Epidemiology of continuous renal replacement therapy in Korea: Results from the National Health Insurance Service claims database from 2005 to 2016

Sehoon Park, Soojin Lee, Hyung Ah Jo, Kyungdo Han, Yaerim Kim, Jung Nam An, Kwon Wook Joo, Chun Soo Lim, Yon Su Kim, Hyeongsu Kim, Dong Ki Kim, Sehoon Park, Soojin Lee, Hyung Ah Jo, Kyungdo Han, Yaerim Kim, Jung Nam An, Kwon Wook Joo, Chun Soo Lim, Yon Su Kim, Hyeongsu Kim, Dong Ki Kim

Abstract

Background: Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is an important treatment modality for severe acute kidney injury. As such, the epidemiology of CRRT in Korea needs further investigation.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide, population-based study analyzing the claims data from National Health Insurance Service of Korea. All index intensive care unit admission cases of CRRT in government-designated tertiary referral hospitals in Korea from 2005 to 2016 were included. Patients with a history of renal replacement therapy or who were under 20 years old were not considered. In addition to baseline and treatment characteristics, patient outcomes, including all-cause mortality and renal survival rates, were investigated. We stratified the study patients according to 3-year time periods and major regions of the nation.

Results: We included 37,337 patients who received CRRT in Korea. The overall use of CRRT increased over time, and more than 80% of cases of acute renal replacement therapy were CRRT after 2014. Seoul was the region in which the majority of CRRT (45.0%) was performed. The clinical characteristics of CRRT patients were significantly different among time-intervals and regions. Both all-cause mortality and renal survival rates after CRRT were prominently improved in the recent time periods (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: CRRT is a widely used treatment strategy for severe acute kidney injury in Korea. The prognosis of CRRT patients has improved compared to the past. This epidemiological study of CRRT in Korea revealed notable trends with regard to time period and geographic region.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Continuous renal replacement therapy; Critical care; Dialysis; Intensive care units.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1. Study population
Figure 1. Study population
CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; ICU, intensive care unit; RRT, renal replacement therapy.
Figure 2. Use of the continuous renal…
Figure 2. Use of the continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and the acute renal replacement therapy (ARRT) from 2005 to 2016 in Korea
IRRT, intermittent renal replacement therapy, including hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
Figure 3. Patient prognosis according to 3-year…
Figure 3. Patient prognosis according to 3-year time-periods
A Kaplan-Meier survival curve showing the all-cause mortality and renal survival rates according to time periods. The x-axes indicate years of index admission. The y-axis for all-cause mortality indicates cumulative patient survival (A) and cumulative renal survival (B).
Figure 4. Patient prognosis according to studied…
Figure 4. Patient prognosis according to studied regions
Kaplan-Meier survival curve showing the all-cause mortality and renal survival rates according to geographical region. The x-axes indicated years of index admission. The y-axis for all-cause mortality indicates cumulative patient survival (A) and cumulative renal survival (B).

References

    1. Perico N, Remuzzi G. Acute kidney injury: more awareness needed, globally. Lancet. 2015;386:1425–1427. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00425-0.
    1. Chertow GM, Burdick E, Honour M, Bonventre JV, Bates DW. Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3365–3370. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004090740.
    1. Wald R, McArthur E, Adhikari NK, et al. Changing incidence and outcomes following dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury among critically ill adults: a population-based cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65:870–877. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.10.017.
    1. Carlson N, Hommel K, Olesen JB, et al. Dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury in Denmark 2000–2012: time trends of incidence and prevalence of risk factors-a nationwide study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148809.
    1. Iwagami M, Yasunaga H, Noiri E, et al. Choice of renal replacement therapy modality in intensive care units: data from a Japanese Nationwide Administrative Claim Database. J Crit Care. 2015;30:381–385. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.11.003.
    1. Kolhe NV, Fluck RJ, Muirhead AW, Taal MW. Regional variation in acute kidney injury requiring dialysis in the English National Health Service from 2000 to 2015 - a national epidemiological study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0162856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162856.
    1. Seong SC, Kim YY, Khang YH, et al. Data resource profile: the National Health Information Database of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:799–800.
    1. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–1139. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83.
    1. Augustine JJ, Sandy D, Seifert TH, Paganini EP. A randomized controlled trial comparing intermittent with continuous dialysis in patients with ARF. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;44:1000–1007. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.08.022.
    1. Bagshaw SM, Berthiaume LR, Delaney A, Bellomo R. Continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:610–617. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0B013E3181611F552.
    1. Davenport A, Will EJ, Davidson AM. Improved cardiovascular stability during continuous modes of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute hepatic and renal failure. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:328–338. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199303000-00007.
    1. Davenport A. Renal replacement therapy in the patient with acute brain injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37:457–466. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.22068.
    1. Vanholder R, Van Biesen W, Hoste E, Lameire N. Pro/con debate: continuous versus intermittent dialysis for acute kidney injury: a never-ending story yet approaching the finish? Crit Care. 2011;15:204. doi: 10.1186/cc9345.
    1. Manns B, Doig CJ, Lee H, et al. Cost of acute renal failure requiring dialysis in the intensive care unit: clinical and resource implications of renal recovery. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:449–455. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000045182.90302.B3.
    1. Stevenson EK, Rubenstein AR, Radin GT, Wiener RS, Walkey AJ. Two decades of mortality trends among patients with severe sepsis: a comparative meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:625–631. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000026.
    1. Liu KD, Matthay MA, Chertow GM. Evolving practices in critical care and potential implications for management of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1:869–873. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00450206.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner