Intralymphatic GAD-Alum (Diamyd®) Improves Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes With HLA DR3-DQ2

Christoph Nowak, Marcus Lind, Zdenek Sumnik, Terezie Pelikanova, Lía Nattero-Chavez, Elena Lundberg, Itxaso Rica, Maria A Martínez-Brocca, MariSol Ruiz de Adana, Jeanette Wahlberg, Ragnar Hanas, Cristina Hernandez, Maria Clemente-León, Ana Gómez-Gila, Marta Ferrer Lozano, Theo Sas, Stepanka Pruhova, Fabricia Dietrich, Sara Puente-Marin, Ulf Hannelius, Rosaura Casas, Johnny Ludvigsson, Christoph Nowak, Marcus Lind, Zdenek Sumnik, Terezie Pelikanova, Lía Nattero-Chavez, Elena Lundberg, Itxaso Rica, Maria A Martínez-Brocca, MariSol Ruiz de Adana, Jeanette Wahlberg, Ragnar Hanas, Cristina Hernandez, Maria Clemente-León, Ana Gómez-Gila, Marta Ferrer Lozano, Theo Sas, Stepanka Pruhova, Fabricia Dietrich, Sara Puente-Marin, Ulf Hannelius, Rosaura Casas, Johnny Ludvigsson

Abstract

Aims: Residual beta cell function in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is associated with lower risk of complications. Autoantigen therapy with GAD-alum (Diamyd) given in 3 intralymphatic injections with oral vitamin D has shown promising results in persons with T1D carrying the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DR3-DQ2 haplotype in the phase 2b trial DIAGNODE-2. We aimed to explore the efficacy of intralymphatic GAD-alum on blood glucose recorded by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

Methods: DIAGNODE-2 (NCT03345004) was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of 109 recent-onset T1D patients aged 12 to 24 years with GAD65 antibodies and fasting C-peptide > 0.12 nmol/L, which randomized patients to 3 intralymphatic injections of 4 μg GAD-alum and oral vitamin D, or placebo. We report results for exploratory endpoints assessed by 14-day CGM at months 0, 6, and 15. Treatment arms were compared by mixed-effects models for repeated measures adjusting for baseline values.

Results: We included 98 patients with CGM recordings of sufficient quality (DR3-DQ2-positive patients: 27 GAD-alum-treated and 15 placebo-treated). In DR3-DQ2-positive patients, percent of time in range (TIR, 3.9-10 mmol/L) declined less between baseline and month 15 in GAD-alum-treated compared with placebo-treated patients (-5.1% and -16.7%, respectively; P = 0.0075), with reduced time > 13.9 mmol/L (P = 0.0036), and significant benefits on the glucose management indicator (P = 0.0025). No differences were detected for hypoglycemia. GAD-alum compared to placebo lowered the increase in glycemic variability (standard deviation) observed in both groups (P = 0.0219). Change in C-peptide was correlated with the change in TIR.

Conclusions: Intralymphatic GAD-alum improves glycemic control in recently diagnosed T1D patients carrying HLA DR3-DQ2.

Keywords: C-peptide; Diamyd; GAD-alum; GAD65; HLA DR3-DQ2; HbA1c; antigen-specific immune therapy; continuous glucose monitoring; type 1 diabetes.

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
DIAGNODE-2 study visit schedule.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean percent of time during the 14-day CGM recording periods spent in different glycemic ranges (individuals with HLA DR3-DQ2).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Change in percent of time in range (3.9-10 mmol/L) during the study. The left panel shows the MMRM-predicted change where the difference between groups in the HLA DR3-DQ2 population reached statistical significance at months 6 (P = 0.0072) and 15 (P = 0.0075). The right shows the original data. Error bars represent standard errors.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Scatterplots showing the association between AUC0-120min C-peptide (raw values in nmol/L) on the x-axis and percent spent in time in range (upper), >13.9 mmol/L (middle), and < 3 mmol/L (lower panel) on the y-axis. A locally estimated scatterplot smoothing regression line with 95% confidence interval has been fitted. All patients with CGM data are included, regardless of treatment condition.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Scatterplot showing the association between change in AUC0-120min C-peptide (ratio between values at month 15 divided by baseline values in nmol/L) on the x-axis and change in time in range (difference between screening visit and month 15 in percent). Simple linear regression lines have been fitted. The figure suggests a positive correlation between preservation of C-peptide and reduced decline in TIR during the study period.

References

    1. Atkinson MA, Roep BO, Posgai A, Wheeler DCS, Peakman M. The challenge of modulating β-cell autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(1):52-64.
    1. Gubitosi-Klug R, Braffett BH, Hitt S, et al. . Residual β cell function in long-term type 1 diabetes associates with reduced incidence of hypoglycaemia. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(3):e143011.
    1. Steffes MW, Sibley S, Jackson M, Thomas W. Beta-cell function and the development of diabetes-related complications in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):832-836.
    1. Palmer JP, Fleming GA, Greenbaum CJ, et al. . C-peptide is the appropriate outcome measure for type 1 diabetes clinical trials to preserve beta-cell function: report of an ADA workshop, 21–22 October 2001. Diabetes. 2004;53(1):250-264.
    1. DCCT. The relationship of glycaemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes. 1995;44(8):968-983.
    1. Nordwall M, Abrahamsson M, Dhir M, Fredrikson M, Ludvigsson J, Arnqvist HJ. Impact of HbA1c, followed from onset of type 1 diabetes, on the development of severe retinopathy and nephropathy: the VISS Study (Vascular Diabetic Complications in Southeast Sweden). Diabetes Care. 2015;38(2):308-315.
    1. Lind M, Pivodic A, Svensson AM, Ólafsdóttir AF, Wedel H, Ludvigsson J. HbA1c level as a risk factor for retinopathy and nephropathy in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: Swedish population based cohort study. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4894.
    1. Lachin JM, McGee P, Palmer JP; DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Impact of C-peptide preservation on metabolic and clinical outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes. 2014;63(2):739-748.
    1. Cox DJ, Kovatchev BP, Julian DM, et al. . Frequency of severe hypoglycaemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus can be predicted from self-monitoring blood glucose data. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79(6):1659-1662.
    1. Qu Y, Jacober SJ, Zhang Q, Wolka LL, DeVries JH. Rate of hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes can be predicted from glycaemic variability data. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(11):1008-1012.
    1. American Diabetes Association. CGM & Time in Range. Accessed January 17, 2022.
    1. Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. . Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(8):1593-1603.
    1. Lu J, Ma X, Zhou J, et al. . Association of time in range, as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring, with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(11):2370-2376.
    1. Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Riddlesworth TD, et al. . Validation of time in range as an outcome measure for diabetes clinical trials. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(3):400-405.
    1. Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Cheng P, et al. . The relationships between time in range, hyperglycaemia metrics, and HbA1c. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019;13(4):614-626.
    1. Vigersky RA, McMahon C. The relationship of hemoglobin A1C to time-in-range in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(2):81-85.
    1. Suh S, Kim JH. Glycaemic Variability: how do we measure it and why is it important? Diabetes Metab J. 2015;39(4):273-282.
    1. DCCT. Hypoglycaemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Diabetes. 1997;46(2):271-286.
    1. Battaglia M, Ahmed S, Anderson MS, et al. . Introducing the endotype concept to address the challenge of disease heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(1):5-12.
    1. Ludvigsson J, Sumnik Z, Pelikanova T, et al. . Intralymphatic glutamic acid decarboxylase with vitamin D supplementation in recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(7):1604-1612.
    1. Hannelius U, Beam CA, Ludvigsson J. Efficacy of GAD-alum immunotherapy associated with HLA-DR3-DQ2 in recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2020;63(10):2177-2181.
    1. Bergenstal RM, Beck RW, Close KL, et al. . Glucose Management Indicator (GMI): a new term for estimating A1C from continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(11):2275-2280.
    1. Vigers T, Chan CL, Snell-Bergeon J, et al. . cgmanalysis: an R package for descriptive analysis of continuous glucose monitor data. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0216851.
    1. Nowak C, Lind M, Sumnik Z, et al. . Supplementary Figures to: Intralymphatic GAD-alum (Diamyd®) improves glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes with HLA DR3-DQ2. Deposited in the data repository of the Svensk nationell datatjänst (SND, Swedish National Data Service).
    1. DCCT 1998. Effect of intensive therapy on residual beta-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes in the diabetes control and complications trial. A randomized, controlled trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(7): 517-523.
    1. Keenan HA, Sun JK, Levine J, et al. . Residual insulin production and pancreatic ß-cell turnover after 50 years of diabetes: Joslin Medalist Study. Diabetes. 2010;59(11): 2846-2853.
    1. Lindner N, Kuwabara A, Holt T. Non-invasive and minimally invasive glucose monitoring devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of hypoglycaemia detection. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):145.
    1. Alva S, Bailey T, Brazg R, et al. . Accuracy of a 14-day factory-calibrated continuous glucose monitoring system with advanced algorithm in pediatric and adult population with diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022;16(1):70-77.
    1. Critical Path Institute. Design of Clinical Trials in New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes: Regulatory Considerations for Drug Development. Workshop Summary. Accessed January 17, 2022.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner