Home Virtual Visits for Outpatient Follow-Up Stroke Care: Cross-Sectional Study

Ramana Appireddy, Sana Khan, Chad Leaver, Cally Martin, Albert Jin, Bryce A Durafourt, Stephen L Archer, Ramana Appireddy, Sana Khan, Chad Leaver, Cally Martin, Albert Jin, Bryce A Durafourt, Stephen L Archer

Abstract

Background: Timely, in-person access to health care is a challenge for people living with conditions such as stroke that result in frailty, loss of independence, restrictions in driving and mobility, and physical and cognitive decline. In Southeastern Ontario, access is further complicated by rurality and the long travel distances to visit physician clinics. There is a need to make health care more accessible and convenient. Home virtual visits (electronic visits, eVisits) can conveniently connect physicians to patients. Physicians use a secure personal videoconferencing tool to connect to patients in their homes. Patients use their device of choice (smartphone, tablet, laptop, or desktop) for the visit.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and logistics of implementing eVisits in a stroke prevention clinic for seniors.

Methods: A 6-month eVisit pilot study was initiated in the Kingston Health Sciences Centre stroke prevention clinic in August 2018. eVisits were used only for follow-up patient encounters. An integrated evaluation was used to test the impact of the program on clinic workflow and patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by telephone interviews, using a brief questionnaire. Access and patient satisfaction metrics were compared with concurrent standard of care (patients' prior personal experience with in-person visits). Values are presented as median (interquartile range).

Results: There were 75 subjects in the pilot. The patients were aged 65 (56-73.5) years, and 39% (29/75) resided in rural areas. There was a shorter wait for an appointment by eVisit versus in-person (mean 59.98 [SD 48.36] days vs mean 78.36 [SD 50.54] days; P<.001). The eVisit was also shorter, taking on an average of only 10 min to deliver follow-up care with a high degree of patient satisfaction versus 90 (60-112) min for in-person care. The total time saved by patients per eVisit was 80 (50-102) min, 44 (21-69) min of which was travel time. Travel distance avoided by the patients was 30.1 km (11.2-82.2). The estimated total out-of-pocket cost savings for patients per eVisit was Can $52.83 (31.26-94.53). The estimated savings (opportunity cost for in-person outpatient care) for our eVisit pilot project was Can $23,832-$28,584. The patient satisfaction with eVisits was very good compared with their prior personal experience with in-person outpatient care.

Conclusions: The eVisit program was well received by patients, deemed to be safe by physicians, and avoided unnecessary patient travel and expense. It also has the potential to reduce health care costs. We plan to scale the project within the department and the institution.

Keywords: eHealth; eVisit; health services accessibility; mobile health; telemedicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: RA received internal grant funding for the eVisit pilot project from the Department of Medicine, Queen’s University.

©Ramana Appireddy, Sana Khan, Chad Leaver, Cally Martin, Albert Jin, Bryce A Durafourt, Stephen L Archer. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 07.10.2019.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6803894/bin/jmir_v21i10e13734_fig1.jpg
Electronic visit workflow. BP: blood pressure; OTN: Ontario Telemedicine Network.

References

    1. Sibley LM, Glazier RH. Reasons for self-reported unmet healthcare needs in Canada: a population-based provincial comparison. Healthc Policy. 2009 Aug;5(1):87–101.
    1. Ronksley PE, Sanmartin C, Campbell DJ, Weaver RG, Allan GM, McBrien KA, Tonelli M, Manns BJ, Hennessy D, Hemmelgarn BR. Perceived barriers to primary care among western Canadians with chronic conditions. Health Rep. 2014 Apr;25(4):3–10.
    1. Kasman NM, Badley EM. Beyond access: WHO reports that health care is not being received when needed in a publicly-funded health care system? Can J Public Health. 2004;95(4):304–8.
    1. Gibbard R. Canadian Medical Association. 2018. [2019-01-24]. Meeting the Care Needs of Canada’s Aging Population
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2011. [2019-01-23]. Health Care in Canada, 2011 - A Focus on Seniors and Aging .
    1. Turcotte M, Schellenberg G. Statistics Canada. 2006. [2019-02-14]. A Portrait of Seniors in Canada: Introduction .
    1. Picker: Patient Centred Care Improvement. 2018. [2019-01-22]. Principles of Person Centred Care
    1. Stiefel M, Nolan K. Institute for Healthcare Improvement: IHI. 2012. [2019-01-24]. A Guide to Measuring the Triple Aim: Population Health, Experience of Care, and Per Capita Cost .
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2018. [2019-01-24]. How Canada Compares: Results From The Commonwealth Fund's 2017 International Health Policy Survey of Seniors .
    1. Uppal S, Barayandema A. Statistics Canada. 2016. [2019-01-22]. Life Satisfaction Among Canadian Seniors .
    1. Canada Health Infoway: Digital Health in Canada. 2019. [2019-05-28]. Showing Results for Resources and Web Pages Tagged: Virtual Visits .
    1. McGrail KM, Ahuja MA, Leaver CA. Virtual visits and patient-centered care: results of a patient survey and observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 26;19(5):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7374.
    1. Canada Health Infoway: Digital Health in Canada. 2018. [2019-01-24]. Connecting Patients for Better Health: 2018
    1. Accenture. 2017. [2019-01-23]. Virtual Care: Just What the Consumer Ordered .
    1. Bhatia RS, Falk W. CD Howe Institute. 2018. [2019-01-24]. Modernizing Canada’s Healthcare System through the Virtualization of Services .
    1. Duffy S, Lee TH. In-person health care as option B. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):104–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1710735.
    1. Coles N, Patel BP, Li P, Cordeiro K, Steinberg A, Zdravkovic A, Hamilton JK. Breaking barriers: adjunctive use of the Ontario telemedicine network (OTN) to reach adolescents with obesity living in remote locations. J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Dec 10;:-. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18816254. (epub ahead of print)
    1. du Plessis V, Roland B, Bollman RD. Statistics Canada. 2002. [2019-02-14]. Definitions of 'Rural' .
    1. Palmer S, Raftery J. Economic notes: opportunity cost. Br Med J. 1999 Jun 5;318(7197):1551–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1551.
    1. Statistics Canada. 2018. [2019-01-23]. Average Usual Hours and Wages by Selected Characteristics, Monthly, Unadjusted for Seasonality, Last 5 Months (X 1,000)
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2018. [2019-02-06]. Comprehensive Ambulatory Classification System (CACS) .
    1. Alberta Wait Times Reporting: Wait Time Trends. 2019. [2019-02-06]. Health Costing, Interactive Health Data Application .
    1. Government of Ontario. 2019. [2019-02-06]. Ontario Case Costing Initiative (OCCI)
    1. Sirintrapun SJ, Lopez AM. Telemedicine in cancer care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:540–5. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_200141.
    1. Patel UK, Malik P, DeMasi M, Lunagariya A, Jani VB. Multidisciplinary approach and outcomes of tele-neurology: a review. Cureus. 2019 Apr 8;11(4):e4410. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4410.
    1. Lin LA, Casteel D, Shigekawa E, Weyrich MS, Roby DH, McMenamin SB. Telemedicine-delivered treatment interventions for substance use disorders: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Jun;101:38–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.03.007.
    1. Kane-Gill SL, Rincon F. Expansion of telemedicine services: telepharmacy, telestroke, teledialysis, tele-emergency medicine. Crit Care Clin. 2019 Jul;35(3):519–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2019.02.007.
    1. Galea MD. Telemedicine in rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019 May;30(2):473–83. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.12.002.
    1. Mehrotra A, Uscher-Pines L, Lee MS. The dawn of direct-to-consumer telehealth. In: Rheuban KS, Krupinski EA, editors. Understanding Telehealth. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018. pp. 217–23.
    1. Dare F. Accenture. 2017. [2018-12-14]. Voting for Virtual Healthcare: Virtual Healthcare for the 21st Century .
    1. Paré G, Leaver C, Bourget C. Diffusion of the digital health self-tracking movement in Canada: results of a national survey. J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 2;20(5):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9388.
    1. Canada Health Infoway: Digital Health in Canada. 2018. [2019-01-22]. 2018 Canadian Physician Survey: Physicians’ Use of Digital Health and Information Technologies in Practice
    1. Elliott T, Shih J. Direct to consumer telemedicine. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2019 Jan 19;19(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11882-019-0837-7.
    1. Seritan AL, Heiry M, Iosif AM, Dodge M, Ostrem JL. Telepsychiatry for patients with movement disorders: a feasibility and patient satisfaction study. J Clin Mov Disord. 2019;6:1. doi: 10.1186/s40734-019-0077-y.
    1. Korn RE, Shukla AW, Katz M, Keenan HT, Goldenthal S, Auinger P, Zhu W, Dodge M, Rizer K, Achey MA, Byrd E, Barbano R, Richard I, Andrzejewski KL, Schwarz HB, Dorsey ER, Biglan KM, Kang G, Kanchana S, Rodriguez R, Tanner CM, Galifianakis NB. Virtual visits for Parkinson disease: a multicenter noncontrolled cohort. Neurol Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;7(4):283–95. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000371.
    1. Hanson RE, Truesdell M, Stebbins GT, Weathers AL, Goetz CG. Telemedicine vs office visits in a movement disorders clinic: comparative satisfaction of physicians and patients. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2019 Jan;6(1):65–9. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12703.
    1. Finkelstein JB, Cahill D, Kurtz MP, Campbell J, Schumann C, Varda BK, Grant R, Humphrey K, Meyers H, Nelson CP, Estrada CR. The use of telemedicine for the postoperative urological care of children: results of a pilot program. J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):159–63. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000109.
    1. Carotenuto A, Rea R, Traini E, Ricci G, Fasanaro AM, Amenta F. Cognitive assessment of patients with Alzheimer's disease by telemedicine: pilot study. JMIR Ment Health. 2018 May 11;5(2):e31. doi: 10.2196/mental.8097.
    1. Patel RS, Bachu R, Adikey A, Malik M, Shah M. Factors related to physician burnout and its consequences: a review. Behav Sci (Basel) 2018 Oct 25;8(11):E98. doi: 10.3390/bs8110098.
    1. Craig JJ, McConville JP, Patterson VH, Wootton R. Neurological examination is possible using telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 1999;5(3):177–81. doi: 10.1258/1357633991933594.
    1. Bove R, Bevan C, Crabtree E, Zhao C, Gomez R, Garcha P, Morrissey J, Dierkhising J, Green AJ, Hauser SL, Cree BA, Wallin MT, Gelfand JM. Toward a low-cost, in-home, telemedicine-enabled assessment of disability in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2018 Aug 24;:-. doi: 10.1177/1352458518793527. (epub ahead of print)

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner