Study protocol for fertility preservation discussions and decisions: A family-centered psychoeducational intervention for male adolescents and emerging adults newly diagnosed with cancer and their families

Charis Stanek, Charleen I Theroux, Anna L Olsavsky, Kylie N Hill, Joseph R Rausch, Sarah H O'Brien, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Cynthia A Gerhardt, Leena Nahata, Charis Stanek, Charleen I Theroux, Anna L Olsavsky, Kylie N Hill, Joseph R Rausch, Sarah H O'Brien, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Cynthia A Gerhardt, Leena Nahata

Abstract

Many childhood cancer survivors desire biological children but are at risk for infertility after treatment. One option for mitigating risk is the use of fertility preservation prior to gonadotoxic therapy. Adolescents and emerging adults may rely on their parents to help them decide whether to use fertility preservation. While this is often a collaborative process, it is currently unknown how parents can optimally support adolescents and emerging adults through this decision. To address this gap, we developed a family-centered, psychoeducational intervention to prompt adolescents and emerging adults to reflect on their future parenthood goals and attitudes towards fertility preservation, as well as to prompt their parents (or other caregivers) to reflect on their own and their child's perspectives on the topic. In this randomized controlled trial, families will be randomized to either the standard of care control group (fertility consult) or the intervention group. After their fertility consult, adolescents and emerging adults and parents in the intervention group will complete a fertility preservation values clarification tool and then participate in a guided conversation about their responses and the fertility preservation decision. The primary expected outcome of this study is that participation in the intervention will increase the use of fertility preservation. The secondary expected outcome is an improvement in decision quality. Chi-square analyses and t-tests will evaluate primary and secondary outcomes. The goal of this intervention is to optimize family-centered fertility preservation decision-making in the context of a new cancer diagnosis to help male adolescents and emerging adults achieve their future parenthood goals.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. SPIRIT schedule describing study timeline.
Fig 1. SPIRIT schedule describing study timeline.
Fig 2. Fidelity checklist.
Fig 2. Fidelity checklist.

References

    1. Ries L. AG Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al.. SEER cancer statistics review. 1975;2005.
    1. Axtell L, Asire A, Myers M. Cancer patient survival report No. 5. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Health. 1976.
    1. Hudson MM, Mertens AC, Yasui Y, Hobbie W, Chen H, Gurney JG, et al.. Health status of adult long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Jama. 2003;290(12):1583–92. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1583
    1. Green DM, Liu W, Kutteh WH, Ke RW, Shelton KC, Sklar CA, et al.. Cumulative alkylating agent exposure and semen parameters in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. The Lancet Oncology. 2014;15(11):1215–23. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70408-5
    1. Brignardello E, Felicetti F, Castiglione A, Chiabotto P, Corrias A, Fagioli F, et al.. Endocrine health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer: the need for specialized adult-focused follow-up clinics. European journal of endocrinology/European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2013;168(3):465–72. doi: 10.1530/EJE-12-1043
    1. Kenney LB, Laufer MR, Grant FD, Grier H, Diller L. High risk of infertility and long term gonadal damage in males treated with high dose cyclophosphamide for sarcoma during childhood. Cancer. 2001;91(3):613–21. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010201)91:3<613::aid-cncr1042>;2-r
    1. Kenney LB, Duffey-Lind E, Ebb D, Sklar CA, Grier H, Diller L. Impaired testicular function after an ifosfamide-containing regimen for pediatric osteosarcoma: a case series and review of the literature. Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology. 2014;36(3):237–40. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3182a27c39
    1. Stein DM, Victorson DE, Choy JT, Waimey KE, Pearman TP, Smith K, et al.. Fertility Preservation Preferences and Perspectives Among Adult Male Survivors of Pediatric Cancer and Their Parents. Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology. 2014;3(2):75–82. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2014.0007
    1. Nilsson J, Jervaeus A, Lampic C, Eriksson LE, Widmark C, Armuand GM, et al.. ’Will I be able to have a baby?’ Results from online focus group discussions with childhood cancer survivors in Sweden. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(12):2704–11. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu280
    1. Ellis SJ, Wakefield CE, McLoone JK, Robertson EG, Cohn RJ. Fertility concerns among child and adolescent cancer survivors and their parents: A qualitative analysis. Journal of psychosocial oncology. 2016;34(5):347–62. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2016.1196806
    1. Benedict C, Shuk E, Ford JS. Fertility Issues in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors. Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology. 2016;5(1):48–57. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0024
    1. Armuand GM, Wettergren L, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Lampic C. Desire for children, difficulties achieving a pregnancy, and infertility distress 3 to 7 years after cancer diagnosis. Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2014;22(10):2805–12.
    1. Lehmann V, Keim MC, Nahata L, Shultz EL, Klosky JL, Tuinman MA, et al.. Fertility-related knowledge and reproductive goals in childhood cancer survivors: short communication. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(11):2250–3. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex297
    1. Klosky JL, Simmons JL, Russell KM, Foster RH, Sabbatini GM, Canavera KE, et al.. Fertility as a priority among at-risk adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer and their parents. Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2015;23(2):333–41. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2366-1
    1. Nahata L, Caltabellotta NM, Yeager ND, Lehmann V, Whiteside SL, O’Brien SH, et al.. Fertility perspectives and priorities among male adolescents and young adults in cancer survivorship. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2018;65(7):e27019. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27019
    1. Chong AL, Gupta A, Punnett A, Nathan PC. A cross Canada survey of sperm banking practices in pediatric oncology centers. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55(7):1356–61. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22705
    1. Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A, Lipshultz LI, Jeha S. Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2002;20(7):1880–9.
    1. Bann CM, Treiman K, Squiers L, Tzeng J, Nutt S, Arvey S, et al.. Cancer Survivors’ Use of Fertility Preservation. Journal of women’s health. 2015;24(12):1030–7. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5160
    1. Grover NS, Deal AM, Wood WA, Mersereau JE. Young Men With Cancer Experience Low Referral Rates for Fertility Counseling and Sperm Banking. Journal of oncology practice. 2016;12(5):465–71. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.010579
    1. Nahata L, Cohen LE, Yu RN. Barriers to fertility preservation in male adolescents with cancer: it’s time for a multidisciplinary approach that includes urologists. Urology. 2012;79(6):1206–9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.035
    1. Flink DM, Sheeder J, Kondapalli LA. A Review of the Oncology Patient’s Challenges for Utilizing Fertility Preservation Services. Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology. 2016. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0065
    1. Panagiotopoulou N, van Delft FW, Hale JP, Stewart JA. Fertility Preservation Care for Children and Adolescents with Cancer: An Inquiry to Quantify Professionals’ Barriers. Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology. 2017;6(3):422–8. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2016.0087
    1. Campbell JE, Assanasen C, Robinson RD, Knudtson JF. Fertility Preservation Counseling for Pediatric and Adolescent Cancer Patients. Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology. 2016;5(1):58–63. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0040
    1. Galvin KM, Clayman ML. Whose future is it? Ethical family decision making about daughters’ treatment in the oncofertility context. Oncofertility. 2010:429–45. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_33
    1. Ellis SJ, Wakefield CE, McLoone JK, Robertson EG, Cohn RJ. Fertility concerns among child and adolescent cancer survivors and their parents: a qualitative analysis. Journal of psychosocial oncology. 2016;34(5):347–62. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2016.1196806
    1. Nahata L, Gerhardt CA, Quinn GP. Fertility Preservation Discussions With Male Adolescents With Cancer and Their Parents:“Ultimately, It’s His Decision”. JAMA pediatrics. 2018;172(9):799–800. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1534
    1. Nurmi J-E, Poole ME, Kalakoski V. Age differences in adolescent future-oriented goals, concerns, and related temporal extension in different sociocultural contexts. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 1994;23(4):471–87.
    1. Flynn JS, Russell KM, Lehmann V, Schenck LAM, Klosky JL. Parent recommendation to bank sperm among at‐risk adolescent and young adult males with cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2020;67(10):e28217. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28217
    1. Klosky JL, Flynn JS, Lehmann V, Russell KM, Wang F, Hardin RN, et al.. Parental influences on sperm banking attempts among adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer. Fertility and sterility. 2017;108(6):1043–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.08.039
    1. Klosky JL, Wang F, Russell KM, Zhang H, Flynn JS, Huang L, et al.. Prevalence and predictors of sperm banking in adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer: examination of adolescent, parent, and provider factors influencing fertility preservation outcomes. Journal of clinical oncology. 2017;35(34):3830. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.4767
    1. Klosky JL, Lehmann V, Flynn JS, Su Y, Zhang H, Russell KM, et al.. Patient factors associated with sperm cryopreservation among at‐risk adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer. Cancer. 2018;124(17):3567–75. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31596
    1. Nahata L, Dattilo TM, Olsavsky AL, Lipak KG, Whiteside S, Yeager ND, et al.. Impact of a novel family-centered values clarification tool on adolescent sperm banking attempts at the time of a new cancer diagnosis. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2021:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02060-0
    1. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: A decade later. Health education quarterly. 1984;11(1):1–47. doi: 10.1177/109019818401100101
    1. Ter Keurst A, Boivin J, Gameiro S. Women’s intentions to use fertility preservation to prevent age-related fertility decline. Reproductive biomedicine online. 2016;32(1):121–31. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.10.007
    1. Fulford B, Bunting L, Tsibulsky I, Boivin J. The role of knowledge and perceived susceptibility in intentions to optimize fertility: findings from the International Fertility Decision-Making Study (IFDMS). Human Reproduction. 2013;28(12):3253–62. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det373
    1. Nahata L, Olsavsky A, Dattilo TM, Lipak KG, Whiteside S, Yeager ND, et al.. Parent–Adolescent Concordance Regarding Fertility Perspectives and Sperm Banking Attempts in Adolescent Males With Cancer. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2021;46(10):1149–58. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab069
    1. Theroux CI, Hill KN, Olsavsky AL, Klosky JL, Yeager ND, Audino A, et al.. Satisfaction with Fertility Preservation Decisions among Adolescent Males with Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study. Cancers. 2021;13(14):3559. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143559
    1. Olsavsky AL, Theroux CI, Dattilo TM, Klosky JL, O’Brien SH, Quinn GP, et al.. Family communication about fertility preservation in adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2021;68(7):e28978.
    1. Bavelas JB, Segal L. Family systems theory: Background and implications. Journal of communication. 1982;32(3):99–107.
    1. Champion VL, Skinner CS. The health belief model. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. 2008;4:45–65.
    1. Achille MA, Rosberger Z, Robitaille R, Lebel S, Gouin J-P, Bultz BD, et al.. Facilitators and obstacles to sperm banking in young men receiving gonadotoxic chemotherapy for cancer: the perspective of survivors and health care professionals. Human reproduction. 2006;21(12):3206–16. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del307
    1. Ginsberg JP, Ogle SK, Tuchman LK, Carlson CA, Reilly MM, Hobbie WL, et al.. Sperm banking for adolescent and young adult cancer patients: sperm quality, patient, and parent perspectives. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2008;50(3):594–8.
    1. Von Bertalanffy L, Sutherland JW. General systems theory: Foundations, developments, applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 1974(6):592–.
    1. Cox MJ, Paley B. Understanding families as systems. Current directions in psychological science. 2003;12(5):193–6.
    1. Elwyn G, Dehlendorf C, Epstein RM, Marrin K, White J, Frosch DL. Shared decision making and motivational interviewing: achieving patient-centered care across the spectrum of health care problems. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2014;12(3):270–5. doi: 10.1370/afm.1615
    1. Emmons KM, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing in health care settings: opportunities and limitations. American journal of preventive medicine. 2001;20(1):68–74. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00254-3
    1. International Q. 2021.
    1. Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social problems. 1965;12(4):436–45.
    1. Sheth KR, Sharma V, Helfand BT, Cashy J, Smith K, Hedges JC, et al.. Improved fertility preservation care for male patients with cancer after establishment of formalized oncofertility program. The Journal of urology. 2012;187(3):979–86. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.154
    1. Kelvin JF, Thom B, Benedict C, Carter J, Corcoran S, Dickler MN, et al.. Cancer and fertility program improves patient satisfaction with information received. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(15):1780. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.5168
    1. Morgan TL, Clark OE, Whiteside S, Audino A, Yeager ND, Klosky JL, et al.. Recruiting families and children newly diagnosed with cancer for behavioral research: Important considerations and successful strategies. Psycho-oncology. 2019;28:928–30. doi: 10.1002/pon.5012
    1. Quinn GP, Murphy D, Knapp C, Stearsman DK, Bradley-Klug KL, Sawczyn K, et al.. Who decides? Decision making and fertility preservation in teens with cancer: a review of the literature. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2011;49(4):337–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.01.005

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner