Impact of volume expansion on the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of liposome bupivacaine

Admir Hadzic, John A Abikhaled, William J Harmon, Admir Hadzic, John A Abikhaled, William J Harmon

Abstract

Liposome bupivacaine is a prolonged-release liposomal formulation of bupivacaine indicated for single-dose infiltration into the surgical site to produce postsurgical analgesia of longer duration than traditional local anesthetics. This review summarizes the available data on how volume expansion may impact the analgesic efficacy of liposome bupivacaine. The Phase II and III clinical studies that involved surgical site administration of liposome bupivacaine at various concentrations in different surgical settings revealed no apparent concentration-efficacy relationship. A single-center, prospective study comparing the efficacy of transversus abdominis plane infiltration with liposome bupivacaine administered in a lower (266 mg/40 mL) vs a higher (266 mg/20 mL) dose concentration in subjects undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy also reported similar postsurgical pain intensity scores and opioid usage in both treatment groups. The pharmacokinetic profile of liposome bupivacaine following subcutaneous injections in rats was unaltered by differences in drug concentration, dose, or injection volume within the ranges tested. Volume expansion of liposome bupivacaine to a total volume of 300 mL or less does not appear to impact its clinical efficacy or pharmacokinetic profile, thus allowing flexibility to administer the formulation across a wide range of diluent volumes.

Keywords: analgesia; concentration; dilution; dose; liposome bupivacaine; pain.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic image of an injection of liposome bupivacaine into the surgical site. Notes: White arrows point to liposomes; white haze illustrates free bupivacaine contained in liposome bupivacaine solution. Image courtesy of Avenue-V Media, New York, NY, USA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean (± SD) subject-reported pain intensity scores assessed using a numeric rating scale (0= no pain; 10= worst possible pain) in adult males who received liposome bupivacaine 266 mg/20 mL (13.3 mg/mL [1.33%]; n=12) or liposome bupivacaine 266 mg/40 mL (6.7 mg/mL [0.67%]; n=12) via bilateral transversus abdominis plane infiltration for postsurgical analgesia following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Notes: Republished with permission of Sternlicht A, Shapiro M, Robelen G, Vellayappan U, Tuerk IA. Infiltration of liposome bupivacaine into the transversus abdominis plane for postsurgical analgesia in robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy: a pilot study. Local Reg Anesth. 2014;7:69–74. Copyright © 2014. Permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Abbreviations: h, hours; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean plasma bupivacaine HCl concentration over time following subcutaneous administration of high- versus low-density liposome bupivacaine in rats (Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., data on file, 2011).

References

    1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(2):248–273.
    1. Ilfeld BM. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: a review of the published evidence. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(4):904–925.
    1. Covino BG, Wildsmith JAW. Clinical pharmacology of local anesthetic agents. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, editors. Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. pp. 97–128.
    1. Exparel® (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) [prescribing information] Parsippany, NJ: Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2014.
    1. Chahar P, Cummings KC., 3rd Liposomal bupivacaine: a review of a new bupivacaine formulation. J Pain Res. 2012;5:257–264.
    1. Nesioonpour Sh, Akhondzadeh R, Pipelzadeh MR, Rezaee S, Nazaree E, Soleymani M. The effect of preemptive analgesia with bupivacaine on postoperative pain of inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. Hernia. 2013;17(4):465–470.
    1. Elliott S, Eckersall S, Fligelstone L, Jothilingam S. Does the addition of clonidine affect duration of analgesia of bupivacaine wound infiltration in inguinal hernia surgery? Br J Anaesth. 1997;79(4):446–449.
    1. Lau H, Patil NG, Lee F, Yuen WK. A prospective trial of analgesia following endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(1):159–162.
    1. Bay-Nielsen M, Klarskov B, Bech K, Andersen J, Kehlet H. Levobupivacaine vs bupivacaine as infiltration anaesthesia in inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82(2):280–282.
    1. Dierking GW, Ostergaard E, Ostergård HT, Dahl JB. The effects of wound infiltration with bupivacaine versus saline on postoperative pain and opioid requirements after herniorrhaphy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994;38(3):289–292.
    1. Dasta J, Ramamoorthy S, Patou G, Sinatra R. Bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension compared with bupivacaine HCl for the reduction of opioid burden in the postsurgical setting. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012;28(10):1609–1615.
    1. Langford RM, Chappell GM, Karrasch JA. A single administration of DepoBupivacaine intraoperatively results in prolonged detectable plasma bupivacaine and analgesia in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair; Abstract P-9088. Presented at: Annual Postgraduate Assembly in Anesthesiology of the New York State Society of Anesthesiologists; December 12–16 2008; New York, NY:
    1. White PF, Schooley GL, Ardeleanu M. Analgesia following a single administration of depobupivacaine intraoperatively in patients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy: preliminary dose-ranging studies [abstract S-242] Anesth Analg. 2009;108(Suppl 3S):S-242. Available from: .
    1. Bramlett K, Onel E, Viscusi ER, Jones K. A randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study comparing wound infiltration of DepoFoam bupivacaine, an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine, to bupivacaine HCl for postsurgical analgesia in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2012;19(5):530–536.
    1. Haas E, Onel E, Miller H, Ragupathi M, White PF. A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study for post-hemorrhoidectomy pain management with liposome bupivacaine, a novel local analgesic formulation. Am Surg. 2012;78(5):574–581.
    1. Smoot JD, Bergese SD, Onel E, Williams HT, Hedden W. The efficacy and safety of DepoFoam bupivacaine in patients undergoing bilateral, cosmetic, submuscular augmentation mammoplasty: a randomized, double-blind, active-control study. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(1):69–76.
    1. Gorfine SR, Onel E, Patou G, Krivokapic ZV. Bupivacaine extended-release liposome injection for prolonged postsurgical analgesia in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(12):1552–1559.
    1. Golf M, Daniels SE, Onel E. A phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of DepoFoam® bupivacaine (extended-release bupivacaine local analgesic) in bunionectomy. Adv Ther. 2011;28(9):776–788.
    1. Sternlicht A, Shapiro M, Robelen G, Vellayappan U, Tuerk IA. Infiltration of liposome bupivacaine into the transversus abdominis plane for postsurgical analgesia in robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy: a pilot study. Local Reg Anesth. 2014;7:69–74.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner