Estimated costs for the delivery of safer conception strategies for HIV-discordant couples in Zimbabwe: a cost analysis

Carolyn Smith Hughes, Joelle Brown, Caroline Murombedzi, Thandiwe Chirenda, Gift Chareka, Felix Mhlanga, Bismark Mateveke, Serah Gitome, Tinei Makurumure, Allen Matubu, Nyaradzo Mgodi, Zvavahera Chirenje, James G Kahn, Carolyn Smith Hughes, Joelle Brown, Caroline Murombedzi, Thandiwe Chirenda, Gift Chareka, Felix Mhlanga, Bismark Mateveke, Serah Gitome, Tinei Makurumure, Allen Matubu, Nyaradzo Mgodi, Zvavahera Chirenje, James G Kahn

Abstract

Background: In recent years, safer conception strategies have been developed to help HIV-serodiscordant couples conceive a child without transmitting HIV to the seronegative partner. The SAFER clinical trial assessed implementation of these strategies in Zimbabwe.

Methods: As a part of the SAFER study, we estimated the costs (in 2017 $US) associated with individual and combination strategies, in the trial setting and real-world practice, from a healthcare system perspective. Safer conception strategies included: 1) ART with frequent viral load testing until achieving undetectable viral load (ART-VL); 2) daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP); 3) semen-washing with intrauterine insemination; and 4) manual self-insemination at home. For costs in the trial, we used a micro-costing approach, including a time and motion study to quantify personnel effort, and estimated the cost per couple for individual and combination strategies for a mean of 6 months of safer services. For real-world practice, we modeled costs for three implementation scenarios, representing differences from the trial in input prices (paid by the Ministry of Health and Child Care [MOHCC]), intervention intensity, and increments to current HIV prevention and treatment practices and guidelines. We used one-way sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of uncertainty in input variables.

Results: Individual strategy costs were $769-$1615 per couple in the trial; $185-$563 if using MOHCC prices. Under the target intervention intensity and using MOHCC prices, individual strategy costs were $73-$360 per couple over and above the cost of current HIV clinical practices. The cost of delivering the most commonly selected combination, ART-VL plus PrEP, ranged from $166-$517 per couple under the three real-world scenarios. Highest costs were for personnel, lab tests, and strategy-specific consumables, in variable proportions by clinical strategy and analysis scenario. Total costs were most affected by uncertainty in the price of PrEP, number of semen-washing attempts, and scale-up of semen-washing capacity.

Conclusions: Safer conception methods have costs that may be affordable in many low-resource settings. These cost data will help implementers and policymakers add safer conception services. Cost-effectiveness analysis is needed to assess value for money for safer conception services overall and for safer strategy combinations.

Trial registration: Registry Name: Clinicaltrials.gov.

Trial registration number: NCT03049176 . Registration date: February 9, 2017.

Keywords: ART; Conception; Cost; Discordant; HIV; PrEP; Semen-washing.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no competing interests to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Target resource intensity and components for safer conception strategy delivery by clinic visit and safer conception strategy. ART = Antiretroviral therapy. ART-VL = Antiretroviral therapy with frequent viral load testing. AVI = Artificial vaginal insemination, at home. HBV = Hepatitis B virus. PrEP = Pre-exposure prophylaxis (with TRUVADA [emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate]). STI = Sexually transmitted infection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Individual strategy cost per couple (2017 $US) by input and activity type: Scenario 1 (High Intensity, Real-world Prices).ART-VL = Antiretroviral therapy with frequent viral load testing. AVI = Artificial vaginal insemination, at home. PrEP = Pre-exposure prophylaxis. SW = Semen-washing
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Individual strategy cost per couple (2017 $US) by input and activity type: Scenario 2 (Target Intensity, Incremental Cost Added to Current Practice). ART-VL = Antiretroviral therapy with frequent viral load testing. AVI = Artificial vaginal insemination, at home. PrEP = Pre-exposure prophylaxis. SW = Semen-washing
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Individual strategy cost per couple (2017 $US) by input and activity type: Scenario 3 (Target Intensity, Incremental Cost Added to Standard of Care). ART-VL = Antiretroviral therapy with frequent viral load testing. AVI = Artificial vaginal insemination, at home. PrEP = Pre-exposure prophylaxis. SW = Semen-washing

References

    1. Ministry of Health and Child Care (MOHCC), Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (ZIMPHIA) 2015–2016: Final Report. August 2019, Harare: MOHCC.
    1. Asfaw HM, Gashe FE. Fertility intentions among HIV positive women aged 18–49 years in Addis Ababa Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. Reprod Health. 2014;11(36). 10.1186/1742-4755-11-36.
    1. Krashin JW, Haddad LB, Tweya H, et al. Factors associated with desired fertility among HIV-positive women and men attending two urban clinics in Lilongwe, Malawi. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198798.
    1. Schwartz SR, Mehta SH, Taha TE, Rees HV, Venter F, Black V. High pregnancy intentions and missed opportunities for patient-provider communication about fertility in a south African cohort of HIV-positive women on antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(1):69–78. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9981-3.
    1. Tweya H, Feldacker C, Breeze E, et al. Incidence of pregnancy among women accessing antiretroviral therapy in urban Malawi: A retrospective cohort study. AIDS Behav. 2013;17:471. .
    1. Matthews LT, Beyeza-Kashesya J, Cooke I, Davies N, Heffron R, Kaida A, et al. Consensus statement: supporting safer conception and pregnancy for men and women living with and affected by HIV. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(6):1713–1724. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1777-7.
    1. Brown JM, Njoroge B, Akama E, Breitnauer B, Leddy A, Darbes L, et al. A novel safer conception counseling toolkit for the prevention of HIV: a mixed methods evaluation in Kisumu, Kenya. AIDS Educ Prev. 2016;28:524–538. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2016.28.6.524.
    1. Updated recommendations on first-line and second-line antiretroviral regimens and post-exposure prophylaxis and recommendations on early infant diagnosis of HIV: interim guidelines . Supplement to the 2016 consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
    1. World Health Organization . Recommendations for a public health approach. Second. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection.
    1. World Health Organization. Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
    1. Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Care . PrEP Guidelines. Harare: MOHCC; 2016.
    1. Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Care . Guidelines for Antiretroviral Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of HIV in Zimbabwe. Harare: MOHCC; 2016.
    1. Drummond M. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
    1. Marseille E, Giganti MJ, Mwango A, et al. Taking ART to scale: determinants of the cost and cost-effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy in 45 clinical sites in Zambia. PLoS One. 2012;7:e51993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051993.
    1. Webb K, Maclean R, Engelsmann B, et al. Optimizing Zimbabwe’s National PMTCT Program: Cost-effectiveness of a planned village health worker (VHW)-based intervention to improve linkage to postnatal care. Vancouver: Poster presented at: 8th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Prevention; 2015.
    1. Vernazza PL, Graf I, Sonnenberg-Schwan U, Geit M, Meurer A. Preexposure prophylaxis and timed intercourse for HIV-discordant couples willing to conceive a child. AIDS. 2011;25(16):2005–2008. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834a36d0.
    1. Joffe M. Time to pregnancy: a measure of reproductive function in either sex. Asclepios project. Occup Environ Med. 1997;54(5):289–295. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.5.289.
    1. Health Transition Fund A Multi-donor Pooled Transition Fund for Health in Zimbabwe. 2011. . Accessed March 23, 2017.
    1. Jain V, Chang W, Byonanebye DM, et al. Estimated costs for delivery of HIV antiretroviral therapy to individuals with CD4+ T-cell counts >350 cells/uL in rural Uganda. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0143433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143433.
    1. Clinton Health Access Initiative. ARV market report: the state of the antiretroviral drug market in low- and middle-income countries. 2016. . Accessed June 19, 2017.
    1. 2016 ANTIRETROVIRAL (ARV) CHAI REFERENCE PRICE LIST. ARV Ref Price List 2016. . Accessed June 19, 2017.
    1. Clinton Health Access Initiative. CHAI supports South Africa and global partners to achieve landmark HIV viral load access program. Case Study; 2015. . Accessed 19 June 2017.
    1. Roche Molecular Systems. Global Access Initiative Country List. July 2015. . Accessed June 19, 2017.
    1. Kahn JG, Harris B, Mermin J, et al. Cost of community integrated prevention campaign for malaria, HIV, and diarrhea in rural Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:346. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-346.
    1. Mack N, Evens EM, Tolley EE, et al. The importance of choice in the rollout of ARV-based prevention to user groups in Kenya and South Africa: a qualitative study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19157. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.3.19157.
    1. Gray A, Smit J, Manzini N, Beksinska M. Systematic review of contraceptive medicines. “Does choice make a difference?” University of Witwatersrand, Johannesberg. 2006.
    1. Donnell D, Baeten JM, Bumpus NN, et al. HIV protective efficacy and correlates of tenofovir blood concentrations in a clinical trial of PrEP for HIV prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66(3):340–348. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000172.
    1. Anglemyer A, Rutherford GW, Horvath T, Baggaley RC, Egger M, Siegfried N. Antiretroviral therapy for prevention of HIV transmission in HIV-discordant couples. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4(4):CD009153. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009153.pub3.
    1. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(6):493–505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105243.
    1. Rutstein SE, Ananworanich J, Fidler S, et al. Clinical and public health implications of acute and early HIV detection and treatment: a scoping review. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20(1):21579. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21579.
    1. Price JT, Wheeler SB, Stranix-Chibanda L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pre-exposure HIV prophylaxis during pregnancy and breastfeeding in sub-Saharan Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72:S145–S153. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001063.
    1. Cremin I, Hallett TB. Estimating the range of potential epidemiological impact of preexposure prophylaxis: run-away success or run-away failure? AIDS. 2015;29(6): 733–738. .
    1. Walensky RP, Jacobsen MM, Bekker L-G, et al. Potential clinical and economic value of long-acting Preexposure prophylaxis for south African women at high-risk for HIV infection. J Infect Dis. 2016;213:1523–1531. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv523.
    1. Huyser C, Boyd L. ART in South Africa: the price to pay. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2013;5(2):91–99.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner