Liposome Bupivacaine for Postsurgical Analgesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colectomy: Results from Prospective Phase IV Sequential Cohort Studies Assessing Health Economic Outcomes

Keith A Candiotti, Laurence R Sands, Edward Lee, Sergio D Bergese, Alan E Harzman, Jorge Marcet, Anjali S Kumar, Eric Haas, Keith A Candiotti, Laurence R Sands, Edward Lee, Sergio D Bergese, Alan E Harzman, Jorge Marcet, Anjali S Kumar, Eric Haas

Abstract

Background: Opioid-based postsurgical analgesia exposes patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy to elevated risk for gastrointestinal motility problems and other opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs). The purpose of our research was to investigate postsurgical outcomes, including opioid consumption, hospital length of stay, and ORAE risk associated with a multimodal analgesia regimen, employing a single administration of liposome bupivacaine as well as other analgesics that act by different mechanisms.

Methods: We analyzed combined results from 6 Phase IV, prospective, single-center studies in which patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy received opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) or multimodal analgesia incorporating intraoperative administration of liposome bupivacaine. As-needed rescue therapy was available to all patients. Primary outcome measures were postsurgical opioid consumption, hospital length of stay, and hospitalization costs. Secondary measures included time to first rescue opioid use, patient satisfaction with analgesia (assessed using a 5-point Likert scale), and ORAEs.

Results: Eighty-two patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy and did not meet intraoperative exclusion criteria (PCA n = 56; multimodal analgesia n = 26). Compared with the PCA group, the multimodal analgesia group had significantly lower mean total postsurgical opioid consumption (96 vs 32 mg, respectively; P < 0.0001) and shorter median postsurgical hospital length of stay (3.0 vs 4.0 days; P = 0.0019). Geometric mean costs were $11,234 and $13,018 in the multimodal analgesia and PCA groups, respectively (P = 0.2612). Median time to first rescue opioid use was longer in the multimodal analgesia group versus PCA group (1.1 hours vs 0.6 hours, respectively; P=0.0003). ORAEs were experienced by 41% of patients receiving intravenous opioid PCA and 8% of patients receiving multimodal analgesia (P = 0.0019). Study limitations included use of an open-label, nonrandomized design; small population size; and the inability to isolate treatment-related effects specifically attributable to liposome bupivacaine.

Conclusions: Compared with intravenous opioid PCA, a liposome bupivacaine-based multimodal analgesia regimen reduced postsurgical opioid use, hospital length of stay, and ORAEs, and may lead to improved postsurgical outcomes following laparoscopic colectomy.

Keywords: hospitalization cost; laparoscopic colectomy; length of stay; multimodal analgesia; opioid-related adverse events; surgery.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Front view of infiltration path for administration of liposome bupivacaine into subcutaneous and dermal regions. About 4 mL study drug solution was administered on each side of the surgical site following the paths shown. (B) Axial view of infiltration depth into subcutaneous and dermal regions. The dotted line shows depth of liposome bupivacaine administration. Reprinted with permission from Best Infiltration Practices: Local Analgesic Infiltration Techniques for Abdominal Surgery PocketGuide. Copyright © 2012 International Guidelines Center. www.GuidelineCentral.com. All rights reserved.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) Front view of infiltration path for administration of liposome bupivacaine into perifascial regions. About 1 mL study drug solution was administered to deep tissue on each side of the surgical site following the paths shown. (B) Axial view of infiltration depth into perifascial (deep tissue) regions. The dotted line shows depth of liposome bupivacaine administration. Reprinted with permission from Best Infiltration Practices: Local Analgesic Infiltration Techniques for Abdominal Surgery PocketGuide. Copyright © 2012 International Guidelines Center. www.GuidelineCentral.com. All rights reserved.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) Front view of anticipated trocar sites. About 10 mL study drug solution was divided and administered across trocar sites. The dotted arrows show locations for trocar placement. (B) Axial view of liposome bupivacaine infiltration into the trocar tract. Reprinted with permission from Best Infiltration Practices: Local Analgesic Infiltration Techniques for Abdominal Surgery PocketGuide. Copyright © 2012 International Guidelines Center. www.GuidelineCentral.com. All rights reserved.

References

    1. Oderda G.M., Said Q., Evans R.S. Opioid-related adverse drug events in surgical hospitalizations: impact on costs and length of stay. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:400–407.
    1. Senagore A.J. Pathogenesis and clinical and economic consequences of postoperative ileus. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(20 Suppl 13):S3–S7.
    1. Oderda GM, Robinson SB, Gan TJ, et al. Impact of postsurgical opioid use and ileus on economic outcomes in gastrointestinal surgeries. Abstract presented at: Annual Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research; June 2–6, 2012; Washington, DC.
    1. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:248–273.
    1. The Management of Postoperative Pain Working Group. VHA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of postoperative pain, 2002. . Accessed August 22, 2012.
    1. Pain Management Guideline Panel Clinicians’ quick reference guide to postoperative pain management in adults. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US Department of Health and Human Services. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1992;7:214–228.
    1. The Joint Commission. Facts about pain management, 2012. . Accessed August 21, 2012.
    1. Warfield C.A., Kahn C.H. Acute pain management. Programs in U.S. hospitals and experiences and attitudes among U.S. adults. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:1090–1094.
    1. Apfelbaum J.L., Chen C., Mehta S.S., Gan T.J. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:534–540.
    1. Gan TJ, Habib AS, White W, Miller T. Postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Abstract presented at: Annual Fall Pain Meeting and Workshops of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine; November 15–18, 2012; Miami Beach, Fla.
    1. Schwenk W., Haase O., Neudecker J., Muller J.M. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 CD003145.
    1. Wongyingsinn M., Baldini G., Stein B. Spinal analgesia for laparoscopic colonic resection using an enhanced recovery after surgery programme: better analgesia, but no benefits on postoperative recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:850–856.
    1. Zafar N., Davies R., Greenslade G.L., Dixon A.R. The evolution of analgesia in an ‘accelerated’ recovery programme for resectional laparoscopic colorectal surgery with anastomosis. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:119–124.
    1. Kaba A., Laurent S.R., Detroz B.J. Intravenous lidocaine infusion facilitates acute rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomy. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:11–18.
    1. Elvir-Lazo O.L., White P.F. The role of multimodal analgesia in pain management after ambulatory surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23:697–703.
    1. Bergese S.D., Ramamoorthy S., Patou G. Efficacy profile of liposome bupivacaine, a novel formulation of bupivacaine for postsurgical analgesia. J Pain Res. 2012;5:107–116.
    1. Dasta J., Ramamoorthy S., Patou G., Sinatra R. Bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension compared with bupivacaine HCl for the reduction of opioid burden in the postsurgical setting. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012;28:1609–1615.
    1. Viscusi E.R., Sinatra R., Onel E., Ramamoorthy S.L. The safety of liposome bupivacaine, a novel local analgesic formulation. Clin J Pain. 2013 Feb 26 [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Haas E., Onel E., Miller H. A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study for post-hemorrhoidectomy pain management with liposome bupivacaine, a novel local analgesic formulation. Am Surg. 2012;78:574–581.
    1. Cohen S.M. Extended pain relief trial utilizing infiltration of Exparel®, a long-acting multivesicular liposome formulation of bupivacaine: a Phase IV health economic trial in adult patients undergoing open colectomy. J Pain Res. 2012;5:567–572.
    1. Best Infiltration Practices: Local Analgesic Infiltration Techniques for Abdominal Surgery. Lake Mary, Fla: International Guidelines Center; 2012.
    1. Marcet J.E., Nfonsam V.N., Larach S. An extended paIn relief trial utilizing the infiltration of a long-acting Multivesicular liPosome foRmulation Of bupiVacaine, EXPAREL (IMPROVE): a Phase IV health economic trial in adult patients undergoing ileostomy reversal. J Pain Res. 2013;6:549–555.
    1. Vogel J.D. Liposome bupivacaine (EXPAREL®) for extended pain relief in patients undergoing ileostomy reversal at a single institution with a fast-track discharge protocol: an IMPROVE Phase IV health economics trial. J Pain Res. 2013;6:605–610.
    1. Patel G.N., Rammos C.K., Patel J.V., Estes N.C. Further reduction of hospital stay for laparoscopic colon resection by modifications of the fast-track care plan. Am J Surg. 2010;199:391–394.
    1. Raue W., Haase O., Junghans T. ‘Fast-track’ multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1463–1468.
    1. Bardram L., Funch-Jensen P., Kehlet H. Rapid rehabilitation in elderly patients after laparoscopic colonic resection. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1540–1545.
    1. Basse L., Hjort J.D., Billesbolle P. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg. 2000;232:51–57.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner