Plasma proteins associated with cardiovascular death in patients with chronic coronary heart disease: A retrospective study

Lars Wallentin, Niclas Eriksson, Maciej Olszowka, Tanja B Grammer, Emil Hagström, Claes Held, Marcus E Kleber, Wolfgang Koenig, Winfried März, Ralph A H Stewart, Harvey D White, Mikael Åberg, Agneta Siegbahn, Lars Wallentin, Niclas Eriksson, Maciej Olszowka, Tanja B Grammer, Emil Hagström, Claes Held, Marcus E Kleber, Wolfgang Koenig, Winfried März, Ralph A H Stewart, Harvey D White, Mikael Åberg, Agneta Siegbahn

Abstract

Background: Circulating biomarkers are associated with the development of coronary heart disease (CHD) and its complications by reflecting pathophysiological pathways and/or organ dysfunction. We explored the associations between 157 cardiovascular (CV) and inflammatory biomarkers and CV death using proximity extension assays (PEA) in patients with chronic CHD.

Methods and findings: The derivation cohort consisted of 605 cases with CV death and 2,788 randomly selected non-cases during 3-5 years follow-up included in the STabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapLadIb TherapY (STABILITY) trial between 2008 and 2010. The replication cohort consisted of 245 cases and 1,042 non-cases during 12 years follow-up included in the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study between 1997 and 2000. Biomarker levels were measured with conventional immunoassays and/or with the OLINK PEA panels CVD I and Inflammation. Associations with CV death were evaluated by Random Survival Forest (RF) and Cox regression analyses. Both cohorts had the same median age (65 years) and 20% smokers, while there were slight differences in male sex (82% and 76%), hypertension (70% and 78%), and diabetes (39% and 30%) in the respective STABILITY and LURIC cohorts. The analyses identified 18 biomarkers with confirmed independent association with CV death by Boruta analyses and statistical significance (all p < 0.0001) by Cox regression when adjusted for clinical characteristics in both cohorts. Most prognostic information was carried by N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), hazard ratio (HR for 1 standard deviation [SD] increase of the log scale of the distribution of the biomarker in the replication cohort) 2.079 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.799-2.402), and high-sensitivity troponin T (cTnT-hs) HR 1.715 (95% CI 1.491-1.973). The other proteins with independent associations were growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) HR 1.728 (95% CI 1.527-1.955), transmembrane immunoglobulin and mucin domain protein (TIM-1) HR 1.555 (95% CI 1.362-1.775), renin HR 1.501 (95% CI 1.305-1.727), osteoprotegerin (OPG) HR 1.488 (95% CI 1.297-1.708), soluble suppression of tumorigenesis 2 protein (sST2) HR 1.478 (95% CI 1.307-1.672), cystatin-C (Cys-C) HR 1.370 (95% CI 1.243-1.510), tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 2 (TRAIL-R2) HR 1.205 (95% CI 1.131-1.285), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA-125) HR 1.347 (95% CI 1.226-1.479), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) HR 1.399 (95% CI 1.255-1.561), interleukin 6 (IL-6) HR 1.478 (95% CI 1.316-1.659), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) HR 1.259 (95% CI 1.134-1.396), spondin-1 HR 1.295 (95% CI 1.156-1.450), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) HR 1.349 (95% CI 1.237-1.472), chitinase-3 like protein 1 (CHI3L1) HR 1.284 (95% CI 1.129-1.461), tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNF-R1) HR 1.486 (95% CI 1.307-1.689), and adrenomedullin (AM) HR 1.750 (95% CI 1.490-2.056). The study is limited by the differences in design, size, and length of follow-up of the 2 studies and the lack of results from coronary angiograms and follow-up of nonfatal events.

Conclusions: Profiles of levels of multiple plasma proteins might be useful for the identification of different pathophysiological pathways associated with an increased risk of CV death in patients with chronic CHD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00799903.

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: LW reports institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co, Roche Diagnostics; consulting fees from Abbott; holds two patents involving GDF-15, both licensed to Roche Diagnostics. NE and MO report institutional research grants from GlaxoSmithKline. EH reports institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi; consulting fees from Amgen, NovoNordisk, Sanofi; speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, NovoNordisk, Sanofi; principal investigator fees paid to institution from CSL Behring, Dalcor, Regeneron, Sanofi, The Medicines Company. WK reports research grants from Roche Diagnostics, Beckmann, Singulex, Abbott; other research support from European Research Agency (ERA-CVD); honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Amgen; expert witness fees from Novartis; consultant/advisory board fees from Novartis, Pfizer, DalCor, Sanofi, Kowa, Amgen. CH reports Honoraria from Pfizer; consultant/advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim. MEK reports consulting/speaker fees from Bayer. WM reports grants and personal fees from Siemens Diagnostics, Abbott Diagnostics, AMGEN, Astrazeneca, Sanofi, BASF, Numares AG, employment from SYNLAB Holding Deutschland GmbH. RAHS reports grants and non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline. HDW reports research grants from Sanofi-Aventis, Dalcor Pharma, NIH, Eisai, Omthera Pharmaceuticals; other support from SAHMRI, ESC, AHA, Sanofi/Regeneron. AS reports institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Roche Diagnostics, GlaxoSmithKline; consulting fees from Olink Proteomics. TBG and MÅ have nothing to declare.

Figures

Fig 1. Variable importance in the STABILITY…
Fig 1. Variable importance in the STABILITY cohort.
Boruta analysis in the STABILITY cohort of the significance of variable importance for CV death in the RF analysis, including clinical variables as well as established and PEA biomarkers. Values are NPX values for the PEA biomarkers and log2 for the ng/L levels of NTproBNP, cTnT-hs, IL-6, GDF-15, Cys-C, CRP-hs, Lp-PLA2, and WBC measured by conventional quantitative assays. Color coding according to the Boruta analysis result: green = confirmed, yellow = tentative, and red = rejected. CRP-hs, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; cTnT-hs, high-sensitivity troponin T; CV, cardiovascular; Cys-C, cystatin-C; GDF-15, growth differentiation factor 15; IL-6, interleukin 6; Lp-PLA2, lipoprotein associated phospholipase A2; NPX, normalized protein expression; NTproBNP, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; PEA, proximity extension assay; RF, Random Survival Forest; STABILITY, STabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapLadIb TherapY; WBC, white blood cell.
Fig 2. Multivariable adjusted linear associations in…
Fig 2. Multivariable adjusted linear associations in the STABILITY cohort.
Cox regression analyses in the STABILITY cohort of associations between biomarkers and CV death with adjustment for baseline characteristics. Values are the same as for Fig 1. HRs and 95% CI are calculated for increase of 1 SD. Color coding according to the Boruta analysis result: green = confirmed, yellow = tentative, and red = rejected. CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; HR, hazard ratio; SD, standard deviation; STABILITY, STabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapLadIb TherapY.
Fig 3. Variable importance in the replication…
Fig 3. Variable importance in the replication cohort.
Boruta analysis in the LURIC cohort of the significance of variable importance for CV death in the RF analysis, including clinical variables as well as established and PEA biomarkers. Values are the same as for Fig 1. Color coding according to the Boruta analysis result: green = confirmed, yellow = tentative, and red = rejected. CV, cardiovascular; LURIC, Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health; PEA, proximity extension assay; RF, Random Survival Forest.
Fig 4. Multivariable adjusted linear associations in…
Fig 4. Multivariable adjusted linear associations in the replication cohort.
Cox regression analyses in the LURIC cohort of associations between biomarkers and CV death after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Values are the same as for Fig 1. HRs and 95% CI are calculated for increase of 1 SD. Color coding according to the Boruta analysis result: green = confirmed, yellow = tentative, and red = rejected. CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; HR, hazard ratio; LURIC, Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health; SD, standard deviation.
Fig 5. Biomarkers and processes associated with…
Fig 5. Biomarkers and processes associated with CV death.
Conceptual figure of biomarkers and processes associated with CV death in chronic CAD. CAD, coronary artery disease; CV, cardiovascular.

References

    1. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2564–603. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.012
    1. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:407–77.
    1. Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, Bangalore S, O'Brien SM, Boden WE, et al. Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020.
    1. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37:267–315. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320
    1. Wollert KC, Kempf T, Wallentin L. Growth Differentiation Factor 15 as a Biomarker in Cardiovascular Disease. Clin Chem. 2017;63:140–51. 10.1373/clinchem.2016.255174
    1. Omland T, White HD. State of the Art: Blood Biomarkers for Risk Stratification in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. Clin Chem. 2017;63:165–76. 10.1373/clinchem.2016.255190
    1. Chow SL, Maisel AS, Anand I, Bozkurt B, de Boer RA, Felker GM, et al. Role of Biomarkers for the Prevention, Assessment, and Management of Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e1054–e91. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000490
    1. Goff DCJ, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D'Agostino RB, Gibbons R, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S49–73. 10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98
    1. Assarsson E, Lundberg M, Holmquist G, Björkesten J, Thorsen SB, Ekman D, et al. Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e95192 10.1371/journal.pone.0095192
    1. Ebai T, Kamali-Moghaddam M, Landegren U. Parallel protein detection by solid-phase proximity ligation assay with real-time PCR or sequencing. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2015;109:20 10 1–25. 10.1002/0471142727.mb2010s109
    1. Darmanis S, Nong RY, Vänelid J, Siegbahn A, Ericsson O, Fredriksson S, et al. ProteinSeq: high-performance proteomic analyses by proximity ligation and next generation sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25583 10.1371/journal.pone.0025583
    1. White H, Held C, Stewart R, Watson D, Harrington R, Budaj A, et al. Study design and rationale for the clinical outcomes of the STABILITY Trial (STabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapLadIb TherapY) comparing darapladib versus placebo in patients with coronary heart disease. Am Heart J. 2010;160:655–61. 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.07.006
    1. White HD, Held C, Stewart R, Tarka E, Brown R, Davies RY, et al. Darapladib for preventing ischemic events in stable coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1702–11. 10.1056/NEJMoa1315878
    1. Wallentin L, Held C, Armstrong PW, Cannon CP, Davies RY, Granger CB, et al. Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Activity Is a Marker of Risk But Not a Useful Target for Treatment in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e003407 10.1161/JAHA.116.003407
    1. Hagström E, Held C, Stewart RA, Aylward PE, Budaj A, Cannon CP, et al. Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Predicts All-Cause Morbidity and Mortality in Stable Coronary Heart Disease. Clin Chem. 2017;63:325–33. 10.1373/clinchem.2016.260570
    1. Lindholm D, Lindbäck J, Armstrong PW, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Granger CB, et al. Biomarker-Based Risk Model to Predict Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients With Stable Coronary Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:813–26. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.030
    1. Held C, White HD, Stewart RAH, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Hochman JS, et al. Inflammatory biomarkers Interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein and outcomes in stable coronary heart disease–experiences from the STABILITY trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005077 10.1161/JAHA.116.005077
    1. Kursa MB. Robustness of Random Forest-based gene selection methods. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:8 10.1186/1471-2105-15-8
    1. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2016. Available from:
    1. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011;45:1–67.
    1. Zethelius B, Berglund L, Sundström J, Ingelsson E, Basu S, Larsson A, et al. Use of multiple biomarkers to improve the prediction of death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2107–16. 10.1056/NEJMoa0707064
    1. Enroth S, Bosdotter Enroth S, Johansson Å, Gyllensten U. Effect of genetic and environmental factors on protein biomarkers for common non-communicable disease and use of personally normalized plasma protein profiles (PNPPP). Biomarkers. 2015;20:355–64. 10.3109/1354750X.2015.1093546
    1. Enroth S, Enroth SB, Johansson Å, Gyllensten U. Protein profiling reveals consequences of lifestyle choices on predicted biological aging. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17282 10.1038/srep17282
    1. Lind L, Ärnlöv J, Lindahl B, Siegbahn A, Sundström J, Ingelsson E. Use of a proximity extension assay proteomics chip to discover new biomarkers for human atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2015;242:205–10. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.07.023
    1. Stenemo M, Nowak C, Byberg L, Sundström J, Giedraitis V, Lind L, et al. Circulating proteins as predictors of incident heart failure in the elderly. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20:55–62. 10.1002/ejhf.980
    1. Skau E, Henriksen E, Wagner P, Hedberg P, Siegbahn A, Leppert J. GDF-15 and TRAIL-R2 are powerful predictors of long-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24:1576–83. 10.1177/2047487317725017
    1. Ganz P, Heidecker B, Hveem K, Jonasson C, Kato S, Segal MR, et al. Development and Validation of a Protein-Based Risk Score for Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease. JAMA. 2016;315:2532–41. 10.1001/jama.2016.5951
    1. McCarthy CP, van Kimmenade RRJ, Gaggin HK, Simon ML, Ibrahim NE, Gandhi P, et al. Usefulness of Multiple Biomarkers for Predicting Incident Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients Who Underwent Diagnostic Coronary Angiography (from the Catheter Sampled Blood Archive in Cardiovascular Diseases [CASABLANCA] Study). Am J Cardiol. 2017;120:25–32. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.265
    1. Wallentin L, Zethelius B, Berglund L, Eggers KM, Lind L, Lindahl B, et al. GDF-15 for prognostication of cardiovascular and cancer morbidity and mortality in men. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78797 10.1371/journal.pone.0078797
    1. Schroder J, Jakobsen JC, Winkel P, Hilden J, Jensen GB, Sajadieh A, et al. Prognosis and Reclassification by YKL-40 in Stable Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e014634 10.1161/JAHA.119.014634
    1. Hosseini H, Yi L, Kanellakis P, Cao A, Tay C, Peter K, et al. Anti-TIM-1 Monoclonal Antibody (RMT1-10) Attenuates Atherosclerosis By Expanding IgM-producing B1a Cells. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008447 10.1161/JAHA.117.008447
    1. Boyce BF, Xing L. Biology of RANK, RANKL, and osteoprotegerin. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007(9 Suppl):1, S1.
    1. Ueland T, Åkerblom A, Ghukasyan T, Michelsen AE, Aukrust P, Becker RC, et al. Osteoprotegerin Is Associated With Major Bleeding But Not With Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e007009 10.1161/JAHA.117.007009
    1. Røysland R, Bonaca MP, Omland T, Sabatine M, Murphy SA, Scirica BM, et al. Osteoprotegerin and cardiovascular mortality in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Heart. 2012;98:786–91. 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301260
    1. Omland T, Ueland T, Jansson AM, Persson A, Karlsson T, Smith C, et al. Circulating osteoprotegerin levels and long-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:627–33. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.058
    1. Ueland T, Jemtland R, Godang K, Kjekshus J, Hognestad A, Omland T, et al. Prognostic value of osteoprotegerin in heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1970–6. 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.076
    1. Ridker PM, Libby P, MacFadyen JG, Thuren T, Ballantyne C, Fonseca F, et al. Modulation of the interleukin-6 signalling pathway and incidence rates of atherosclerotic events and all-cause mortality: analyses from the Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3499–507. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy310
    1. Tardif JC, Kouz S, Waters DD, Bertrand OF, Diaz R, Maggioni AP, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2497–505. 10.1056/NEJMoa1912388
    1. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, et al. Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1119–31. 10.1056/NEJMoa1707914
    1. Tonkin AM, Blankenberg S, Kirby A, Zeller T, Colquhoun DM, Funke-Kaiser A, et al. Biomarkers in stable coronary heart disease, their modulation and cardiovascular risk: The LIPID biomarker study. Int J Cardiol. 2015;201:499–507. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.07.080
    1. Falcão F, de Oliveira FRA, da Silva M, Sobral Filho DC. Carbohydrate antigen 125: a promising tool for risk stratification in heart diseases. Biomark Med. 2018;12:367–81. 10.2217/bmm-2017-0452
    1. Qin Z, Liu X, Song M, Zhou Q, Yu J, Zhou B, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 as a predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in prospective studies. Atherosclerosis. 2017;261:1–11. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.03.042
    1. Clemitson JR, Dixon RJ, Haines S, Bingham AJ, Patel BR, Hall L, et al. Genetic dissection of a blood pressure quantitative trait locus on rat chromosome 1 and gene expression analysis identifies SPON1 as a novel candidate hypertension gene. Circ Res. 2007;100:992–9. 10.1161/01.RES.0000261961.41889.9c
    1. Carlsson AC, Larsson A, Helmersson-Karlqvist J, Lind L, Ingelsson E, Larsson TE, et al. Urinary kidney injury molecule-1 and the risk of cardiovascular mortality in elderly men. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:1393–401. 10.2215/CJN.11901113
    1. Park M, Hsu CY, Go AS, Feldman HI, Xie D, Zhang X, et al. Urine Kidney Injury Biomarkers and Risks of Cardiovascular Disease Events and All-Cause Death: The CRIC Study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12:761–71. 10.2215/CJN.08560816
    1. de Souza AJ, Oriss TB, O'Malley KJ, Ray A, Kane LP. T cell Ig and mucin 1 (TIM-1) is expressed on in vivo-activated T cells and provides a costimulatory signal for T cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:17113–8. 10.1073/pnas.0508643102
    1. Volpe M, Unger T. Plasma renin and cardiovascular risk: what is the evidence for an association? Cardiology. 2013;125:50–9. 10.1159/000348365
    1. Demissei BG, Cotter G, Prescott MF, Felker GM, Filippatos G, Greenberg BH, et al. A multimarker multi-time point-based risk stratification strategy in acute heart failure: results from the RELAX-AHF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:1001–10. 10.1002/ejhf.749
    1. Pfetsch V, Sanin V, Jaensch A, Dallmeier D, Mons U, Brenner H, et al. Increased Plasma Concentrations of Soluble ST2 Independently Predict Mortality but not Cardiovascular Events in Stable Coronary Heart Disease Patients: 13-Year Follow-up of the KAROLA Study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2017;31:167–77. 10.1007/s10557-017-6718-1
    1. Eggers KM, Armstrong PW, Califf RM, Simoons ML, Venge P, Wallentin L, et al. ST2 and mortality in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J. 2010;159:788–94. 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.02.022
    1. Chen LQ, de Lemos JA, Das SR, Ayers CR, Rohatgi A. Soluble ST2 is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a population-based cohort: the Dallas Heart Study. Clin Chem. 2013;59:536–46. 10.1373/clinchem.2012.191106
    1. Dieplinger B, Egger M, Haltmayer M, Kleber ME, Scharnagl H, Silbernagel G, et al. Increased soluble ST2 predicts long-term mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease: results from the Ludwigshafen risk and cardiovascular health study. Clin Chem. 2014;60:530–40. 10.1373/clinchem.2013.209858
    1. Madonna R, Cevik C, Nasser M, De Caterina R. Hepatocyte growth factor: molecular biomarker and player in cardioprotection and cardiovascular regeneration. Thromb Haemost. 2012;107:656–61. 10.1160/TH11-10-0711
    1. Wang LS, Wang H, Zhang QL, Yang ZJ, Kong FX, Wu CT. Hepatocyte Growth Factor Gene Therapy for Ischemic Diseases. Hum Gene Ther. 2018;29:413–23. 10.1089/hum.2017.217
    1. Susen S, Sautière K, Mouquet F, Cuilleret F, Chmait A, McFadden EP, et al. Serum hepatocyte growth factor levels predict long-term clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:2387–95. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi436
    1. Rychli K, Richter B, Hohensinner PJ, Kariem Mahdy A, Neuhold S, Zorn G, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with advanced heart failure. Heart. 2011;97:1158–63. 10.1136/hrt.2010.220228
    1. Bell EJ, Decker PA, Tsai MY, Pankow JS, Hanson NQ, Wassel CL, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor is associated with progression of atherosclerosis: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Atherosclerosis. 2018;272:162–7. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.03.040
    1. Santalahti K, Havulinna A, Maksimow M, Zeller T, Blankenberg S, Vehtari A, et al. Plasma levels of hepatocyte growth factor and placental growth factor predict mortality in a general population: a prospective cohort study. J Intern Med. 2017;282:340–52. 10.1111/joim.12648
    1. Pérez-Calvo JI, Morales-Rull JL, Gimeno-Orna JA, Lasierra-Díaz P, Josa-Laorden C, Puente-Lanzarote JJ, et al. Usefulness of the Hepatocyte Growth Factor as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Heart Failure Regardless of Ejection Fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118:543–9. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.048
    1. Carlsson AC, Ruge T, Kjøller E, Hilden J, Kolmos HJ, Sajadieh A, et al. 10-Year Associations Between Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors 1 and 2 and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease: A CLARICOR (Effect of Clarithromycin on Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease) Trial Substudy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008299 10.1161/JAHA.117.008299

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner