EV-101: A Phase I Study of Single-Agent Enfortumab Vedotin in Patients With Nectin-4-Positive Solid Tumors, Including Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Jonathan Rosenberg, Srikala S Sridhar, Jingsong Zhang, David Smith, Dean Ruether, Thomas W Flaig, Joaquina Baranda, Joshua Lang, Elizabeth R Plimack, Randeep Sangha, Elisabeth I Heath, Jamie Merchan, David I Quinn, Sandy Srinivas, Matthew Milowsky, Chunzhang Wu, Elaina M Gartner, Peiying Zuo, Amal Melhem-Bertrandt, Daniel P Petrylak, Jonathan Rosenberg, Srikala S Sridhar, Jingsong Zhang, David Smith, Dean Ruether, Thomas W Flaig, Joaquina Baranda, Joshua Lang, Elizabeth R Plimack, Randeep Sangha, Elisabeth I Heath, Jamie Merchan, David I Quinn, Sandy Srinivas, Matthew Milowsky, Chunzhang Wu, Elaina M Gartner, Peiying Zuo, Amal Melhem-Bertrandt, Daniel P Petrylak

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the safety/tolerability and antitumor activity of enfortumab vedotin (EV), a novel investigational antibody-drug conjugate that delivers the microtubule-disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E, to cells that express Nectin-4.

Methods: EV-101 is a phase I dose escalation/expansion study that enrolled patients with Nectin-4-expressing solid tumors (eg, metastatic urothelial carcinoma [mUC]) who progressed on ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy regimen and/or programmed death-1 receptor/programmed death ligand-1 [PD-(L)1] inhibitor, including a cohort of patients with mUC who received prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Patients received escalating doses of EV up to 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle. Primary objectives were evaluation of safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics; antitumor activity was a secondary objective.

Results: Enrolled patients with mUC (n = 155) were heavily pretreated, with 96% having prior platinum-based chemotherapy and 29% receiving ≥ 3 lines of prior treatment. Maximum tolerated dose of EV was not established; however, the recommended phase II dose was identified as 1.25 mg/kg. Rash, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, alopecia, and nausea were the most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); the most common TRAEs were grade 1-2 in severity. Among the 112 patients with mUC treated with single-agent EV 1.25 mg/kg, the investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 43%, and duration of response was 7.4 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 12.3 months, and the OS rate at 1 year was 51.8%. Similar ORR and estimated median OS were observed in patients ≥ 75 years of age with and without prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, liver metastases, or upper-tract disease.

Conclusion: Single-agent EV was generally well tolerated and provided clinically meaningful and durable responses in patients with mUC; survival data are encouraging. A pivotal phase II and a confirmatory phase III study are ongoing.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Antitumor effects of enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. (A) Change in tumor burden from baseline (investigator assessed). A total of 103 patients had at least 1 measurable postbaseline response assessment. (B) Time to response and duration of response (DoR; investigator-assessed responders only). (C) DoR (investigator assessed). (D) Progression-free survival (investigator assessed). (E) Overall survival (OS; investigator assessed). (*) Patients with liver metastasis at baseline. CR, complete response; PD-(L)1, programmed death-1 receptor/programmed death ligand-1; PR, partial response.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Survival with enfortumab vedotin (EV) 1.25 mg/kg in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) with prior programmed death-1 receptor/programmed death ligand-1 [PD-(L)1] exposure. (A) Duration of response (investigator-assessed responders and central review). (B) Progression-free survival (PFS; central review). (C) Overall survival (OS; investigator assessed).

References

    1. Samanta D, Almo SC. Nectin family of cell-adhesion molecules: Structural and molecular aspects of function and specificity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72:645–658.
    1. Challita-Eid PM, Satpayev D, Yang P, et al. Enfortumab vedotin antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4 is a highly potent therapeutic agent in multiple preclinical cancer models. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3003–3013.
    1. Rikitake Y, Mandai K, Takai Y. The role of nectins in different types of cell-cell adhesion. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:3713–3722.
    1. Uhlén M, Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347:1260419.
    1. Wu C, Orozco C, Boyer J, et al. BioGPS: An extensible and customizable portal for querying and organizing gene annotation resources. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R130.
    1. Saxman SB, Propert KJ, Einhorn LH, et al. Long-term follow-up of a phase III intergroup study of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A cooperative group study. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2564–2569.
    1. Milowsky MI, Rumble RB, Booth CM, et al. Guideline on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer (European Association of Urology Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1945–1952.
    1. Bukhari N, Al-Shamsi HO, Azam F. Update on the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma. ScientificWorldJournal. 2018;2018:5682078.
    1. Galsky MD, Hahn NM, Rosenberg J, et al. Treatment of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer “unfit” for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2432–2438.
    1. Siefker-Radtke A, Curti B. Immunotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: Focus on immune checkpoint inhibition. Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15:112–124.
    1. Ivanova A, Qaqish BF, Schell MJ. Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology. Biometrics. 2005;61:540–545.
    1. Petrylak DP, Perez RP, Zhang J, et al: A phase I study of enfortumab vedotin (ASG-22CE; ASG-22ME): Updated analysis of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 106)
    1. Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Vaughn DJ, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1015–1026.
    1. Powles T, Durán I, van der Heijden MS, et al. Atezolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor211): A multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391:748–757.
    1. Rosenberg JE, O’Donnell PH, Balar AV, et al. Pivotal trial of enfortumab vedotin in urothelial carcinoma after platinum and anti-programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:2592–2600.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner