A model to predict disease progression in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): the ADPKD Outcomes Model

Phil McEwan, Hayley Bennett Wilton, Albert C M Ong, Bjarne Ørskov, Richard Sandford, Francesco Scolari, Maria-Cristina V Cabrera, Gerd Walz, Karl O'Reilly, Paul Robinson, Phil McEwan, Hayley Bennett Wilton, Albert C M Ong, Bjarne Ørskov, Richard Sandford, Francesco Scolari, Maria-Cristina V Cabrera, Gerd Walz, Karl O'Reilly, Paul Robinson

Abstract

Background: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the leading inheritable cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD); however, the natural course of disease progression is heterogeneous between patients. This study aimed to develop a natural history model of ADPKD that predicted progression rates and long-term outcomes in patients with differing baseline characteristics.

Methods: The ADPKD Outcomes Model (ADPKD-OM) was developed using available patient-level data from the placebo arm of the Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of ADPKD and its Outcomes Study (TEMPO 3:4; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00428948). Multivariable regression equations estimating annual rates of ADPKD progression, in terms of total kidney volume (TKV) and estimated glomerular filtration rate, formed the basis of the lifetime patient-level simulation model. Outputs of the ADPKD-OM were compared against external data sources to validate model accuracy and generalisability to other ADPKD patient populations, then used to predict long-term outcomes in a cohort matched to the overall TEMPO 3:4 study population.

Results: A cohort with baseline patient characteristics consistent with TEMPO 3:4 was predicted to reach ESRD at a mean age of 52 years. Most patients (85%) were predicted to reach ESRD by the age of 65 years, with many progressing to ESRD earlier in life (18, 36 and 56% by the age of 45, 50 and 55 years, respectively). Consistent with previous research and clinical opinion, analyses supported the selection of baseline TKV as a prognostic factor for ADPKD progression, and demonstrated its value as a strong predictor of future ESRD risk. Validation exercises and illustrative analyses confirmed the ability of the ADPKD-OM to accurately predict disease progression towards ESRD across a range of clinically-relevant patient profiles.

Conclusions: The ADPKD-OM represents a robust tool to predict natural disease progression and long-term outcomes in ADPKD patients, based on readily available and/or measurable clinical characteristics. In conjunction with clinical judgement, it has the potential to support decision-making in research and clinical practice.

Keywords: Disease modelling; ESRD; End-stage renal disease; Kidney volume; Renal function decline; Renal progression.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article is based on previously conducted research, and does not involve any new studies of human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

ACMO, BØ, RS, FS, M-CVC, and GW have received honoraria from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Europe Ltd. for serving on advisory board meetings and/or lectures. PM and HBW are employees of HEOR Ltd., a company sponsored by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Europe Ltd. to build the model. KO and PR are employees of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Europe Ltd.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of patient simulation through the ADPKD Outcomes Model. CKD: chronic kidney disease; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD: end-stage renal disease; TKV: total kidney volume
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Validation of the TEMPO 3:4 disease progression equations implemented within the ADPKD Outcomes Model. Trajectories of eGFR progression were consistent with predictions derived from equations fitted to CRISP I data (panel a), while model-predicted eGFR progression was consistent with observed data from HALT-PKD Study A (panel b), HALT-PKD Study B (panel c), and THIN database (panel d). Shaded regions depict 95% prediction intervals; error bars depict 95% confidence intervals. ADPKD-OM: autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease Outcomes Model; CRISP: Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease study; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD: end-stage renal disease; HALT-PKD: Halt Progression of Polycystic Kidney Disease trials; THIN: The Health Improvement Network; TKV: total kidney volume
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Age at ESRD onset as a function of baseline patient characteristics: eGFR (60–110 mL/min/1.73 m2); age (25–45 years); TKV (1000–2000 mL). Midline represents median; upper and lower hinges represent 25th and 75th percentiles; upper and lower whiskers represent highest and lowest values within 1.5 times the interquartile range; data beyond the whiskers are plotted as outliers. eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD: end-stage renal disease; TKV: total kidney volume
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Univariate sensitivity analyses demonstrating the influence of baseline patient characteristics on lifetime ESRD risk and predicted age at ESRD onset. Profiles 1–3 represent hypothetical patient cohorts with increasingly advanced stages of ADPKD progression at baseline. Vertical lines represent base-case values. eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD: end-stage renal disease; TKV: total kidney volume
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Prediction of disease progression for three illustrative ADPKD patient profiles. Upper sections of patient characteristics describe modelled drivers of progression. CKD: chronic kidney disease; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD: end-stage renal disease; TKV: total kidney volume; PI: prediction interval

References

    1. Ong AC, Devuyst O, Knebelmann B, Walz G, ERA-EDTA Working Group for Inherited Kidney Diseases Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: the changing face of clinical management. Lancet. 2015;385:1993–2002. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60907-2.
    1. Spithoven EM, Kramer A, Meijer E, Orskov B, Wanner C, Abad JM, et al. Renal replacement therapy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) in Europe: prevalence and survival—an analysis of data from the ERA-EDTA registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(Suppl 4):iv15–iv25. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu017.
    1. Schrier RW, Brosnahan G, Cadnapaphornchai MA, Chonchol M, Friend K, Gitomer B, et al. Predictors of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease progression. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25:2399–2418. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013111184.
    1. Willey CJ, Blais JD, Hall AK, Krasa HB, Makin AJ, Czerwiec FS. Prevalence of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in the European Union. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016; 10.1093/ndt/gfw240.
    1. Shaw C, Simms RJ, Pitcher D, Sandford R. Epidemiology of patients in England and Wales with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and end-stage renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:1910–1918. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu087.
    1. Spithoven EM, Kramer A, Meijer E, Orskov B, Wanner C, Caskey F, et al. Analysis of data from the ERA-EDTA registry indicates that conventional treatments for chronic kidney disease do not reduce the need for renal replacement therapy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2014;86:1244–1252. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.120.
    1. Miskulin DC, Abebe KZ, Chapman AB, Perrone RD, Steinman TI, Torres VE, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and CKD stages 1-4: a cross-sectional study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63:214–226. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.017.
    1. Gansevoort RT, Arici M, Benzing T, Birn H, Capasso G, Covic A, et al. Recommendations for the use of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a position statement on behalf of the ERA-EDTA working groups on inherited kidney disorders and European renal best practice. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31:337–348. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv456.
    1. Irazabal MV, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Osborn SL, Harmon AJ, Sundsbak JL, et al. Imaging classification of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a simple model for selecting patients for clinical trials. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:160–172. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013101138.
    1. Woon C, Bielinski-Bradbury A, O’Reilly K, Robinson P. A systematic review of the predictors of disease progression in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2015;16:140. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0114-5.
    1. European Medicines Agency. European public assessment report summary for the public: Jinarc (tolvaptan). 2016. . Accessed 30 Nov 2016.
    1. Torres VE, Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Gansevoort RT, Grantham JJ, Higashihara E, et al. Tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2407–2418. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205511.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Chronic kidney disease in adults: assessment and management. Clinical guideline [CG182]. 2015. . Accessed 30 Mar 2017.
    1. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2002.
    1. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–612. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006.
    1. UK Office for National Statistics. National life tables, UK: 2013–2015. 2016. . Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
    1. Chapman AB, Guay-Woodford LM, Grantham JJ, Torres VE, Bae KT, Baumgarten DA, et al. Renal structure in early autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): the consortium for radiologic imaging studies of polycystic kidney disease (CRISP) cohort. Kidney Int. 2003;64:1035–1045. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00185.x.
    1. Grantham JJ, Torres VE, Chapman AB, Guay-Woodford LM, Bae KT, King BF, Jr, et al. Volume progression in polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2122–2130. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054341.
    1. Schrier RW, Abebe KZ, Perrone RD, Torres VE, Braun WE, Steinman TI, et al. Blood pressure in early autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2255–2266. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402685.
    1. Torres VE, Abebe KZ, Chapman AB, Schrier RW, Braun WE, Steinman TI, et al. Angiotensin blockade in late autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2267–2276. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402686.
    1. In Practice Systems Ltd. The Health Improvement Network (THIN). 2017. . Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
    1. Cornec-Le Gall E, Audrézet M-P, Rousseau A, Hourmant M, Renaudineau E, Charasse C, et al. The PROPKD score: a new algorithm to predict renal survival in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:942–951. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015010016.
    1. Harrell F. Regression Modeling Strategies. New York: Springer; 2001.
    1. Torres VE, Meijer E, Bae KT, Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Gansevoort RT, et al. Rationale and design of the TEMPO (tolvaptan efficacy and safety in management of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and its outcomes) 3-4 study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57:692–699. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.11.029.
    1. Davis S, Stevenson M, Tappenden P, Wailoo A. NICE DSU Technical Support Document 15: Cost-effectiveness modelling using patient-level simulation. 2014. . Accessed 28 Apr 2017.
    1. Caro JJ, Briggs AH, Siebert U, Kuntz KM. Modeling good research practices—overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force–1. Value Health. 2012;32:796–803. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.012.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Tolvaptan for treating autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Technology appraisal guidance [TA358]. 2015. . Accessed 30 Nov 2016.
    1. Scottish Medicines Consortium. tolvaptan (Jinarc). 2016. . Accessed 28 Apr 2017.
    1. European Commission. The 2015 Ageing Report: Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013–2060). 2015. . Accessed 3 Jul 2017.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Qualification opinion: Total Kidney Volume (TKV) as a prognostic biomarker for use in clinical trials evaluating patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD). 2015. . Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Clinical Review of PKD Outcomes Consortium biomarker qualification submission. 2015. . Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
    1. Ahmed ER, Tashkandi MA, Nahrir S, Maulana A. Retrospective analysis of factors affecting the progression of chronic renal failure in adult polycystic kidney disease. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2006;17:511–515.
    1. De Almeida E, De Oliveira E, Lopes J, Almeida A, Lopes M, Prata M. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement in young normotensive patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Rev Port Cardiol. 2007;26:235–243.
    1. Devuyst O, Torres VE. Osmoregulation, vasopressin, and cAMP signaling in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2013;22:459–470. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3283621510.
    1. Tan YC, Blumenfeld J, Rennert H. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: genetics, mutations and microRNAs. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1812:1202–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.03.002.
    1. Chapman AB, Bost JE, Torres VE, Guay-Woodford L, Bae KT, Landsittel D, et al. Kidney volume and functional outcomes in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:479–486. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09500911.
    1. Harris PC, Bae KT, Rossetti S, Torres VE, Grantham JJ, Chapman AB, et al. Cyst number but not the rate of cystic growth is associated with the mutated gene in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:3013–3019. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006080835.
    1. Tangri N, Hougen I, Alam A, Perrone R, McFarlane P, Pei Y. Total kidney volume as a biomarker of disease progression in Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2017;4:1–6. doi: 10.1177/2054358117693355.
    1. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc . Amended clinical study report. 2013.
    1. Thong KM, Ong AC. The natural history of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: 30-year experience from a single centre. QJM. 2013;106:639-46.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner