Persistent severe acute respiratory distress syndrome for the prognostic enrichment of trials

Elizabeth Sanchez, David R Price, Kuei-Pin Chung, Clara Oromendia, Augustine M K Choi, Edward J Schenck, Ilias I Siempos, Elizabeth Sanchez, David R Price, Kuei-Pin Chung, Clara Oromendia, Augustine M K Choi, Edward J Schenck, Ilias I Siempos

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is heterogeneous. As an indication of the heterogeneity of ARDS, there are patients whose syndrome improves rapidly (i.e., within 24 hours), others whose hypoxemia improves gradually and still others whose severe hypoxemia persists for several days. The latter group of patients with persistent severe ARDS poses challenges to clinicians. We attempted to assess the baseline characteristics and outcomes of persistent severe ARDS and to identify which variables are useful to predict it.

Methods: A secondary analysis of patient-level data from the ALTA, EDEN and SAILS ARDSNet clinical trials was conducted. We defined persistent severe ARDS as a partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2:FiO2) of equal to or less than 100 mmHg on the second study day following enrollment. Regularized logistic regression with an L1 penalty [Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)] techniques were used to identify predictive variables of persistent severe ARDS.

Results: Of the 1531 individuals with ARDS alive on the second study day after enrollment, 232 (15%) had persistent severe ARDS. Of the latter, 100 (43%) individuals had mild or moderate hypoxemia at baseline. Usage of vasopressors was greater [144/232 (62%) versus 623/1299 (48%); p<0.001] and baseline severity of illness was higher in patients with versus without persistent severe ARDS. Mortality at 60 days [95/232 (41%) versus 233/1299 (18%); p<0.001] was higher, and ventilator-free (p<0.001), intensive care unit-free [0 (0-14) versus 19 (7-23); p<0.001] and non-pulmonary organ failure-free [3 (0-21) versus 20 (1-26); p<0.001] days were fewer in patients with versus without persistent severe ARDS. PaO2:FiO2, FiO2, hepatic failure and positive end-expiratory pressure at enrollment were useful predictive variables.

Conclusions: Patients with persistent severe ARDS have distinct baseline characteristics and poor prognosis. Identifying such patients at enrollment may be useful for the prognostic enrichment of trials.

Conflict of interest statement

The corresponding author has read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: AMC is a co-founder of Proterris and serving as a consultant for an advisory board meeting of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, July 2018. None declared (ES, DRP, KPC, CO, EJS, IIS). This does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1. Lasagna plot depicting the trajectory…
Fig 1. Lasagna plot depicting the trajectory of hypoxemia of each individual patient during the first two study days after trial enrollment.
On the second study day, some patients that initially had mild/moderate ARDS (shown as green) progressed to persistent severe ARDS (shown in red). Some patients with an initial presentation of severe ARDS (red) continued to have severe ARDS on the second study day.

References

    1. Matthay MA, McAuley DF, Ware LB. Clinical trials in acute respiratory distress syndrome: challenges and opportunities. Lancet Respir Med 2017; 5(6):524–34. 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30188-1
    1. Pham T, Rubenfeld GD. Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. The Epidemiology of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A 50th Birthday Review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195:860–70. 10.1164/rccm.201609-1773CP
    1. Meyer NJ, Calfee CS. Novel translational approaches to the search for precision therapies for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med 2017; 5:512–23. 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30187-X
    1. Harrington JS, Schenck EJ, Oromendia C, Choi AMK, Siempos II. Acute respiratory distress syndrome without identifiable risk factors: A secondary analysis of the ARDS network trials. J Crit Care 2018; 47:49–54. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.06.002
    1. Schenck EJ, Oromendia C, Torres LK, Berlin DA, Choi AMK, Siempos II. Rapidly improving acute respiratory distress syndrome in therapeutic randomized controlled trials. Chest 2019;155:474–482. 10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.031
    1. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, et al.; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA 2016; 315:788–800. 10.1001/jama.2016.0291
    1. Thille AW, Esteban A, Fernández-Segoviano P, Rodriguez JM, Aramburu JA, Peñuelas O, et al. Comparison of the Berlin definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome with autopsy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187:761–7. 10.1164/rccm.201211-1981OC
    1. Coady SA, Mensah GA, Wagner EL, Goldfarb ME, Hitchcock DM, Giffen CA. Use of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Data Repository. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:1849–58. 10.1056/NEJMsa1603542
    1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Matthay MA, Brower RG, Carson S, Douglas IS, Eisner M, Hite D, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of an aerosolized β2-agonist for treatment of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 184:561–8. 10.1164/rccm.201012-2090OC
    1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Steingrub J, Hite RD, Moss M, et al. Initial trophic versus full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA 2012; 307:795–803. 10.1001/jama.2012.137
    1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Clinical Trials Network, Truwit JD, Bernard GR, Steingrub J, Matthay MA, Liu KD, Albertson TE, et al. Rosuvastatin for sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:2191–200. 10.1056/NEJMoa1401520
    1. Laffey JG, Madotto F, Bellani G, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, et al.; LUNG SAFE Investigators and the ESICM Trials Group. Geo-economic variations in epidemiology, patterns of care, and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: insights from the LUNG SAFE prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2017; 5:627–38. 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30213-8
    1. Breiman L. Random Forests. Machine Learning 2001; 45:5–32.
    1. Zou H, Hastie T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Statist Soc B 2005; 67:301–20.
    1. Calfee CS, Delucchi K, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Matthay MA; NHLBI ARDS Network. Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: latent class analysis of data from two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2:611–20. 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70097-9
    1. Villar J, Pérez-Méndez L, Blanco J, Añón JM, Blanch L, Belda J, et al.; Spanish Initiative for Epidemiology, Stratification, and Therapies for ARDS (SIESTA) Network. A universal definition of ARDS: the PaO2/FiO2 ratio under a standard ventilatory setting—a prospective, multicenter validation study. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39:583–92. 10.1007/s00134-012-2803-x
    1. Oromendia C, Siempos II. Reclassification of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Secondary Analysis of the ARDS Network Trials. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2018; 15:998–1001. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201803-192RL
    1. Calfee CS, Delucchi KL, Sinha P, Matthay MA, Hackett J, Shankar-Hari M, et al.; Irish Critical Care Trials Group. Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes and differential response to simvastin: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2018; 6:691–8. 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30177-2
    1. Lorente JA, Cardinal-Fernández P, Muñoz D, Frutos-Vivar F, Thille AW, Jaramillo C, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with and without diffuse alveolar damage: an autopsy study. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41:1921–30. 10.1007/s00134-015-4046-0
    1. Travis WD, Costabel U, Hansell DM, King TE Jr, Lynch DA, Nicholson AG, et al.; ATS/ERS Committee on Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias: An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement. Update of the international multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188:733–48. 10.1164/rccm.201308-1483ST
    1. Cardinal-Fernández P, Lorente JA, Ballén-Barragán A, Matute-Bello G. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Diffuse Alveolar Damage. New Insights on a Complex Relationship. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017; 14:844–50. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201609-728PS
    1. Villar J, Pérez-Méndez L, López J, Belda J, Blanco J, Saralegui I, et al.; HELP Network. An early PEEP/FIO2 trial identifies different degrees of lung injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 176:795–804. 10.1164/rccm.200610-1534OC
    1. Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, et al.; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:2159–68. 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103
    1. Villar J, Ambrós A, Soler JA, Martínez D, Ferrando C, Solano R, et al.; Stratification and Outcome of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (STANDARDS) Network. Age, PaO2/FIO2, and Plateau Pressure Score: A Proposal for a Simple Outcome Score in Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Crit Care Med 2016; 44:1361–9. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001653
    1. Madotto F, Pham T, Bellani G, Bos LD, Simonis FD, Fan E, et al.; LUNG SAFE Investigators and the ESICM Trials Group. Resolved versus confirmed ARDS after 24 h: insights from the LUNG SAFE study. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44:564–77. 10.1007/s00134-018-5152-6

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner