Assessment of physical activity: a critical appraisal

Klaas R Westerterp, Klaas R Westerterp

Abstract

Assessment of physical activity in a free-living environment is important for understanding relations between physical activity and health and determining the effectiveness of interventions. Techniques include behavioral observation, questionnaires in the form of diaries, recall questionnaires and interviews, and physiological markers like heart rate, calorimetry, and motion sensors. The doubly labeled water method has become the gold standard for the validation of field methods of assessing physical activity. Then, questionnaires show a low reliability and validity but can be adequately applied as an activity-ranking instrument. The heart rate requires individual calibration to be an effective method to assess physical activity only at group level. The indicated method for the assessment of habitual physical activity in daily life is a doubly labeled water validated accelerometer. Future developments are simultaneous measurement of body acceleration and heart rate for the assessment of physical fitness. A new generation of accelerometers will provide information on body posture and activity recognition to allow objective assessment of subjects' habitual activities, options for a healthy change, and effects of the follow-up of any changes.

References

    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994 Nov;60(5):676-81
    1. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2008 Jan;12(1):20-6
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Aug;38(8):1396-401
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Aug;81(2):1019-26
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Jul;84(1):230-6
    1. Public Health Rep. 1985 Mar-Apr;100(2):126-31
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 May;36(5):883-9
    1. Public Health Nutr. 2003 Jun;6(4):407-13
    1. Public Health Nutr. 2005 Oct;8(7A):968-93
    1. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 Feb;50(2):72-92
    1. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005 Mar;29(3):302-9
    1. Ann Hum Biol. 2008 Jul-Aug;35(4):416-21
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jul;82(1):13-20
    1. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1981;69 Pt C:37-46
    1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Jan;49(1):28-35
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Nov;33(11):1959-67
    1. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006 Jan;10(1):156-67
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S498-504
    1. Physiol Behav. 2008 Mar 18;93(4-5):1039-43
    1. Obes Res. 2003 Jan;11(1):33-40
    1. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Aug;32(8):1256-63
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 May;37(5):872-6
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Mar;32(3):642-6
    1. J Biomech. 2008;41(7):1398-406
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Aug;56(2):343-52
    1. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Jan;26(1):111-8
    1. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Jun;32(6):1031-3
    1. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Dec 03;4:62
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Jul;52(1):59-65
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Aug;29(8):1062-8
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Nov;31(11 Suppl):S522-5
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S442-9
    1. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Oct;15(10):2371-9
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Aug;38(8):1510-4
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Mar;96(5):517-24
    1. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1996 May;36(5):385-96
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1374-80
    1. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Dec;15(12):3031-8
    1. Nature. 2001 Mar 29;410(6828):539
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;55(4):392-9
    1. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003 Aug;62(3):645-50
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Dec;82(6):1253-9
    1. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Mar;59(3):376-83
    1. Br J Sports Med. 2003 Jun;37(3):197-206; discussion 206

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner