Long-term safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy and relationship with clinical outcome: A landmark analysis in patients with advanced melanoma

Caroline Robert, Wen-Jen Hwu, Omid Hamid, Antoni Ribas, Jeffrey S Weber, Adil I Daud, F Stephen Hodi, Jedd D Wolchok, Tara C Mitchell, Peter Hersey, Roxana Dronca, Richard W Joseph, Celine Boutros, Le Min, Georgina V Long, Jacob Schachter, Igor Puzanov, Reinhard Dummer, Jianxin Lin, Nageatte Ibrahim, Scott J Diede, Matteo S Carlino, Anthony M Joshua, Caroline Robert, Wen-Jen Hwu, Omid Hamid, Antoni Ribas, Jeffrey S Weber, Adil I Daud, F Stephen Hodi, Jedd D Wolchok, Tara C Mitchell, Peter Hersey, Roxana Dronca, Richard W Joseph, Celine Boutros, Le Min, Georgina V Long, Jacob Schachter, Igor Puzanov, Reinhard Dummer, Jianxin Lin, Nageatte Ibrahim, Scott J Diede, Matteo S Carlino, Anthony M Joshua

Abstract

Objective: Long-term safety of pembrolizumab in melanoma was analyzed in KEYNOTE-001, KEYNOTE-002, and KEYNOTE-006.

Patients and methods: Analysis involved patients who received ≥1 pembrolizumab dose. Lead-time bias was addressed via landmark analyses in patients who were progression-free before day 147.

Results: Adverse events (AEs) were analyzed for 1567 patients (median follow-up, 42.4 months). Most AEs were mild/moderate; grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 17.7% of patients. Two pembrolizumab-related deaths occurred. Any-grade immune-mediated AEs (imAEs) occurred in 23.0%, most commonly hypothyroidism (9.1%), pneumonitis (3.3%), and hyperthyroidism (3.0%); grade 3/4 imAEs occurred in 6.9% of patients. Most imAEs occurred within 16 weeks of treatment. In landmark analysis, patients who did (n = 79) versus did not (n = 384) develop imAEs had similar objective response rates (ORRs) (64.6% versus 63.0%); median time to response (TTR), 5.6 months for both; median duration of response (DOR), 20.0 versus 25.3 months; median progression-free survival (PFS), 17.0 versus 17.7 months; median overall survival (OS), not reached (NR) versus 43 months (p = 0.1104). Patients who did (n = 17) versus did not (n = 62) receive systemic corticosteroids had similar ORRs (70.6% vs. 62.9%) and median TTR (6.4 vs. 5.6 months) but numerically shorter median PFS (9.9 vs. 17.0 months); median DOR, 14.2 months versus NR; median OS, NR for both.

Conclusions: These results enhance the knowledge base for pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma, with no new toxicity signals after lengthy follow-up of a large population. In landmark analyses, pembrolizumab efficacy was similar regardless of imAEs or systemic corticosteroid use.

Clinical trial registry: NCT01295827, NCT01704287, NCT01866319.

Keywords: Advanced melanoma; Corticosteroid use; Immune-checkpoint inhibitors; Immune-related adverse events; Immunomodulating drugs; PD-1 inhibitors; Pembrolizumab.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement C.R. has participated in advisory boards for Roche; Pierre Fabre; Merck; Novartis; Amgen; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Novartis; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, U.S.A. (MSD); and Sanofi. O.H. reports personal fees from Merck for consulting during the conduct of the study; as well as contracted research for his institution from Arcus, Aduro, Akeso, Amgen, Array, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CytomX, Exelixis, Genentech, GSK, Immunocore, Incyte, Iovance, Merck, Moderna, Merck Serono, NextCure, Novartis, Regeneron, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Torque, and Zelluna outside the submitted work. A.R. has received personal fees as honoraria for consulting from Amgen, Chugai, Genentech-Roche, Novartis, and Merck; and personal fees, as a scientific advisory member and stockholder from Arcus, Bi-oncotech, Compugen, CytomX, Five Prime, FLX-Bio, Merus, Rgenix, PACT Pharma, and Tango Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. J.S.W. reports personal fees for honoraria for advisory boards and transportation from Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Celldex, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. In addition. J.S.W. has a patent named on a PD-1 biomarker patent by Biodesix issued. I.D. reports grants from Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, OncoSec, and Regeneron, and personal fees from Regeneron, during the conduct of the study. F.S.H. reports other from Merck to their institution for clinical trial support during the conduct of the study; grants, personal fees, and consulting from Bristol-Myers Squibb; personal fees from Merck, EMD Serono, Genentech/Roche, Bayer, Partners Therapeutics, Sanofi, Pfizer, and Kairos for consulting; grants and personal fees from Novartis for consulting; personal fees from Takeda, Surface, Compass Therapeutics, Verastem, and Rheos for advisory boards; personal fees from Apricity and Bicara for scientific advisory board and equity; personal fees from Aduro for advisor consulting; personal fees from Pionyr for advisory board and equity; personal fees from 7 Hills Pharma for advisor; other from Torque for scientific advisory board and equity; outside the submitted work. In addition, F.S.H. has a patent for Methods for Treating MICA-Related Disorders (#20100111973) with royalties paid, a patent for Tumor antigens and uses thereof issued (#7250291), a patent for Angiopoieten-2 Biomarkers Predictive of Anti-immune checkpoint response pending (#20170248603), a patent for Compositions and Methods for Identification, Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Melanoma using PD-L1 Isoforms pending (#20160340407), five patents for Therapeutic peptides pending (#20160046716, #20140004112, #20170022275, #20170008962, #9402905), and a patent for “methods of using pembrolizumab and trebananib.” J.D.W. reports personal fees for consulting from Adaptive Biotech, Amgen, Apricity, Ascentage Pharma, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Eli Lilly, F-star, Imvaq, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Linnaeus, MedImmune, Merck, Neon Therapeutics, Ono, Polaris Pharma, Polynoma, PsiOxus, Puretech, Recepta, Takara Bio, Trieza, Truvax, Serametrix, Surface Oncology, Syndax, and Syntalogic; research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca; and equity in Potenza Therapeutics, Tizona Pharmaceuticals, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Imvaq, BeiGene, Trieza, and Linnaeus. T.C.M. reports personal fees for honorarium from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Aduro, Merck, and Incyte outside the submitted work. R.W.J. reports other from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Gilead for consulting, outside the submitted work. C.B. reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb (board advisor), speaker fees from Merck, and travel fees from Amgen and Sandoz outside the submitted work. GVL is consultant advisor for Aduro Biotech Inc, Amgen Inc, Array Biopharma inc, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Highlight Therapeutics S.L., MSD, Novartis Pharma AG, Pierre Fabre, QBiotics Group Limited, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, SkylineDX B.V. I.P. is a consultant for Amgen, Merck, and Iovance, outside the submitted work. R.Dummer reports intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships with Novartis, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Amgen, Takeda, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Catalym, Second Genome, Regeneron, Alligator, MaxiVAX SA and touchIME outside the submitted work. J.L. reports employment at MSD, and GSK. S.J.D. reports personal fees as an employee of MSD, and shareholder inMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. M.S.C. has served on advisory boards for Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Amgen, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Merck, Ideaya, Regeneron, Nektar, Eisai, Oncosec and Qbiotics., outside the submitted work. A.J. reports consulting and/or advisory role for Neolukin, Janssen Oncology, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Noxopharm, IQvia, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck Serono, outside the submitted work. A.J. also reports research funding from Bristol-myers Squibb, Janssen Oncology, MSD, Mayne Pharma, Roche/Genentech, Bayer, Macrogenics, Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Corvus Pharmaceuticals. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Incidence of any-grade imAEsa occurring in at least one patient (N = 1567) (A); median (range) time to onset (B) and resolution (C) of any-grade imAEs (incidence >0%). imAEs, immune-mediated adverse events. aEndocrine AEs that were managed with hormone supplements might have been categorized as resolved or unresolved by different investigators.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
First occurrence of imAEsa of any grade over time (A) and median (range) time to resolution of imAEs of any grade with corticosteroids (B). AEs, adverse events; imAEs, immune-mediated adverse events. aEndocrine AEs that were managed with hormone supplements might have been categorized as resolved or unresolved by different investigators.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Kaplan-Meier plot of PFS in patients with or without imAEs who were receiving pembrolizumab before week 21. imAEs, immune-mediated adverse events; PFS, progression-free survival.

References

    1. Karlsson AK, Saleh SN. Checkpoint inhibitors for malignant melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Cosmet Invest Dermatol 2017;10:325–39.
    1. KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) for injection, for intravenous use. 11/2020. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA; 2020.
    1. Hamid O, Robert C, Daud A, Hodi FS, Hwu WJ, Kefford R, et al.Five-year survival outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-001. Ann Oncol 2019;30(4):582–8.
    1. Hamid O, Puzanov I, Dummer R, Schachter A, Daud A, Schadendorf D, et al.Final analysis of a randomized trial comparing pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma. Eur J Canc 2017;86:37–45.
    1. Robert C, Ribas A, Schachter J, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al.Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2019;20(9):1239–51.
    1. Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al.Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015;372(26):2521–32.
    1. Hamid O, Robert C, Daud A, Hodi FS, Hwu WJ, Kefford R, et al.Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2013;369(2):134–44.
    1. Ribas A, Puzanov I, Dummer R, Schadendorf D, Hamid O, Robert C, et al.Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16(8):908–18.
    1. Schachter J, Ribas A, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al.Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006). Lancet 2017;390(10105): 1853–62.
    1. Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, Caterino JM, et al.Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(17):1714–68.
    1. Giobbie-Hurder A, Gelber RD, Regan MM. Challenges of guarantee-time bias. J Clin Oncol 2013;31(23):2963–9.
    1. National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4. In: National Cancer Institute website; 2009. . [Accessed27 July 2020].
    1. Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD. Analysis of survival by tumor response. J Clin Oncol 1983;1(11):710–9.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al.New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Canc 2009;45(2): 228–47.
    1. Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, Bingham CO III, Brogdon C, Dadu R, et al.Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) toxicity management working group. J Immunother Canc 2017;5(1):95.
    1. Ribas A, Hamid O, Daud A, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD, Kefford R, et al.Association of pembrolizumab with tumor response and survival among patients with advanced melanoma. JAMA 2016; 315(15):1600–9.
    1. Weber JS, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD, Topalian SL, Schadendorf D, Larkin J, et al.Safety profile of nivolumab monotherapy: a pooled analysis of patients with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2017;35(7):785–92.
    1. Weber JS, Kahler KC, Hauschild A. Management of immune-related adverse events and kinetics of response with ipilimumab. J Clin Oncol 2012;30(21):2691–7.
    1. Sarnaik AA, Yu B, Yu D, Morelli D, Hall M, Bogle D, et al.Extended dose ipilimumab with a peptide vaccine: immune correlates associated with clinical benefit in patients with resected high-risk stage IIIc/IV melanoma. Clin Canc Res 2011;17(4): 896–906.
    1. Freeman-Keller M, Kim Y, Cronin H, Richards A, Gibney G, Weber JS. Nivolumab in resected and unresectable metastatic melanoma: characteristics of immune-related adverse events and association with outcomes. Clin Canc Res 2016;22(4):886–94.
    1. Downey SG, Klapper JA, Smith FO, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Royal RE, et al.Prognostic factors related to clinical response in patients with metastatic melanoma treated by CTL-associated antigen-4 blockade. Clin Canc Res 2007;13(22 Pt 1):6681–8.
    1. Harmankaya K, Erasim C, Koelblinger C, Ibrahim R, Hoos A, Pehamberger H, et al.Continuous systemic corticosteroids do not affect the ongoing regression of metastatic melanoma for more than two years following ipilimumab therapy. Med Oncol 2011; 28(4):1140–4.
    1. Yasir M, Goyal YM, Bansal A, Sonthalia S. Corticosteroid adverse effects. In: Statspearls (internet). Treasure Island, FL: Statpearls Publishing; 2020.
    1. Dafni U Landmark analysis at the 25-year landmark point. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2011;4(3):363–71.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner