Risk factors for recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal malignant neoplasm

Mario Morino, Marco Ettore Allaix, Mario Caldart, Gitana Scozzari, Alberto Arezzo, Mario Morino, Marco Ettore Allaix, Mario Caldart, Gitana Scozzari, Alberto Arezzo

Abstract

Background: Indications and results of local excision of rectal lesions are currently under debate. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), allowing a precise, full-thickness excision, could improve oncological results in early rectal tumors.

Methods: A prospective database was analyzed with the intent to identify risk factors for recurrence after TEM.

Results: Among 355 patients subjected to TEM, 107 had an adenocarcinoma: 48 pT1, 43 pT2, and 16 pT3. Comparing pre- and postoperative data, histological discrepancy was 20% and staging discrepancy was 34%. Mortality was nil, morbidity was 9%. Mean follow-up was 54.2 months (range = 12-164), follow-up rate was 100%. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 85.9, 78.4, and 49.4% for pT1, pT2, and pT3, respectively (p = 0.006). Recurrence rate was 0% (0/26) in pT1sm1 cancers and 22.7% (5/22) in sm2-3 (p < 0.05). A submucosal infiltration represented a significant risk factor for recurrences: 0% sm1, 16.7% sm2, and 30% sm3. Recurrence in pT2 was 0% in patients who had neoadjuvant therapy and 26% in the others. At univariate analysis, diameter, sm stage, pT stage, tumor grading, margin infiltration, and lymphovascular invasion demonstrated statistical significance. Multivariate analysis indicated sm stage, pT stage, and tumor grading as independent predictors of recurrence.

Conclusions: TEM represents an effective curative treatment for pT1 sm1 rectal malignancies. pT1 sm2-3 patients should be considered high-risk cases if treated only by TEM. A consistent improvement in the preoperative assessment of the risk factors identified by the present study will be a crucial development for optimal treatment of early rectal cancers.

References

    1. World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Aug 15;10(16):2444-6
    1. Ann Surg. 2005 Aug;242(2):212-23
    1. Ann Surg. 2000 Mar;231(3):345-51
    1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1255-65
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Apr;51(4):379-84; discussion 384
    1. Dig Surg. 2005;22(3):182-9; discussion 189-90
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1986 Apr;1(2):79-84
    1. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jun;54(76):1102-6
    1. World J Surg. 2002 Sep;26(9):1170-4
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Nov;52(11):1831-6
    1. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994 Oct;2(5):247-50
    1. Chirurg. 1984 Oct;55(10):677-80
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Sep 20;26(27):4466-72
    1. Colorectal Dis. 2000 Sep;2(5):252-63
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Oct;34(10):880-5
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Oct;68(4 Suppl):S3-47
    1. Br J Surg. 1973 Sep;60(9):688-95
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6 Suppl):S3-43
    1. Br J Surg. 2009 Mar;96(3):280-90
    1. Br J Surg. 2005 Dec;92(12):1546-52
    1. Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):445-9
    1. Tech Coloproctol. 2009 Sep;13(3):231-6
    1. Tech Coloproctol. 2009 Jun;13(2):105-11
    1. Ann Surg. 2003 Mar;237(3):335-42
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Mar;50(3):292-301
    1. Br J Surg. 1983 Aug;70(8):460-2
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003 May;18(3):230-3
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Apr;48(4):711-9; discussion 719-21
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1973 Nov-Dec;16(6):508-14
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Aug;43(8):1064-71; discussion 1071-4
    1. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1233-40
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 1;20(3):817-25
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jul;48(7):1380-8

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner