Goal Setting with ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) and Multidisciplinary Team Approach in Stroke Rehabilitation

Matilde Leonardi, Klemens Fheodoroff, Thomas Platz, Matilde Leonardi, Klemens Fheodoroff, Thomas Platz

Excerpt

Stroke-associated impairments display a wide variety of clinical signs and symptoms. Therefore, a multidisciplinary team with different experts working closely together is necessary for effective stroke rehabilitation.

In rehabilitation of stroke patients, a holistic view on functioning and disability is necessary to establish an individualized and comprehensive treatment program. The WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a common language to describe individual functioning in a given context suitable for a shared documentation system.

Goal setting has become a central component of effective communication and decision-making in rehabilitation practice, both as part of the process and as a person-centred outcome measure for stroke rehabilitation. Nevertheless, agreed standards on goal setting and evaluation still need to be defined.

Here, we highlight some aspects with relevance for multidisciplinary team building and coordination and for using the ICF in the context of stroke rehabilitation; how to describe individual levels of functioning and disability and to set treatment goals as well as to identify barriers and facilitators to individual functioning and health.

Copyright 2021, The Author(s).

References

    1. ANPT (2015) ANPT outcome measures recommendations (EDGE) [online]. Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy, Alexandria, VA. . Accessed 14 Jan 2019
    1. Ashford SJ, de Stobbeleir KEM (2013) Feedback, goal setting, and task performance revisited. In: Locke EA, Latham GP (eds) New developments in goal setting and task performance, 1st edn. Routledge, New York, London
    1. Ashford S, Turner-Stokes L (2006) Goal attainment for spasticity management using botulinum toxin. Physiother Res Int 11:24–34
    1. Ayerbe L, Ayis S, Wolfe CD, Rudd AG (2013) Natural history, predictors and outcomes of depression after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 202(1):14–21. .
    1. Bandura A (2010) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman, New York
    1. Bandura A (2013) The role of self-efficacy in goal-based motivation. In: Locke EA, Latham GP (eds) New developments in goal setting and task performance, 1st edn. Routledge, New York, London
    1. Brands IM, Wade DT, Stapert SZ, Van Heugten CM (2012) The adaptation process following acute onset disability: an interactive two-dimensional approach applied to acquired brain injury. Clin Rehabil 26:840–852
    1. Brands I, Stapert S, Kohler S, Wade D, Van Heugten C (2014) Life goal attainment in the adaptation process after acquired brain injury: the influence of self-efficacy and of flexibility and tenacity in goal pursuit. Clin Rehabil 29:611–622
    1. Braun JP, Mende H, Bause H, Bloos F, Geldner G, Kastrup M, Kuhlen R, Markewitz A, Martin J, Quintel M, Steinmeier-Bauer K, Waydhas C, Spies C, NEQUI (2010) Quality indicators in intensive care medicine: why? Use or burden for the intensivist. Ger Med Sci 8:Doc22
    1. Brown M, Levack W, McPherson KM, Dean SG, Reed K, Weatherall M, Taylor WJ (2013) Survival, momentum, and things that make me “me”: patients’ perceptions of goal setting after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 36:1020–1026
    1. Cerniauskaite M, Quintas R, Boldt C, Raggi A, Cieza A, Bickenbach JE, Leonardi M (2011) Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2009: its use, implementation and operationalisation. Disabil Rehabil 33:281–309
    1. Cianci AM, Schaubroeck JM, Mcgill GA (2010) Achievement goals, feedback, and task performance. Hum Perform 23:131–154
    1. Cieza A, Ewert T, Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G (2004) Development of ICF core sets for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med:9–11
    1. Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, Prodinger B (2016) Refinements of the ICF linking rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil:1–10
    1. Cytrynbaum S, Ginath Y, Birdwell J, Brandt L (1979) Goal attainment scaling:a critical review. Eval Q 3:5–40
    1. Epping-Jordan JE, Pruitt SD, Bengoa R, Wagner EH (2004) Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions. Qual Saf Health Care 13:299–305
    1. Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos J, Almansa J, Nieto M, Chatterji S, Vilagut G, Alonso J, Cieza A, Svetskova O, Burger H, Racca V, Francescutti C, Vieta E, Kostanjsek N, Raggi A, Leonardi M, Ferrer M, CONSORTIUM, M (2010) Validation of the “World Health Organization disability assessment schedule, WHODAS-2” in patients with chronic diseases. Health Qual Life Outcomes 8:51
    1. Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, Kostanjsek N, Ring H, Stucki G (2004) ICF core sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med:135–141
    1. Hurn J, Kneebone I, Cropley M (2006) Goal setting as an outcome measure: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 20:756–772
    1. Kerr S, Lepelley D (2013) Stretch goals: risks, possibilities, and best practices. In: Locke EA, Latham GP (eds) New developments in goal setting and task performance, 1st edn. Routledge, New York, London
    1. Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE (1968) Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J 4:443–453
    1. Levack WM, Weatherall M, Hay-Smith EJ, Dean SG, McPherson K, Siegert RJ (2015) Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit for adults with acquired disability participating in rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD009727
    1. Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
    1. Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. Am Psychol 57:705–717
    1. Locke EA, Latham GP (2013a) Goal setting theory: the current state. In: Locke EA, Latham GP (eds) New developments in goal setting and task performance, 1st edn. Routledge, New York, London
    1. Locke EA, Latham GP (2013b) New developments in goal setting and task performance. London, Routledge, New York
    1. Maribo T, Petersen KS, Handberg C, Melchiorsen H, Momsen AM, Nielsen CV, Leonardi M, Labriola M (2016) Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2013 in the Nordic countries focusing on clinical and rehabilitation context. J Clin Med Res 8:1–9
    1. McPherson K, Kayes N, Kersten P (2014) MEANING as a smarter approach to goals in rehabilitation. In: Siegert RJ, Levack WMM (eds) Rehabilitation goal setting: theory, practice and evidence. Taylor & Francis Group, London
    1. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2009). Levels of Evidence (March 2009). Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. . Accessed 20.09.2020.
    1. Palmer K, Marengoni A, Forjaz MJ, Jureviciene E, Laatikainen T, Mammarella F, Muth C, Navickas R, Prados-Torres A, Rijken M, Rothe U, Souchet L, Valderas J, Vontetsianos T, Zaletel J, Onder G, Joint Action on Chronic, D. & Promoting Healthy Ageing Across the life, C (2018) Multimorbidity care model: recommendations from the consensus meeting of the joint action on chronic diseases and Promoting healthy ageing across the life cycle (JA-CHRODIS). Health Policy 122:4–11
    1. Plant SE, Tyson SF, Kirk S, Parsons J (2016) What are the barriers and facilitators to goal-setting during rehabilitation for stroke and other acquired brain injuries? A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Clin Rehabil 30:921–930
    1. Platz T (2017). Practice guidelines in neurorehabilitation. Neurology International Open. 1(3): E148–E152.
    1. Raggi A, Leonardi M, Cabello M, Bickenbach JE (2010) Application of ICF in clinical settings across Europe. Disabil Rehabil 32(Suppl 1):S17–S22
    1. Rosewilliam S, Roskell CA, Pandyan AD (2011) A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 25:501–514
    1. Schlote A, Richter M, Wunderlich MT, Poppendick U, Möller C, Schwelm K, Wallesch CW (2009) WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives. Disabil Rehabil 31:855–864
    1. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors (2013) GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October 2013. The GRADE Working Group. Available from
    1. Scobbie L, Dixon D, Wyke S (2011) Goal setting and action planning in the rehabilitation setting: developed and implemented a theory-based Goal setting and Action Planning framework. Clin Rehabil 25:468–482
    1. Scobbie L et al (2013) Implementing a framework for goal setting in community based stroke rehabilitation: a process evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res 13(1):190
    1. Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R, Scholz U, Schüz B (2005) Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: theory and assessment. Eur J Soc Psychol 35:565–576
    1. Sniehotta FF, Presseau J, Allan J, Araujo-Soares V (2016) “you Can’t always get what you want”: a novel research paradigm to explore the relationship between multiple intentions and behaviours. Appl Psychol Health Well Being 8(2):258–275
    1. Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Herrin JS, Bowen SE, Stevens AB, Uomoto J (2005) Team functioning and patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:403–409
    1. Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Stevens AB, Uomoto JM, Herrin J, Bowen SE, Burridge AB (2008) Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:10–15
    1. Stroke Unit Trialists C (2013) Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013(9):CD000197
    1. Sugavanam T, Mead G, Bulley C, Donaghy M, Van Wijck F (2013) The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation—a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 35:177–190
    1. Teasell R, Hussein N (2016) Background concepts in stroke rehabilitation. In: Teasell R, Foley N, Hussein N, Speechley M (eds) Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation, 17th edn. London, Ontario, Canada, Sockit Solutions
    1. Teasell R, Foley N, Hussein N, Cotoi A (2016a) The efficacy of stroke rehabilitation. In: Teasell R, Richardson M, Allen L, Hussein N (eds) Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation, 17th edn. London, Sockit Solutions
    1. Teasell R, Foley N, Hussein N, Speechley M (2016b) The elements of stroke rehabilitation. In: Teasell R, Foley N, Hussein N, Speechley M (eds) Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation, 17th edn. London, Ontario, Canada, Sockit Solutions
    1. Tempest S, Harries P, Kilbride C, De Souza L (2012) To adopt is to adapt: the process of implementing the ICF with an acute stroke multidisciplinary team in England. Disabil Rehabil 34:1686–1694
    1. Tempest S, Harries P, Kilbride C, De Souza L (2013) Enhanced clarity and holism: the outcome of implementing the ICF with an acute stroke multidisciplinary team in England. Disabil Rehabil 35:1921–1925
    1. Tennant A (2007) Goal attainment scaling: current methodological challenges. Disabil Rehabil 29:1583–1588
    1. Turner-Stokes L (2009) Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil 23:362–370
    1. Turner-Stokes L, Williams H (2010) Goal attainment scaling: a direct comparison of alternative rating methods. Clin Rehabil 24:66–73
    1. Turner-Stokes L, Williams H, Johnson J (2009) Goal attainment scaling: does it provide added value as a person-centred measure for evaluation of outcome in neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury? J Rehabil Med 41:528–535
    1. Tyson S, Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R (2010) The use of measurement tools in clinical practice: an observational study of neurorehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 24:74–81
    1. Tyson SF, Burton L, McGovern A (2014a) Multi-disciplinary team meetings in stroke rehabilitation: an observation study and conceptual framework. Clin Rehabil 28:1237–1247
    1. Tyson SF, Burton LJ, McGovern A, Sharifi S (2014b) Service users’ views of the assessment process in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 28:824–831
    1. Tyson SF, Burton L, McGovern A (2015) The effect of a structured model for stroke rehabilitation multi-disciplinary team meetings on functional recovery and productivity: a phase I/II proof of concept study. Clin Rehabil 29:920–925
    1. UN (2007) Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. United Nations, New York
    1. Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J, Saxena S, Von Korff M, Pull C, Project, W. N. J (2010) Developing the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ 88:815–823
    1. Wade DT (2009) Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clin Rehabil 23:291–295
    1. Wagner EH (1998) Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract 1:2–4
    1. Wagle J, Farner L, Flekkøy K, Wyller T, Sandvik L, Fure B, et al (2011). Early post-stroke cognition in stroke rehabilitation patients predicts functional outcome at 13 months. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders 31;379–387.
    1. WHO (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. World Health Organization, Geneva
    1. WHO (2017) International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI) - Beta [online]. World Health Organisation (WHO), Geneva. . Accessed 11 Dec 2018
    1. WHO & UNESCO (2010) Community-based rehabilitation: CBR guidelines. World Health Organization, Geneva
    1. Wood JP, Connelly DM, Maly MR (2010) ‘Getting back to real living’: a qualitative study of the process of community reintegration after stroke. Clin Rehabil 24:1045–1056
    1. Wood RE, Whelan J, Sojo V, Wong M (2013) Goals, goal orientations, strategies, and performance. In: Locke EA, Latham GP (eds) New developments in goal setting and task performance, 1st edn. Routledge, New York, London
    1. Woodman P, Riazi A, Pereira C, Jones F (2014) Social participation post stroke: a meta-ethnographic review of the experiences and views of community-dwelling stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil 36:2031–2043
    1. Yen T-H, Liou T-H, Chang K-H, Wu N-N, Chou L-C, Chen H-C (2014) Systematic review of ICF core set from 2001 to 2012. Disabil Rehabil 36:177–184

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner