Effects of Narrowband Light on Choroidal Thickness and the Pupil

Linjiang Lou, Lisa A Ostrin, Linjiang Lou, Lisa A Ostrin

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effects of narrowband light exposure on choroidal thickness and the pupil response in humans.

Methods: Twenty subjects, ages 21 to 43 years, underwent 1 hour of exposure to broadband, short wavelength "blue," or long wavelength "red" light, or darkness. Choroidal thickness, imaged with spectral domain optical coherence tomography, axial length, determined from biometry, and rod/cone- and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell-driven pupil responses were measured before and after exposure. Pupil stimuli were six 1 second alternating red (651 nm) and blue (456 nm) stimuli, 60 seconds apart. Pupil metrics included maximum constriction and the 6 second post-illumination pupil response (PIPR).

Results: Compared with before exposure, the choroid significantly thinned after broadband light, red light, and dark exposure (all P < 0.05), but not after blue light exposure (P = 0.39). The maximum constriction to 1 second red stimuli significantly decreased after all light exposures (all P < 0.001), but increased after dark exposure (P = 0.02), compared with before exposure. Maximum constriction and 6-second PIPR to 1 second blue stimuli significantly decreased after all light exposures compared with before exposure (all P < 0.005), with no change after dark exposure (P > 0.05). There were no differences in axial length change or 6-second PIPR to red stimuli between exposures.

Conclusions: Narrowband blue and red light exposure induced differential changes in choroidal thickness. Maximum constriction, a function of rod/cone activity, and the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell-mediated PIPR were attenuated after all light exposures. Findings demonstrate differing effects of short-term narrowband light and dark exposure on the choroid, rod/cone activity, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: L. Lou, None; L.A. Ostrin, None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) A six-line 30° radial scan protocol used for SD-OCT imaging. (B) Segmentation of Bruch's membrane (red) and the choroid/sclera border (blue). Choroidal thickness was averaged for a 1-mm wide region centered at the fovea. (C) Representative choroidal thickness map generated from the segmentations. Yellow areas represent thicker regions of the choroid and blue areas represent thinner regions of the choroid.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Experimental protocol. Subjects first underwent a 10-minute distance viewing task under 60 lux room illumination. OCT imaging, ocular biometry, and pupil measurements were conducted before and after a 1-hour exposure condition. (B) Pupil stimulation protocol. Five minutes of dark adaptation was followed by 10 seconds of baseline pupil diameter recording. Three 1-second red and three 1-second blue stimuli were presented in alternating order, with a 60-second interstimulus interval.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Spectral composition and room set up for (A, B) broadband light (C, D) short wavelength blue light, and (E, F) long wavelength red light.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Bland-Altman analysis of the difference between scan 1 and scan 2 against mean choroidal thickness to assess within-session repeatability. The dashed and dotted lines represent the mean difference and 95% limits of agreement, respectively. Shaded areas represent the 95% confidence intervals for the mean difference and 95% limits of agreement.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Change in (A) choroidal thickness and (B) axial length after 1 hour of exposure for each condition; broadband light (open bars), blue light (blue bars), red light (red bars), and darkness (black bars). Error bars represent standard error of the mean. **P < 0.01.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
(A) Maximum constriction (%) and (B) 6-second PIPR (%) before (open bars) and after 1 hour of exposure (red bars) to broadband light, blue light, red light, or darkness in response to a 1-second red stimulus. (C) Maximum constriction (%) and (D) 6-second PIPR (%) before (open bars) and after 1 hour of exposure (blue bars) to broadband light, blue light, red light, or darkness in response to a 1 second blue stimulus. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

References

    1. Norton TT, Siegwart JT. Light levels, refractive development, and myopia – a speculative review. Exp Eye Res. 2013; 114: 48–57.
    1. Ramamurthy D, Lin Chua SY, Saw S-M. A review of environmental risk factors for myopia during early life, childhood and adolescence. Clin Exp Optom. 2015; 98: 497–506.
    1. Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, et al. .. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115: 1279–1285.
    1. Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Light exposure and eye growth in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56: 6779–6787.
    1. Rucker F. Monochromatic and white light and the regulation of eye growth. Exp Eye Res. 2019; 184: 172–182.
    1. Long Q, Chen D, Chu R. Illumination with monochromatic long-wavelength light promotes myopic shift and ocular elongation in newborn pigmented guinea pigs. Cutaneous Ocular Toxicol. 2009; 28: 176–180.
    1. Foulds WS, Barathi VA, Luu CD. Progressive myopia or hyperopia can be induced in chicks and reversed by manipulation of the chromaticity of ambient light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 8004–8012.
    1. Jiang L, Zhang S, Schaeffel F, et al. .. Interactions of chromatic and lens-induced defocus during visual control of eye growth in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus). Vision Res. 2014; 94: 24–32.
    1. Smith EL 3rd, Hung L-F, Arumugam B, Holden BA, Neitz M, Neitz J. Effects of long-wavelength lighting on refractive development in infant rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56: 6490–6500.
    1. Gawne TJ, Ward AH, Norton TT. Long-wavelength (red) light produces hyperopia in juvenile and adolescent tree shrews. Vision Res. 2017; 140: 55–65.
    1. Gawne TJ, Siegwart JT Jr., Ward AH, Norton TT. The wavelength composition and temporal modulation of ambient lighting strongly affect refractive development in young tree shrews. Exp Eye Res. 2017; 155: 75–84.
    1. Hung L-F, Arumugam B, She Z, Ostrin L, Smith EL 3rd. Narrow-band, long-wavelength lighting promotes hyperopia and retards vision-induced myopia in infant rhesus monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2018; 176: 147–160.
    1. Gawne TJ, Ward AH, Norton TT. Juvenile tree shrews do not maintain emmetropia in narrow-band blue light. Optom Vis Sci. 2018; 95: 911–920.
    1. Wallman J, Wildsoet C, Xu A, et al. .. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res. 1995; 35: 37–50.
    1. Wildsoet C, Wallman J.. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Res. 1995; 35: 1175–1194.
    1. Hung L-F, Wallman J, Smith EL III. Vision-dependent changes in the choroidal thickness of macaque monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41: 1259–1269.
    1. Read SA, Fuss JA, Vincent SJ, Collins MJ, Alonso-Caneiro D. Choroidal changes in human myopia: insights from optical coherence tomography imaging. Clin Exp Optom. 2019; 102: 270.
    1. Hattar S, Liao HW, Takao M, Berson DM, Yau KW. Melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells: architecture, projections, and intrinsic photosensitivity. Science. 2002; 295: 1065–1070.
    1. Berson DM, Dunn FA, Takao M. Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science. 2002; 295: 1070–1073.
    1. Dacey DM, Liao H-W, Peterson BB, et al. .. Melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells in primate retina signal colour and irradiance and project to the LGN. Nature. 2005; 433: 749–754.
    1. Hattar S, Kumar M, Park A, et al. .. Central projections of melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells in the mouse. J Comp Neurol. 2006; 497: 326–349.
    1. Gamlin PDR, McDougal DH, Pokorny J, Smith VC, Yau K-W, Dacey DM. Human and macaque pupil responses driven by melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells. Vision Res. 2007; 47: 946–954.
    1. Adhikari P, Zele AJ, Feigl B. The post-illumination pupil response (PIPR). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56: 3838–3849.
    1. Chakraborty R, Ostrin LA, Nickla DL, Iuvone PM, Pardue MT, Stone RA. Circadian rhythms, refractive development, and myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018; 38: 217–245.
    1. Brown JS, Flitcroft DI, Ying GS, et al. .. In vivo human choroidal thickness measurements: evidence for diurnal fluctuations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50: 5–12.
    1. Chakraborty R, Read SA, Collins MJ. Diurnal variations in axial length, choroidal thickness, intraocular pressure, and ocular biometrics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 5121–5129.
    1. Burfield HJ, Patel NB, Ostrin LA. Ocular biometric diurnal rhythms in emmetropic and myopic adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018; 59: 5176–5187.
    1. Zele AJ, Feigl B, Smith SS, Markwell EL. The circadian response of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. PloS One. 2011; 6: e17860–e17860.
    1. Münch M, Léon L, Crippa SV, Kawasaki A. Circadian and wake-dependent effects on the pupil light reflex in response to narrow-bandwidth light pulses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 4546–4555.
    1. Tan CS, Ouyang Y, Ruiz H, Sadda SR. Diurnal variation of choroidal thickness in normal, healthy subjects measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 261–266.
    1. Kang HM, Woo YJ, Koh HJ, Lee CS, Lee SC. The effect of consumption of ethanol on subfoveal choroidal thickness in acute phase. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016; 100: 383.
    1. Vural DA, Kara AN, Sayin AN, Pirhan AD, Ersan AHB. Choroidal thickness changes after a single administration of coffee in healthy subjects. Retina. 2014; 34: 1223–1228.
    1. Altinkaynak H, Ceylan E, Kartal B, Keleş S, Ekinci M, Olcaysu OO. Measurement of choroidal thickness following caffeine intake in healthy subjects. Curr Eye Res. 2016; 41: 708–714.
    1. Ostrin LA. The ipRGC-driven pupil response with light exposure and refractive error in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018; 38: 503–515.
    1. Ostrin LA, Abbott KS, Queener HM. Attenuation of short wavelengths alters sleep and the ipRGC pupil response. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017; 37: 440–450.
    1. Barrionuevo PA, Nicandro N, McAnany JJ, Zele AJ, Gamlin P, Cao D. Assessing rod, cone, and melanopsin contributions to human pupil flicker responses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55: 719–727.
    1. Abbott KS, Queener HM, Ostrin LA. The ipRGC-driven pupil response with light exposure, refractive error, and sleep. Optom Vis Sci. 2018; 95: 323–331.
    1. CIE System for Metrology of Optical Radiation for ipRGC-influenced Responses to Light. CIE. Vienna, Austria: CIE Central Bureau; 2018.
    1. Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB. The schematic eye. In: Bennett AG,, Rabbetts RB, eds. Clinical visual optics. London, UK: Butterworths; 1989: 249–274.
    1. Bennett AG, Rudnicka AR, Edgar DF. Improvements on Littmann's method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994; 232: 361–367.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG.. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 327: 307–310.
    1. Liu R, Hu M, He JC, et al. .. The effects of monochromatic illumination on early eye development in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55: 1901–1909.
    1. Read SA, Pieterse EC, Alonso-Caneiro D, et al. .. Daily morning light therapy is associated with an increase in choroidal thickness in healthy young adults. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 8200.
    1. Berkowitz BA, Schmidt T, Podolsky RH, Roberts R. Melanopsin phototransduction contributes to light-evoked choroidal expansion and rod L-type calcium channel function in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: 5314–5319.
    1. Alagöz C, Pekel G, Alagöz N, et al. .. Choroidal thickness, photoreceptor thickness, and retinal vascular caliber alterations in dark adaptation. Curr Eye Res. 2016; 41: 1608–1613.
    1. Nickla DL, Wildsoet CF, Troilo D. Endogenous rhythms in axial length and choroidal thickness in chicks: implications for ocular growth regulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42: 584–588.
    1. Kardon R, Anderson SC, Damarjian TG, Grace EM, Stone E, Kawasaki A. Chromatic pupil responses: preferential activation of the melanopsin-mediated versus outer photoreceptor-mediated pupil light reflex. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 1564–1573.
    1. Markwell EL, Feigl B, Zele AJ. Intrinsically photosensitive melanopsin retinal ganglion cell contributions to the pupillary light reflex and circadian rhythm. Clin Exp Optom. 2010; 93: 137–149.
    1. de Zeeuw J, Papakonstantinou A, Nowozin C, et al. .. Living in biological darkness: objective sleepiness and the pupillary light responses are affected by different metameric lighting conditions during daytime. J Biol Rhythms. 2019; 34: 410–431.
    1. Wang B, Shen C, Zhang L, et al. .. Dark adaptation-induced changes in rod, cone and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (ipRGC) sensitivity differentially affect the pupil light response (PLR). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015; 253: 1997–2005.
    1. Mure LS, Rieux C, Hattar S, Cooper HM. Melanopsin-dependent nonvisual responses: evidence for photopigment bistability in vivo. J Biol Rhythms. 2007; 22: 411–424.
    1. Hansen MS, Sander B, Kawasaki A, Brondsted AE, Nissen C, Lund-Andersen H. Prior light exposure enhances the pupil response to subsequent short wavelength (blue) light. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011; 2.
    1. Joyce DS, Feigl B, Zele AJ. The effects of short-term light adaptation on the human post-illumination pupil response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: 5672–5680.
    1. Koyanagi M, Kubokawa K, Tsukamoto H, Shichida Y, Terakita A. Cephalochordate melanopsin: evolutionary linkage between invertebrate visual cells and vertebrate photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. Curr Biol. 2005; 15: 1065–1069.
    1. Melyan Z, Tarttelin EE, Bellingham J, Lucas RJ, Hankins MW. Addition of human melanopsin renders mammalian cells photoresponsive. Nature. 2005; 433: 741–745.
    1. Panda S, Nayak SK, Campo B, Walker JR, Hogenesch JB, Jegla T. Illumination of the melanopsin signaling pathway. Science. 2005; 307: 600–604.
    1. Mure LS, Cornut P-L, Rieux C, et al. .. Melanopsin bistability: a fly's eye technology in the human retina. PLoS One. 2009; 4: e5991.
    1. Münch M, Kourti P, Brouzas D, Kawasaki A. Variation in the pupil light reflex between winter and summer seasons. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016; 94: e244–e246.
    1. Münch M, Ladaique M, Roemer S, Hashemi K, Kawasaki A. Melanopsin-mediated acute light responses measured in winter and in summer: seasonal variations in adults with and without cataracts. Front Neurol. 2017; 8.
    1. Thorne HC, Jones KH, Peters SP, Archer SN, Dijk D-J. Daily and seasonal variation in the spectral composition of light exposure in humans. Chronobiol Int. 2009; 26: 854–866.
    1. Ostrin LA, Sajjadi A, Benoit JS. Objectively measured light exposure during school and summer in children. Optom Vis Sci. 2018; 95: 332–342.
    1. Ostrin LA. Objectively measured light exposure in emmetropic and myopic adults. Optom Vis Sci. 2017; 94: 229–238.
    1. Bruijel J, van der Meijden WP, Bijlenga D, et al. .. Individual differences in the post-illumination pupil response to blue light: assessment without mydriatics. Biology (Basel). 2016; 5: 34.
    1. Fulk WG, Cyert AL, Parker AD. Seasonal variation in myopia progression and ocular elongation. Optom Vis Sci. 2002; 79: 46–51.
    1. Donovan L, Sankaridurg P, Ho A, et al. .. Myopia progression in Chinese children is slower in summer than in winter. Optom Vis Sci. 2012; 89: 1196–1202.
    1. Gwiazda J, Deng L, Manny R, Norton TT. Seasonal variations in the progression of myopia in children enrolled in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55: 752–758.
    1. Tähkämö L, Partonen T, Pesonen A-K. Systematic review of light exposure impact on human circadian rhythm. Chronobiol Int. 2019; 36: 151–170.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner