Legacy for ChildrenTM: a pair of randomized controlled trials of a public health model to improve developmental outcomes among children in poverty

Ruth Perou, Marc N Elliott, Susanna N Visser, Angelika H Claussen, Keith G Scott, Leila H Beckwith, Judy Howard, Lynne F Katz, D Camille Smith, Ruth Perou, Marc N Elliott, Susanna N Visser, Angelika H Claussen, Keith G Scott, Leila H Beckwith, Judy Howard, Lynne F Katz, D Camille Smith

Abstract

Background: One in five Americans under age 18 lives in a family below the Federal poverty threshold. These more than 15 million children are at increased risk of a wide variety of adverse long-term health and developmental outcomes. The early years of life are critical to short- and long-term health and well-being. The Legacy for ChildrenTM model was developed in response to this need and marries the perspectives of epidemiology and public health to developmental psychology theory in order to better address the needs of children at environmental risk for poor developmental outcomes.

Methods/design: The Legacy for ChildrenTM group-based parenting intervention model was evaluated as a pair of randomized controlled trials among low-income families in Miami and Los Angeles. The study was designed to allow for site-stratified analysis in order to evaluate each model implementation separately. Evaluation domains include comprehensive assessments of family, maternal, and child characteristics, process outcomes, and prospective programmatic cost. Data collection began prenatally or at birth and continues into school-age.

Discussion: The societal costs of poor developmental outcomes are substantial. A concerted effort from multiple sectors and disciplines, including public health, is necessary to address these societal concerns. Legacy uses a public health model to engage parents and promote overall child well-being in families in poverty through rigorous evaluation methodologies and evidence-based intervention strategies. This study collects rich and modular information on maternal and child outcomes, process, and cost that will enable a detailed understanding of how Legacy works, how it can be refined and improved, and how it can be translated and disseminated. Taken together, these results will inform public policy and help to address issues of health disparities among at-risk populations.

Trial registration: NCT00164697.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Legacy for ChildrenTMconceptual model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Legacy for ChildrenTM logic model.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CONSORT Flowchart for the Legacy for ChildrenTM project.

References

    1. Wright VR, Chau M, Aratani Y. Who Are America’s Poor Children? The Official Story. New York, NY: National Center for Children in Poverty; 2010.
    1. Chau M, Thampi K, Wight V. Basic facts about low-income children. New York, NY: National Center for Children in Poverty; 2010. pp. 1–8.
    1. Currie J. Health disparities and gaps in school readiness. Future Child. 2005;15(1):117–138. doi: 10.1353/foc.2005.0002.
    1. Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan GJ. The effects of poverty on children. Future Child. 1997;7:55–71. doi: 10.2307/1602387.
    1. Marmot MG, Shipley MJ. Do socioeconomic differences in mortality persist after retirement? 25 year follow-up of civil servants from the first Whitehall II Study. Br Med J. 1996;313(7066):1177–1180. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1177.
    1. Swanson CB. Who Graduates? Who Doesn’t? A Statistical Portrait of Public High School Graduation, Class of 2001. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Education Policy Center; 2004.
    1. Entwisle DR, Alexander KL. Beginning school math competence: Minority and majority comparisons. Child Dev. 1990;61:454–471. doi: 10.2307/1131107.
    1. Haveman RH, Wolfe BS. Succeeding generations: On the effects of investments in children. New York, NY, US: Russell Sage; 1994.
    1. Patterson CJ, Kupersmidt JB, Vaden NA. Income level, gender, ethnicity, and household composition as predictors of children's school-based competence. Child Dev. 1990;61(2):485–494. doi: 10.2307/1131109.
    1. Hackman DA, Farah MJ. Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009;13(2):65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.003.
    1. Farah MJ, Shera DM, Savage JH, Betancourt L, Giannetta JM, Brodsky NL, Malmud EK, Hurt H. Childhood poverty: specific associations with neurocognitive development. Brain Res. 2006;1110(1):166–174. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.072.
    1. Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Walker J, Whitfield CL, Bremner JD, Perry BD, Dube SR, Giles WH. The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood: A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology. Eur Arch Psychiatr Clin Neurosci. 2006;56(3):174–186.
    1. Shonkoff J, Philips D, editor. National Research Council & Institute of Medicine: Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. (Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development).
    1. Shonkoff JP, Boyce WT, McEwen BS. Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: Building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention. JAMA. 2009;301(21):2252–2259. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.754.
    1. Mercy JA, Saul J. Creating a healthier future through early interventions for children. JAMA. 2009;301(21):2262–2264. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.803.
    1. Schweinhart LJ, Barnes HV, Weikart DP. Significant benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool study through age 27. Monogr High Scope Educ Res Found. 1993;No 10
    1. Karoly LA, Kilburn MR, Cannon JS. Early childhood interventions: Proven results, future promise. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2005.
    1. Weikart DP. Changing early childhood development through educational intervention. Prev Med. 1998;27(2):233–237. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0280.
    1. Stevens JH. From 3 to 20: The Early Training Project. Young Children. 1982;37(6):57–64.
    1. Reynolds AJ, Temple JA. Extended early childhood intervention and school achievement: Age thirteen findings from the Chicago Longitudinal Study. Child Dev. 1998;69(1):231–246.
    1. Ramey CT, Ramey SL. Prevention of intellectual disabilities: early interventions to improve cognitive development. Prev Med. 1998;27(2):224–232. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0279.
    1. Warr-Leeper GA. A review of early intervention programs and effectiveness research for environmentally disadvantaged children. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 2001;25(2):89–102.
    1. Mahoney G, Boyce G, Fewell RR, Spiker D, Wheeden CA. The relationship of parent–child interaction to the effectiveness of early intervention services for at-risk children and children with disabilities. Top Early Child Spec Educ. 1998;18(1):5–17. doi: 10.1177/027112149801800104.
    1. Karoly LA, Greenwood PW, Everingham SS, Houbé J, Kilburn MR, Rydell CP, Sanders M, Chiesa J. Investing in our children: What we know and don't know about the costs and benefits of early childhood interventions. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 1998.
    1. Fewell RR, Wheeden CA. A pilot study of intervention with adolescent mothers and their children: A preliminary examination of child outcomes. Top Early Child Spec Educ. 1998;18(1):18–25. doi: 10.1177/027112149801800105.
    1. McCarton CM, Brooks-Gunn J, Wallace IF, Bauer CR, Bennett FC, Bernbaum JC, Broyles RS, Casey PH, McCormick MC, Scott DT. et al.Results at age 8 years of early intervention for low-birth-weight premature infants. The Infant Health and Development Program. JAMA. 1997;277(2):126–132. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540260040033.
    1. Fox DP, Gottfredson DC, Kumpfer KK, Beatty PD. Challenges in disseminating model programs: A qualitative analysis of the Strengthening Washington DC Families Program. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2004;7(3):165–176.
    1. McCormick MC, McCarton CM, Tonascia J, Brooks-Gunn J. Early educational intervention for very low birth weight infants: Results from the Infant Health and Development Program. J Pediatr. 1993;123(4):527–533. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80945-X.
    1. Moffitt TE, Arseneault L, Belsky D, Dickson N, Hancox RJ, Harrington H, Houts R, Poulton R, Roberts BW, Ross S, A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011.
    1. Schweinhart LJ. The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through age 40: Summary, conclusion and frequently asked questions. Ypsilanti: MI High Scope Educational Foundation; 2004.
    1. Maccoby EE, Martin JA. In: Handbook of child psychology. 4. Mussen PH, Hetherington EM, editor. New York, NY: Wiley; 1983. Socialization in the context of the family: Parent–child interaction; pp. 1–101. (Socialization, personality, and social development).
    1. Werner EE, Smith RS. Vulnerable but invincible: A study of resilient children. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1982.
    1. Maggi S, Irwin LJ, Siddiqi A, Hertzman C. The social determinants of early child development: An overview. J Paediatr Child Health. 2010;46(11):627–635. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01817.x.
    1. Serbin LA, Karp J. The intergenerational transfer of psychosocial risk: Mediators of vulnerability and resilience. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55(1):333–363. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145228.
    1. Garmezy N. Children in poverty: Resilience despite risk. Psychiatry. 1993;56:127–136.
    1. Asp E, Garbarino J. In: Integrative processes and socialization: Early to middle childhood edn. Johnson TDYJE, editor. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1988. Integrative processes at school and in the community; pp. 167–183.
    1. Bronfenbrenner U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychol. 1977;32:513–531.
    1. Bronfenbrenner U. Contexts of child rearing: Problems and prospects. Am Psychol. 1979;34(10):844–850.
    1. Garbarino J, Kostelny K. In: Parenting: An ecological perspective. Okagaki ITLL, editor. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993. Neighborhood and community influences on parenting.
    1. Crnic K, Greenberg M, Robinson N, Ragozin A. Maternal stress and social support: Effects on the mother-infant relationship from birth to eighteen months. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1984;54:224–235.
    1. Crockenberg SB. Stress and role satisfaction experienced by employed and nonemployed mothers with young children. Lifestyles. 1988;9(2):97–110. doi: 10.1007/BF00986933.
    1. Taylor RD, Roberts D. Kinship support and maternal and adolescent well-being in economically disadvantaged African-American families. Child Dev. 1995;66(6):1585–1597. doi: 10.2307/1131898.
    1. Crnic K, Greenberg M, Robinson N, Ragozin A. Maternal stress and social support: Effects on the mother-infant relationship from birth to eighteen months. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1984;54:224–235.
    1. McPhee D, Fritz J, Miller-Heyl J. Ethnic variations in personal social networks and parenting. Child Dev. 1996;67:3278–3295. doi: 10.2307/1131779.
    1. Mertesacker B, Bade U, Haverkock A, Pauli-Pott U. Predicting maternal reactivity/sensitivity: The role of infant emotionality, maternal depressiveness/anxiety, and social support. Infant Ment Health J. 2004;25(1):47–61. doi: 10.1002/imhj.10085.
    1. Shin H, Park Y-J, Ryu H, Seomun G-A. Maternal sensitivity: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2008;64(3):304–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04814.x.
    1. Burchinal MR, Follmer A, Bryant DM. The relations of maternal social support and family structure with maternal responsiveness and child outcomes among African American families. Dev Psychol. 1996;32(6):1073–1083.
    1. Jennings KD, Wisner KL, Conley BA. Serving the mental health needs of families with children under three: A comprehensive program. Infant Ment Health J. 1991;12(4):276–290. doi: 10.1002/1097-0355(199124)12:4<276::AID-IMHJ2280120402>;2-U.
    1. Jennings KD, Wisner KL, Conley BA. Serving the mental health needs of families with children under three: A comprehensive program. Infant Ment Health J. 1991;12:276–290. doi: 10.1002/1097-0355(199124)12:4<276::AID-IMHJ2280120402>;2-U.
    1. Fritz AS. Parent group education: A preventive intervention approach. Soc Work Groups. 1985;8(3):23–31. doi: 10.1300/J009v08n03_04.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY, US: Freeman; 1997.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215.
    1. Brody GH, Flor DL, Gibson NM. Linking maternal efficacy beliefs, developmental goals, parenting practices, and child competence in rural single-parent African American families. Child Dev. 1999;70(5):1197–1208. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00087.
    1. Mrazek PJ, Haggerty RJ. Reducing risks for mental disorders: frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 1994.
    1. Olds DL, Sadler L, Kitzman H. Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: recent evidence from randomized trials. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007;48(3–4):355–391.
    1. Lazar I, Darlington R, Murray H, Royce J, Snipper A, Ramey CT. Lasting effects of early education: A report from the Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1982;47(2/3):i-151.
    1. Carter N. See how we grow: A report on the status of parenting education in the U.S. Philadelphia, PA: The Pew Charitable Trusts; 1996.
    1. Seitz V. Intervention programs for impoverished children: A comparison of educational and family support models. Annals Child Dev. 1990;7:73–103.
    1. Ramey CT, Campbell FA. Preventive education for high-risk children: Cognitive consequences of the Carolina Abecedarian Project. Am J Ment Defic. 1984;88(5):515–523.
    1. Wasik BH, Ramey CT, Bryant DM, Sparling JJ. A longitudinal study of two early intervention strategies: Project CARE. Child Dev. 1990;61(6):1682–1696. doi: 10.2307/1130831.
    1. Weikart DP, Bond JT, McNeil JT. The Ypsilanti Perry Preschool Project: Preschool years and longitudinal results through fourth grade. Monogr High Scope Educ Res Found. 1978;No. 3
    1. Ramey CT, Bryant DM, Wasik BH, Sparling JJ, Fendt KH, LaVange LM. Infant Health and Development Program for low birth weight, premature infants: program elements, family participation, and child intelligence. Pediatrics. 1992;89(3):454–465.
    1. Health I, Program D. Enhancing the outcome of low birth weight, premature infant: A multisite, randomized trial. JAMA. 1990;263(22):3035–3070.
    1. Aylward GP, Hatcher RP, Stripp B, Gustafson N, Leavitt LA. Who goes and who stays: subject loss in a multicenter, longitudinal follow-up study. Dev Behav Pediatr. 1985;6:3–8.
    1. Briggs-Gowan MJ, Carter AS. Brief-Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA): Manual. Version 2.0. New Haven, CT: Yale University; 2002.
    1. LeBuffe PA, Naglieri JA. Devereux Early Childhood Assessment Program (DECA) Lewisville, NC: Kaplan Press; 1999.
    1. Kaufman AS, Kaufman NL. Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. 2. Circle Pines, MNZ: AGS Publishing; 2004.
    1. Zimmerman IL, Steiner VG, Pond RE. Preschool Language Scale-4. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 2002.
    1. Shahinfar A, Fox NA, Leavitt LA. Preschool children's exposure to violence: Relation of behavior problems to parent and child reports. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2000;70(1):115–125.
    1. McCartney K. Key findings on the Bracken Basic Concepts Scale in the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. Paper presented at Selecting Cognitive Measures for Young Children in Large Scale Surveys: May 1, 2002; Washington DC. 2002.
    1. Crnic KA, Greenberg MT. Minor parenting stress with young children. Child Dev. 1990;61(5):1628–1637. doi: 10.2307/1130770.
    1. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller S. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12): Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;32:220–233.
    1. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Mroczek D, Ustun TB, Wittchen H. The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Short Form (CIC-SF) Int J Method Psych. 1998;7:171–185. doi: 10.1002/mpr.47.
    1. Hammer AL, Marting MS. Coping Resources Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1988.
    1. Broadhead WE, Gehlbach SH, de Gruy FV, Kaplan BH. The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire: Measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Med Care. 1988;26:709–723. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00006.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner