HIV protective efficacy and correlates of tenofovir blood concentrations in a clinical trial of PrEP for HIV prevention

Deborah Donnell, Jared M Baeten, Namandjé N Bumpus, Justin Brantley, David R Bangsberg, Jessica E Haberer, Andrew Mujugira, Nelly Mugo, Patrick Ndase, Craig Hendrix, Connie Celum, Deborah Donnell, Jared M Baeten, Namandjé N Bumpus, Justin Brantley, David R Bangsberg, Jessica E Haberer, Andrew Mujugira, Nelly Mugo, Patrick Ndase, Craig Hendrix, Connie Celum

Abstract

Background: Antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a novel HIV prevention strategy for which adherence is a known determinant of efficacy. Blood concentrations of PrEP medications are one objective marker of adherence.

Methods: In a placebo-controlled PrEP efficacy trial of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and TDF with emtricitabine (FTC/TDF) among 4747 African women and men with an HIV-infected partner, we measured plasma tenofovir concentrations from participants in the active PrEP arms: 29 HIV seroconverters (cases) and 196 randomly selected controls who remained uninfected.

Results: Among controls, 71% of visits had tenofovir concentrations >40 ng/mL, consistent with steady-state daily dosing, compared with 21% of cases at the visit HIV was first detected. Pill count data indicated that 96% of controls and 66% of cases had >80% adherence for these same visits. The estimated protective effect of PrEP against HIV, based on concentrations >40 ng/mL, was 88% (95% confidence interval: 60 to 96, P < 0.001) for individuals receiving TDF and 91% (95% confidence interval: 47 to 98, P = 0.008) for individuals receiving FTC/TDF. Controls had consistent patterns of PrEP concentrations during follow-up; among the 81% with concentrations >40 ng/mL at month 1, 75% maintained this concentration at month 12. Only 5 of 29 seroconverters seemed to be consistently adherent to PrEP. Tenofovir concentrations >40 ng/mL were associated with older age and shorter time on study; concentrations ≤40 ng/mL occurred more commonly when participants reported no sex with their HIV-infected partner.

Conclusions: Plasma concentrations of tenofovir consistent with daily dosing were highly predictive of protection from HIV acquisition. Most of those who took PrEP seemed to have high and consistent adherence.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Change in plasma level detected by visit in control and cases. Levels of tenofovir detected are grouped by undetectable (40) ng/mL in plasma. Figures 1a, 1b and 1c show individual patterns in control participants grouped by the levels of tenofovir quantified at the month 1 visit (green ≤0.31, orange = 0.31, 40.0, blue ≥40) ; each participant is represented by one line and lines terminate at each participant's last visit. Figure 1d shows the plasma levels of the 29 seroconverters; the final value shown corresponds to the tenofovir plasma level at first visit at which HIV infection was detected. Off drug means on clinical drug hold as a result of pregnancy, AE or other reason.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Pill count coverage and quantified tenofovir levels in plasma. Pill count coverage combines pill count and dispensing data to estimate the percentage of days since the previous visit that pills were taken.

References

    1. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure Chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. New Engl J Med. 2010;363:2587–2599
    1. Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA, et al. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:423–434
    1. Choopanya K, Martin M, Suntharasamai P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:2083–2090
    1. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:399–410
    1. Marrazzo J, Ramjee G, Nair G, et al. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV in Women: Daily Oral Tenofovir, Oral Tenofovir/Emtricitabine, or Vaginal Tenofovir Gel in the VOICE Study (MTN 003). 20th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistics Infections, 3–6 March 2013. Atlanta, GA
    1. Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:411–422
    1. Haberer JE, Baeten JM, Campbell J, et al. Adherence to antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention: a substudy cohort within a clinical trial of serodiscordant couples in East Africa. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001511.
    1. Keller MJ, Madan RP, Torres NM, et al. A randomized trial to assess anti-HIV activity in female genital tract secretions and soluble mucosal immunity following application of 1% tenofovir gel. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16475.
    1. Karim SS, Kashuba AD, Werner L, et al. Drug concentrations after topical and oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis: implications for HIV prevention in women. Lancet. 2011;378:279–281
    1. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women [Supplemental Material]. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:399–410 Available at: . Accessed September 9, 2013
    1. Blum MR, Chittick GE, Begley JA, et al. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate administered alone and in combination in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;47:751–759
    1. Kiser JJ, Fletcher CV, Flynn PM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral regimens containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and atazanavir-ritonavir in adolescents and young adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:631–637
    1. Patterson KB, Prince HA, Kraft E, et al. Penetration of tenofovir and emtricitabine in mucosal tissues: implications for prevention of HIV-1 transmission. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:112re114
    1. Kakuda TN, Scholler-Gyure M, De Smedt G, et al. Assessment of the steady-state pharmacokinetic interaction between etravirine administered as two different formulations and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in healthy volunteers. HIV Med. 2009;10:173–181
    1. Breslow NE, Lumley T, Ballantyne CM, et al. Improved Horvitz-Thompson estimation of model Parameters from two-phase Stratified samples: Applications in Epidemiology. Stat Biosci. 2009;1:32.
    1. Lumley T. Complex Surveys: A Guide to Analysis Using R. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley; 2010
    1. Survey: analysis of complex survey samples[computer program]. R package version 3.28. Lumley T, 2012.
    1. Anderson PL, Glidden DV, Liu A, et al. Emtricitabine-tenofovir concentrations and pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in men who have sex with men. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:151ra125
    1. Gueorguieva R, Wu R, Krystal JH, et al. Temporal patterns of adherence to medications and behavioral treatment and their relationship to patient characteristics and treatment response. Addict Behav. 2013;38:2119–2127
    1. Riegel B, Lee CS, Ratcliffe SJ, et al. Predictors of objectively measured medication nonadherence in adults with heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5:430–436
    1. Schackman BR, Eggman AA. Cost-effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV: a review. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012;7:587–592
    1. Gomez GB, Borquez A, Case KK, et al. The cost and impact of scaling up pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness modelling studies. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001401.
    1. Walensky RP, Park JE, Wood R, et al. The cost-effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection in South African women. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:1504–1513
    1. Hallett TB, Baeten JM, Heffron R, et al. Optimal uses of antiretrovirals for prevention in HIV-1 serodiscordant heterosexual couples in South Africa: a modelling study. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001123.
    1. Ware NC, Wyatt MA, Haberer JE, et al. What's love got to do with it? Explaining adherence to oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-serodiscordant couples. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59:463–468
    1. O'Laughlin KN, Wyatt MA, Kaaya S, et al. How treatment partners help: social analysis of an African adherence support intervention. AIDS Behav. 2012;16:1308–1315
    1. Naderi SH, Bestwick JP, Wald DS. Adherence to drugs that prevent cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis on 376,162 patients. Am J Med. 2012;125:882 e881–887 e881
    1. Lewey J, Shrank WH, Bowry AD, et al. Gender and racial disparities in adherence to statin therapy: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2013;165:665–678, 678 e661
    1. Cheetham TC, Niu F, Green K, et al. Primary nonadherence to statin medications in a managed care organization. J Manag Care Pharm. 2013;19:367–373
    1. Bardel A, Wallander MA, Svardsudd K. Factors associated with adherence to drug therapy: a population-based study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:307–314
    1. Ho PM, Bryson CL, Rumsfeld JS. Medication Adherence: Its Importance in cardiovascular outcomes. Circulation. 2009;119:3028–3035
    1. Donnell DJ, Baeten JM, Hong T, et al. Correlation between pill counts and biologic effects in an HIV-1 prevention clinical trial: implications for measuring adherence. AIDS Behav. 2013;17:632–639
    1. Baisley K, Baeten JM, Hughes JP, et al. Summary measures of adherence using pill counts in two HIV prevention trials: the need for Standardisation in reporting. AIDS Behav. 2013;17:3108–3119

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner