Short-term outcomes of a COVID-adapted triage pathway for colorectal cancer detection

Janice Miller, Yasuko Maeda, Stephanie Au, Frances Gunn, Lorna Porteous, Rebecca Pattenden, Peter MacLean, Colin L Noble, Stephen Glancy, Malcolm G Dunlop, Farhat V N Din, Janice Miller, Yasuko Maeda, Stephanie Au, Frances Gunn, Lorna Porteous, Rebecca Pattenden, Peter MacLean, Colin L Noble, Stephen Glancy, Malcolm G Dunlop, Farhat V N Din

Abstract

Aim: The dramatic curtailment of endoscopy and CT colonography capacity during the coronavirus pandemic has adversely impacted timely diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). We describe a rapidly implemented COVID-adapted diagnostic pathway to mitigate risk and maximize cancer diagnosis in patients referred with symptoms of suspected CRC.

Method: The 'COVID-adapted pathway' integrated multiple quantitative faecal immunochemical tests (qFIT) to enrich for significant colorectal disease with judicious use of CT with oral contrast to detect gross pathology. Patients reporting 'high-risk' symptoms were triaged to qFIT+CT and the remainder underwent an initial qFIT to inform subsequent investigation. Demographic and clinical data were prospectively collected. Outcomes comprised cancer detection frequency.

Results: Overall, 422 patients (median age 64 years, 220 women) were triaged using this pathway. Most (84.6%) were referred as 'urgent suspicious of cancer'. Of the 422 patients, 202 (47.9%) were triaged to CT and qFIT, 211 (50.0%) to qFIT only, eight (1.9%) to outpatient clinic and one to colonoscopy. Fifteen (3.6%) declined investigation and seven (1.7%) were deemed unfit. We detected 13 cancers (3.1%), similar to the mean cancer detection rate from all referrals in 2017-2019 (3.3%). Compared with the period 1 April-31 May in 2017-2019, we observed a 43% reduction in all primary care referrals (1071 referrals expected reducing to 609).

Conclusion: This COVID-adapted pathway mitigated the adverse effects on diagnostic capacity and detected cancer at the expected rate within those referred. However, the overall reduction in the number of referrals was substantial. The described risk-mitigating measures could be a useful adjunct whilst standard diagnostic services remain constrained due to the ongoing pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; colorectal cancer; faecal immunochemical tests; qFIT; triage.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

© 2021 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
NHS Lothian COVID‐adapted colorectal cancer pathway. Patients were triaged by colorectal consultants with information provided from general practice (GP). They proceeded through the pathway in a step‐wise fashion being stratified by quantitative faecal immunochemical test (qFIT) results (CRC, colorectal cancer; CT, computed tomography scan; IDA, iron deficiency anaemia; OPD, outpatient department; USOC, urgent suspected of cancer)
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Flow of patients through the pathway leading to cancer diagnosis. Patients were diagnosed through a variety of routes, the maximal yield coming from those who had both initial CT and quantitative faecal immunochemical test (qFIT) testing. With 50% being diagnosed from the outpatient clinic, the initial referral examination was deemed to be of great importance
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Distribution of double quantitative faecal immunochemical test (qFIT) results. Double qFIT testing showed variability of results. Eighty‐four per cent of patients had both results 80 μg/g and a further 8% had two results >80 μg/g. There were two cancers diagnosed in those with two qFITs 400 μg/g (USOC, urgent suspected of cancer)
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Distribution of quantitative faecal immunochemical test (qFIT) results and overall outcome. The majority of patients had an undetected qFIT result. Despite this three cancers were diagnosed within this group
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Number of referrals by priority 2017–2019. There was a marked decrease in the total number of referrals during the pandemic, with an increase in the number of ‘urgent suspected of cancer’ referrals (qFIT, quantitative faecal immunochemical test)

References

    1. Sud A, Jones M, Broggio J, Loveday C, Torr B, Garrett A, et al. Collateral damage: the impact on outcomes from cancer surgery of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(8):1065–74.
    1. Sud A, Jones M, Broggio J, Scott S, Loveday C, Torr B, et al. Quantifying and mitigating the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on outcomes in colorectal cancer. Gut (accepted). 2020.
    1. Gu J, Han B, Wang J. COVID‐19: gastrointestinal manifestations and potential fecal‐oral transmission. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(6):1518–9.
    1. Song Y, Liu X, Chu Y, Zhang J, Xia J, Gao X, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 induced diarrhoea as onset symptom in patient with COVID‐19. Gut. 2020;69(6):1143–4.
    1. Zhang J, Wang S, Xue Y. Fecal specimen diagnosis 2019 novel coronavirus‐infected pneumonia. J Med Virol. 2020;92(6):680–2.
    1. Xiao F, Tang M, Zheng X, Liu Y, Xiaofeng L, Shan H. Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS‐CoV‐2. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(6):1831–3.
    1. British Society of Gastroenterology . Endoscopy activity and COVID‐19: BSG and JAG guidance; 2020. [accessed 16 June 2020]. Available from:
    1. Joint ACPGBI . BSG and BSGAR considerations for adapting the rapid access colorectal cancer pathway during COVID‐19 pandemic [accessed 16 June 2020]; 2020. Available from:
    1. CT Colonography Activity and Covid‐19: British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology guidance; 2020. Available from:
    1. Hamilton W, Walter F, Rubin G, Neal R. Improving early diagnosis of symptomatic cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13(12):740–9.
    1. Pickhardt P, Hassan C, Halligan S, Marmo R. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection–systematic review and meta‐analysis. Radiology. 2011;259:393–405.
    1. Westwood M, Lang S, Armstrong N, van Turenhout S, Cubiella J, Stirk L, et al. Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) can help to rule out colorectal cancer in patients presenting in primary care with lower abdominal symptoms: a systematic review conducted to inform new NICE DG30 diagnostic guidance. BMC Med. 2017;15:189.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Quantitative faecal immunochemical tests to guide referral for colorectal cancer in primary care – diagnostics guidance [DG30]; 2017.
    1. Laszlo H, Seward E, Ayling R, Lake J, Malhi A, Hackshaw A, et al. Quantitative faecal immunochemical test for patients with ‘high risk’ bowel symptoms: a prospective cohort study. medrxiv. 2020.
    1. Maeda Y, Dunlop M, Din F. Risk mitigation for suspected colorectal cancer diagnostic pathway during COVID‐19 pandemic. Br J Surg. 2020;107(10):e361–2.
    1. New Scott Bowel Screen Test [accessed 22 July 2020]. Available from:
    1. Bell S, Crawford J, Gunn F, Miller J, Noble C, Dunlop M, et al. Nurse led telephone outreach for a COVID‐adapted suspected colorectal cancer pathway. Gastrointest Nurs. 2021;19(1):22–26.
    1. Whittaker K, Scott S, Winstanley K, MacLeod U, Wardle J. Attributions of cancer ‘alarm’ symptoms in a community sample. PLoS One. 2014;9:1–17.
    1. Forbes L, Simon A, Warburton F, Boniface D, Brain K, Dessaix A, et al. Differences in cancer awareness and beliefs between Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): do they contribute to differences in cancer survival? Br J Cancer. 2013;108(2):292–300.
    1. Llanwarne N, Newbould J, Burt J, Campbell J, Roland M. Wasting the doctor’s time? A video elicitation study with patients in primary care. Soc Sci Med. 2017;176:113–22.
    1. Syriopoulou E, Morris E, Finan P, Lambert P, Rutherford M. Understanding the impact of socioeconomic differences in colorectal cancer survival: potential gain in life‐years. Br J Cancer. 2019;120:1052–8.
    1. Sud A, Torr B, Broggio J, Scott S, Loveday C, Garrett A, et al. Effect of delays in the 2‐week‐wait cancer referral pathway during the COVID‐19 pandemic on cancer survival in the UK: a modelling study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(8):1035–44.
    1. Zhou Y, Abel G, Hamilton W, Pritchard‐Jones K, Gross C, Walter F, et al. Diagnosis of cancer as an emergency: a critical review of current evidence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;14(1):45–56.
    1. ACPGBI Legacy Working Group . Legacy of COVID‐19 ‐ the opportunity to enhance surgical services for patients with colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22(10):1219–28.
    1. D’Souza N, Delisle T, Chen M, Benton S, Abulafi M. Faecal immunochemical test is superior to symptoms in predicting pathology in patients with suspected colorectal cancer symptoms referred on a 2WW pathway: a diagnostic accuracy study. Gut. 2020.
    1. Matsuda T, Ikematsu H, Takamaru H, Oono Y, Mizuguchi Y, Sekiguchi M, et al. Stage‐ and site‐specific sensitivity of the fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal neoplasia – a prospective study. Intestine. 2019;23(5):441–8.
    1. CRUK . Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) [accessed 16 June 2020]. Available from:
    1. McDonald P, Digby J, Innes C, Strachan J, Carey F, Steele R, et al. Low faecal haemoglobin concentration potentially rules out significant colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(3):e151–9.
    1. Mowat C, Digby J, Strachan J, Wilson R, Carey F, Fraser C, et al. Faecal haemoglobin and faecal calprotectin as indicators of bowel disease in patients presenting to primary care with bowel symptoms. Gut. 2016;65(9):1463–9.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner