Prolonged QRS duration on the resting ECG is associated with sudden death risk in coronary disease, independent of prolonged ventricular repolarization

Carmen Teodorescu, Kyndaron Reinier, Audrey Uy-Evanado, Jo Navarro, Ronald Mariani, Karen Gunson, Jonathan Jui, Sumeet S Chugh, Carmen Teodorescu, Kyndaron Reinier, Audrey Uy-Evanado, Jo Navarro, Ronald Mariani, Karen Gunson, Jonathan Jui, Sumeet S Chugh

Abstract

Background: Abnormalities of ventricular repolarization as well as depolarization have been associated with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias.

Objective: To evaluate the relative contribution of these predictors to risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: In the ongoing Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study, adult residents from the Portland, Oregon, metropolitan area (population ~1 million) who suffered SCD were identified prospectively (2002-2007). Of these, we analyzed the subgroup of SCDs that had a resting 12-lead ECG prior to SCD and also had associated CAD. Comparisons were conducted with a control group of subjects with known CAD but no history of SCD from the same geographic region. Corrected QT interval (QTc), JT interval (JTc), QRS duration (QRSd), and other parameters were measured from ECG prior and unrelated to SCD. Analysis of left ventricular function was limited to those subjects who had undergone echocardiography prior to and remote from SCD.

Results: A total of 642 SCD cases (71 ± 13 years, 62% male) were compared to 450 controls (66 ± 12 years, 64% male). SCD cases had significantly longer QRSd (102 ± 25 ms vs 97 ± 20 ms, P = .0008) as well as JTc (348 ± 44 ms vs 339 ± 34 ms, P = .0006) vs controls. In cases with prolonged QRSd, 38% had severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and 62% had normal, mild, or moderately decreased left ventricular systolic function. In a multivariable model, QRSd, JTc, age, and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction were independent predictors. There was minimal overlap between prolonged QRSd and JTc in both case and control groups (3% and 4%, respectively).

Conclusion: Prolonged QRSd, JTc, and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction had independent contributions to risk of SCD in coronary disease, in this community-based setting.

Copyright © 2011 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Case-control distribution of QRSd (Fig 1A; p=0.0002), JTc (Fig 1B; p=0.01) and QTc (Fig 1C; p

Figure 1

Case-control distribution of QRSd (Fig…

Figure 1

Case-control distribution of QRSd (Fig 1A; p=0.0002), JTc (Fig 1B; p=0.01) and QTc…

Figure 1
Case-control distribution of QRSd (Fig 1A; p=0.0002), JTc (Fig 1B; p=0.01) and QTc (Fig 1C; p

Figure 1

Case-control distribution of QRSd (Fig…

Figure 1

Case-control distribution of QRSd (Fig 1A; p=0.0002), JTc (Fig 1B; p=0.01) and QTc…

Figure 1
Case-control distribution of QRSd (Fig 1A; p=0.0002), JTc (Fig 1B; p=0.01) and QTc (Fig 1C; p

Figure 2

The relationship between LV systolic…

Figure 2

The relationship between LV systolic function and QRS duration among SCD (sudden cardiac…

Figure 2
The relationship between LV systolic function and QRS duration among SCD (sudden cardiac death) cases and controls. In either group, only a minority of subjects with prolonged QRS duration had severe LV systolic dysfunction (EF≤ 35%).

Figure 3

Distribution of QRSd and JTc…

Figure 3

Distribution of QRSd and JTc prolongation among cases (Panel A) and controls (Panel…

Figure 3
Distribution of QRSd and JTc prolongation among cases (Panel A) and controls (Panel B).
Comment in
Similar articles
Cited by
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Figure 1
Figure 1
Case-control distribution of QRSd (Fig 1A; p=0.0002), JTc (Fig 1B; p=0.01) and QTc (Fig 1C; p

Figure 1

Case-control distribution of QRSd (Fig…

Figure 1

Case-control distribution of QRSd (Fig 1A; p=0.0002), JTc (Fig 1B; p=0.01) and QTc…

Figure 1
Case-control distribution of QRSd (Fig 1A; p=0.0002), JTc (Fig 1B; p=0.01) and QTc (Fig 1C; p

Figure 2

The relationship between LV systolic…

Figure 2

The relationship between LV systolic function and QRS duration among SCD (sudden cardiac…

Figure 2
The relationship between LV systolic function and QRS duration among SCD (sudden cardiac death) cases and controls. In either group, only a minority of subjects with prolonged QRS duration had severe LV systolic dysfunction (EF≤ 35%).

Figure 3

Distribution of QRSd and JTc…

Figure 3

Distribution of QRSd and JTc prolongation among cases (Panel A) and controls (Panel…

Figure 3
Distribution of QRSd and JTc prolongation among cases (Panel A) and controls (Panel B).
Comment in
Similar articles
Cited by
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 1
Figure 1
Case-control distribution of QRSd (Fig 1A; p=0.0002), JTc (Fig 1B; p=0.01) and QTc (Fig 1C; p

Figure 2

The relationship between LV systolic…

Figure 2

The relationship between LV systolic function and QRS duration among SCD (sudden cardiac…

Figure 2
The relationship between LV systolic function and QRS duration among SCD (sudden cardiac death) cases and controls. In either group, only a minority of subjects with prolonged QRS duration had severe LV systolic dysfunction (EF≤ 35%).

Figure 3

Distribution of QRSd and JTc…

Figure 3

Distribution of QRSd and JTc prolongation among cases (Panel A) and controls (Panel…

Figure 3
Distribution of QRSd and JTc prolongation among cases (Panel A) and controls (Panel B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The relationship between LV systolic function and QRS duration among SCD (sudden cardiac death) cases and controls. In either group, only a minority of subjects with prolonged QRS duration had severe LV systolic dysfunction (EF≤ 35%).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of QRSd and JTc prolongation among cases (Panel A) and controls (Panel B).

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner