Efficacy and Tolerability of Ezetimibe/Atorvastatin Fixed-dose Combination Versus Atorvastatin Monotherapy in Hypercholesterolemia: A Phase III, Randomized, Active-controlled Study in Chinese Patients

Juying Qian, Zhanquan Li, Xuelian Zhang, Jiyan Chen, Chunhua Ding, Ping Yang, Yan Liu, Miao Shi, Xinru Ren, Junbo Ge, Phase III Study Investigators, Juying Qian, Zhanquan Li, Xuelian Zhang, Jiyan Chen, Chunhua Ding, Ping Yang, Yan Liu, Miao Shi, Xinru Ren, Junbo Ge, Phase III Study Investigators

Abstract

Purpose: The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ("statins") and the cholesterol-lowering medication ezetimibe are widely used in the treatment of patients with high- and very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ezetimibe/atorvastatin (EZ/AS) with those of escalating doses of atorvastatin monotherapy in Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia uncontrolled with statin monotherapy.

Methods: This Phase III, 12-week, randomized, double-blind study included patients aged 18 to 80 years with hypercholesterolemia uncontrolled on atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg/d monotherapy. After a 5-week run-in period of treatment with atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg/d (cohorts A and B, respectively), or a bioequivalent dosage of another statin, patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio within each cohort to receive EZ/AS 10/10 mg FDC (EZ10/AS10) or atorvastatin 20 mg (AS20), once daily (cohort A); or EZ/AS 10/20 mg FDC (EZ10/AS20) or atorvastatin 40 mg (AS40), once daily (cohort B). The primary end point was the percentage change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Tolerability was also evaluated.

Findings: Of the 454 patients enrolled, 412 (90.7%) completed the study. The percentage change from baseline in LDL-C was statistically greater with EZ10/AS10 treatment (n = 88) compared with AS20 monotherapy (n = 89) (treatment difference, -19.5%; 95% CI, -26.7% to -12.3%; P < 0.001). The percentage change from baseline in LDL-C was statistically greater with EZ10/AS20 treatment (n = 137) compared with AS40 monotherapy (n = 140) (treatment difference, -15.9%; 95% CI, -21.0% to -10.7%; P < 0.001). The safety profile was comparable between the EZ/AS and atorvastatin groups in the two cohorts.

Implications: The LDL-C level at week 12 was significantly improved with both FDCs compared with escalated doses of atorvastatin (20 or 40 mg/d) in these Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia uncontrolled on atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg/d. Both FDCs were well tolerated, with no new tolerability-related findings. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20190172; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03768427.

Keywords: China; LDL-C; atorvastatin; ezetimibe; fixed-dose combination; hypercholesterolemia.

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations Xinru Ren is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme. The authors have indicated that they have no other conflicts of interest with regard to the content of this article.

Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner