Validating the Body Uneasiness Test (BUT) in obese patients

G Marano, M Cuzzolaro, G Vetrone, P E Garfinkel, F Temperilli, G Spera, R Dalle Grave, S Calugi, G Marchesini, QUOVADIS Study Group, G Marano, M Cuzzolaro, G Vetrone, P E Garfinkel, F Temperilli, G Spera, R Dalle Grave, S Calugi, G Marchesini, QUOVADIS Study Group

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Body Uneasiness Test (BUT) in a large sample of subjects with obesity seeking treatment. BUT is a 71-item self-report questionnaire in two parts: BUT-A which measures weight phobia, body image concerns, avoidance, compulsive self-monitoring, detachment and estrangement feelings towards one's own body (depersonalization); and BUT-B, which looks at specific worries about particular body parts or functions.

Methods: We recruited a clinical sample of 1,812 adult subjects (age range 18-65 years, females 1,411, males 401) with obesity (Body Mass Index, BMI > or = 30 kg/m2) and a normal weight (BMI value between 18.5 and 25 kg/m2) non-clinical sample of 457 adult subjects (females 248, males 209) with an Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26) score under the cut-off point 20 (scores > or = 20 indicate possible cases of eating disorders).

Results: The exploratory and confirmatory analyses confirmed a structural five-factor model for BUT-A and an eight-factor model for BUT-B. Internal consistency was satisfactory. Concurrent validity with Binge Eating Scale (BES) and Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) was evaluated. The authors calculated mean values for BUT scores in adult (18-65 years) patients with obesity, and evaluated the influence of gender, age and BMI. Females obtained statistically significant higher scores than males in all age groups and in all classes of obesity; patients with obesity, compared with normal weight subjects, generally obtained statistically significant higher scores, but few differences could be attributed to the influence of BMI.

Conclusion: The BUT can be a valuable multidimensional tool for the clinical assessment of body uneasiness in obesity; the scores of its sub-scales do not show a linear correlation with BMI values.

References

    1. Am J Psychiatry. 1967 Apr;123(10):1296-300
    1. Behav Res Ther. 1996 Sep;34(9):755-66
    1. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Sep;15(9):2320-7
    1. Eat Behav. 2004 May;5(2):181-7
    1. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(1):71-83
    1. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003 Oct;57(5):511-6
    1. Psychol Med. 1982 Nov;12(4):871-8
    1. Eat Weight Disord. 1997 Jun;2(2):100-4
    1. Eat Weight Disord. 1999 Dec;4(4):187-93
    1. Psychiatry Res. 2000 May 15;94(2):131-8
    1. Eat Weight Disord. 2006 Mar;11(1):1-13
    1. Int J Eat Disord. 2006 May;39(4):332-40
    1. Eat Weight Disord. 2006 Sep;11(3):e79-84
    1. Eat Weight Disord. 2003 Dec;8(4):315-8
    1. Eat Weight Disord. 2004 Sep;9(3):194-9
    1. Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2003 Apr;16(2):115-24
    1. Psychol Med. 1979 May;9(2):273-9
    1. Int J Eat Disord. 1996 Nov;20(3):287-93
    1. J Consult Psychol. 1953 Oct;17(5):343-7
    1. Eat Weight Disord. 2003 Dec;8(4):321-5
    1. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005 Mar;28(1):69-87, viii
    1. Am J Psychiatry. 1967 May;123(11):1443-7
    1. Obes Res. 2005 Nov;13(11):1961-9
    1. Psychopathology. 2003 Sep-Oct;36(5):247-54
    1. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Dec;26(4):257-64
    1. Obes Res. 2004 Dec;12(12):2005-12
    1. Eat Weight Disord. 1998 Mar;3(1):7-15
    1. Int J Eat Disord. 2005 May;37(4):342-6
    1. Addict Behav. 1982;7(1):47-55
    1. Eat Weight Disord. 1998 Dec;3(4):188-94
    1. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Mar;26(3):299-307
    1. Psychopathology. 2003 Sep-Oct;36(5):239-46

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner