° or 90° breast shield in the first session, and the other shield in the second session. Effectiveness (breast drainage) and efficiency (volume expressed) of both breast shields were assessed after 15 minutes of pumping. Intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses were performed to determine if the 105° breast shield was non-inferior to the 90° breast shield for breast drainage and volume expressed. Perceived comfort was assessed via questionnaire.

Results: The 105° breast shield was both non-inferior and superior compared to the standard 90° shield for breast drainage (intention-to-treat, 3.87% (0.01-7.72), P = .049) and volume expressed (intention-to-treat, 9.14 mL (1.37-16.91), P=.02). In addition, the 105° shield was rated as feeling more comfortable (P < .001) and as having an improved fit to the breast (P < .001) compared to the 90° shield.

Conclusions: Expressing with the 105° breast shield was more efficient, effective and comfortable compared to the 90° shield. Breast shield design can significantly impact pumping outcomes, and an opening angle of 105° improves both the dynamics and comfort of milk removal.

Keywords: breast expression; breast pumping; breastfeeding; infant; lactation.

Conflict of interest statement

This clinical study was conducted and financed by Medela AG, Switzerland. LJ, NGSH, LRM, and DKP are employees of Medela AG. VSS and LI were employees of Medela AG during the planning, data collection and manuscript preparation phases of the study. AGH is an employee of CTU Bern, The University of Bern, Switzerland. CTU Bern, University of Bern staff policy prohibits its employees from the direct acceptance of honoraria or consultancy fees.

© 2020 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort Flowchart

References

    1. Labiner‐Wolf J, Fein SB, Shealy KR, Wang C. Prevalence of breast milk expression and associated factors. Pediatrics. 2008;122:563.
    1. Johns HM, Amir LH, McLachlan HL, Della FA. Breast pump use amongst mothers of healthy term infants in Melbourne, Australia: a prospective cohort study. Midwifery. 2016;33:82‐89.
    1. Shealy KR, Scanlon KS, Labiner‐Wolfe J, Fein SB, Grummer‐Strawn LM. Characteristics of breastfeeding practices among US mothers. Pediatrics. 2008;122(Suppl 2):S50‐S55.
    1. Binns CW, Win NN, Zhao Y, Scott JA. Trends in the expression of Breastmilk. Breastfeeding Review. 2006;14:5‐9.
    1. Keim SA, Boone KM, Oza‐Frank R, Geraghty SR. Pumping milk without ever feeding at the breast in the Moms2Moms study. Breastfeed Med. 2017;12:422‐429.
    1. Kent JC, Geddes DT, Hepworth AR, Hartmann PE. Effect of warm breastshields on breast milk pumping. J Hum Lact. 2011;27:331‐338.
    1. Meier PP, Patel AL, Hoban R, Engstrom JL. Which breast pump for which mother: An evidence‐based approach to individualizing breast pump technology. J Perinatol. 2016;36:493‐499.
    1. Kent JC, Ramsay DT, Doherty D, Larsson M, Hartmann PE. Response of breasts to different stimulation patterns of an electric breast pump. J Hum Lact. 2003;19:179‐186.
    1. Meier PP, Engstrom JL, Janes JE, Jegier BJ, Loera F. Breast pump suction patterns that mimic the human infant during breastfeeding: greater milk output in less time spent pumping for breast pump‐dependent mothers with premature infants. J Perinatol. 2012;32:103‐110.
    1. Burton P, Kennedy K, Ahluwalia JS, Nicholl R, Lucas A, Fewtrell MS. Randomized trial comparing the effectiveness of 2 electric breast pumps in the NICU. J Hum Lact. 2013;29:412‐419.
    1. Eglash A, Malloy ML. Breastmilk expression and breast pump technology. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58:855‐867.
    1. Jones E. Initiating and establishing lactation in the mother of a preterm infant. J Neonatal Nurs. 2009;15:56‐59.
    1. Jones E, Hilton S. Correctly fitting breast shields are the key to lactation success for pump dependent mothers following preterm delivery. J Neonatal Nurs. 2009;15:14‐17.
    1. Ramsay DT, Kent JC, Hartmann RA, Hartmann PE. Anatomy of the lactating human breast redefined with ultrasound imaging. J Anat. 2005;206:525‐534.
    1. Ramsay DT, Kent JC, Owens RA, Hartmann PE. Ultrasound imaging of milk ejection in the breast of lactating women. Pediatrics. 2004;113:361‐367.
    1. Geddes DT. The anatomy of the lactating breast: latest research and clinical implications. Infant. 2007;3:59‐63.
    1. Schlienger A, Prime DK, Käppeli D, et al. Optimisation of breastshield shape with the aim of improving breast expression (P‐25); Abstracts from the 18th international society for research in human milk and lactation conference. Breastfeed Med. 2016;11:A28‐A29.
    1. Muther M, Prime DK, Käppeli D, et al. Scans of the lactating breast can be used to investigate the breast:breastshield interface (P‐24); Abstracts from the 18th International Society for Research in Human Milk and Lactation Conference. Breastfeed Med. 2016;11:A28.
    1. Kent JC, Mitoulas LR, Cregan MD, et al. Importance of vacuum for breastmilk expression. Breastfeed Med. 2008;3:11‐19.
    1. Prime DK. Dynamics of milk flow and milk ejection during breast expression in women. Dissertation. The University of Western Australia; 2010.
    1. Prime DK, Geddes DT, Spatz DL, Robert M, Trengove NJ, Hartmann PE. Using milk flow rate to investigate milk ejection in the left and right breasts during simultaneous breast expression in women. Int Breastfeed J. 2009;4:10.
    1. Prime DK, Kent JC, Hepworth AR, Trengove NJ, Hartmann PE. Dynamics of milk removal during simultaneous breast expression in women. Breastfeed Med. 2012;7:100‐106.
    1. Arthur PG, Hartmann PE, Smith M. Measurement of the milk intake of breast‐fed infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1987;6:758‐763.
    1. Kent JC, Mitoulas LR, Cregan MD, Ramsay DT, Doherty DA, Hartmann PE. Volume and frequency of breastfeedings and fat content of breast milk throughout the day. Pediatrics. 2006;117:e387‐e395.
    1. Fleet IR, Linzell JL. A rapid method of estimating fat in very small quantities of milk. J Physiol. 1964;175:17.
    1. Daly SE, Di Rosso A, Owens RA, Hartmann PE. Degree of breast emptying explains changes in the fat content, but not fatty acid composition, of human milk. Exp Physiol. 1993;78:741‐755.
    1. Prime DK, Garbin CP, Hartmann PE, Kent JC. Simultaneous breast expression in breastfeeding women is more efficacious than sequential breast expression. Breastfeed Med. 2012;7:442‐447.
    1. Alekseev NP, et al. Dynamics of milk ejection reflexes accompanying continuous rhythmic stimulation of areola‐nipple complex of the mammary gland. Russian J Physiol. 2000;86:711‐719.
    1. Ramsay DT, Mitoulas LR, Kent JC, et al. Milk flow rates can be used to identify and investigate milk ejection in women expressing breast milk using an electric breast pump. Breastfeed Med. 2006;1:14‐23.
    1. Prime DK, Geddes DT, Hepworth AR, Trengove NJ, Hartmann PE. Comparison of the patterns of milk ejection during repeated breast expression sessions in women. Breastfeed Med. 2011;6:183.
    1. Fewtrell M, Kennedy K, Lukoyanova O, et al. Short‐term efficacy of two breast pumps and impact on breastfeeding outcomes at 6 months in exclusively breastfeeding mothers: A randomised trial. Mat Child Nutrit. 2019;15:e12779.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner