Validation of the novel Eosinophilic Esophagitis Impact Questionnaire

Eilish McCann, Mirna Chehade, Jonathan M Spergel, Andrew Yaworsky, Tara Symonds, Jonathan Stokes, Sarette T Tilton, Xian Sun, Siddhesh Kamat, Eilish McCann, Mirna Chehade, Jonathan M Spergel, Andrew Yaworsky, Tara Symonds, Jonathan Stokes, Sarette T Tilton, Xian Sun, Siddhesh Kamat

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has a detrimental effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The Eosinophilic Esophagitis Impact Questionnaire (EoE-IQ) is a novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure assessing the impact of EoE on HRQOL. To assess suitability of the EoE-IQ, its measurement properties were evaluated.

Methods: Using baseline and week 24 data from the pivotal, randomized, placebo-controlled, multinational phase 3 R668-EE-1774 trial (NCT03633617) of dupilumab, we evaluated EoE-IQ's measurement properties (including reliability, construct and known-groups validity, and ability to detect change) and established the threshold for change in scores that can be considered clinically meaningful.

Results: The analysis population comprised 239 adults and adolescents with EoE. Mean age was 28.1 (standard deviation, 13.14) years; 63.6% were male, and 90.4% were White. Reliability estimates for the EoE-IQ average score exceeded acceptable thresholds for patients who were stable as indicated by ratings of Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) and Change (PGIC) (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.75 and 0.81). Construct validity correlations with other EoE-specific PRO scores were moderate at baseline (|r|= 0.44-0.60) and moderate to strong at week 24 (|r|= 0.61-0.72). In known-groups analysis, EoE-IQ average score discriminated among groups of patients at varying EoE severity levels defined by PGIS scores. A ≥ 0.6-point reduction in EoE-IQ average score (where scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse HRQOL) from baseline to week 24 can be considered clinically meaningful.

Conclusions: The EoE-IQ's measurement properties are acceptable, making it a valid, reliable measure of the HRQOL impacts of EoE among adults and adolescents.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03633617. Registered August 14, 2018, https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03633617 .

Conflict of interest statement

STT is an employee of Sanofi Global and may hold stocks and/or shares in the company. EM, SK, and XS are employees of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and may hold shares and/or stock options in the company. AY is an employee of Adelphi Values who developed the EoE-IQ as part of research funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and JS was an employee of Adelphi Values at the time the research was conducted. TS is an employee of Clinical Outcomes Solutions, who conducted research used to further develop the EoE-IQ, as part of research funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. MC has received consultant fees from Regeneron, Allakos, Adare/Ellodi, Shire/Takeda, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Phathom, Nexstone Immunology, and Recludix Pharma and has received research funding from Regeneron, Allakos, Shire/Takeda, AstraZeneca, Adare/Ellodi, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Danone . JMS has grant support and consultant fees from Regeneron and Sanofi.

© 2023. The Author(s).

References

    1. Straumann A, Katzka DA. Diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(2):346–359. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.066.
    1. Mukkada V, Falk GW, Eichinger CS, King D, Todorova L, Shaheen NJ. Health-related quality of life and costs associated with eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(4):495–503.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.036.
    1. Stern E, Taft T, Zalewski A, Gonsalves N, Hirano I. Prospective assessment of disease-specific quality of life in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis. Dis Esophagus. 2018 doi: 10.1093/dote/dox128.
    1. Dellon ES, Hirano I. Epidemiology and natural history of eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(2):319–332 e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.067.
    1. Navarro P, Arias A, Arias-Gonzalez L, Laserna-Mendieta EJ, Ruiz-Ponce M, Lucendo AJ. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the growing incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults in population-based studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;49(9):1116–1125. doi: 10.1111/apt.15231.
    1. Taft TH, Kern E, Keefer L, Burstein D, Hirano I. Qualitative assessment of patient-reported outcomes in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45(9):769–774. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182166a5a.
    1. Miehlke S. Clinical features of Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;29(5):739–748. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.09.005.
    1. Lucendo AJ, Arias-González L, Molina-Infante J, Arias Á. Determinant factors of quality of life in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2018;6(1):38–45. doi: 10.1177/2050640617707095.
    1. Ahmed M. Eosinophilic esophagitis in adults: an update. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016;7(2):207–213. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.207.
    1. Lucendo AJ, Molina-Infante J, Arias A, von Arnim U, Bredenoord AJ, Bussmann C, et al. Guidelines on eosinophilic esophagitis: evidence-based statements and recommendations for diagnosis and management in children and adults. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2017;5(3):335–358. doi: 10.1177/2050640616689525.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration (2009) Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims.
    1. Taft TH, Kern E, Kwiatek MA, Hirano I, Gonsalves N, Keefer L. The adult eosinophilic oesophagitis quality of life questionnaire: a new measure of health-related quality of life. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(7):790–798. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04791.x.
    1. Bedell A, Taft TH, Keefer L, Pandolfino J. Development of the Northwestern esophageal quality of life scale: a hybrid measure for use across esophageal conditions. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(4):493–499. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.20.
    1. Franciosi JP, Hommel KA, Greenberg AB, DeBrosse CW, Greenler AJ, Abonia JP, et al. Development of the pediatric quality of life inventory eosinophilic esophagitis module items: qualitative methods. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;25(12):135. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-135.
    1. Dellon ES, Rothenberg ME, Collins MH, Hirano I, Chehade M, Bredenoord AJ, et al. Dupilumab in adults and adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(25):2317–2330. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2205982.
    1. Dellon ES, Irani AM, Hill MR, Hirano I. Development and field testing of a novel patient-reported outcome measure of dysphagia in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38(6):634–642. doi: 10.1111/apt.12413.
    1. Hudgens S, Evans C, Phillips E, Hill M. Psychometric validation of the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis treated with budesonide oral suspension. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0006-5.
    1. Hirano I, Moy N, Heckman MG, Thomas CS, Gonsalves N, Achem SR. Endoscopic assessment of the oesophageal features of eosinophilic oesophagitis: validation of a novel classification and grading system. Gut. 2013;62(4):489–495. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301817.
    1. Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
    1. McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(1):30–46. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.30.
    1. Litwin MS. How to measure survey reliability and validity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge; 1988.
    1. Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin College Division; 2003.
    1. Hays RD, Brodsky M, Johnston MF, Spritzer KL, Hui KK. Evaluating the statistical significance of health-related quality-of-life change in individual patients. Eval Health Prof. 2005;28(2):160–171. doi: 10.1177/0163278705275339.
    1. Cotton CC, Woosley JT, Moist SE, McGee SJ, Iuga A, Shaheen NJ, et al. Determination of a treatment response threshold for the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Endoscopic Reference Score. Endoscopy. 2022;54(7):635–643. doi: 10.1055/a-1675-7860.
    1. Dellon ES, Collins MH, Katzka DA, Hudgens S, Lan L, Williams J, et al. Improvements in dysphagia and pain with swallowing in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis receiving budesonide oral suspension. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19(4):699–706 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.060.
    1. Ma C, van Rhijn BD, Jairath V, Nguyen TM, Parker CE, Aceves SS, et al. Heterogeneity in clinical, endoscopic, and histologic outcome measures and placebo response rates in clinical trials of eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(11):1714–1729 e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.005.
    1. European Medicines Agency (2005) Reflection paper on the regulatory guidance for the use of health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures in the evaluation of medicinal products. . Accessed 2 Dec 2021
    1. US Food and Drug Administration (2018) Patient-focused drug development guidance public workshop. Methods to identify what is important to patients & select, develop or modify fit-for-purpose clinical outcomes assessments workshop

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner