Does low socioeconomic status potentiate the effects of heightened cardiovascular responses to stress on the progression of carotid atherosclerosis?

J W Lynch, S A Everson, G A Kaplan, R Salonen, J T Salonen, J W Lynch, S A Everson, G A Kaplan, R Salonen, J T Salonen

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined whether heightened cardiovascular reactivity and low socioeconomic status had synergistic effects on the progression of carotid atherosclerosis in a population of eastern Finnish men.

Methods: Data from the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study were used to measure 4-year progression of intima-media thickness in 882 men according to cardiovascular reactivity and socioeconomic status. Associations were examined in relation to risk factors and were stratified by baseline levels of atherosclerosis and prevalent ischemic heart disease.

Results: The effect of reactivity on atherosclerotic progression depended on socioeconomic status. Men who had heightened cardiovascular responsiveness to stress and were born into poor families, received little education, or had low incomes had the greatest atherosclerotic progression.

Conclusions: An understanding of associations between individual risk factors and disease should be based on etiologic hypotheses that are conceived at the population level and involve fundamental social and economic causes of disease. This study demonstrates how examining the interaction of an individual biological predisposition will low socioeconomic status over the life course is etiologically informative for understanding the progression of atherosclerotic vascular disease.

References

    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Oct 1;136(7):806-18
    1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997 Mar;17(3):513-9
    1. Circulation. 1995 Oct 1;92(7):1758-64
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1971 Aug;128(2):201-14
    1. Int J Behav Med. 1994;1(1):4-31
    1. Circulation. 1990 Oct;82(4):1230-42
    1. Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):674-7
    1. Psychosom Med. 1995 May-Jun;57(3):208-12
    1. Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):678-83
    1. Circulation. 1995 Oct 1;92(7):1786-92
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Oct;112(4):467-70
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(6):809-19
    1. Lancet. 1994 Feb 26;343(8896):524-7
    1. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994 Feb;14(2):261-4
    1. J Health Soc Behav. 1990 Jun;31(2):162-72
    1. Ann Clin Res. 1988;20(1-2):46-50
    1. Circulation. 1991 Jul;84(1):129-39
    1. Ethn Dis. 1996 Winter-Spring;6(1-2):21-9
    1. Hypertension. 1996 May;27(5):1059-64
    1. BMJ. 1995 Mar 25;310(6982):771-6
    1. J Health Soc Behav. 1996 Mar;37(1):104-20
    1. BMJ. 1990 Nov 17;301(6761):1121-3
    1. Ann Epidemiol. 1996 Mar;6(2):147-53
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Oct;39(7):887-903
    1. Lancet. 1993 May 1;341(8853):1158-9
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Nov 15;144(10):934-42
    1. Am Heart J. 1988 Jul;116(1 Pt 2):328-33
    1. Epidemiology. 1993 Jan;4(1):32-6
    1. Am J Public Health. 1996 Apr;86(4):471-3
    1. Psychosom Med. 1995 Sep-Oct;57(5):411-22
    1. Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):726-8
    1. N Engl J Med. 1996 Nov 21;335(21):1552-8

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner