One-year follow-up of a randomized trial with a dilemma-focused intervention for depression: Exploring an alternative to problem-oriented strategies

Guillem Feixas, Clara Paz, Eugeni García-Grau, Adrián Montesano, Joan C Medina, Arturo Bados, Adriana Trujillo, Eliana Ortíz, Victoria Compañ, Marta Salla, Mari Aguilera, Víctor Guasch, Jordi Codina, David A Winter, Guillem Feixas, Clara Paz, Eugeni García-Grau, Adrián Montesano, Joan C Medina, Arturo Bados, Adriana Trujillo, Eliana Ortíz, Victoria Compañ, Marta Salla, Mari Aguilera, Víctor Guasch, Jordi Codina, David A Winter

Abstract

Background: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is aimed to counteract cognitions and behaviours that are considered as dysfunctional. The aim of the study is to test whether the inclusion of a non-counteractive approach (dilemma-focused intervention, DFI) in combination with CBT group therapy will yield better short- and long-term outcomes than an intervention conducted entirely using CBT.

Method: A total of 128 patients with depression and at least one cognitive conflict, of six health community centres in Barcelona, participated from November of 2011 to December of 2014 in seven weekly group CBT sessions and were then randomly allocated to either DFI or CBT (eight individual sessions each) by an independent researcher. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory-II at baseline, at the end of therapy and three- and twelve-month follow-ups. Therapists did not participate in any of the assessments nor in the randomisation of patients and evaluators were masked to group assignment. Both intention to treat and complete case analyses were performed using linear mixed models with random effects.

Findings: According to intention-to-treat analysis (F2, 179 = 0.69) and complete case analysis (F2, 146 = 0.88), both conditions similarly reduced the severity of symptoms across posttreatment assessments. For the 77 participants (CBTgroup +CBTindividual = 40; CBTgroup+DFIindividual = 37) that completed allocated treatment and one-year follow-up assessment, response and remission rates were relative higher for the DFI condition, however no significant differences were found between treatment conditions. The relapse rates were similar between treatment conditions (CBTgroup +CBTindividual = 7/20; CBTgroup+DFIindividual = 8/22).

Interpretation: Although using a counteractive approach across all the treatment sessions is quite effective, it does not seem to be necessary to produce significant improvement. DFI may be considered as an alternative, which could be included in a wider treatment for depression.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; ID: NCT01542957.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Example of an implicative dilemma…
Fig 1. Example of an implicative dilemma found in the repertory grid of one of the participants of the study.
Fig 2. CONSORT diagram of participants including…
Fig 2. CONSORT diagram of participants including one-year follow-up assessment.
BDI-II = Beck Depression Inventory-II; CC = Cognitive Conflict; CBT = Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; DFI = Dilemma-Focused Intervention.

References

    1. NICE National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Depression in adults: The treatment and management of depression in adults. National Clinical Practice Guideline number 90 [Internet]. London: National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health; 2009 [cited 2017 Oct 05] Available from:
    1. Cuijpers P, Hollon SD, van Straten A, Bockting C, Berking M, Andersson G. Does cognitive behaviour therapy have an enduring effect that is superior to keeping patients on continuation pharmacotherapy? A meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3(4):1–8. Available from:
    1. Beck AT, Bredemeier K. A Unified Model of Depression: Integrating Clinical, Cognitive, Biological, and Evolutionary Perspectives. Clin Psychol Sci. 2016;4(4):596–619.
    1. Longmore RJ, Worrell M. Do we need to challenge thoughts in cognitive behaviour therapy? Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27(2): 173–187.
    1. Wampold BE. The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods, and Findings Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
    1. Feixas G, Compañ V. Dilemma-focused intervention for unipolar depression: A treatment manual. BMC Psychiatry [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2017 Oct 10]; 16(1):235 Available from:
    1. Feixas G. Dilemma Resolution In: Winter DA, Reed N, editors. The Wiley Handbook of Personal Construct Psychology. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2016. p. 230–240.
    1. Kelly GA. The psychology of personal constructs. New York, NY: Norton; 1955.
    1. Feixas G, Saúl LA. The Multi-Center Dilemma Project: an investigation on the role of cognitive conflicts in health. Span J Psychol [Internet]. 2004;7(1):69–78.
    1. Feixas G, Montesano A, Compañ V, Salla M, Dada G, Pucurull O, et al. Cognitive conflicts in major depression: Between desired change and personal coherence. Br J Clin Psychol [Internet]. 2014. [cited 2017 Sep 30];53(4):369–85.
    1. Montesano A, Feixas G, Saúl LA, Erazo-Caicedo MI, Dada G, Winter D. Cognitive conflicts and symptom severity in dysthymia: “I’d rather be good than happy.” Salud Ment. 2014;37(1):41–48.
    1. Feixas G, Compañ V. Manual de intervención centrada en dilemas para la depresión. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer; 2015.
    1. Feixas G, Bados A, García-Grau E, Paz C, Montesano A, Compañ V, et al. A dilemma-focused intervention for depression: a multicenter-randomized controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up. Depress Anxiety [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2017 Oct 10];33(9):862–869. Available from:
    1. Feixas G, Bados A, García-Grau E, et al. Efficacy of a dilemma-focused intervention for unipolar depression: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials [Internet]. 2013. [cited 2017 Oct 10];14(144). Available from:
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed, text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
    1. Beck A, Rush A, Shaw B, Emery G. Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford; 1979.
    1. Winter D, Reed N. The Wiley Handbook of Personal Construct Psychology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015.
    1. First M, Spitzer R, Gibbon M, Williams J. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders, Clinician Version (SCID-CV) New York: Biometrics Research Department; 1996.
    1. Beck A, Steer R, Brown G. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory- Second edition (BDI-II). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
    1. Sanz J, Vázquez C. Adaptación española del Inventario para la Depresión de Beck-II (BDI-II). Madrid: Pearson Education; 2011.
    1. Riedel M, Möller H-J, Obermeier M, et al. Response and remission criteria in major depression—a validation of current practice. J Psychiatr Res. 2010;44(15):1063–8.
    1. Feixas G, Cornejo JM. A Manual for the Repertory Grid using the Gridcor programme (version 4.0). Available from
    1. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014. [cited 2015 Oct 10] Available from:
    1. Caine TM, Wijesinghe OBA, Winter DA. Personal Styles in Neurosis: Implications for Small Group Psychotherapy and Behaviour Therapy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1981. (republished by Routledge, 2014).
    1. Neimeyer GJ, Morton RJ. Personal epistemologies and preferences for rationalist versus constructivist psychotherapies. J Constr Psychol. 1997;10:109–123.
    1. Neimeyer GJ, Lee J, Aksoy G, Phillip D. Epistemic styles among seasoned psychotherapists: some practical implications In: Raskin J, Bridges S, editors. Studies in Meaning. Vol. 3 New York: Pace University Press; 2006.
    1. Caine TM, Winter DA. Personal styles and universal polarities: implications for therapeutic practice. Ther Communities. 1993;14:91–102.
    1. Winter DA. Personal styles, constructive alternativism, and the provision of a therapeutic service. Br J Med Psychol. 1985; 58:129–136.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner