Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the child perceptions questionnaire for 8-10-year-old children

Deem Al-Blaihed, Azza A El-Housseiny, Nada J Farsi, Najat M Farsi, Deem Al-Blaihed, Azza A El-Housseiny, Nada J Farsi, Najat M Farsi

Abstract

Purpose: To develop an Arabic version of the CPQ8-10 and test its validity and reliability for use among Arabic-speaking children.

Methods: The 25-item professionally translated questionnaire included two global rating questions across four domains, which was assessed through a pilot study on 20 participants who were not included in the main study. Children (n = 175) aged 8-10 years were consecutively recruited: group I (n = 120) included pediatric dental patients, group II (n = 25) included children with orofacial clefts, and group III (n = 30) included orthodontic patients. Construct (convergent and discriminant) validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. All children were clinically examined; 66 children completed the questionnaire a second time. A cross-sectional study design was employed.

Results: CPQ8-10 scores and global ratings were positively correlated. CPQ8-10 scores were highest in group II, followed by groups I and III, respectively. CPQ8-10 scores were significantly higher in children affected with caries or malocclusion compared to unaffected children. Cronbach's alpha was 0.95 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97.

Conclusions: The Arabic CPQ8-10 was valid and reliable; therefore, it can be utilized with Arabic-speaking children in this age group.

Keywords: Child perceptions questionnaire; Children; Oral health-related quality of life; Reliability; Validity.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Arabic CPQ8–10-scale questions

References

    1. Wogelius P, Gjørup H, Haubek D, Lopez R, Poulsen S. Development of Danish version of child oral-health-related quality of life questionnaires (CPQ 8–10 and CPQ 11–14) BMC Oral Health. 2009;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-9-11.
    1. Glick M, Williams DM, Kleinman DV, Vujicic M, Watt RG, Weyant RJ. A new definition for oral health developed by the FDI World Dental Federation opens the door to a universal definition of oral health. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 2017;77(1):3–5. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12213.
    1. FDI World Dental Federation (2016). World Dental Federation. FDI in brief. Retrieved July 6, 2017 from .
    1. Barbosa TS, Tureli MCM, Gavião MBD. Validity and reliability of the Child Perceptions Questionnaires applied in Brazilian children. BMC Oral Health. 2009;9(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-9-13.
    1. Brown A, Al Khayal Z. Validity and reliability of the Arabic translation of the child oral-health-related quality of life questionnaire (CPQ11− 14) in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2006;16(6):405–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00775.x.
    1. Jokovic A, Locker D, Guyatt G. Short forms of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire for 11–14-year-old children (CPQ 11–14): Development and initial evaluation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2006;4(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-4.
    1. Jokovic A, Locker D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Questionnaire for measuring oral health-related quality of life in eight-to ten-year-old children. Pediatric Dentistry. 2004;26(6):512–518.
    1. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. Developing and evaluating an oral health-related quality of life index for children; the CHILD-OIDP. Community Dental Health. 2004;21(2):161–169.
    1. Broder HL, McGrath C, Cisneros GJ. Questionnaire development: Face validity and item impact testing of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2007;35(s1):8–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00401.x.
    1. Gilchrist F, Rodd H, Deery C, Marshman Z. Assessment of the quality of measures of child oral health-related quality of life. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-1114-1140.
    1. Hadzipasic-Nazdrajic A. Validation of the child perceptions questionnaire 8–10 in bosnia and herzegovina. Materia Socio-Medica. 2012;24(3):157. doi: 10.5455/msm.2012.24.157-161.
    1. Irigoyen-Camacho M. Validation of the CPQ8-10ESP in Mexican school children in urban areas. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2011;16(3):430–435.
    1. Shin H-S, Han D-H, Shin M-S, Lee H-J, Kim M-S, Kim H-D. Korean version of child perceptions questionnaire and dental caries among Korean children. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0116011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116011.
    1. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18(6):805–835. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511.
    1. Huynh H, Saunders JC. Accuracy of two procedures for estimating reliability of mastery tests. Journal of Educational Measurement. 1980;17(4):351–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1980.tb00836.x.
    1. Behling O, Law K. Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: Problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. pp. 7–133.
    1. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidimiology. 2010;63(7):737–745. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
    1. World Health Organization . WHO basic oral health survery. 5. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
    1. World Health Organization . WHO basic oral health survery. 4. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997.
    1. Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ, Jotikastira D. Utility of the dental aesthetic index in industrialized and developing countries. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 1989;49(3):163–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1989.tb02054.x.
    1. Richmond S, Shaw W, O'Brien K, Buchanan I, Stephens C, Andrews M, et al. The relationship between the index of orthodontic treatment need and consensus opinion of a panel of 74 dentists. British Dental Journal. 1995;178(10):370–374. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808776.
    1. Krabbe P. Concepts, methods and applications from a multidisciplinary perspective. 1. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2016. p. 380.
    1. Hubley AM. Discriminant validity. In: Michalos AC, editor. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. pp. 1664–1667.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997;314(7080):572–573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572.
    1. Akoglu H. User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018;18(3):91–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001.
    1. Foster Page LA, Thomson WM, Jokovic A, Locker D. Validation of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ 11–14) Journal of Dental Research. 2005;84(7):649–652. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400713.
    1. Mtaya M, Astrom AN, Tsakos G. Applicability of an abbreviated version of the Child-OIDP inventory among primary schoolchildren in Tanzania. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2007;5:40. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-40.
    1. Robinson PG, Gibson B, Khan FA, Birnbaum W. Validity of two oral health-related quality of life measures. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2003;31(2):90–99. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00051.x.
    1. Kassis A, El Osta N, Tubert-Jeannin S, Hennequin M, El Osta L, Ghoubril J. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the child perceptions questionnaire (CPQ(11–14)) among children in Lebanon. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18:18. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0482-x.
    1. Do LG, Spencer AJ. Evaluation of oral health-related quality of life questionnaires in a general child population. Community Dental Health. 2008;25(4):205–210.
    1. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal Chiropractic Medicine. 2016;15(2):155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner