Potential markers for sample size estimations in hereditary spastic paraplegia type 5

Qianqian Lin, Ying Liu, Zhixian Ye, Jianping Hu, Wenjie Cai, Qiang Weng, Wan-Jin Chen, Ning Wang, Dairong Cao, Yi Lin, Ying Fu, Qianqian Lin, Ying Liu, Zhixian Ye, Jianping Hu, Wenjie Cai, Qiang Weng, Wan-Jin Chen, Ning Wang, Dairong Cao, Yi Lin, Ying Fu

Abstract

Background: Aim to identify potential biomarkers to assess therapeutic efficacy for hereditary spastic paraplegias type 5 (SPG5) by investigating the clinical, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study to compare SPG5 patients with age- and sex-matched healthy controls who underwent conventional and quantitative MRI techniques of spinal cord (C1-T9) and brain. SPG5 patients also underwent assessment for clinical status and CSF biomarkers (27-hydroxycholesterol, neurofilament light). We identified a set of markers with standardized effect sizes (|t|> 0.5) to estimate sample sizes for disease progression (disease duration > 14 years vs. ≤ 14 years).

Results: Seventeen genetically confirmed SPG5 patients (11 men, 6 women; age range, 13-49 years; median disease duration, 14 years) were enrolled. Compared to healthy controls, the total spinal cord area (SCA) of SPG5 patients was reduced particularly at the thoracic levels (cervical levels: 12-27%; thoracic levels 41-60%). Patients did not show significant alterations of brain signal abnormalities or atrophy relative to controls. A total of 10 surrogate markers were selected and a minimum sample size was achieved with the measurement of SCA on T9 (n = 22) much less that what would be required if using clinical disability assessment (n = 124).

Conclusions: SPG5 patients showed distinct MRI features of spinal cord atrophy without significant brain alterations. Our finding supports the measurements of spinal cord on T9 level as potential endpoint for SPG5 clinical trials. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04006418. Registered 05 July 2019, https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04006418?term=NCT04006418&draw=2&rank=1 .

Keywords: Biomarkers; Hereditary; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sample size; Spastic paraplegia.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Quantitative MRI to assess spinal cord area. A Processing included 3 steps: (1) composing the cervical and thoracic spinal cord with 3D-T2W-SPACE; (2) segmentation and labeling the spinal cord; (3) measurement of spinal cord cross-sectional area (SCA) and sectional diameter (RL and AP). B Area of spinal cords (C2-T9) in SPG5 patients and matched healthy controls, comparisons performed using Mann–Whitney test, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. C, D Representative MRIs of SPG5 and healthy control. In SPG5 patients, a significant thinning in the spinal cord was observed (blue arrow) in the 3D T1-weighted and 3D T2-weighted sequence, respectively
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Conventional brain MRI evaluation. A Abnormal signals were assessed on T2, FLAIR, SWI and T1 routine sequence (above panel, from left to right). BD Neuroradiological signs, previously reported in other subtypes of hereditary spastic paraplegias, were also assessed; B thin corpus callosum (left T1, right T2 FLAIR, green edge arrow); C T2 hyperintensity of the dentate nucleus (above T1, below T2; black edge arrow); D “Ears- of -the- Lynx” MRI sign (above T1, below T2 FLAIR, red edge arrow)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Quantitative MRI to assess the structural changes of brain. A Visual rating scales to assess cerebral atrophy, OF = orbitofrontal cortex, AC = anterior cingulate, AT = anterior temporal, FI = fronto-insula, MT = medial temporal lobe, PA = posterior cortex; Visual rating was performed by two neurologists, the intraclass correlation coefficient value ranged from 0.829 to 1.000. Comparisons to each visual rating score and total visual rating scores between the SPG5 patients and the matched healthy controls (HC) were performed using the Mann–Whitney test. B Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was performed to assess brain volume analysis alteration between healthy controls (HC) and SPG5 patients; statistical tests were evaluated at a significance level of P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons with the false discovery rate (FDR). C Comparisons of the grey matter fraction (GMF) between SPG5 patients and healthy controls were performed using the Mann–Whitney test (right). D Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was performed to assess gray matter analysis alteration between healthy controls (HC) and patients; statistical tests were evaluated at a significance level of P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons with FDR. E, F Comparisons of the cerebellum volume fraction and corpus collosum volume fraction between SPG5 patients and healthy controls were performed using the Mann–Whitney test

References

    1. Salinas S, Proukakis C, Crosby A, Warner TT. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: clinical features and pathogenetic mechanisms. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:1127–1138. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70258-8.
    1. Shribman S, Reid E, Crosby AH, Houlden H, Warner TT. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: from diagnosis to emerging therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:1136–1146. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30235-2.
    1. Schols L, Rattay TW, Martus P, Meisner C, Baets J, Fischer I, et al. Hereditary spastic paraplegia type 5: natural history, biomarkers and a randomized controlled trial. Brain. 2017;140:3112–3127. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx273.
    1. Marelli C, Lamari F, Rainteau D, Lafourcade A, Banneau G, Humbert L, et al. Plasma oxysterols: biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment in spastic paraplegia type 5. Brain. 2018;141:72–84. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx297.
    1. Faber I, Martinez ARM, de Rezende TJR, Martins CR, Jr, Martins MP, Lourenço CM, et al. SPG11 mutations cause widespread white matter and basal ganglia abnormalities, but restricted cortical damage. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;19:848–857. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.05.031.
    1. Castellano A, Papinutto N, Cadioli M, Brugnara G, Iadanza A, Scigliuolo G, et al. Quantitative MRI of the spinal cord and brain in adrenomyeloneuropathy: in vivo assessment of structural changes. Brain. 2016;139:1735–1746. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww068.
    1. Eden D, Gros C, Badji A, Dupont SM, De Leener B, Maranzano J, et al. Spatial distribution of multiple sclerosis lesions in the cervical spinal cord. Brain. 2019;142:633–646. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy352.
    1. Khalil M, Teunissen CE, Otto M, Piehl F, Sormani MP, Gattringer T, et al. Neurofilaments as biomarkers in neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14:577–589. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0058-z.
    1. Dong EL, Wang C, Wu S, Lu YQ, Lin XH, Su HZ, et al. Clinical spectrum and genetic landscape for hereditary spastic paraplegias in China. Mol Neurodegener. 2018;13:36. doi: 10.1186/s13024-018-0269-1.
    1. Schüle R, Holland-Letz T, Klimpe S, Kassubek J, Klopstock T, Mall V, et al. The Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS): a reliable and valid measure of disease severity. Neurology. 2006;67:430–434. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000228242.53336.90.
    1. Chou CT, Soong BW, Lin KP, Tsai YS, Jih KY, Liao YC, et al. Clinical characteristics of Taiwanese patients with Hereditary spastic paraplegia type 5. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020;7:486–496. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51019.
    1. Hedera P, Eldevik OP, Maly P, Rainier S, Fink JK. Spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging in autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia. Neuroradiology. 2005;47(10):730–734. doi: 10.1007/s00234-005-1415-3.
    1. Servelhere KR, Casseb RF, de Lima FD, Rezende TJR, Ramalho LP, França MC., Jr Spinal Cord Gray and White Matter Damage in Different Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia Subtypes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42(3):610–615. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7017.
    1. da Graca FF, de Rezende TJR, Vasconcellos LFR, Pedroso JL, Barsottini OGP, França MC., Jr Neuroimaging in hereditary spastic paraplegias: current use and future perspectives. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1117. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01117.
    1. Biancheri R, Ciccolella M, Rossi A, Tessa A, Cassandrini D, Minetti C, et al. White matter lesions in spastic paraplegia with mutations in SPG5/CYP7B1. Neuromuscul Disord. 2009;19:62–65. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2008.10.009.
    1. Goizet C, Boukhris A, Durr A, Beetz C, Truchetto J, Tesson C, et al. CYP7B1 mutations in pure and complex forms of hereditary spastic paraplegia type 5. Brain. 2009;132:1589–1600. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp073.
    1. Kuhle J, Kropshofer H, Haering DA, Kundu U, Meinert R, Barro C, et al. Blood neurofilament light chain as a biomarker of MS disease activity and treatment response. Neurology. 2019;92:e1007–e1015. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007032.
    1. Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Cohen JA, Comi G, Correale J, Coyle PK, et al. Ofatumumab versus teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:546–557. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246.
    1. Barro C, Benkert P, Disanto G, Tsagkas C, Amann M, Naegelin Y, et al. Serum neurofilament as a predictor of disease worsening and brain and spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2018;141:2382–2391. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy154.
    1. Chrestian N, Dupré N, Gan-Or Z, Szuto A, Chen S, Venkitachalam A, et al. Clinical and genetic study of hereditary spastic paraplegia in Canada. Neurol Genet. 2016;3(1):e122. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000122.
    1. Harding AE. Classification of the hereditary ataxias and paraplegias. Lancet. 1983;1:1151–1155. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)92879-9.
    1. Harper L, Fumagalli GG, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, O'Brien JT, Bouwman F, et al. MRI visual rating scales in the diagnosis of dementia: evaluation in 184 post-mortem confirmed cases. Brain. 2016;139:1211–1225. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww005.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner