Treatment of CD20-directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an early phase IIa trial report

Wen-Ying Zhang, Yao Wang, Ye-Lei Guo, Han-Ren Dai, Qing-Ming Yang, Ya-Jing Zhang, Yan Zhang, Mei-Xia Chen, Chun-Meng Wang, Kai-Chao Feng, Su-Xia Li, Yang Liu, Feng-Xia Shi, Can Luo, Wei-Dong Han, Wen-Ying Zhang, Yao Wang, Ye-Lei Guo, Han-Ren Dai, Qing-Ming Yang, Ya-Jing Zhang, Yan Zhang, Mei-Xia Chen, Chun-Meng Wang, Kai-Chao Feng, Su-Xia Li, Yang Liu, Feng-Xia Shi, Can Luo, Wei-Dong Han

Abstract

Patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma have a dismal prognosis. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-modified T cells (CART cells) that targeted CD20 were effective in a phase I clinical trial for patients with advanced B-cell lymphomas. We performed a phase IIa trial to further assess the safety and efficacy of administering autologous anti-CD20 CART (CART-20) cells to patients with refractory or relapsed CD20+ B-cell lymphoma. Eleven patients were enrolled, and seven patients underwent cytoreductive chemotherapy to debulk the tumors and deplete the lymphocytes before receiving T-cell infusions. The overall objective response rate was 9 of 11 (81.8%), with 6 complete remissions (CRs) and 3 partial remissions; no severe toxicity was observed. The median progression-free survival lasted for >6 months, and 1 patient had a 27-month continuous CR. A significant inverse correlation between the levels of the CAR gene and disease recurrence or progression was observed. Clinically, the lesions in special sites, specifically the spleen and testicle, were refractory to CART-20 treatment. Collectively, these results together with our data from phase I strongly demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of CART-20 treatment in lymphomas and suggest large-scale patient recruitment in a future study. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.org as NCT01735604.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical protocol design. Patients with tumors that had a diameter

Figure 2

Clinical responses of all patients.…

Figure 2

Clinical responses of all patients. ( a ) The progression-free survival (PFS) for…

Figure 2
Clinical responses of all patients. (a) The progression-free survival (PFS) for all participating patients. More than 50% of the patients achieved a 6-month PFS. (b, c) The positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) images of patients UPN03 and UPN07, respectively. The higher uptake in the cervical lymph node of UPN03 disappeared at the 3-month time point after the Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T-20 (CART-20) cell infusion. The lesions of patient UPN07 at the mediastinum and groin disappeared at the 6-month time point after the CART-20 cell infusion. (d) The time of progression-free survival after the CART-20 cell infusions was significantly longer than that observed after the last salvage chemotherapies. The light brown bars denote responses after salvage chemotherapy; the dark brown bars demonstrate the PFS after the CART-20 cell infusion.

Figure 3

Characteristics and influential factors of…

Figure 3

Characteristics and influential factors of expansion of the Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T-20 (CART-20)…

Figure 3
Characteristics and influential factors of expansion of the Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T-20 (CART-20) cells in vivo. (a) The time course shows that the peak levels of the CART-20 cells detected by qRT-PCR were observed at approximately 4 weeks after infusion and gradually decreased thereafter. (b) Detection of CART-20 cells at 1 week and 4 weeks after infusion was independent of the infused T-cell dose. (c) A copy number less than 200 (no./mg gDNA) was regarded as CART-20 cell negative. The last observance of positive CART-20 cells was independent of the absolute effects of memory and central memory T cells.

Figure 4

The numbers of CD20 +…

Figure 4

The numbers of CD20 + lymphocyte cells by flow cytometry and the copy…

Figure 4
The numbers of CD20+ lymphocyte cells by flow cytometry and the copy numbers of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) molecules by quantitative real-time-PCR in the peripheral blood of relapsed patients after Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T-20 (CART-20) cell infusion. Relapses occurred after the numbers of copies dropped and the numbers of B cells increased. An ↓ indicates the time of relapse.

Figure 5

Responses of the special lesions…

Figure 5

Responses of the special lesions to Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T-20 (CART-20) cells. (…

Figure 5
Responses of the special lesions to Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T-20 (CART-20) cells. (a) The skin lesions of patient UPN09 completely disappeared, and the disappearance lasted up to 10 months or more, despite continued splenomegaly. (b) The new lesions in the testes of patient UPN02 emerged at 6 months after infusion. (c) Immunohistochemical examination of a needle biopsy of lesions in the testis from patient UPN02 at 6 months after CART-20 cell infusion showed that the tumor cells were CD20+, CD3−, CD4−, and CD8−. (d) The CART-20 cells in the peripheral blood, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and the testis of patient UPN02 were measured by quantitative real-time-PCR at 6 months after CART-20 cell infusion. PB, peripheral blood cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clinical responses of all patients. (a) The progression-free survival (PFS) for all participating patients. More than 50% of the patients achieved a 6-month PFS. (b, c) The positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) images of patients UPN03 and UPN07, respectively. The higher uptake in the cervical lymph node of UPN03 disappeared at the 3-month time point after the Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T-20 (CART-20) cell infusion. The lesions of patient UPN07 at the mediastinum and groin disappeared at the 6-month time point after the CART-20 cell infusion. (d) The time of progression-free survival after the CART-20 cell infusions was significantly longer than that observed after the last salvage chemotherapies. The light brown bars denote responses after salvage chemotherapy; the dark brown bars demonstrate the PFS after the CART-20 cell infusion.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Characteristics and influential factors of expansion of the Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T-20 (CART-20) cells in vivo. (a) The time course shows that the peak levels of the CART-20 cells detected by qRT-PCR were observed at approximately 4 weeks after infusion and gradually decreased thereafter. (b) Detection of CART-20 cells at 1 week and 4 weeks after infusion was independent of the infused T-cell dose. (c) A copy number less than 200 (no./mg gDNA) was regarded as CART-20 cell negative. The last observance of positive CART-20 cells was independent of the absolute effects of memory and central memory T cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The numbers of CD20+ lymphocyte cells by flow cytometry and the copy numbers of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) molecules by quantitative real-time-PCR in the peripheral blood of relapsed patients after Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T-20 (CART-20) cell infusion. Relapses occurred after the numbers of copies dropped and the numbers of B cells increased. An ↓ indicates the time of relapse.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Responses of the special lesions to Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T-20 (CART-20) cells. (a) The skin lesions of patient UPN09 completely disappeared, and the disappearance lasted up to 10 months or more, despite continued splenomegaly. (b) The new lesions in the testes of patient UPN02 emerged at 6 months after infusion. (c) Immunohistochemical examination of a needle biopsy of lesions in the testis from patient UPN02 at 6 months after CART-20 cell infusion showed that the tumor cells were CD20+, CD3−, CD4−, and CD8−. (d) The CART-20 cells in the peripheral blood, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and the testis of patient UPN02 were measured by quantitative real-time-PCR at 6 months after CART-20 cell infusion. PB, peripheral blood cells.

References

    1. Zelenetz AD , Abramson JS , Advani RH , Andreadis CB , Byrd JC , Czuczman MS et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2010; 8: 288–334.
    1. Coiffier B , Thieblemont C , Van Den Neste E , Lepeu G , Plantier I , Castaigne S et al. Long-term outcome of patients in the LNH-98.5 trial, the first randomized study comparing rituximab-CHOP to standard CHOP chemotherapy in DLBCL patients: a study by the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. Blood 2010; 116: 2040–2045.
    1. Hamlin PA , Zelenetz AD , Kewalramani T , Qin J , Satagopan JM , Verbel D et al. Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index predicts autologous stem cell transplantation outcome for patients with relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2003; 102: 1989–1996.
    1. Kewalramani T , Zelenetz AD , Nimer SD , Portlock C , Straus D , Noy A et al. Rituximab and ICE as second-line therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2004; 103: 3684–3688.
    1. Morschhauser F , Illidge T , Huglo D , Martinelli G , Paganelli G , Zinzani PL et al. Efficacy and safety of yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma not appropriate for autologous stem-cell transplantation. Blood 2007; 110: 54–58.
    1. Morschhauser FA , Cartron G , Thieblemont C , Solal-Celigny P , Haioun C , Bouabdallah R et al. Obinutuzumab (GA101) monotherapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma or mantle-cell lymphoma: results from the phase II GAUGUIN study. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 2912–2919.
    1. Ohmachi K , Niitsu N , Uchida T , Kim SJ , Ando K , Takahashi N et al. Multicenter phase II study of bendamustine plus rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 2103–2109.
    1. Sauter CS , Matasar MJ , Meikle J , Schoder H , Ulaner GA , Migliacci JC et al. Prognostic value of FDG-PET prior to autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2015; 125: 2579–2581.
    1. Swann JB , Smyth MJ . Immune surveillance of tumors. J Clin Invest 2007; 117: 1137–1146.
    1. Peniket AJ , Ruiz de Elvira MC , Taghipour G , Cordonnier C , Gluckman E , de Witte T et al. An EBMT registry matched study of allogeneic stem cell transplants for lymphoma: allogeneic transplantation is associated with a lower relapse rate but a higher procedure-related mortality rate than autologous transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 31: 667–678.
    1. Ruella M , Kalos M . Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer. Immunol Rev 2014; 257: 14–38.
    1. Stadanlick J . Video podcast: adoptive immunotherapy for cancer. Immunol Rev 2014; 257: 6.
    1. Till BG , Jensen MC , Wang J , Chen EY , Wood BL , Greisman HA et al. Adoptive immunotherapy for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma using genetically modified autologous CD20-specific T cells. Blood 2008; 112: 2261–2271.
    1. Kochenderfer JN , Dudley ME , Kassim SH , Somerville RP , Carpenter RO , Stetler-Stevenson M et al. Chemotherapy-refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and indolent B-cell malignancies can be effectively treated with autologous T cells expressing an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 540–549.
    1. Wang Y , Zhang WY , Han QW , Liu Y , Dai HR , Guo YL et al. Effective response and delayed toxicities of refractory advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated by CD20-directed chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. Clin Immunol 2014; 155: 160–175.
    1. Cheson BD , Horning SJ , Coiffier B , Shipp MA , Fisher RI , Connors JM et al. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1244.
    1. Bindon CI , Hale G , Waldmann H . Importance of antigen specificity for complement-mediated lysis by monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Immunol 1988; 18: 1507–1514.
    1. Brentjens RJ , Riviere I , Park JH , Davila ML , Wang X , Stefanski J et al. Safety and persistence of adoptively transferred autologous CD19-targeted T cells in patients with relapsed or chemotherapy refractory B-cell leukemias. Blood 2011; 118: 4817–4828.
    1. Kalos M , Levine BL , Porter DL , Katz S , Grupp SA , Bagg A et al. T cells with chimeric antigen receptors have potent antitumor effects and can establish memory in patients with advanced leukemia. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3: 95ra73.
    1. Porter DL , Levine BL , Kalos M , Bagg A , June CH . Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 725–733.
    1. Maude SL , Barrett D , Teachey DT , Grupp SA . Managing cytokine release syndrome associated with novel T cell-engaging therapies. Cancer J 2014; 20: 119–122.
    1. Xu XJ , Tang YM . Cytokine release syndrome in cancer immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor engineered T cells. Cancer Lett 2014; 343: 172–178.
    1. Morgan RA , Yang JC , Kitano M , Dudley ME , Laurencot CM , Rosenberg SA . Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Mol Ther 2010; 18: 843–851.
    1. Savoldo B , Ramos CA , Liu E , Mims MP , Keating MJ , Carrum G et al. CD28 costimulation improves expansion and persistence of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in lymphoma patients. J Clin Invest 2011; 121: 1822–1826.
    1. Grupp SA , Kalos M , Barrett D , Aplenc R , Porter DL , Rheingold SR et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1509–1518.
    1. Kochenderfer JN , Dudley ME , Feldman SA , Wilson WH , Spaner DE , Maric I et al. B-cell depletion and remissions of malignancy along with cytokine-associated toxicity in a clinical trial of anti-CD19 chimeric-antigen-receptor-transduced T cells. Blood 2012; 119: 2709–2720.
    1. Kochenderfer JN , Wilson WH , Janik JE , Dudley ME , Stetler-Stevenson M , Feldman SA et al. Eradication of B-lineage cells and regression of lymphoma in a patient treated with autologous T cells genetically engineered to recognize CD19. Blood 2010; 116: 4099–4102.
    1. Kerkar SP , Sanchez-Perez L , Yang S , Borman ZA , Muranski P , Ji Y et al. Genetic engineering of murine CD8+ and CD4+ T cells for preclinical adoptive immunotherapy studies. J Immunother 2011; 34: 343–352.
    1. Klebanoff CA , Gattinoni L , Restifo NP . Sorting through subsets: which T-cell populations mediate highly effective adoptive immunotherapy? J Immunother 2012; 35: 651–660.
    1. Wang X , Berger C , Wong CW , Forman SJ , Riddell SR , Jensen MC . Engraftment of human central memory-derived effector CD8+ T cells in immunodeficient mice. Blood 2011; 117: 1888–1898.
    1. Dai H , Zhang W , Li X , Han Q , Guo Y , Zhang Y et al. Tolerance and efficacy of autologous or donor-derived T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors in adult B-ALL with extramedullary leukemia. Oncoimmunology 2015; 4: e1027469.
    1. Tabata R , Iwama H , Tabata C , Yasumizu R , Kojima M . CD5- and CD23-positive splenic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with very low CD20 expression. J Clin Exp Hematop 2014; 54: 155–161.
    1. Bruchard M , Ghiringhelli F . [Impact of chemotherapies on immunosuppression and discovery of new therapeutic targets]. Bull Cancer 2014; 101: 605–607.
    1. Cornelissen AS , Maijenburg MW , Nolte MA , Voermans C . Organ-specific migration of mesenchymal stromal cells: Who, when, where and why? Immunol Lett. 2015; 168: 159–169.
    1. Hannani D , Sistigu A , Kepp O , Galluzzi L , Kroemer G , Zitvogel L . Prerequisites for the antitumor vaccine-like effect of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Cancer J 2011; 17: 351–358.
    1. Senff NJ , Hoefnagel JJ , Neelis KJ , Vermeer MH , Noordijk EM , Willemze R et al. Results of radiotherapy in 153 primary cutaneous B-Cell lymphomas classified according to the WHO-EORTC classification. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143: 1520–1526.
    1. Chakraborty M , Abrams SI , Camphausen K , Liu K , Scott T , Coleman CN et al. Irradiation of tumor cells up-regulates Fas and enhances CTL lytic activity and CTL adoptive immunotherapy. J Immunol 2003; 170: 6338–6347.
    1. Chakraborty M , Abrams SI , Coleman CN , Camphausen K , Schlom J , Hodge JW . External beam radiation of tumors alters phenotype of tumor cells to render them susceptible to vaccine-mediated T-cell killing. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 4328–4337.
    1. Burger JA , Burger M , Kipps TJ . Chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells express functional CXCR4 chemokine receptors that mediate spontaneous migration beneath bone marrow stromal cells. Blood 1999; 94: 3658–3667.
    1. Burger JA , Tsukada N , Burger M , Zvaifler NJ , Dell'Aquila M , Kipps TJ . Blood-derived nurse-like cells protect chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells from spontaneous apoptosis through stromal cell-derived factor-1. Blood 2000; 96: 2655–2663.
    1. Tumeh PC , Harview CL , Yearley JH , Shintaku IP , Taylor EJ , Robert L et al. PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature 2014; 515: 568–571.
    1. Maude SL , Teachey DT , Porter DL , Grupp SA . CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2015; 125: 4017–4023.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner