Radioembolization With Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Randomized, Open-Label, International, Multicenter, Phase III Trial

Mary F Mulcahy, Armeen Mahvash, Marc Pracht, Amir H Montazeri, Steve Bandula, Robert C G Martin 2nd, Ken Herrmann, Ewan Brown, Darryl Zuckerman, Gregory Wilson, Tae-You Kim, Andrew Weaver, Paul Ross, William P Harris, Janet Graham, Jamie Mills, Alfonso Yubero Esteban, Matthew S Johnson, Constantinos T Sofocleous, Siddharth A Padia, Robert J Lewandowski, Etienne Garin, Philip Sinclair, Riad Salem, EPOCH Investigators, Mary F Mulcahy, Armeen Mahvash, Marc Pracht, Amir H Montazeri, Steve Bandula, Robert C G Martin 2nd, Ken Herrmann, Ewan Brown, Darryl Zuckerman, Gregory Wilson, Tae-You Kim, Andrew Weaver, Paul Ross, William P Harris, Janet Graham, Jamie Mills, Alfonso Yubero Esteban, Matthew S Johnson, Constantinos T Sofocleous, Siddharth A Padia, Robert J Lewandowski, Etienne Garin, Philip Sinclair, Riad Salem, EPOCH Investigators

Abstract

Purpose: To study the impact of transarterial Yttrium-90 radioembolization (TARE) in combination with second-line systemic chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

Methods: In this international, multicenter, open-label phase III trial, patients with CLM who progressed on oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based first-line therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive second-line chemotherapy with or without TARE. The two primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatic PFS (hPFS), assessed by blinded independent central review. Random assignment was performed using a web- or voice-based system stratified by unilobar or bilobar disease, oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based first-line chemotherapy, and KRAS mutation status.

Results: Four hundred twenty-eight patients from 95 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia were randomly assigned to chemotherapy with or without TARE; this represents the intention-to-treat population and included 215 patients in the TARE plus chemotherapy group and 213 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88; 1-sided P = .0013), with a median PFS of 8.0 (95% CI, 7.2 to 9.2) and 7.2 (95% CI, 5.7 to 7.6) months, respectively. The HR for hPFS was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.77; 1-sided P < .0001), with a median hPFS of 9.1 (95% CI, 7.8 to 9.7) and 7.2 (95% CI, 5.7 to 7.6) months, respectively. Objective response rates were 34.0% (95% CI, 28.0 to 40.5) and 21.1% (95% CI, 16.2 to 27.1; 1-sided P = .0019) for the TARE and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Median overall survival was 14.0 (95% CI, 11.8 to 15.5) and 14.4 months (95% CI, 12.8 to 16.4; 1-sided P = .7229) with a HR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.32) for TARE and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Grade 3 adverse events were reported more frequently with TARE (68.4% v 49.3%). Both groups received full chemotherapy dose intensity.

Conclusion: The addition of TARE to systemic therapy for second-line CLM led to longer PFS and hPFS. Further subset analyses are needed to better define the ideal patient population that would benefit from TARE.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01483027.

Conflict of interest statement

Mary F. MulcahyResearch Funding: BTG Armeen MahvashHonoraria: Sirtex MedicalConsulting or Advisory Role: Sirtex Medical, Boston Scientific, AbbiskoSpeakers' Bureau: SIR-TexResearch Funding: BTG, Sirtex MedicalTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: BTG, SIR-TexOpen Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/1192235 Marc PrachtTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD Steve BandulaHonoraria: Varian Medical Systems Robert C. G. MartinConsulting or Advisory Role: Angiodynamics Ken HerrmannLeadership: Sofibio, Theragnostics, Pharma15Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Sofibio, Theragnostics, Pharma15, Aktis OncologyConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Bain Capital, Bayer, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Amgen, BTG, Ipsen, ITG, ROTOP Pharmaka, Siemens Healthineers, GE Healthcare Ewan BrownResearch Funding: MSD Oncology Gregory WilsonStock and Other Ownership Interests: Tandem Diabetes Care, Regeneron, Novacyt, Spire Hospital GroupConsulting or Advisory Role: Delcath Systems Paul RossStock and Other Ownership Interests: Perci Health LtdHonoraria: Sirtex Medical, Eisai, Servier, Pierre Fabre, Shire, Roche, AstraZeneca, MerckConsulting or Advisory Role: Sirtex Medical, Eisai, Servier, Roche, AstraZeneca, AmgenSpeakers' Bureau: Amgen, Merck, Servier, Boston ScientificResearch Funding: Sanofi, BayerTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Ipsen William P. HarrisConsulting or Advisory Role: Neo Therma, Eisai, Exelixis, Bristol Myers Squibb, QED Therapeutics, Zymeworks, BD Medical, MerckResearch Funding: ArQule, Exelixis, Halozyme, Bristol Myers Squibb, MedImmune, Agios, Bayer, Merck, BTG, Boston Scientific, Koo Foundation, ZymeworksTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Eisai Janet GrahamHonoraria: Merck Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, Nucana, BayerConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck KGaATravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Nucana Jamie MillsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: GenesisCare UK Matthew S. JohnsonStock and Other Ownership Interests: Endoshape, FluidXConsulting or Advisory Role: Argon Medical Devices, Boston Scientific, Cook MedicalResearch Funding: Argon Medical Devices, Boston Scientific, Black SwanExpert Testimony: Argon Medical Devices Constantinos T. SofocleousHonoraria: Ethicon/Johnson & JohnsonConsulting or Advisory Role: Varian Medical Systems, BTG, Sirtex Medical, TerumoSpeakers' Bureau: Ethicon/Johnson & JohnsonResearch Funding: BTG, Ethicon, Sirtex MedicalTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson, Terumo Siddharth A. PadiaConsulting or Advisory Role: Boston Scientific, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Teleflex Medical, Varian Medical SystemsResearch Funding: Varian Medical Systems Robert J. LewandowskiConsulting or Advisory Role: Boston Scientific, BD Bard, Varian Medical Systems, ABKSpeakers' Bureau: Boston Scientific Etienne GarinHonoraria: BTG/Boston ScientificConsulting or Advisory Role: BTG/Boston ScientificTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: BTG/Boston Scientific Philip SinclairEmployment: Boston ScientificStock and Other Ownership Interests: Boston Scientific Riad SalemConsulting or Advisory Role: Eisai, Bard Medical, Cook Medical, Boston Scientific, Sirtex Medical, AstraZeneca, QED Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, SiemensResearch Funding: Boston ScientificNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram showing subject enrollment, treatment allocation, patient disposition, and data analysis. aIncludes patients on study when study was terminated by sponsor. bIncludes 16 patients randomly assigned to TARE but who received chemotherapy only. TARE, transarterial yttrium-90 radioembolization.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall PFS for TARE plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in the intention-to-treat population. PFS, progression-free survival; TARE, transarterial yttrium-90 radioembolization.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of hPFS for TARE plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in the intention-to-treat population. hPFS, hepatic progression-free survival; TARE, transarterial yttrium-90 radioembolization.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of OS for transarterial yttrium-90 radioembolization plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in the intention-to-treat population. OS, overall survival; TARE, transarterial yttrium-90 radioembolization.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8660005/bin/jco-39-3897-g001.jpg

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. : Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209-249, 2021
    1. Uhlig J, Lukovic J, Dawson LA, et al. : Locoregional therapies for colorectal cancer liver metastases: Options beyond resection. Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book 41:133-146, 2021
    1. Salem R, Thurston KG: Radioembolization with 90Yttrium microspheres: A state-of-the-art brachytherapy treatment for primary and secondary liver malignancies. Part 1: Technical and methodologic considerations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1251-1278, 2006
    1. Mulcahy MF, Lewandowski RJ, Ibrahim SM, et al. : Radioembolization of colorectal hepatic metastases using yttrium-90 microspheres. Cancer 115:1849-1858, 2009
    1. Salem R, Johnson GE, Kim E, et al. : Yttrium-90 radioembolization for the treatment of solitary, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: The LEGACY study. Hepatology 74:2342-2352, 2021
    1. Hickey R, Lewandowski RJ, Prudhomme T, et al. : 90Y radioembolization of colorectal hepatic metastases using glass microspheres: Safety and survival outcomes from a 531-patient multicenter study. J Nucl Med 57:665-671, 2016
    1. Wasan HS, Gibbs P, Sharma NK, et al. : First-line selective internal radiotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX, and FOXFIRE-Global): A combined analysis of three multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 18:1159-1171, 2017
    1. Chauhan N, Mulcahy MF, Salem R, et al. : TheraSphere yttrium-90 glass microspheres combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma of the liver: Protocol for the EPOCH phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JMIR Res Protoc 8:e11545, 2019
    1. Padia SA, Lewandowski RJ, Johnson GE, et al. : Radioembolization of hepatic malignancies: Background, quality improvement guidelines, and future directions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 28:1-15, 2017
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. : New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228-247, 2009
    1. Abbott AM, Kim R, Hoffe SE, et al. : Outcomes of therasphere radioembolization for colorectal metastases. Clin Colorectal Cancer 14:146-153, 2015
    1. Hickey R, Mulcahy MF, Lewandowski RJ, et al. : Chemoradiation of hepatic malignancies: Prospective, phase 1 study of full-dose capecitabine with escalating doses of yttrium-90 radioembolization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:1025-1031, 2014
    1. Buyse M, Burzykowski T, Carroll K, et al. : Progression-free survival is a surrogate for survival in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:5218-5224, 2007
    1. Saad ED, Buyse M: Statistical controversies in clinical research: End points other than overall survival are vital for regulatory approval of anticancer agents. Ann Oncol 27:373-378, 2016
    1. Giantonio BJ, Catalano PJ, Meropol NJ, et al. : Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. J Clin Oncol 25:1539-1544, 2007
    1. Peeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A, et al. : Final results from a randomized phase 3 study of FOLFIRI {+/-} panitumumab for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 25:107-116, 2014
    1. Cremolini C, Antoniotti C, Rossini D, et al. : Upfront FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab and reintroduction after progression versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRIBE2): A multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 21:497-507, 2020
    1. Brule SY, Jonker DJ, Karapetis CS, et al. : Location of colon cancer (right-sided versus left-sided) as a prognostic factor and a predictor of benefit from cetuximab in NCIC CO.17. Eur J Cancer 51:1405-1414, 2015
    1. Tejpar S, Stintzing S, Ciardiello F, et al. : Prognostic and predictive relevance of primary tumor location in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Retrospective analyses of the CRYSTAL and FIRE-3 trials. JAMA Oncol 3:194-201, 2017
    1. Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, et al. : Effect of first-line chemotherapy combined with cetuximab or bevacizumab on overall survival in patients with KRAS wild-type Advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 317:2392-2401, 2017
    1. Gonsalves WI, Mahoney MR, Sargent DJ, et al. : Patient and tumor characteristics and BRAF and KRAS mutations in colon cancer, NCCTG/Alliance N0147. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju106, 2014
    1. Loree JM, Pereira AAL, Lam M, et al. : Classifying colorectal cancer by tumor location rather than sidedness highlights a continuum in mutation profiles and consensus molecular subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 24:1062-1072, 2018
    1. Laurent-Puig P, Cayre A, Manceau G, et al. : Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:5924-5930, 2009
    1. Lee MS, Menter DG, Kopetz S: Right versus left colon cancer biology: Integrating the consensus molecular subtypes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15:411-419, 2017
    1. Liang L, Zeng JH, Qin XG, et al. : Distinguishable prognostic signatures of left- and right-sided colon cancer: A study based on sequencing data. Cell Physiol Biochem 48:475-490, 2018
    1. van Hazel GA, Heinemann V, Sharma NK, et al. : SIRFLOX: Randomized phase III trial comparing first-line mFOLFOX6 (plus or minus bevacizumab) versus mFOLFOX6 (plus or minus bevacizumab) plus selective internal radiation therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:1723-1731, 2016
    1. Gibbs P, Heinemann V, Sharma NK, et al. : Effect of primary tumor side on survival outcomes in untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer when selective internal radiation therapy is added to chemotherapy: Combined analysis of two randomized controlled studies. Clin Colorectal Cancer 17:e617-e629, 2018
    1. Alsultan AA, van Roekel C, Barentsz MW, et al. : Dose-response and dose-toxicity relationships for yttrium-90 glass radioembolization in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Nucl Med 62:1616-1623, 2021
    1. Padia SA, Johnson GE, Agopian VG, et al. : Yttrium-90 radiation segmentectomy for hepatic metastases: A multi-institutional study of safety and efficacy. J Surg Oncol 123:172-178, 2021
    1. Dudeck O, Zeile M, Reichardt P, et al. : Comparison of RECIST and Choi criteria for computed tomographic response evaluation in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with sunitinib. Ann Oncol 22:1828-1833, 2011

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner