Surgical Occlusion Setup in Correction of Skeletal Class III Deformity Using Surgery-First Approach: Guidelines, Characteristics and Accuracy

Yu-Fang Liao, Shu Hsien Lo, Yu-Fang Liao, Shu Hsien Lo

Abstract

The aims of this study were to establish guidelines for the surgical occlusion setup of surgery-first orthognathic surgery, and evaluate the resulting characteristics and accuracy. Skeletal Class III patients (N = 53) underwent Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Study models before orthognathic surgery were set according to the guidelines. Occlusion was measured and computer-aided surgical simulation was used to evaluate the characteristics and accuracy of the surgical occlusion. The mean age of participants was 25 ± 6 years with 24 males and 29 females. The occlusion was set as positive overjet (4.4 ± 2.0 mm) and overbite (1.4 ± 1.8 mm), Class II or I molar relation, and posterior cross bite (overjet: 4.9 ± 2.0 mm and 4.4 ±1.9 mm, respectively for the right and left second molars) and open bite (overbite: -2.0 ± 1.6 mm and -1.9 ± 1.3 mm, respectively for the right and left second molars). Normal jaw relationship and symmetry were noted after virtual surgery. None of the patients required new occlusal setup. Our data contribute the use of the surgery-first approach for skeletal Class III patients by establishing guidelines for a surgical occlusion setup in three dimensions.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dental casts showing surgical occlusion of a patient. (Top) Maxillary (left) and mandibular (right) casts; red indicates midlines. (Bottom) Surgical occlusion showing the coordination of the maxillary and mandibular jaw midlines; red indicates midlines.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maxillary dental cast of a patient showing surgical occlusal contact on three segments and six teeth.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Computed tomography images used for linear and angular measurements of jaw symmetry. (Left) Horizontal deviation for maxilla (anterior nasal spine and upper incisor) and mandible (lower incisor and menton); ANS, anterior nasal spine; UI: upper incisor; LI: lower incisor; Me: menton. (Center) Vertical discrepancy for mandible (distance between point R and point L); point R: inflection point of mandibular body at the level of right mental foramen; point L: contralateral corresponding point of mandibular body on the left side. (Right) Horizontal discrepancy for mandible (distance discrepancy between dr and dl); dr: distance from point R to the facial midsagittal plane; dl: distance from point L to the facial midsagittal plane.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Computed tomography images used for volumetric measurements of jaw symmetry (volumetric discrepancy between right and left mandibular body).

References

    1. Proffit, W. R., White, R. P. & Sarver, D. M. Combining surgery and orthognathics: Who does what, when? Contemporary Treatment of Dentofacial Deformity (ed. Proffit, W.R., White, R.P., Sarver, D.M.) 245–267 (Mosby, 2003).
    1. Luther F, Morris DO, Hart C. Orthodontic preparation for orthognathic surgery: How long does it take and why? A retrospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;41:401–406. doi: 10.1016/S0266-4356(03)00163-3.
    1. Diaz PM, et al. Time used for orthodontic surgical treatment of dentofacial deformities in white patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:88–92. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.062.
    1. Nurminen L, Pietilä T, Vinkka-Puhakka H. Motivation for and satisfaction with orthodontic-surgical treatment: A retrospective study of 28 patients. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:79–87. doi: 10.1093/ejo/21.1.79.
    1. Nagasaka H, Sugawara J, Kawamura H, Nanda R. “Surgery first” skeletal Class III correction using the Skeletal Anchorage System. J Clin Orthod. 2009;43:97–105.
    1. Villegas C, Uribe F, Sugawara J, Nanda R. Expedited correction of significant dentofacial asymmetry using a “surgery first” approach. J Clin Orthod. 2010;44:97–103.
    1. Baek SH, Ahn HW, Kwon YH, Choi JY. Surgery-first approach in skeletal Class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery: Evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:332–338. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf5fd4.
    1. Liao YF, et al. Presurgical orthodontics versus no presurgical orthodontics: Treatment outcome of surgical-orthodontic correction for skeletal class III open bite. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:2074–2083. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f52710.
    1. Hernandez-Alfaro F, Guijarro-Martınez R, Molina-Coral A, Badía-Escriche C. “Surgery first” in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:e201–e207. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.01.010.
    1. Liou EJ, et al. Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: postoperative rapid orthodontic tooth movement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:781–785. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.035.
    1. Liou EJ, et al. Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: orthodontic guidelines and setup for model surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:771–780. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.011.
    1. Kim CS, et al. Stability of mandibular setback surgery with and without presurgical orthodontics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:779–787. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.033.
    1. Yu HB, et al. The surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study of 50 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;4:1463–1467. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.05.024.
    1. Park KR, Kim SY, Park HS, Jung YS. Surgery-first approach on patients with temporomandibular joint disease by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 116. 2013;436:e429. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.038.
    1. Ko EW, et al. Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:1469–1477. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.022.
    1. Park HM, Lee YK, Choi JY, Baek SH. Maxillary incisor inclination of skeletal Class III patients treated with extraction of the upper first premolars and two-jaw surgery: Conventional orthognathic surgery vs surgery-first approach. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:720–729. doi: 10.2319/072113-529.1.
    1. Hsieh YJ, et al. Effect of bimaxillary rotational setback surgery on upper airway structure in skeletal Class III deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:361e–369e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000913.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner