Uterine adenomyosis is an oligoclonal disorder associated with KRAS mutations
Satoshi Inoue, Yasushi Hirota, Toshihide Ueno, Yamato Fukui, Emiko Yoshida, Takuo Hayashi, Shinya Kojima, Reina Takeyama, Taiki Hashimoto, Tohru Kiyono, Masako Ikemura, Ayumi Taguchi, Tomoki Tanaka, Yosuke Tanaka, Seiji Sakata, Kengo Takeuchi, Ayako Muraoka, Satoko Osuka, Tsuyoshi Saito, Katsutoshi Oda, Yutaka Osuga, Yasuhisa Terao, Masahito Kawazu, Hiroyuki Mano, Satoshi Inoue, Yasushi Hirota, Toshihide Ueno, Yamato Fukui, Emiko Yoshida, Takuo Hayashi, Shinya Kojima, Reina Takeyama, Taiki Hashimoto, Tohru Kiyono, Masako Ikemura, Ayumi Taguchi, Tomoki Tanaka, Yosuke Tanaka, Seiji Sakata, Kengo Takeuchi, Ayako Muraoka, Satoko Osuka, Tsuyoshi Saito, Katsutoshi Oda, Yutaka Osuga, Yasuhisa Terao, Masahito Kawazu, Hiroyuki Mano
Abstract
Uterine adenomyosis is a benign disorder that often co-occurs with endometriosis and/or leiomyoma, and impairs quality of life. The genomic features of adenomyosis are unknown. Here we apply next-generation sequencing to adenomyosis (70 individuals and 192 multi-regional samples), as well as co-occurring leiomyoma and endometriosis, and find recurring KRAS mutations in 26/70 (37.1%) of adenomyosis cases. Multi-regional sequencing reveals oligoclonality in adenomyosis, with some mutations also detected in normal endometrium and/or co-occurring endometriosis. KRAS mutations are more frequent in cases of adenomyosis with co-occurring endometriosis, low progesterone receptor (PR) expression, or progestin (dienogest; DNG) pretreatment. DNG's anti-proliferative effect is diminished via epigenetic silencing of PR in immortalized cells with mutant KRAS. Our genomic analyses suggest that adenomyotic lesions frequently contain KRAS mutations that may reduce DNG efficacy, and that adenomyosis and endometriosis may share molecular etiology, explaining their co-occurrence. These findings could lead to genetically guided therapy and/or relapse risk assessment after uterine-sparing surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
- Vannuccini S, et al. Pathogenesis of adenomyosis: an update on molecular mechanisms. Reprod. BioMed. Online. 2017;35:592–601. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.016.
- Burney RO, Giudice LC. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2012;98:511–519. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.029.
- Di Donato N, et al. Prevalence of adenomyosis in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014;181:289–293. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.016.
- Chapron C, et al. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum. Reprod. 2017;32:1393–1401. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex088.
- Güzel Aİ, et al. Risk factors for adenomyosis, leiomyoma and concurrent adenomyosis and leiomyoma. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2015;41:932–937. doi: 10.1111/jog.12635.
- Yu W, Liu G, Liu C, Zhang Z. Recurrence-associated factors of laparoscopic adenomyomectomy for severely symptomatic adenomyoma. Oncol. Lett. 2018;16:3430–3438.
- Han AR, Lee TH, Kim S, Lee HY. Risk factors and biomarkers for the recurrence of ovarian endometrioma: about the immunoreactivity of progesterone receptor isoform B and nuclear factor kappa B. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2017;33:70–74. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2016.1205580.
- Lee KH, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of diegnogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system after laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2018;44:1779–1786. doi: 10.1111/jog.13703.
- Koninckx PR, et al. Pathogenesis of endometriosis: the genetic/epigenetic theory. Fertil. Steril. 2019;111:327–340. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.013.
- Benagiano G, Brosens I, Habiba M. Structural and molecular features of the endomyometrium in endometriosis and adenomyosis. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2014;20:386–402. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt052.
- Bird CC, McElin TW, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus—revisited. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1972;112:583–593. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90781-8.
- Hashimoto A, et al. Adenomyosis and adverse perinatal outcomes: increased risk of second trimester miscarriage, preeclampsia, and placental malposition. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31:364–369. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1285895.
- Vannuccini S, et al. Infertility and reproductive disorders: impact of hormonal and inflammatory mechanisms on pregnancy outcome. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2016;22:104–115. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv044.
- Templeman C, et al. Adenomyosis and endometriosis in the California Teachers Study. Fertil. Steril. 2008;90:415–424. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.027.
- García-Solares J, Donnez J, Donnez O, Dolmans M-M. Pathogenesis of uterine adenomyosis: invagination or metaplasia? Fertil. Steril. 2018;109:371–379. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.030.
- Vannuccini S, Luisi S, Tosti C, Sorbi F, Petraglia F. Role of medical therapy in the management of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 2018;109:398–405. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.013.
- Flores VA, Vanhie A, Dang T, Taylor HS. Progesterone receptor status predicts response to progestin therapy in endometriosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;103:4561–4568. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01227.
- Makinen N, et al. MED12, the mediator complex aubunit 12 gene, is mutated at high frequency in uterine leiomyomas. Science. 2011;334:252–255. doi: 10.1126/science.1208930.
- Getz G, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497:67–73. doi: 10.1038/nature12113.
- Anglesio MS, et al. Cancer-associated mutations in endometriosis without cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:1835–1848. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614814.
- Suda K, et al. Clonal expansion and diversification of cancer-associated mutations in endometriosis and normal endometrium. Cell Rep. 2018;24:1777–1789. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.037.
- Yizhak K, et al. RNA sequence analysis reveals macroscopic somatic clonal expansion across normal tissues. Science. 2019;364:eaaw0726. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw0726.
- Lac Vivian, Nazeran Tayyebeh M, Tessier‐Cloutier Basile, Aguirre‐Hernandez Rosalia, Albert Arianne, Lum Amy, Khattra Jaswinder, Praetorius Teresa, Mason Madeline, Chiu Derek, Köbel Martin, Yong Paul J, Gilks Blake C, Anglesio Michael S, Huntsman David G. Oncogenic mutations in histologically normal endometrium: the new normal? The Journal of Pathology. 2019;249(2):173–181. doi: 10.1002/path.5314.
- Moore, L. et al. The mutational landscape of normal human endometrial epithelium. Preprint at (2018).
- Sasagawa S, et al. Dienogest is a selective progesterone receptor agonist in transactivation analysis with potent oral endometrial activity due to its efficient pharmacokinetic profile. Steroids. 2008;73:222–231. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2007.10.003.
- Takeuchi A, et al. Dienogest reduces proliferation, NGF expression and nerve fiber density in human adenomyosis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016;207:157–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.053.
- Ring KL, et al. Endometrial cancers with activating KRas mutations have activated estrogen signaling and paradoxical response to MEK inhibition. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2017;27:854–862. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000960.
- Patel B, et al. Role of nuclear progesterone receptor isoforms in uterine pathophysiology. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2015;21:155–173. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu056.
- Wu Y, Strawn E, Basir Z, Halverson G, Guo S-W. Promoter hypermethylation of progesterone receptor isoform B (PR-B) in endometriosis. Epigenetics. 2006;1:106–111. doi: 10.4161/epi.1.2.2766.
- Patel BG, Rudnicki M, Yu J, Shu Y, Taylor RN. Progesterone resistance in endometriosis: origins, consequences and interventions. Acta Obstetricia et. Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2017;96:623–632. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13156.
- Markowski DN, et al. MED12 mutations in uterine fibroids-their relationship to cytogenetic subgroups. Int. J. Cancer. 2012;131:1528–1536. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27424.
- Heikkinen, T. et al. MED12 mutations and fumarate hydratase inactivation in uterine adenomyomas. Hum. Reprod. Open2018, hoy020 (2018).
- Koga K, Takamura M, Fujii T, Osuga Y. Prevention of the recurrence of symptom and lesions after conservative surgery for endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2015;104:793–801. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.026.
- Matsushima T, Akira S, Fukami T, Yoneyama K, Takeshita T. Efficacy of hormonal therapies for decreasing uterine volume in patients with adenomyosis. Gynecol. Minim. Invasive Ther. 2018;7:119–123. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_35_18.
- Fawzy M, Mesbah Y. Comparison of dienogest versus triptorelin acetate in premenopausal women with adenomyosis: a prospective clinical trial. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015;292:1267–1271. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3755-5.
- Kawazu M, et al. Integrative analysis of genomic alterations in triple-negative breast cancer in association with homologous recombination deficiency. PLOS Genet. 2017;13:e1006853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006853.
- Li X, et al. Decreased DNA methylations at the progesterone receptor promoter A induce functional progesterone withdrawal in human parturition. Reprod. Sci. 2014;21:898–905. doi: 10.1177/1933719113518982.
Source: PubMed