Patient perceptions and recall of consent for regional anaesthesia compared with consent for surgery

Roxaneh Zarnegar, Matthew R D Brown, Matthew Henley, Victoria Tidman, Ahilan Pathmanathan, Roxaneh Zarnegar, Matthew R D Brown, Matthew Henley, Victoria Tidman, Ahilan Pathmanathan

Abstract

Objective: In Britain, consent for surgery is documented using a Department of Health form signed by the surgeon and the patient. In contrast, anaesthetic procedures have no formalised consent process. Evidence on the process of consent for regional anaesthesia, and patient perceptions of this, is scarce outside obstetric practice. We aimed to determine patient recall and perceptions of consent for interscalene brachial plexus block and compared this to surgical consent for shoulder arthroplasty.

Design: Prospective observational survey.

Setting: A specialist musculoskeletal centre, UK.

Participants: Forty-six patients (female:male 30:16, mean age 61 years) undergoing shoulder arthroplasty with interscalene brachial plexus block.

Main outcome measures: Recall and understanding of consent for regional anaesthesia and surgery was examined using a semi-structured questionnaire 1-2 days after arthroplasty. Surgical consent forms and discussions recorded by the anaesthetist were examined in participants' medical notes to compare against the level of recall. Analysis to determine statistical significance was conducted using McNemar's test.

Results: Recall of surgical risks was overall significantly better than recall of brachial plexus block risks. Compared to their recollections of surgical risk, patients remembered fewer specific risks for brachial plexus block (p < 0.001). There were more patients unable to recall any risks when questioned about brachial plexus block than about their surgery (p < 0.05). One-third of patients did not regard the consent discussion about regional anaesthesia as important as consent for surgery and over one-quarter had not recognised the preoperative discussion about the brachial plexus block as a consent process similar to that conducted for surgery.

Conclusions: Fundamental misunderstandings about the consent process are prevalent. Future work in this area should seek to investigate how documentation of the consent process and patients' understanding of consent for regional anaesthesia can be improved.

Keywords: consent; intercalene brachial plexus block; regional anaesthesia.

© The Royal Society of Medicine.

References

    1. Eyal N. Informed consent. In: Zalta EN (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 edition). See .
    1. Singh A, Kelly C, O’Brien T, Wilson J, Warner JJP. Ultrasound-guided interscalene block anesthesia for shoulder arthroscopy: a prospective study of 1319 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 2040–2046.
    1. Lenters TR, Davies J, Matsen F. The types and severity of complications associated with interscalene brachial plexus block anesthesia: local and national evidence. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2007; 16: 379–387.
    1. Department of Health of the United Kingdom. Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment, 2nd edn London: Department of Health, 2009.
    1. The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Consent for Anaesthesia. London: The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, 2006.
    1. Campbell B. New consent forms issued by the Department of Health. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2004; 86: 457–458.
    1. Sherlock A, Brownie S. Patients’ recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review. ANZ J Surg 2014; 84: 207–210.
    1. Bierstein K. Informed consent and the Medicare Interpretive Guidelines. ASA News 2006; 70: 13–14.
    1. Elfant AB, Korn C, Mendez L, Pello MJ, Peikin SR. Recall of informed consent after endoscopic procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 1–3.
    1. Turner P, Williams C. Informed consent: patients listen and read, but what information do they retain? N Z Med J 2002; 115: U218–U218.
    1. Akkad A, Jackson C, Kenyon S, Dixon-Woods M, Taub N, Habiba M. Patients’ perceptions of written consent: questionnaire study. BMJ 2006; 333: 528–528.
    1. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Gauger V. Parental recall of anesthesia information: informing the practice of informed consent. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 918–923.
    1. Rosique I, Pérez-Cárceles MD, Romero-Martín M, Osuna E, Luna A. The use and usefulness of information for patients undergoing anaesthesia. Med Law 2006; 25: 715–727.
    1. White SM. Consent for anaesthesia. J Med Ethics 2004; 30: 286–290.
    1. Braun AR, Leslie K, Merry AF, Story D. What are we telling our patients? A survey of risk disclosure for anaesthesia in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 935–938.
    1. Jamjoom AAB, White S, Walton SM, Hardman JG, Moppett IK. Anaesthetists’ and surgeons' attitudes towards informed consent in the UK: an observational study. BMC Med Ethics 2010; 11: 2–2.
    1. O’leary C. Informed consent for anesthesia: has the time come for a separate written consent document? ASA News 2006; 70: 11–12.
    1. Marco AP. Informed consent for surgical anesthesia care: has the time come for separate consent? Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 280–282.
    1. White SM, Baldwin TJ. Consent for anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 760–774.
    1. Waisel DB, Lamiani G, Sandrock NJ, Pascucci R, Truog RD, Meyer EC. Anesthesiology trainees face ethical, practical, and relational challenges in obtaining informed consent. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 480–486.
    1. Braun AR, Skene L, Merry AF. Informed consent for anaesthesia in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 809–822.
    1. Brull R, McCartney CJL, Chan VWS, et al. Disclosure of risks associated with regional anesthesia: a survey of academic regional anesthesiologists. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2007; 32: 7–11.
    1. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. Guidelines on Consent for Anaesthesia or Sedation. ANZCA Professional Document PS26. Melbourne: ANZCA, 2005.
    1. American Association of Nurse Anesthetists. Informed Consent in Anesthesia. Park Ridge, IL: AANA, 2004.
    1. Sahin N, Oztürk A, Ozkan Y, Demirhan Erdemir A. What do patients recall from informed consent given before orthopedic surgery? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010; 44: 469–475.
    1. Akkad A, Jackson C, Kenyon S, Dixon-Woods M, Taub N, Habiba M. Informed consent for elective and emergency surgery: questionnaire study. BJOG 2004; 111: 1133–1138.
    1. Tait AR, Teig MK, Voepel-Lewis T. Informed consent for anesthesia: a review of practice and strategies for optimizing the consent process. Can J Anesth 2014; 61: 832–842.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner