Twelve-month outcomes in patients with diabetes implanted with a zotarolimus-eluting stent: results from the E-Five Registry

Ajay K Jain, Chaim Lotan, Ian T Meredith, Faustos Feres, Robaayah Zambahari, Nakul Sinha, Martin T Rothman, E-Five Registry Investigators, Ajay K Jain, Chaim Lotan, Ian T Meredith, Faustos Feres, Robaayah Zambahari, Nakul Sinha, Martin T Rothman, E-Five Registry Investigators

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively evaluate the 12-month effectiveness of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients enrolled in the E-Five Registry.

Design and setting: The E-Five Registry is a prospective, multicentre registry of 8314 patients presenting with symptomatic coronary artery disease treated with the Endeavor (ZES). Patients were treated at 188 centres located in 37 countries across Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific.

Patients: There were 2721 (32.7%) patients with diabetes (DM) and among these patients 682 were insulin-treated (ITDM) and 2039 were non-insulin-treated diabetic patients (NITDM). Interventions All enrolled patients received an Endeavor ZES and were followed for 12 months.

Main outcome measurements: The primary outcome measure was major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularisation (TLR), target vessel revascularisation (TVR), target vessel failure (TVF) and stent thrombosis.

Results: Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients had higher rates of MACE (9.7% vs 6.4%, p<0.001), TLR (5.3% vs 4.0%, p=0.028) and Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definite and probable stent thrombosis (1.5% vs 0.9%, p=0.041). Compared with non-DM patients, ITDM patients had higher rates of MACE (12.6% vs 6.4%, p<0.001). ITDM patients had higher rates of death (6.7% vs 1.7%, p<0.001), cardiac death (4.5% vs 1.2%, p<0.001) and TLR (6.5% vs 4.0%, p=0.011) than non-DM patients.

Conclusions: The Endeavor ZES performed well in DM patients; however, DM patients experienced higher rates of adverse clinical events compared with non-DM patients. TRIAL REG NO:

Clinical trial registration information: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NTC00623441.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00623441.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: AKJ, CL, ITM and MTR have served as consultants to Medtronic, Inc. MTR has received research/grant support from Medtronic, Inc and since this paper was written has become VP Medical Affairs, Coronary & Peripheral Division, Medtronic, Inc. JM is a stockholder and employee of Medtronic, Inc. CL has served as a consultant for Angio Score Ltd. ITM has served as an advisory board member for Boston Scientific; MTR has served as a consultant to Abbott Vascular, Cordis Corporation, JenaValve Technology, GmbH, Lombard Medical Technologies plc and Volcano and has received research/grant support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, CardioBridge GmbH, and Cordis Corporation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier curves showing cumulative incidence of (A) major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in non-diabetics (non-DM), insulin-treated diabetics (ITDM) and non-insulin-treated diabetic (NITDM) patients; (B) target lesion revascularisation (TLR) in non-diabetics (non-DM), insulin-treated diabetics (ITDM) and non-insulin-treated diabetic (NITDM) patients; (C) definite or probable stent thrombosis in non-diabetics (non-DM), insulin-treated diabetics (ITDM), and non-insulin-treated diabetic (NITDM) patients.

References

    1. Hermiller JB, Raizner A, Cannon L, et al. TAXUS-IV Investigators. Outcomes with the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent in patients with diabetes mellitus: the TAXUS-IV trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1206–12
    1. Kirtane AJ, Ellis SG, Dawkins KD, et al. Paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:708–15
    1. Fajadet J, Wijns W, Laarman G-J, et al. Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting phosphorylcholine-encapsulated stent for the treatment of native coronary artery lesions: clinical and angiographic results of the ENDEAVOR II trial. Circulation 2006;114:798–806
    1. Kandzari DE, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. for the ENDEAVOR III Investigators Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with native coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2440–7
    1. Leon MB, Mauri L, Popma JJ, et al. A randomized comparison of the ENDEAVOR zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary lesions: 12-month outcomes from the ENDEAVOR IV trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:543–54
    1. Jain AK, Meredith IT, Lotan C, et al. Real-world safety and efficacy of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent: early data from the E-Five registry. Am J Cardiol 2007;100(8B):77M–83M
    1. Lotan C, Meredith IT, Mauri L, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent in real-world clinical practice: 12-month data from the E-Five Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2;1227–35
    1. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical endpoints in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007;115:2344–51
    1. Kandzari DE, Leon MB. Overview of pharmacology and clinical trials program with the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor stent. J Interv Cardiol 2006;19:405–13
    1. Kumar R, Lee TT, Jeremias A, et al. Comparison of outcomes using sirolimus-eluting stenting in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with comparison of insulin versus non-insulin therapy in the diabetic patients. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1187–91
    1. Urban P, Gershlick AH, Guagliumi G, et al. Safety of coronary sirolimus-eluting stents in daily clinical practice: one-year follow-up of the e-Cypher registry. Circulation 2006;113:1434–41
    1. Simonton CA, Brodie B, Cheek B, et al. Comparative clinical outcomes of paclitaxel and sirolimus-eluting stents: Results from a large prospective multicenter registry—STENT group. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1214–22
    1. Waksman R, Buch AN, Torguson R, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes and thrombosis rates of sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in an unselected population with coronary artery disease (REWARDS registry). Am J Cardiol 2007;100:45–51
    1. Seabra-Gomes R. Percutaneous coronary interventions with drug eluting stents for diabetic patients. Heart 2006;92:410–19
    1. Moussa I, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. Impact of sirolimus-eluting stents on outcome in diabetic patients: a SIRIUS SIRolImUS-coated Bx Velocity balloon-expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions) substudy. Circulation 2004;109:2273–8
    1. Ong AT, Aoki J, van Mieghem CA, et al. Comparison of short- (one month) and long- (twelve months) term outcomes of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in 293 consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus (from the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH registries). Am J Cardiol 2005;96:358–62
    1. Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA 2005;293:2126–30
    1. Iijima R, Ndrepepa G, Mehilli J, et al. Impact of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcomes in the drug-eluting stent era. Am Heart J 2007;154:688–93

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner