Coronary Artery and Cardiac Disease in Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Cohort Study

Anda Bularga, John Hung, Marwa Daghem, Stacey Stewart, Caelan Taggart, Ryan Wereski, Trisha Singh, Mohammed N Meah, Takeshi Fujisawa, Amy V Ferry, Justin Chiong, William S Jenkins, Fiona E Strachan, Scott Semple, Edwin J R van Beek, Michelle Williams, Damini Dey, Chris Tuck, Andrew H Baker, David E Newby, Marc R Dweck, Nicholas L Mills, Andrew R Chapman, Anda Bularga, John Hung, Marwa Daghem, Stacey Stewart, Caelan Taggart, Ryan Wereski, Trisha Singh, Mohammed N Meah, Takeshi Fujisawa, Amy V Ferry, Justin Chiong, William S Jenkins, Fiona E Strachan, Scott Semple, Edwin J R van Beek, Michelle Williams, Damini Dey, Chris Tuck, Andrew H Baker, David E Newby, Marc R Dweck, Nicholas L Mills, Andrew R Chapman

Abstract

Background: Type 2 myocardial infarction is caused by myocardial oxygen supply-demand imbalance, and its diagnosis is increasingly common with the advent of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Although this diagnosis is associated with poor outcomes, widespread uncertainty and confusion remain among clinicians as to how to investigate and manage this heterogeneous group of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction.

Methods: In a prospective cohort study, 8064 consecutive patients with increased cardiac troponin concentrations were screened to identify patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. We excluded patients with frailty or renal or hepatic failure. All study participants underwent coronary (invasive or computed tomography angiography) and cardiac (magnetic resonance or echocardiography) imaging, and the underlying causes of infarction were independently adjudicated. The primary outcome was the prevalence of coronary artery disease.

Results: In 100 patients with a provisional diagnosis of type 2 myocardial infarction (median age, 65 years [interquartile range, 55-74 years]; 43% women), coronary and cardiac imaging reclassified the diagnosis in 7 patients: type 1 or 4b myocardial infarction in 5 and acute myocardial injury in 2 patients. In those with type 2 myocardial infarction, median cardiac troponin I concentrations were 195 ng/L (interquartile range, 62-760 ng/L) at presentation and 1165 ng/L (interquartile range, 277-3782 ng/L) on repeat testing. The prevalence of coronary artery disease was 68% (63 of 93), which was obstructive in 30% (28 of 93). Infarct-pattern late gadolinium enhancement or regional wall motion abnormalities were observed in 42% (39 of 93), and left ventricular systolic dysfunction was seen in 34% (32 of 93). Only 10 patients had both normal coronary and normal cardiac imaging. Coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction were previously unrecognized in 60% (38 of 63) and 84% (27 of 32), respectively, with only 33% (21 of 63) and 19% (6 of 32) on evidence-based treatments.

Conclusions: Systematic coronary and cardiac imaging of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction identified coronary artery disease in two-thirds and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in one-third of patients. Unrecognized and untreated coronary or cardiac disease is seen in most patients with type 2 myocardial infarction, presenting opportunities for initiation of evidence-based treatments with major potential to improve clinical outcomes.

Registration: URL: https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03338504.

Keywords: cardiac imaging techniques; echocardiography; magnetic resonance imaging; myocardial infarction.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study population. Screening, enrollment, recruitment and final study population with an adjudicated diagnosis of type 2 myocardial infarction. CT indicates computed tomography; DEMAND-MI, Determining the Mechanism of Myocardial Injury and Role of Coronary Disease in Type 2 Myocardial Infarction; and MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Imaging findings and diagnostic reclassification in patients with a clinical diagnosis of type 2 myocardial infarction. Alluvial plot illustrating the cause of supply-demand imbalance, presence of coronary disease on coronary imaging, and final adjudicated diagnosis according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction stratified according to evidence of myocardial infarction (MI) on cardiac imaging. The cause of supply-demand imbalance in type 2 myocardial infarction is categorized in 3 clinically relevant groups: coronary subgroup encompassing coronary artery dissection, coronary embolism, and vasospasm; systemic subgroup encompassing patients presenting for anemia, hypotension, severe hypertension, or hypoxemia; and arrhythmia subgroup encompassing supply-demand imbalance attributable to sustained bradyarrhythmia or tachyarrhythmia. MI indicates myocardial infarction.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Exemplar cases and imaging studies according to cause of type 2 myocardial infarction. Patients with 3 differing causes of type 2 myocardial infarction showing clinical presentation data; study imaging, including invasive coronary angiogram; and cardiac magnetic resonance images. Coronary cause case: Invasive coronary angiogram (A) with evidence of coronary embolus with occlusion of the mid left anterior descending coronary artery (B). Cardiac magnetic resonance showed normal ventricular size and moderate impairment in left ventricular function (ejection fraction, 48%) with evidence of near-transmural late gadolinium enhancement in the anteroseptum (C). T2 value at the site of late gadolinium enhancement was elevated at 75.6 milliseconds, indicating an acute infarct (D). Systemic cause case: Invasive coronary angiogram showed evidence of 3-vessel obstructive coronary artery disease (A and B). Cardiac magnetic resonance showed normal ventricular size and function (ejection fraction, 64%) with evidence of subendocardial late gadolinium enhancement in the inferior wall (C). T2 value at the site of late gadolinium enhancement was elevated at 49.6 milliseconds, indicating an acute infarct (D). Arrhythmia cause case: Normal invasive coronary angiogram (A and B). Cardiac magnetic resonance showed normal ventricular size and function (ejection fraction, 62%) with evidence of basal subendocardial late gadolinium enhancement affecting the inferior, inferolateral, and anterior walls (C). T2 value at the site of late gadolinium enhancement was elevated at 51 milliseconds, indicating an acute infarct (D). BP indicates blood pressure; and HR, heart rate.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Prior treatment in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic impairment identified on coronary and cardiac imaging. Proportion of patients with coronary artery disease or left ventricular impairment identified on coronary and cardiac imaging, respectively, stratified by prior treatment with evidence-based medical therapy. ACE indicates angiotensin-converting enzyme.

References

    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Jaffe AS, Apple FS, Galvani M, Katus HA, Newby LK, Ravkilde J, Chaitman B, et al. ; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2007;116:2634–2653. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187397
    1. Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) Trial Investigators. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2011;345:494–502. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa010746
    1. Roe MT, Messenger JC, Weintraub WS, Cannon CP, Fonarow GC, Dai D, Chen AY, Klein LW, Masoudi FA, McKay C, et al. . Treatments, trends, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:254–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.008
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD; ESC Scientific Document Group. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. 2019;40:237–269. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462
    1. Chapman AR, Adamson PD, Mills NL. Assessment and classification of patients with myocardial injury and infarction in clinical practice. Heart. 2017;103:10–18. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309530
    1. Raphael CE, Roger VL, Sandoval Y, Singh M, Bell M, Lerman A, Rihal CS, Gersh BJ, Lewis B, Lennon RJ, et al. . Incidence, trends, and outcomes of type 2 myocardial infarction in a community cohort. Circulation. 2020;141:454–463. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043100
    1. Saaby L, Poulsen TS, Hosbond S, Larsen TB, Pyndt Diederichsen AC, Hallas J, Thygesen K, Mickley H. Classification of myocardial infarction: frequency and features of type 2 myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2013;126:789–797. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.02.029
    1. Chapman AR, Adamson PD, Shah ASV, Anand A, Strachan FE, Ferry AV, Lee KK, Berry C, Findlay I, Cruikshank A, et al. ; High-STEACS Investigators. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2020;141:161–171. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042960
    1. Nestelberger T, Boeddinghaus J, Badertscher P, Twerenbold R, Wildi K, Breitenbücher D, Sabti Z, Puelacher C, Rubini Giménez M, Kozhuharov N, et al. ; APACE Investigators. Effect of definition on incidence and prognosis of type 2 myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1558–1568. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.774
    1. McCarthy CP, Olshan DS, Rehman S, Jones-O’Connor M, Murphy S, Cohen JA, Singh A, Vaduganathan M, Januzzi JL, Jr, Wasfy JH. Cardiologist evaluation of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021;14:e007440. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007440
    1. DeFilippis AP, Chapman AR, Mills NL, de Lemos JA, Arbab-Zadeh A, Newby LK, Morrow DA. Assessment and treatment of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and acute nonischemic myocardial injury. Circulation. 2019;140:1661–1678. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040631
    1. Furie N, Israel A, Gilad L, Neuman G, Assad F, Ben-Zvi I, Grossman C. Type 2 myocardial infarction in general medical wards: clinical features, treatment, and prognosis in comparison with type 1 myocardial infarction. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e17404. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017404
    1. University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh imaging. Accessed December 1, 2021.
    1. Shah AS, Anand A, Sandoval Y, Lee KK, Smith SW, Adamson PD, Chapman AR, Langdon T, Sandeman D, Vaswani A, et al. ; High-STEACS Investigators. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study. Lancet. 2015;386:2481–2488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00391-8
    1. Shah ASV, Anand A, Strachan FE, Ferry AV, Lee KK, Chapman AR, Sandeman D, Stables CL, Adamson PD, Andrews JPM, et al. ; High-STEACS Investigators. High-sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;392:919–928. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31923-8
    1. Chin CW, Shah AS, McAllister DA, Joanna Cowell S, Alam S, Langrish JP, Strachan FE, Hunter AL, Maria Choy A, Lang CC, et al. . High-sensitivity troponin I concentrations are a marker of an advanced hypertrophic response and adverse outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2312–2321. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu189
    1. Lee KK, Ferry AV, Anand A, Strachan FE, Chapman AR, Kimenai DM, Meex SJR, Berry C, Findlay I, Reid A, et al. ; High-STEACS Investigators. Sex-specific thresholds of high-sensitivity troponin in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:2032–2043. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.082
    1. Wallace M, Shelkey M. Monitoring functional status in hospitalized older adults. Am J Nurs. 2008;108:64–71; quiz 71. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000314811.46029.3d
    1. Abbara S, Blanke P, Maroules CD, Cheezum M, Choi AD, Han BK, Marwan M, Naoum C, Norgaard BL, Rubinshtein R, et al. . SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:435–449. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.10.002
    1. Wharton G, Steeds R, Allen J, Phillips H, Jones R, Kanagala P, Lloyd G, Masani N, Mathew T, Oxborough D, et al. . A minimum dataset for a standard adult transthoracic echocardiogram: a guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Res Pract. 2015;2:G9–G24. doi: 10.1530/ERP-14-0079
    1. Saaby L, Poulsen TS, Diederichsen AC, Hosbond S, Larsen TB, Schmidt H, Gerke O, Hallas J, Thygesen K, Mickley H. Mortality rate in type 2 myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected hospital cohort. Am J Med. 2014;127:295–302. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.12.020
    1. Singh A, Gupta A, DeFilippis EM, Qamar A, Biery DW, Almarzooq Z, Collins B, Fatima A, Jackson C, Galazka P, et al. . Cardiovascular mortality after type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction in young adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:1003–1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.052
    1. Lambrecht S, Sarkisian L, Saaby L, Poulsen TS, Gerke O, Hosbond S, Diederichsen ACP, Thygesen K, Mickley H. different causes of death in patients with myocardial infarction type 1, type 2, and myocardial injury. Am J Med. 2018;131:548–554. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.11.043
    1. Chapman AR, Shah ASV, Lee KK, Anand A, Francis O, Adamson P, McAllister DA, Strachan FE, Newby DE, Mills NL. Long-term outcomes in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury. Circulation. 2018;137:1236–1245. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031806
    1. Wereski R, Kimenai DM, Bularga A, Taggart C, Lowe DJ, Mills NL, Chapman AR. Risk factors for type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:127–135. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab581
    1. Chapman AR, Sandoval Y. Type 2 myocardial infarction: evolving approaches to diagnosis and risk-stratification. Clin Chem. 2021;67:61–69. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa189
    1. Neglia D, Rovai D, Caselli C, Pietila M, Teresinska A, Aguadé-Bruix S, Pizzi MN, Todiere G, Gimelli A, Schroeder S, et al. ; EVINCI Study Investigators. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e002179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002179
    1. Neumann JT, Sörensen NA, Rübsamen N, Ojeda F, Renné T, Qaderi V, Teltrop E, Kramer S, Quantius L, Zeller T, et al. . Discrimination of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:3514–3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx457
    1. Smilowitz NR, Subramanyam P, Gianos E, Reynolds HR, Shah B, Sedlis SP. Treatment and outcomes of type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury compared with type 1 myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis. 2018;29:46–52. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000545
    1. Achenbach S, Rudolph T, Rieber J, Eggebrecht H, Richardt G, Schmitz T, Werner N, Boenner F, Möllmann H. Performing and interpreting fractional flow reserve measurements in clinical practice: an expert consensus document. Interv Cardiol. 2017;12:97–109. doi: 10.15420/icr.2017:13:2
    1. Gudmundsdottir I, Adamson P, Gray C, Spratt JC, Behan MW, Henriksen P, Newby DE, Mills N, Uren NG, Cruden NL. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease. Open Heart. 2015;2:e000225. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000225
    1. Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Protocols. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:91. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-91
    1. Singh T, Kite TA, Joshi SS, Spath NB, Kershaw L, Baker A, Jordan H, Gulsin GS, Williams MC, van Beek EJR, et al. . MRI and CT coronary angiography in survivors of COVID-19. Heart. 2022;108:46–53. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319926
    1. Meah MN, Singh T, Williams MC, Dweck MR, Newby DE, Slomka P, Adamson PD, Moss AJ, Dey D. Reproducibility of quantitative plaque measurement in advanced coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021;15:333–338. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.12.008
    1. Tzolos E, McElhinney P, Williams MC, Cadet S, Dweck MR, Berman DS, Slomka PJ, Newby DE, Dey D. Repeatability of quantitative pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation and coronary plaque burden from coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021;15:81–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.03.007
    1. Dey D, Schepis T, Marwan M, Slomka PJ, Berman DS, Achenbach S. Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: comparison with intravascular US. Radiology. 2010;257:516–522. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100681
    1. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Boxt LM, Budoff MJ, Cheng V, DeFrance T, Hellinger JC, Karlsberg RP; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:122–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.01.001
    1. Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Cury R, Earls JP, Mancini GJ, Nieman K, Pontone G, Raff GL. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8:342–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.003
    1. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Koo BK, van Mieghem C, Erglis A, Lin FY, Dunning AM, Apruzzese P, et al. . Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA. 2012;308:1237–1245. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11274

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner