Examining the psychosocial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: an international cross-sectional study protocol

Sandila Tanveer, Philip J Schluter, Richard J Porter, Joseph Boden, Ben Beaglehole, Ruqayya Sulaiman-Hill, Shaystah Dean, Romana Bell, Wafaa N Al-Hussainni, Maliheh Arshi, Amer Siddiq Amer Nordin, Mehmet Dinç, Mussarat Jabeen Khan, Mohammad Sabzi Khoshnami, Muthana A Majid Al-Masoodi, Amir Moghanibashi-Mansourieh, Sara Noruzi, Anggi Rahajeng, Shaista Shaikh, Nisa Tanveer, Feyza Topçu, Saadet Yapan, Irfan Yunianto, Lori A Zoellner, Caroline Bell, Sandila Tanveer, Philip J Schluter, Richard J Porter, Joseph Boden, Ben Beaglehole, Ruqayya Sulaiman-Hill, Shaystah Dean, Romana Bell, Wafaa N Al-Hussainni, Maliheh Arshi, Amer Siddiq Amer Nordin, Mehmet Dinç, Mussarat Jabeen Khan, Mohammad Sabzi Khoshnami, Muthana A Majid Al-Masoodi, Amir Moghanibashi-Mansourieh, Sara Noruzi, Anggi Rahajeng, Shaista Shaikh, Nisa Tanveer, Feyza Topçu, Saadet Yapan, Irfan Yunianto, Lori A Zoellner, Caroline Bell

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed people to significant and prolonged stress. The psychosocial impacts of the pandemic have been well recognised and reported in high-income countries (HICs) but it is important to understand the unique challenges posed by COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where limited international comparisons have been undertaken. This protocol was therefore devised to study the psychosocial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in seven LMICs using scales that had been designed for or translated for this purpose.

Methods and analysis: This cross-sectional study uses an online survey to administer a novel COVID Psychosocial Impacts Scale (CPIS) alongside established measures of psychological distress, post-traumatic stress, well-being and post-traumatic growth in the appropriate language. Participants will include adults aged 18 years and above, recruited from Indonesia, Iraq, Iran, Malaysia, Pakistan, Somalia and Turkey, with a pragmatic target sample size of 500 in each country.Data will be analysed descriptively on sociodemographic and study variables. In addition, CPIS will be analysed psychometrically (for reliability and validity) to assess the suitability of use in a given context. Finally, within-subjects and between-subjects analyses will be carried out using multi-level mixed-effect models to examine associations between key sociodemographic and study variables.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was granted by the Human Ethics Committee, University of Otago, New Zealand (Ref. No. 21/102). In addition, international collaborators obtained local authorisation or ethical approval in their respective host universities before data collection commenced.Participants will give informed consent before taking part. Data will be collected and stored securely on the University of Otago, New Zealand Qualtrics platform using an auto-generated non-identifiable letter-number string. Data will be available on reasonable request. Findings will be disseminated by publications in scientific journals and/or conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT05052333.

Keywords: COVID-19; MENTAL HEALTH; PUBLIC HEALTH.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. World Health Organization . Listings of WHO’s response to COVID-19. 2020. Available:
    1. World Health Organization . WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. n.d. Available:
    1. World Health Organization . The true death toll of COVID-19: estimating global excess mortality. n.d. Available:
    1. Pfefferbaum B, North CS. Mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med 2020;383:510–2. 10.1056/NEJMp2008017
    1. Bell C, Beaglehole B, Bell R, et al. . Learning from previous disasters: potential pitfalls of epidemiological psychosocial research in the COVID-19 environment. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2021;55:646–9. 10.1177/0004867421998783
    1. Akan Y. Development of the “COVID-19 Psychological Impact Scale”: a validity and reliability study. Curr Psychol 2022:1–10. 10.1007/s12144-022-02760-5
    1. Fernández RS, Crivelli L, Guimet NM, et al. . Psychological distress and mental health trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina: a longitudinal study. Sci Rep 2022;12:5632. 10.1038/s41598-022-09663-2
    1. Every-Palmer S, Jenkins M, Gendall P, et al. . Psychological distress, anxiety, family violence, suicidality, and wellbeing in New Zealand during the COVID-19 lockdown: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2020;15:e0241658. 10.1371/journal.pone.0241658
    1. Van Rheenen TE, Meyer D, Neill E, et al. . Mental health status of individuals with a mood-disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: initial results from the COLLATE project. J Affect Disord 2020;275:69–77. 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.037
    1. Bell C, Williman J, Beaglehole B, et al. . Challenges facing essential workers: a cross-sectional survey of the subjective mental health and well-being of New Zealand healthcare and “other” essential workers during the COVID-19 lockdown. BMJ Open 2021;11:e048107. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048107
    1. Chew NWS, Lee GKH, Tan BYQ, et al. . A multinational, multicentre study on the psychological outcomes and associated physical symptoms amongst healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak. Brain Behav Immun 2020;88:559–65. 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.049
    1. Krishnamoorthy Y, Nagarajan R, Saya GK, et al. . Prevalence of psychological morbidities among general population, healthcare workers and COVID-19 patients amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res 2020;293:113382. 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113382
    1. Bell C, Williman J, Beaglehole B, et al. . Psychological distress, loneliness, alcohol use and suicidality in New Zealanders with mental illness during a strict COVID-19 lockdown. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2022;56:800–10. 10.1177/00048674211034317
    1. Iasevoli F, Fornaro M, D’Urso G, et al. . Psychological distress in patients with serious mental illness during the COVID-19 outbreak and one-month mass quarantine in Italy. Psychol Med 2021;51:1054–6. 10.1017/S0033291720001841
    1. Cénat JM, Blais-Rochette C, Kokou-Kpolou CK, et al. . Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res 2021;295:113599. 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113599
    1. COVID-Minds . Recommended scales. 2020. Available:
    1. Ahorsu DK, Lin C-Y, Imani V, et al. . The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: development and initial validation. Int J Ment Health Addict 2022;20:1537–45. 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8
    1. The CoRonavIruS health Impact Survey . CRISIS V0.1. 2020. Available:
    1. Lee SA. Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: a brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety. Death Stud 2020;44:393–401. 10.1080/07481187.2020.1748481
    1. Silva WAD, de Sampaio Brito TR, Pereira CR. COVID-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS): development and psychometric properties. Curr Psychol 2022;41:5693–702. 10.1007/s12144-020-01195-0
    1. COVID-Minds . The psychological impact of COVID-19. 2020. Available:
    1. Beaglehole B, Williman J, Bell C, et al. . Thriving in a pandemic: determinants of excellent wellbeing among New Zealanders during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown; a cross-sectional survey. PLoS One 2022;17:e0262745. 10.1371/journal.pone.0262745
    1. Jenkins M, Hoek J, Jenkin G, et al. . Silver linings of the COVID-19 lockdown in New Zealand. PLoS One 2021;16:e0249678. 10.1371/journal.pone.0249678
    1. Généreux M, Schluter PJ, Hung KK, et al. . One virus, four continents, eight countries: an interdisciplinary and international study on the psychosocial impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic among adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:22. 10.3390/ijerph17228390
    1. Chen SX, Ng JCK, Hui BPH, et al. . Dual impacts of coronavirus anxiety on mental health in 35 societies. Sci Rep 2021;11:8925. 10.1038/s41598-021-87771-1
    1. Cénat JM, Noorishad P-G, Kokou-Kpolou CK, et al. . Prevalence and correlates of depression during the COVID-19 pandemic and the major role of stigmatization in low- and middle-income countries: a multinational cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Res 2021;297:113714. 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113714
    1. Tee M, Wang C, Tee C, et al. . Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health in lower and upper middle-income Asian countries: a comparison between the Philippines and China. Front Psychiatry 2020;11:568929. 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.568929
    1. Fergusson DM, Boden JM, Horwood LJ, et al. . Perceptions of distress and positive consequences following exposure to a major disaster amongst a well-studied cohort. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2015;49:351–9. 10.1177/0004867414560652
    1. McLeod GFH, Horwood LJ, Fergusson DM, et al. . Life-stress and reactivity by gender in a longitudinal birth cohort at 30 and 35 years. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2016;51:1385–94. 10.1007/s00127-016-1254-z
    1. Sulaiman-Hill R, Porter R, Tanveer S, et al. . Psychosocial impacts on the Christchurch Muslim community following the 15 March terrorist attacks: a mixed-methods study protocol. BMJ Open 2021;11:e055413. 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055413
    1. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. J Psychosom Res 1967;11:213–8. 10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4
    1. Theiner G. A beginner’s guide to group minds. In: Sprevak M, Kallestrup J, eds. New Waves in Philosophy of Mind. New Waves in Philosophy. London Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 10.1057/9781137286734_15
    1. Tanveer S, Schluter PJ, Beaglehole B, et al. . n.d. The COVID Psychosocial Impacts Scale: a reliable and valid tool to examine the psychosocial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health (Submitted)
    1. Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, et al. . Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:184–9. 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184
    1. Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, et al. . The WHO-5 well-being index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom 2015;84:167–76. 10.1159/000376585
    1. Andrews G, Slade T. Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Aust N Z J Public Health 2001;25:494–7. 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00310.x
    1. Weathers FW, Litz BT, Keane TM, et al. . The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) – standard measurement instrument. The National Center for PTSD 2013.
    1. Tedeschi RG, Cann A, Taku K, et al. . The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: a revision integrating existential and spiritual change. J Trauma Stress 2017;30:11–8. 10.1002/jts.22155
    1. IBM Corp . IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, 2021.
    1. StataCorp . Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC, 2021.
    1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. . The STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:1453–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
    1. Pye V, Taylor N, Clay-Williams R, et al. . When is enough, enough? understanding and solving your sample size problems in health services research. BMC Res Notes 2016;9:90. 10.1186/s13104-016-1893-x
    1. Ammar A, Mueller P, Trabelsi K, et al. . Psychological consequences of COVID-19 home confinement: the ECLB-COVID19 multicenter study. PLoS One 2020;15:e0240204. 10.1371/journal.pone.0240204
    1. TMGH-Global COVID-19 Collaborative . Perceived stress of quarantine and isolation during COVID-19 pandemic: a global survey. Front Psychiatry 2021;12:656664. 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.656664
    1. Généreux M, Schluter PJ, Landaverde E, et al. . The evolution in anxiety and depression with the progression of the pandemic in adult populations from eight countries and four continents. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:4845. 10.3390/ijerph18094845
    1. Schluter PJ, Généreux M, Landaverde E, et al. . An eight country cross-sectional study of the psychosocial effects of COVID-19 induced quarantine and/or isolation during the pandemic. Sci Rep 2022;12:13175. 10.1038/s41598-022-16254-8

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner