The Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ertugliflozin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

V Sahasrabudhe, S G Terra, A Hickman, D Saur, H Shi, M O'Gorman, Z Zhou, D L Cutler, V Sahasrabudhe, S G Terra, A Hickman, D Saur, H Shi, M O'Gorman, Z Zhou, D L Cutler

Abstract

Ertugliflozin is a highly selective and potent inhibitor of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The glycemic efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors such as ertugliflozin depends on glucose filtration through the kidney. This phase 1, open-label study evaluated the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of ertugliflozin (15 mg) in type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy subjects with normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate not normalized for body surface area ≥90 mL/min) and type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects with mild (60-89 mL/min), moderate (30-59 mL/min), or severe (<30 mL/min) renal impairment (n = 36). Blood and urine samples were collected predose and over 96 hours postdose for pharmacokinetic evaluation and measurement of urinary glucose excretion over 24 hours. Log-linear regression analyses indicated predicted mean area under the concentration-time curve values for mild, moderate, and severe renal function groups that were ≤70% higher relative to subjects with normal renal function. Generally consistent results were obtained with categorical analysis based on analysis of variance. The increase in ertugliflozin exposure in subjects with renal impairment is not expected to be clinically meaningful. Regression analysis of change from baseline in urinary glucose excretion over 24 hours vs estimated glomerular filtration rate showed a decrease in urinary glucose excretion with declining renal function. A single 15-mg dose of ertugliflozin was well tolerated in all groups.

Keywords: ertugliflozin; renal impairment; sodium-glucose cotransporter 2; type 2 diabetes mellitus.

© 2017 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Median plasma ertugliflozin concentration‐time profiles following a single 15‐mg oral dose by renal function group. Plots show linear (A) and semilogarithmic (B) scales, respectively. Summary statistics were calculated by setting concentration values below the LLOQ to 0. The LLOQ was 0.500 ng/mL. Renal function groups were based on BSA‐unnormalized eGFR. Normal renal function, eGFR ≥90 mL/min; mild renal impairment, eGFR 60‐89 mL/min; moderate renal impairment, eGFR 30‐59 mL/min; severe renal impairment eGFR

Figure 2

Regression and 90%CI of Ln…

Figure 2

Regression and 90%CI of Ln AUC vs BSA‐unnormalized eGFR after oral administration of…

Figure 2
Regression and 90%CI of Ln AUC vs BSA‐unnormalized eGFR after oral administration of ertugliflozin in subjects with varying degrees of renal function. R2 = 0.3142; Slope P‐value = .0004. Vertical lines represent the renal function group cutoff values. The solid line is the predicted line of the response variable. The shadowed area is the 90% confidence region of the response variable. AUC indicates area under the plasma concentration‐time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time; BSA, body surface area; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Ln, natural logarithm; RI, renal impairment; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Key to symbols: circles, T2DM with normal renal function (eGFR ≥90 mL/min); diamonds, T2DM with mild RI (eGFR 60‐89 mL/min); closed squares, T2DM with moderate RI (eGFR 30‐59 mL/min); triangles, T2DM with severe RI (eGFR <30 mL/min); open squares, healthy normal (eGFR ≥90 mL/min).

Figure 3

Regression and 90%CI of CL/F…

Figure 3

Regression and 90%CI of CL/F vs BSA‐unnormalized eGFR after oral administration of ertugliflozin…

Figure 3
Regression and 90%CI of CL/F vs BSA‐unnormalized eGFR after oral administration of ertugliflozin in subjects with varying degrees of renal function. R2 = 0.2730; Slope P‐value = .0011. Vertical lines represent the renal function group cutoff values. The solid line is the predicted line of the response variable. The shadowed area is the 90% confidence region of the response variable. BSA indicates body surface area; CL/F, apparent clearance; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; RI, renal impairment; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Key to symbols: circles, T2DM with normal renal function (eGFR ≥90 mL/min); diamonds, T2DM with mild RI (eGFR 60‐89 mL/min); closed squares, T2DM with moderate RI (eGFR 30‐59 mL/min); triangles, T2DM with severe RI (eGFR <30 mL/min); open squares, healthy normal (eGFR ≥90 mL/min).

Figure 4

Plot of Ln change from…

Figure 4

Plot of Ln change from baseline for 24‐hour urinary glucose excretion vs BSA‐unnormalized…

Figure 4
Plot of Ln change from baseline for 24‐hour urinary glucose excretion vs BSA‐unnormalized eGFR in subjects with T2DM after administration of a single 15‐mg oral dose of ertugliflozin. R2 = 0.5036; Slope P‐value < .0001. The solid line is the predicted line of the Ln (change from baseline in 24‐hour UGE). The shadowed area is the 90% confidence region for the Ln (change from baseline in 24‐hour UGE). Vertical lines represent the renal function group cutoff values. BSA indicates body surface area; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Ln, natural logarithm; RI, renal impairment; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; UGE, urinary glucose excretion. Key to symbols: circles, T2DM with normal renal function (eGFR ≥90 mL/min); diamonds, T2DM with mild RI (eGFR 60‐89 mL/min); closed squares, T2DM with moderate RI (eGFR 30‐59 mL/min); triangles, T2DM with severe RI (eGFR <30 mL/min).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regression and 90%CI of Ln AUC vs BSA‐unnormalized eGFR after oral administration of ertugliflozin in subjects with varying degrees of renal function. R2 = 0.3142; Slope P‐value = .0004. Vertical lines represent the renal function group cutoff values. The solid line is the predicted line of the response variable. The shadowed area is the 90% confidence region of the response variable. AUC indicates area under the plasma concentration‐time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time; BSA, body surface area; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Ln, natural logarithm; RI, renal impairment; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Key to symbols: circles, T2DM with normal renal function (eGFR ≥90 mL/min); diamonds, T2DM with mild RI (eGFR 60‐89 mL/min); closed squares, T2DM with moderate RI (eGFR 30‐59 mL/min); triangles, T2DM with severe RI (eGFR <30 mL/min); open squares, healthy normal (eGFR ≥90 mL/min).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Regression and 90%CI of CL/F vs BSA‐unnormalized eGFR after oral administration of ertugliflozin in subjects with varying degrees of renal function. R2 = 0.2730; Slope P‐value = .0011. Vertical lines represent the renal function group cutoff values. The solid line is the predicted line of the response variable. The shadowed area is the 90% confidence region of the response variable. BSA indicates body surface area; CL/F, apparent clearance; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; RI, renal impairment; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Key to symbols: circles, T2DM with normal renal function (eGFR ≥90 mL/min); diamonds, T2DM with mild RI (eGFR 60‐89 mL/min); closed squares, T2DM with moderate RI (eGFR 30‐59 mL/min); triangles, T2DM with severe RI (eGFR <30 mL/min); open squares, healthy normal (eGFR ≥90 mL/min).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Plot of Ln change from baseline for 24‐hour urinary glucose excretion vs BSA‐unnormalized eGFR in subjects with T2DM after administration of a single 15‐mg oral dose of ertugliflozin. R2 = 0.5036; Slope P‐value < .0001. The solid line is the predicted line of the Ln (change from baseline in 24‐hour UGE). The shadowed area is the 90% confidence region for the Ln (change from baseline in 24‐hour UGE). Vertical lines represent the renal function group cutoff values. BSA indicates body surface area; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Ln, natural logarithm; RI, renal impairment; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; UGE, urinary glucose excretion. Key to symbols: circles, T2DM with normal renal function (eGFR ≥90 mL/min); diamonds, T2DM with mild RI (eGFR 60‐89 mL/min); closed squares, T2DM with moderate RI (eGFR 30‐59 mL/min); triangles, T2DM with severe RI (eGFR <30 mL/min).

References

    1. de Boer IH, Rue TC, Hall YN, et al. Temporal trends in the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA. 2011;305:2532–2539.
    1. Tuttle KR, Bakris GL, Bilous RW, et al. Diabetic kidney disease: a report from an ADA Consensus Conference. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64:510–533.
    1. Wu B, Bell K, Stanford A, et al. Understanding CKD among patients with T2DM: prevalence, temporal trends, and treatment patterns—NHANES 2007‐2012. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016;4:e000154.
    1. Wright EM, Loo DD, Hirayama BA. Biology of human sodium glucose transporters. Physiol Rev. 2011;91:733–794.
    1. Abdul‐Ghani MA, Norton L, DeFronzo RA. Renal sodium‐glucose cotransporter inhibition in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2015;309:F889–F900.
    1. Terra SG, Focht K, Davies M, et al. Phase III, efficacy and safety study of ertugliflozin monotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise alone. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:721–728.
    1. Eldor RR, Golm G, Huyck S, et al. Effect of ertugliflozin plus sitagliptin on glycemic control vs. either treatment alone in subjects with T2DM inadequately controlled with metformin. Paper presented at: 76th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association (ADA); June 10‐14, 2016; New Orleans, LA.
    1. Lauring BER, Liu J, DaGogo‐Jack S, et al. Efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in subjects with T2DM inadequately controlled on the dual combination of metformin and sitagliptin: the VERTIS SITA2 trial. Paper presented at: 52nd Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); September 12‐16, 2016; Munich, Germany.
    1. Amin NB, Wang X, Mitchell JR, et al. Blood pressure‐lowering effect of the sodium glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitor ertugliflozin, assessed via ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17:805–808.
    1. Amin NB, Wang X, Jain SM, et al. Dose‐ranging efficacy and safety study of ertugliflozin, a sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes on a background of metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17:591‐598.
    1. Gilbert RE. SGLT‐2 inhibition in patients with kidney disease. Diabetes Metab. 2014;40:S23–S27.
    1. Yale JF, Bakris G, Cariou B, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in subjects with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:463–473.
    1. Kohan DE, Fioretto P, Tang W, List JF. Long‐term study of patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate renal impairment shows that dapagliflozin reduces weight and blood pressure but does not improve glycemic control. Kidney Int. 2014;85:962–971.
    1. Barnett AH, Mithal A, Manassie J, et al. Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin added to existing antidiabetes treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:369–384.
    1. Kalgutkar AS, Tugnait M, Zhu T, et al. Preclinical species and human disposition of PF‐04971729, a selective inhibitor of the sodium‐dependent glucose cotransporter 2 and clinical candidate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39:1609–1619.
    1. Miao Z, Nucci G, Amin N, et al. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of the antidiabetic agent ertugliflozin (PF‐04971729) in healthy male subjects. Drug Metab Dispos. 2013;41:445–456.
    1. Margaillan G, Rouleau M, Fallon JK, et al. Quantitative profiling of human renal UDP‐glucuronosyltransferases and glucuronidation activity: a comparison of normal and tumoral kidney tissues. Drug Metab Dispos. 2015;43:611–619.
    1. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:247–254.
    1. European Medicines Agency . Guideline on the evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of medicinal products in patients with decreased renal function. . Accessed June 9, 2017.
    1. American Diabetes Association . Executive summary: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;35 (suppl 1):S4–S10.
    1. Thomas MC, Cooper ME, Zimmet P. Changing epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and associated chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12:73–81.
    1. Devineni D, Curtin CR, Marbury TC, et al. Effect of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor. Clin Ther. 2015;37:610–628.e614.
    1. National Kidney Association . Frequently asked questions about GFR estimates. . Accessed June 9, 2017.
    1. Kumar V, Sahasrabudhe V, Matschke K, et al. Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between ertugliflozin and sitagliptin or metformin in healthy subjects. Paper presented at: 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (ASCPT); March 8‐12, 2016; San Diego, CA.
    1. Kumar V, Sahasrabudhe V, Liang Y, et al. Effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin in healthy subjects. Paper presented at: 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (ASCPT); March 8‐12, 2016; San Diego, CA.
    1. Sahasrabudhe V, Kumar V, Matschke K, et al. Lack of a clinically meaningful pharmacokinetic interaction between ertugliflozin and glimepiride or simvastatin in healthy subjects. Paper presented at: 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (ASCPT); March 8‐12, 2016; San Diego, CA.
    1. Raje S, Callegari E, Sahasrabudhe V, et al. Determination of absolute oral availability and fraction absorbed of ertugliflozin using a novel microtracer approach. Paper presented at: 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (ASCPT); March 8‐12, 2016; San Diego, CA.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner