Abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk patients. Outcome of selective management based on size and expansion rate

E F Bernstein, E L Chan, E F Bernstein, E L Chan

Abstract

Low mortality rates for elective surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms justify an aggressive approach in most patients. However, in high-risk patients with small aneurysms and no symptoms, the decision to operate remains a delicate balance of risk and benefit. Our observations include 99 high-risk patients with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms initially measuring 3 to 6 cm in the largest transverse diameter, who have been followed 1 to 9 years (average 2.4 years) with serial echographic measurements. Elective operations were performed for aneurysmal enlargement greater than 6 cm or symptom development. An additional 11 patients with aneurysms initially greater than 6 cm, whose initial evaluation did not result in elective surgery, were also followed. Serial data documented a mean expansion rate of 0.4 cm/year for aneurysms smaller than 6 cm. Forty-one of these 99 high-risk patients with small aneurysms eventually underwent an elective resection with two deaths (4.9%). Thirty-four patients (34%) died from causes unrelated to their unoperated aneurysms, and 21 patients (21%) are alive without symptoms. Three of the 99 patients suffered aneurysm rupture and emergency operation with two deaths. Thus, of the 99 high-risk patients with small aneurysms, four have died of elective aneurysm surgery or rupture (4%). A protocol of re-echo (or computerized tomography) examination at 3-month intervals appears to define which of these high-risk patients require elective aneurysm surgery, and has limited rupture to less than 5%. Improved criteria may emerge from recent advances in high-resolution computerized tomography.

References

    1. Surgery. 1968 May;63(5):711-21
    1. JAMA. 1978 Oct 27;240(18):1966-8
    1. Comput Tomogr. 1977;1(1):51-61
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1969 Jul;129(1):1-9
    1. Surgery. 1967 Jan;61(1):83-93
    1. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1976 May-Jun;17(3):195-201
    1. Arch Surg. 1976 Nov;111(11):1250-7
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1979 May;27(5):479-88
    1. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1980 Mar-Apr;21(2):135-42
    1. Surgery. 1972 Dec;72(6):939-45
    1. Arch Surg. 1972 Apr;104(4):600-6
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970 Jun;130(6):981-7
    1. AMA Arch Surg. 1952 Mar;64(3):405-8
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963 Sep;117:355-8
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1977 Sep;24(3):241-4
    1. Ann Surg. 1964 Oct;160:622-39
    1. Comput Tomogr. 1978;2(2):99-109
    1. Arch Surg. 1975 May;110(5):513-7
    1. Am J Surg. 1963 Jun;105:793-801
    1. Ann Surg. 1980 Sep;192(3):414-21
    1. Surgery. 1982 Feb;91(2):188-93
    1. Ann Surg. 1975 Jun;181(6):863-9
    1. Surgery. 1976 Dec;80(6):765-73
    1. Am J Surg. 1965 May;109:560-5
    1. Am J Surg. 1983 Jul;146(1):93-7
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978 Aug;131(2):317-20
    1. Arch Surg. 1973 Aug;107(2):297-302
    1. Surgery. 1983 Oct;94(4):591-7
    1. Am J Surg. 1963 Aug;106:128-43
    1. Ann Surg. 1966 Oct;164(4):678-99
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1974 Feb;54(1):175-93
    1. Ann Surg. 1981 Jun;193(6):699-709
    1. Arch Surg. 1979 Dec;114(12):1402-8
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976 Mar;142(3):321-4
    1. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1979 Jan-Feb;20(1):13-20
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980 Feb;150(2):171-6
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1961 Jul;113:17-23
    1. Surgery. 1982 Apr;91(4):390-3
    1. Ann Surg. 1980 Nov;192(5):667-73

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner