COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: A longitudinal study

Ariel Fridman, Rachel Gershon, Ayelet Gneezy, Ariel Fridman, Rachel Gershon, Ayelet Gneezy

Abstract

How do attitudes toward vaccination change over the course of a public health crisis? We report results from a longitudinal survey of United States residents during six months (March 16 -August 16, 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic. Contrary to past research suggesting that the increased salience of a disease threat should improve attitudes toward vaccines, we observed a decrease in intentions of getting a COVID-19 vaccine when one becomes available. We further found a decline in general vaccine attitudes and intentions of getting the influenza vaccine. Analyses of heterogeneity indicated that this decline is driven by participants who identify as Republicans, who showed a negative trend in vaccine attitudes and intentions, whereas Democrats remained largely stable. Consistent with research on risk perception and behavior, those with less favorable attitudes toward a COVID-19 vaccination also perceived the virus to be less threatening. We provide suggestive evidence that differential exposure to media channels and social networks could explain the observed asymmetric polarization between self-identified Democrats and Republicans.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Vaccination attitudes and intentions by…
Fig 1. Vaccination attitudes and intentions by political affiliation (March–August 2020).
Points represent means, and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. All scale responses range from 1 to 7.
Fig 2. Perceived threat of COVID-19 by…
Fig 2. Perceived threat of COVID-19 by political affiliation (March–August 2020).
Points represent means, and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. All scale responses range from 1 to 7.
Fig 3. Trust in broad institutions by…
Fig 3. Trust in broad institutions by political affiliation (March–August 2020).
Points represent means, and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. All scale responses range from 1 to 7.

References

    1. Orenstein WA, Ahmed R. Simply put: vaccination saves lives. 2017: 4031–3.
    1. World Health Organization. The Power of Vaccines: Still not fully utilized. WHO; 2020. .
    1. Harris KM, Maurer J, Kellermann AL. Influenza vaccine—safe, effective, and mistrusted. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010. December 2;363(23):2183–5.
    1. Immunization Safety Review Committee. Immunization safety review: vaccines and autism. National Academies Press; 2004. September 30.
    1. Horne Z, Powell D, Hummel JE, Holyoak KJ. Countering antivaccination attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015. August 18;112(33):10321–4. 10.1073/pnas.1504019112
    1. Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Fielding KS. The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation. Health Psychology. 2018. April;37(4):307. 10.1037/hea0000586
    1. Dube E, Vivion M, MacDonald NE. Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implications. Expert review of vaccines. 2015. January 2;14(1):99–117. 10.1586/14760584.2015.964212
    1. Paules CI, Marston HD, Fauci AS. Measles in 2019—going backward. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019. June 6;380(23):2185–7. 10.1056/NEJMp1905099
    1. Chen RT, Hibbs B. Vaccine safety: current and future challenges. Pediatric annals. 1998. July 1;27(7):445–55. 10.3928/0090-4481-19980701-11
    1. Kestenbaum LA, Feemster KA. Identifying and addressing vaccine hesitancy. Pediatric annals. 2015. April 1;44(4):e71–5. 10.3928/00904481-20150410-07
    1. Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological bulletin. 2001. March;127(2):267.
    1. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive psychology. 1973. September 1;5(2):207–32.
    1. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science. 1987. April 17;236(4799):280–5. 10.1126/science.3563507
    1. Sheeran P, Harris PR, Epton T. Does heightening risk appraisals change people’s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychological bulletin. 2014. March;140(2):511. 10.1037/a0033065
    1. Miton H, Mercier H. Cognitive obstacles to pro-vaccination beliefs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2015. November 1;19(11):633–6. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.007
    1. Nyhan B, Reifler J, Richey S, Freed GL. Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2014. April 1;133(4):e835–42. 10.1542/peds.2013-2365
    1. Goldman RD, McGregor S, Marneni SR, Katsuta T, Griffiths MA, Hall JE, et al.. Willingness to vaccinate children against influenza after the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The Journal of pediatrics. 2020. August 7. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.08.005
    1. Kohlhammer Y, Schnoor M, Schwartz M, Raspe H, Schäfer T. Determinants of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in elderly people: a systematic review. Public health. 2007. October 1;121(10):742–51. 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.02.011
    1. Timmermans DR, Henneman L, Hirasing RA, Van der Wal G. Attitudes and risk perception of parents of different ethnic backgrounds regarding meningococcal C vaccination. Vaccine. 2005. May 9;23(25):3329–35. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.075
    1. Vandermeulen C, Roelants M, Theeten H, Van Damme P, Hoppenbrouwers K. Vaccination coverage and sociodemographic determinants of measles–mumps–rubella vaccination in three different age groups. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2008. October 1;167(10):1161. 10.1007/s00431-007-0652-3
    1. Galarce EM, Minsky S, Viswanath K. Socioeconomic status, demographics, beliefs and A (H1N1) vaccine uptake in the United States. Vaccine. 2011. July 18;29(32):5284–9. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.014
    1. Uddin M, Cherkowski GC, Liu G, Zhang J, Monto AS, Aiello AE. Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of influenza vaccination disparities among university students. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2010. September 1;64(9):808–13. 10.1136/jech.2009.090852
    1. Endrich MM, Blank PR, Szucs TD. Influenza vaccination uptake and socioeconomic determinants in 11 European countries. Vaccine. 2009. June 19;27(30):4018–24. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.04.029
    1. Baumgaertner B, Carlisle JE, Justwan F. The influence of political ideology and trust on willingness to vaccinate. PloS one. 2018. January 25;13(1):e0191728. 10.1371/journal.pone.0191728
    1. Luton R, Hare C. Conservatives are more likely to believe that vaccines cause autism. The Washington Post. 2015 March 1. .
    1. Reinhart R. Fewer in US continue to see vaccines as important. 2020 Jan 24. .
    1. Hornsey MJ, Finlayson M, Chatwood G, Begeny CT. Donald Trump and vaccination: The effect of political identity, conspiracist ideation and presidential tweets on vaccine hesitancy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2020. May 1;88:103947.
    1. Summers, Juana Timeline: How Trump Has Downplayed The Coronavirus Pandemic. NPR. 2020 October 2, 2020.
    1. Ortiz J, Hauck G. Coronavirus in the US. USA Today. 2020 March 30, 2020. .
    1. Elflein J. State of Health. World Health Organization. 2020 October 5. .
    1. United States Census Bureau. Quick Facts. 2019. .
    1. Smith TW, Davern M, Freese J, Morgan S. General Social Surveys, National Science Foundation. 2020.
    1. Sarathchandra D, Navin MC, Largent MA, McCright AM. A survey instrument for measuring vaccine acceptance. Preventive medicine. 2018. April 1;109:1–7. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.01.006
    1. Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press; 2010. October 1.
    1. Feise RJ. Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment?. BMC medical research methodology. 2002. December;2(1):1–4. 10.1186/1471-2288-2-8
    1. Gilligan MJ, Pasquale BJ, Samii C. Civil war and social cohesion: Lab-in-the-field evidence from Nepal. American Journal of Political Science. 2014. July;58(3):604–19.
    1. Bowles S, Gintis H. Origins of human cooperation. Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation. 2003;2003:429–3.
    1. Gneezy A, Fessler DM. Conflict, sticks and carrots: war increases prosocial punishments and rewards. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012. January 22;279(1727):219–23. 10.1098/rspb.2011.0805
    1. Drury J, Cocking C, Reicher S. The nature of collective resilience: Survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters. 2009. March 1;27(1):66–95.
    1. Drury J, Cocking C, Reicher S, Burton A, Schofield D, Hardwick A, et al.. Cooperation versus competition in a mass emergency evacuation: a new laboratory simulation and a new theoretical model. Behavior research methods. 2009. August 1;41(3):957–70. 10.3758/BRM.41.3.957
    1. Van Bavel JJ, Baicker K, Boggio PS, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M, et al.. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour. 2020. April 30:1–2.
    1. Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, McCaul KD, Weinstein ND. Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination. Health psychology. 2007. March;26(2):136. 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136
    1. Jurkowitz M, Mitchell A. Cable TV and COVID-19: How Americans perceive the outbreak and view media coverage differ by main news source. Pew Research Center. 2020. April 1.
    1. Del Vicario M, Vivaldo G, Bessi A, Zollo F, Scala A, Caldarelli G, et al.. Echo chambers: Emotional contagion and group polarization on facebook. Scientific reports. 2016. December 1;6:37825. 10.1038/srep37825
    1. Garrett RK. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2009. January 1;14(2):265–85.
    1. Anderson J. She Hunts Viral Rumors about Real Viruses. The New York Times. 2020 October 13. .
    1. Bump P. Coronavirus has come to Trump country. The Washington Post. 2020 June 17. .
    1. Quinn M. Fauci warns U.S. "unlikely" to reach Herd Immunity if too Many Refuse Vaccine. CBS News. 2020 June 29. .
    1. World Health Organization. Improving vaccination demand and addressing hesitancy. WHO; 2019. [cited 2020 November 3]. .
    1. Capraro V, Barcelo H. The effect of messaging and gender on intentions to wear a face covering to slow down COVID-19 transmission. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy. 2020;4(S2):45–55.
    1. Chintagunta P, Labroo AA. It’s About Time: A Call for More Longitudinal Consumer Research Insights. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research. 2020. July 1;5(3):240–7.
    1. Hsiao C. Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges. Test. 2007. May 1;16(1):1–22.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner