Addressing the important error of missing surgical items in an operated patient

Sergio Susmallian, Royi Barnea, Bella Azaria, Martine Szyper-Kravitz, Sergio Susmallian, Royi Barnea, Bella Azaria, Martine Szyper-Kravitz

Abstract

Background: We aim to analyze the characteristics of incidences of missing surgical items (MSIs) and to examine the changes in MSI events following the implementation of an MSI prevention program.

Methods: All surgical cases registered in our medical center from January 2014 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: Among 559,910 operations, 154 MSI cases were reported. Mean patient age was 48.67 years (standard deviation, 20.88), and 56.6% were female. The rate of MSIs was 0.259/1000 cases. Seventy-seven MSI cases (53.10%) had no consequences, 47 (32.41%) had mild consequences, and 21 (14.48%) had severe consequences. These last 21 cases represented a rate of 0.037/1000 cases. MSI events were more frequent in cardiac surgery (1.82/1000 operations). Textile elements were the most commonly retained materials (28.97% of cases). In total, 15.86% of the cases were not properly reported. The risk factors associated with MSIs included body mass index (BMI) above 35 kg/m2 and prolonged operative time. After the implementation of the institutional prevention system in January 2017, there was a gradual decrease in the occurrence of severe events despite an increase in the number of MSIs.

Conclusion: Despite the increase in the rate of MSIs, an implemented transparency and reporting system helped reduce the cases with serious consequences. To further prevent the occurrence of losing surgical elements in a surgery, we recommend educating OR staff members about responsibility and obligation to report all incidents that are caused during an operation, to develop an event reporting system as well as "rituals" within the OR setting to increase the team's awareness to MSIs. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04293536). Date of registration: 08.01.2021. https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04293536 .

Keywords: Complications; Never events; Retained surgical items.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Annual numbers of surgeries and the incidence of MSI
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cases in which events and near-events occurred

References

    1. Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G, Lipsitz SR, Esquivel MM, Uribe-Leitz T, et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. Lancet. 2015;385(Suppl 2):S11.
    1. Cima RR, Kollengode A, Garnatz J, Storsveen A, Weisbrod C, Deschamps C. Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:80–87.
    1. Lauwers PR, Van Hee RH. Intraperitoneal gossypibomas: the need to count sponges. World J Surg. 2000;24:521–527.
    1. World Alliance for Patient Safety WHO surgical safety checklist and implementation manual. . Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
    1. Hariharan D, Lobo DN. Retained surgical sponges, needles and instruments. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95:87–92.
    1. Berkowitz S, Marshall H, Charles A. Retained intra-abdominal surgical instruments: Time to use nascent technology? Am Surg. 2007;73:1083–1085.
    1. Wan W, Le T, Riskin L, Macario A. Improving safety in the operating room: a systematic literature review of retained surgical sponges. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:207–214.
    1. Gothwal M, Rodha M, Surekha B, Singh P, Yadav G, Sethi P. Gossypiboma—a nightmare for surgeon: a rare case with review of literature. J Midlife Health. 2019;10:160–162.
    1. Steelman VM, Shaw C, Shine L, Hardy-Fairbanks AJ. Retained surgical sponges: a descriptive study of 319 occurrences and contributing factors from 2012 to 2017. Patient Saf Surg. 2018;12:20.
    1. Brooks J. US Medicare will stop paying for preventable errors. CMAJ. 2007;177:841–842.
    1. Biswas RS, Ganguly S, Saha ML, Saha S, Mukherjee S, Ayaz A. Gossypiboma and surgeon- current medicolegal aspect—a review. Indian J Surg. 2012;74:318–322.
    1. Lembitz A, Clarke TJ. Clarifying "never events and introducing "always events". Patient Saf Surg. 2009;3:26.
    1. Judson TJ, Howell MD, Guglielmi C, Canacari E, Sands K. Miscount incidents: a novel approach to exploring risk factors for unintentionally retained surgical items. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39:468–474.
    1. Mehtsun WT, Ibrahim AM, Diener-West M, Pronovost PJ, Makary MA. Surgical never events in the United States. Surgery. 2013;153:465–472.
    1. Habahbeh AA, Alkhalaileh MA. Effect of an educational programme on the attitudes towards patient safety of operation room nurses. Br J Nurs. 2020;29:222–228.
    1. Niu L, Li HY, Tang W, Gong S, Zhang LJ. Evolving safety practices in the setting of modern complex operating room: role of nurses. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017;31:659–665.
    1. Ragusa PS, Bitterman A, Auerbach B, Healy WA., 3rd Effectiveness of surgical safety checklists in improving patient safety. Orthopedics. 2016;39:e307–e310.
    1. Elsharydah A, Warmack KO, Minhajuddin A, Moffatt-Bruce SD. Retained surgical items after abdominal and pelvic surgery: Incidence, trend and predictors- observational study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2016;12:60–64.
    1. Stawicki SPA, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Ahmed HM, Anderson HL, III, Balija TM, Bernescu I, et al. Retained surgical items: a problem yet to be solved. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:15–22.
    1. Gunnar W, Soncrant C, Lynn MM, Neily J, Tesema Y, Nylander W. The impact of surgical count technology on retained surgical items rates in the Veterans Health Administration. J Patient Saf. 2020.
    1. Fencl JL. Guideline implementation: prevention of retained surgical items. AORN J. 2016;104:37–48.
    1. Knowles M. 13 statistics on never events. : Becker's Hospital Review. ; 2018 [Available from: .
    1. Counting of absorbents, sharp items, ancillary items and surgical instruments. Jerusalem, Israel: Medical Administration, Ministry of Health; 2016. Contract No.: 13/2016.
    1. Agrawal A. Counting matters: lessons from the root cause analysis of a retained surgical item. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012;38:566–574.
    1. Manzella A, Filho PB, Albuquerque E, Farias F, Kaercher J. Imaging of gossypibomas: pictorial review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:S94–101.
    1. Machado DM, Zanetti G, Araujo Neto CA, Nobre LF, Meirelles GS, Silva JL, et al. Thoracic textilomas: CT findings. J Bras Pneumol. 2014;40:535–542.
    1. O'Connor AR, Coakley FV, Meng MV, Eberhardt SC. Imaging of retained surgical sponges in the abdomen and pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:481–489.
    1. Steelman VM, Shaw C, Shine L, Hardy-Fairbanks AJ. Unintentionally retained foreign objects: a descriptive study of 308 sentinel events and contributing factors. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019;45:249–258.
    1. Cheng TC, Chou AS, Jeng CM, Chang PY, Lee CC. Computed tomography findings of gossypiboma. J Chin Med Assoc. 2007;70:565–569.
    1. Sheehan RE, Sheppard MN, Hansell DM. Retained intrathoracic surgical swab: CT appearances. J Thorac Imaging. 2000;15:61–64.
    1. Abe T, Murai S, Nasuhara Y, Shinohara N. Characteristics of medical adverse events/near misses associated with laparoscopic/thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective study based on the Japanese National Database of Medical Adverse Events. J Patient Saf. 2019;15:343–351.
    1. Lincourt AE, Harrell A, Cristiano J, Sechrist C, Kercher K, Heniford BT. Retained foreign bodies after surgery. J Surg Res. 2007;138:170–174.
    1. Greenberg CC, Regenbogen SE, Lipsitz SR, Diaz-Flores R, Gawande AA. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count. Ann Surg. 2008;248:337–341.
    1. Lazzaro A, Corona A, Iezzi L, Quaresima S, Armisi L, Piccolo I, et al. Radiofrequency-based identification medical device: An evaluable solution for surgical sponge retrieval? Surg Innov. 2017;24:268–275.
    1. Williams TL, Tung DK, Steelman VM, Chang PK, Szekendi MK. Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:354–364.
    1. Coustasse A, Tomblin S, Slack C. Impact of radio-frequency identification (RFID) technologies on the hospital supply chain: a literature review. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2013;10:1d.
    1. Jayadevan R, Stensland K, Small A, Hall S, Palese M. A protocol to recover needles lost during minimally invasive surgery. JSLS. 2014;18.
    1. Zaman S, Clarke R, Schofield A. Intraoperative loss of a surgical needle: a laparoscopic dilemma. JSLS. 2015;19.
    1. Egorova NN, Moskowitz A, Gelijns A, Weinberg A, Curty J, Rabin-Fastman B, et al. Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments: what is the value of counting? Ann Surg. 2008;247:13–18.
    1. Edel EM. Surgical count practice variability and the potential for retained surgical items. AORN J. 2012;95:228–238.
    1. Kaiser CW, Friedman S, Spurling KP, Slowick T, Kaiser HA. The retained surgical sponge. Ann Surg. 1996;224:79–84.
    1. Smith SL. "Managing up" can improve teamwork in the OR. AORN J. 2010;91:576–582.
    1. Birgand G, Haudebourg T, Grammatico-Guillon L, Ferrand L, Moret L, Gouin F, et al. Improvement in staff behavior during surgical procedures to prevent post-operative complications (ARIBO(2)): study protocol for a cluster randomised trial. Trials. 2019;20:275.
    1. Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, Regehr G, Baker GR, Reznick R, et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:330–334.
    1. Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N, Nam RK, Detsky AS, Satkunasivam R. Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ. 2017;359:j4366.
    1. Myers CG, Lu-Myers Y, Ghaferi AA. Excising the "surgeon ego" to accelerate progress in the culture of surgery. BMJ. 2018;363:k4537.
    1. Whitaker M. The surgical personality: does it exist? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100:72–77.
    1. Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJ. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:229–235.
    1. Moffatt-Bruce SD, Cook CH, Steinberg SM, Stawicki SP. Risk factors for retained surgical items: a meta-analysis and proposed risk stratification system. J Surg Res. 2014;190:429–436.
    1. Cattanach D, Teague B. Retained foreign body after adjustable gastric band removal: a case series. Obes Surg. 2017;27:3337–3340.
    1. Barger LK, Ayas NT, Cade BE, Cronin JW, Rosner B, Speizer FE, et al. Impact of extended-duration shifts on medical errors, adverse events, and attentional failures. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e487.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner