Characteristics associated with willingness to participate in a randomized controlled behavioral clinical trial using home-based personal computers and a webcam

Hiroko H Dodge, Yuriko Katsumata, Jian Zhu, Nora Mattek, Molly Bowman, Mattie Gregor, Katherine Wild, Jeffrey A Kaye, Hiroko H Dodge, Yuriko Katsumata, Jian Zhu, Nora Mattek, Molly Bowman, Mattie Gregor, Katherine Wild, Jeffrey A Kaye

Abstract

Background: Trials aimed at preventing cognitive decline through cognitive stimulation among those with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment are of significant importance in delaying the onset of dementia and reducing dementia prevalence. One challenge in these prevention trials is sample recruitment bias. Those willing to volunteer for these trials could be socially active, in relatively good health, and have high educational levels and cognitive function. These participants' characteristics could reduce the generalizability of study results and, more importantly, mask trial effects. We developed a randomized controlled trial to examine whether conversation-based cognitive stimulation delivered through personal computers, a webcam and the internet would have a positive effect on cognitive function among older adults with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment. To examine the selectivity of samples, we conducted a mass mail-in survey distribution among community-dwelling older adults, assessing factors associated with a willingness to participate in the trial.

Methods: Two thousand mail-in surveys were distributed to retirement communities in order to collect data on demographics, the nature and frequency of social activities, personal computer use and additional health-related variables, and interest in the prevention study. We also asked for their contact information if they were interested in being contacted as potential participants in the trial.

Results: Of 1,102 surveys returned (55.1% response rate), 983 surveys had complete data for all the variables of interest. Among them, 309 showed interest in the study and provided their contact information (operationally defined as the committed with interest group), 74 provided contact information without interest in the study (committed without interest group), 66 showed interest, but provided no contact information (interest only group), and 534 showed no interest and provided no contact information (no interest group). Compared with the no interest group, the committed with interest group were more likely to be personal computer users (odds ratio (OR) = 2.78), physically active (OR = 1.03) and had higher levels of loneliness (OR = 1.16).

Conclusion: Increasing potential participants' familiarity with a personal computer and the internet before trial recruitment could increase participation rates and improve the generalizability of future studies of this type.

Trial registration: The trial was registered on 29 March 2012 at ClinicalTirals.gov (ID number NCT01571427).

References

    1. Norton S, Matthews FE, Barnes DE, Yaffe K, Brayne C. Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer's disease: an analysis of population-based data. The Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:788–794. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70136-X.
    1. Fratiglioni L, Paillard-Borg S, Winblad B. An active and socially integrated lifestyle in late life might protect against dementia. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:343–353. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00767-7.
    1. Ganguli M, Lytle ME, Reynolds MD, Dodge HH. Random versus volunteer selection for a community-based study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998;53:M39–M46. doi: 10.1093/gerona/53A.1.M39.
    1. Peters-Davis N, Burant C, Braunschweig H. Factors associated with volunteer behavior among community dwelling older persons. Act Adapt Aging. 2001;26:29–44.
    1. Dodge HH, Zhu J, Mattek N, Bowman M, Ybarra O, Wild K, Loewenstein DL, Kaye JA. Alzheimers Dement Transl Res Clin Interv. 2014. Web-enabled conversational interactions as a means to improve cognitive functions: results of a 6-week randomized controlled trial.
    1. Dodge HH, Kita Y, Takechi H, Hayakawa T, Ganguli M, Ueshima H. Healthy cognitive aging and leisure activities among the oldest old in Japan: Takashima study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63:1193–1200. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.11.1193.
    1. Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population-based studies. Res Aging. 2004;26:655–672. doi: 10.1177/0164027504268574.
    1. US Census Bureau . Internet Use in the United States. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2010.
    1. Wild KV, Mattek NC, Maxwell SA, Dodge HH, Jimison HB, Kaye JA. Computer-related self-efficacy and anxiety in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 2012;8:544–552. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.12.008.
    1. Heiman GW. Research Methods in Psychology. 3. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2002.
    1. de Barreto SP, Ferrandez AM, Saliba-Serre B. Are older adults who volunteer to participate in an exercise study fitter and healthier than nonvolunteers? The participation bias of the study population. J Phys Act Health. 2013;10:359–367.
    1. Almeida L, Kashdan TB, Nunes T, Coelho R, Albino-Teixeira A, Soares-da-Silva P. Who volunteers for phase I clinical trials? Influences of anxiety, social anxiety and depressive symptoms on self-selection and the reporting of adverse events. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;64:575–582. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0468-8.
    1. Jordan S, Watkins A, Storey M, Allen SJ, Brooks CJ, Garaiova I, Heaven ML, Jones R, Plummer SF, Russell IT, Thornton CA, Morgan G. Volunteer bias in recruitment, retention, and blood sample donation in a randomized controlled trial involving mothers and their children at six months and two years: a longitudinal analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067912.
    1. Ganguli M, Lee CW, Hughes T, Snitz BE, Jakubcak J, Duara R, Chang CC. Brain Imaging Behav. 2014. Who wants a free brain scan? Assessing and correcting for recruitment biases in a population-based sMRI pilot study.
    1. Dodge HH, Wang CN, Chang CC, Ganguli M. Terminal decline and practice effects in older adults without dementia: the MoVIES project. Neurology. 2011;77:722–730. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822b0068.
    1. Cooper C, Ketley D, Livingston G. Systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate potential recruitment to dementia intervention studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;29:515–525. doi: 10.1002/gps.4034.
    1. Bower P, Brueton V, Gamble C, Treweek S, Smith CT, Young B, Williamson P. Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities. Trials. 2014;15:399. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-399.
    1. Martinez IL, Frick K, Glass TA, Carlson M, Tanner E, Ricks M, Fried LP. Engaging older adults in high impact volunteering that enhances health: recruitment and retention in the experience corps Baltimore. J Urban Health. 2006;83:941–953. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9058-1.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner