Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization by CalliSpheres is effective and well tolerated in treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients: A preliminary result from CTILC study

Jun Luo, Jiaping Zheng, Changsheng Shi, Jian Fang, Zhiyi Peng, Jing Huang, Junhui Sun, Guanhui Zhou, Tiefeng Li, Dedong Zhu, Huanhai Xu, Qinming Hou, Shihong Ying, Zhichao Sun, Haijun Du, Xiaoxi Xie, Guohong Cao, Wenbin Ji, Jun Han, Wenjiang Gu, Xiaohua Guo, Guoliang Shao, Zhihai Yu, Jian Zhou, Wenqiang Yu, Xin Zhang, Ling Li, Hongjie Hu, Tingyang Hu, Xia Wu, Yutang Chen, Jiansong Ji, Wenhao Hu, Jun Luo, Jiaping Zheng, Changsheng Shi, Jian Fang, Zhiyi Peng, Jing Huang, Junhui Sun, Guanhui Zhou, Tiefeng Li, Dedong Zhu, Huanhai Xu, Qinming Hou, Shihong Ying, Zhichao Sun, Haijun Du, Xiaoxi Xie, Guohong Cao, Wenbin Ji, Jun Han, Wenjiang Gu, Xiaohua Guo, Guoliang Shao, Zhihai Yu, Jian Zhou, Wenqiang Yu, Xin Zhang, Ling Li, Hongjie Hu, Tingyang Hu, Xia Wu, Yutang Chen, Jiansong Ji, Wenhao Hu

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment in Chinese intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients.37 ICC patients underwent DEB-TACE treatment in CTILC study (registered on clinicaltrials.gov with registry No. NCT03317483) were included in this present study. Treatment response was assessed according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the time of DEB-TACE operation until the date of death from any causes. Liver function change and adverse events (AEs) were recorded during and after DEB-TACE operation.3 (8.1%) patients achieved complete response (CR) and 22 (59.5%) patients achieved partial response (PR), with objective response rate (ORR) of 67.6%. After DEB-TACE treatment, mean OS was 376 days (95%CI: 341-412 days). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that Bilobar disease (P = .040, OR: 0.105, 95% CI: 0.012-0.898) and portal vein invasion (P = .038, OR: 0.104, 95% CI: 0.012-0.881) could independently predict less possibility of ORR. Patients with ALB abnormal, TP abnormal, ALT abnormal and AST abnormal were increased at 1-week post DEB-TACE treatment (P = .034, P = .001, P < .001, P = .006, respectively), while returned to the levels at baseline after 1 to 3 months (all P > .050). Besides, most of the AEs were mild including pain, fever, vomiting, and nausea in this study.DEB-TACE was effective and well tolerated in treating ICC patients, and bilobar disease as well as portal vein invasion were independently correlated with less probability of ORR achievement.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treatment response of DEB-TACE in ICC patients. (A) Treatment response of DEB-TACE in patients. (B) Treatment response of DEB-TACE in treated nodules. Comparison among groups was determined by Chi-Squared test. P < .05 was considered significant.
Figure 2
Figure 2
OS of DEB-TACE treatment in ICC patients. K–M curve was performed to evaluate the OS.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CT and DSA images of 2 patients at pre-operation and post-operation. (A–D) CT and DSA images of 1 patient at preoperation and postoperation. (E–H) CT and DSA images of another patient at preoperation and postoperation. Scan parameters were that: tube voltage was 120 kv; automatic pipe technology to adjust current; collimator width was 128 × 0. 625 mm; the reconstruction was 5 mm; a thick layer of reconstruction interval was 5 mm; screw pitch was 0.914. Enhanced scan USED MEDRAD double cylinder of high-pressure syringe injected iodine alcohol (containing iodine 300 mg/ml) from peripheral vein intravenous (dose of 1.5 ml/kg). When abdominal aorta CT value arrive to 100 HU, it delays after 5 seconds and begins to scan, and after arterial phase late 30 seconds and 150 seconds, respectively, it began to scan portal venous phase and delayed phase.

References

    1. Choi J, Ghoz HM, Peeraphatdit T, et al. Aspirin use and the risk of cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 2016;64:785–96.
    1. Njei B. Changing pattern of epidemiology in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 2014;60:1107–8.
    1. Rizvi S, Gores GJ. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2013;145:1215–29.
    1. Savic LJ, Chapiro J, Geschwind JH. Intra-arterial embolotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: update and future prospects. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2017;6:7–21.
    1. Sia D, Hoshida Y, Villanueva A, et al. Integrative molecular analysis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma reveals 2 classes that have different outcomes. Gastroenterology 2013;144:829–40.
    1. Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin RD, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut 2012;61:1657–69.
    1. Konstantinidis IT, Groot Koerkamp B, Do RK, et al. Unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systemic plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is associated with longer survival in comparison with systemic chemotherapy alone. Cancer 2016;122:758–65.
    1. Currie BM, Soulen MC. Decision making: intra-arterial therapies for cholangiocarcinoma-TACE and TARE. Semin Intervent Radiol 2017;34:92–100.
    1. Lee S, Kim KA, Park MS, et al. MRI findings and prediction of time to progression of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. J Korean Med Sci 2015;30:965–73.
    1. Baur J, Ritter CO, Germer CT, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepat Med 2016;8:69–74.
    1. Gaba RC, Emmadi R, Parvinian A, et al. Correlation of doxorubicin delivery and tumor necrosis after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization of rabbit VX2 liver tumors. Radiology 2016;280:752–61.
    1. Seyal AR, Gonzalez-Guindalini FD, Arslanoglu A, et al. Reproducibility of mRECIST in assessing response to transarterial radioembolization therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2015;62:1111–21.
    1. Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2014;60:1268–89.
    1. Razumilava N, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet 2014;383:2168–79.
    1. McConnell J. Icaac/Icc 2015. Lancet Infect Dis 2015;15:1267.
    1. Prajapati HJ, Spivey JR, Hanish SI, et al. mRECIST and EASL responses at early time point by contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI predict survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by doxorubicin drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB TACE). Ann Oncol 2013;24:965–73.
    1. Duan F, Wang EQ, Lam MG, et al. Superselective chemoembolization of HCC: comparison of short-term safety and efficacy between drug-eluting LC beads, quadraspheres, and conventional ethiodized oil emulsion. Radiology 2016;278:612–21.
    1. Megias Vericat JE, Garcia Marcos R, Lopez Briz E, et al. Trans-arterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting particles versus conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a study of effectiveness, safety and costs. Radiologia (Roma) 2015;57:496–504.
    1. Huang K, Zhou Q, Wang R, et al. Doxorubicin-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;29:920–5.
    1. Ni JY, Xu LF, Wang WD, et al. Conventional transarterial chemoembolization vs microsphere embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:17206–17.
    1. Chen P, Yuan P, Chen B, et al. Evaluation of drug-eluting beads versus conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2017;41:75–85.
    1. Liu YS, Ou MC, Tsai YS, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization using gelatin sponges or microspheres plus lipiodol-doxorubicin versus doxorubicin-loaded beads for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:125–32.
    1. Arabi M, BenMousa A, Bzeizi K, et al. Doxorubicin-loaded drug-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2015;21:175–80.
    1. Rahman FA, Naidu J, Ngiu CS, et al. Conventional versus doxorubicin-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a tertiary medical centre experience in malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016;17:4037–41.
    1. Manini MA, Sangiovanni A, Martinetti L, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads is effective for the maintenance of the Milan-in status in patients with a small hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl 2015;21:1259–69.
    1. Wengert GJ, Bickel H, Breitenseher J, et al. Primary liver tumors: hepatocellular versus intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Radiologe 2015;55:27–35.
    1. Aliberti C, Benea G, Tilli M, et al. Chemoembolization (TACE) of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with slow-release doxorubicin-eluting beads: preliminary results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2008;31:883–8.
    1. Aliberti C, Carandina R, Sarti D, et al. Chemoembolization with drug-eluting microspheres loaded with doxorubicin for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Anticancer Res 2017;37:1859–63.
    1. Vesselle G, Quirier-Leleu C, Velasco S, et al. Predictive factors for complete response of chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2016;26:1640–8.
    1. Zhu K, Chen J, Lai L, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: treatment with transarterial chemoembolization combined with sorafenib--a retrospective controlled study. Radiology 2014;272:284–93.
    1. Tawada A, Chiba T, Ooka Y, et al. Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization targeting portal vein tumor thrombus in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res 2014;34:4231–7.
    1. She WH, Chan AC, Cheung TT, et al. Acute pancreatitis induced by transarterial chemoembolization: a single-center experience of over 1500 cases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2016;15:93–8.
    1. Luz JH, Luz PM, Martin HS, et al. DEB TACE for Intermediate and advanced HCC - initial experience in a Brazilian Cancer Center. Cancer Imaging 2017;17:5.
    1. Lencioni R. Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Oncol 2012;39:503–9.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner