Integrating a physical activity coaching intervention into diabetes care: a mixed-methods evaluation of a pilot pragmatic trial

Amy G Huebschmann, Russell E Glasgow, Ian M Leavitt, Kristi Chapman, John D Rice, Steven Lockhart, Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley, Jane E B Reusch, Andrea L Dunn, Judith G Regensteiner, Amy G Huebschmann, Russell E Glasgow, Ian M Leavitt, Kristi Chapman, John D Rice, Steven Lockhart, Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley, Jane E B Reusch, Andrea L Dunn, Judith G Regensteiner

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) counseling is under-utilized in primary care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), despite improving important health outcomes, including physical function. We adapted evidence-based PA counseling programs to primary care patients, staff, and leader's needs, resulting in "Be ACTIVE" comprised of shared PA tracker data (FitBit©), six theory-informed PA coaching calls, and three in-person clinician visits. In a pilot randomized pragmatic trial, we evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of Be ACTIVE. Sedentary patients with T2D were randomized to Be ACTIVE versus an enhanced control condition. Mixed methods assessments of feasibility and acceptability included costs. Objective pilot effectiveness outcomes included PA (primary outcome, accelerometer steps/week), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) physical function measure, and behavioral PA predictors. Fifty patients were randomized to Be ACTIVE or control condition. Acceptability was >90% for patients and clinic staff. Coaching and PA tracking costs of ~$90/patient met Medicare reimbursement criteria. Pre-post PA increased by ~11% (Be ACTIVE) and ~6% in controls (group difference: 1574 ± 4391 steps/week, p = .72). As compared to controls, Be ACTIVE participants significantly improved SPPB (0.9 ± 0.3 vs. -0.1 ± 0.3, p = .01, changes >0.5 points prevent falls clinically), and PA predictors of self-efficacy (p = .02) and social-environmental support (p < .01). In this pilot trial, Be ACTIVE was feasible and highly acceptable to stakeholders and yielded significant improvements in objective physical function consistent with lower fall risk, whereas PA changes were less than anticipated. Be ACTIVE may need additional adaptation or a longer duration to improve PA outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02473926.

Keywords: Implementation; Physical activity; Physical function; Primary care; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; acceptability.

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Summary of the Be ACTIVE Intervention content and implemented strategy tested.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Be ACTIVE intervention increases Physical Function more than Physical Activity. Data shown compare group change between Be ACTIVE (Blue) vs. Enhanced Usual Care (Black) for outcomes of physical activity (PA, a), physical function by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB, b), and physical function by timed 400-meter walk (c).

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner