Development, reliability and validity of the Chichewa WHOQOL-BREF in adults in Lilongwe, Malawi

Tim Colbourn, Gibson Masache, Jolene Skordis-Worrall, Tim Colbourn, Gibson Masache, Jolene Skordis-Worrall

Abstract

Background: Quality of life measurement is a useful addition to measurement of health outcomes in evaluation of the benefits of many health and welfare interventions. The WHOQOL-BREF measures quality of life from a broad multi-dimensional perspective but was not used in Malawi. The objective of this study was to translate the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire into the main local language of Malawi: Chichewa; and to validate it quantitatively with respect to internal consistency, domain structure, and discriminant validity for this context.

Methods: WHO-mandated guidelines were followed for translation, adaptation, pre-testing (focus groups), piloting (patient interviews) and data coding. Analyses using descriptive statistics, correlation and regression were undertaken to investigate the validity of the WHOQOL-BREF in the ways described above. Additional regression analyses examined the impact of socio-demographic variables on the domain scores.

Results: 309 respondents completed the questionnaire (with >98% response rates for all questions except Q21 (sex life)). 259 were sick with a variety of health problems, and 50 were considered healthy. All domains showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > =0.7) with all item scores also most highly correlated with the scores of their assigned domain. All domain scores varied by health problem, and more depressed respondents had significantly lower scores in all domains than those less depressed. Domain scores and their associations with socio-demographic variables are presented and discussed.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the new Chichewa WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire is acceptable and comprehensible to respondents in Malawi. The questionnaire also passed a number of tests of the validity of its psychometric properties. In the pilot population we found that older age was associated with lower Physical domain scores. Conversely, higher levels of educational attainment were found to be associated with higher quality of life in all domains except for Social Relationships. Respondents living as married or single were found to have higher quality of life in the Physical, Psychological and Social domains, and those who were widowed lower Physical quality of life.

References

    1. Drummond M, Weatherly H, Claxton K, Cookson R, Ferguson B, Godfrey C, Rice N, Sculpher M, Sowden A. Assessing the Challenges of Applying Standard Methods of Economic Evaluation to Public Health Interventions. Public Health Research Consortium; Final Report 2008. 2012. pp. 1–226. last accessed 28/05/2012.
    1. The-WHOQoL-Group. The WHO Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:1569–1585. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4.
    1. Skevington SM, Lofty M, O’Connell KA, WHOQOL G. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-Bref quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:299–310.
    1. Tsutsumi A, Izutsu T, Kato S, Islam MDA, Yamada H, Kato H, Wakai S. Reliability and validity of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF in an adult population in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006;60:493–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01537.x.
    1. Nedjat S, Montazeri A, Holakouie K, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh R. Psychometric properties of the Iranian interview-administered version of the World Health Organization’s Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF): A population-based study. BMC Heal Serv Res. 2008;8(6):1.
    1. Jaracz K, Kalfoss M, Gorna K, Baczyk G. Quality of life in Polish respondents: psychometric properties of the Polish WHOQOL—Bref. Scand J Caring Sci. 2006;20:251–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00401.x.
    1. Eser E, Findaner H, Eser SY, Elibi H, Goker E. Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-BREF. J Psychiatry Psychol Psychopharmacol. 1999;7:23–40. In Turkish.
    1. Kayambazinthu E. The Language Planning Situation in Malawi. J Multiling Multicult Dev. 1998;19(5):369–439. doi: 10.1080/01434639808666363.
    1. WHO: WHOQoL User Manual. WHO/MNH/MHP/98.4.Rev.1 WHO Programme on Mental Health. Geneva; 1998. pp. 1–106. .
    1. WHO: WHOQoL Translation Methodology. World Health Organisation. Geneva: World Health Organisation Press, Department of Knowledge Management and Sharing, Information, Evidence and Research Cluster; 2009. following granting of permission to undertake the WHOQoL-BREF translation on 06/02/2009.
    1. Webster J, Nicholas C, Velacott C, Cridland N, Fawcett L. Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF among women following childbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50:132–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01131.x.
    1. WHO. Global Burden of Disease 2004 update: disability weights for diseases and conditions. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2004. last accessed 28/05/2012.
    1. National Statistics Office (NSO) [Malawi], ORC Macro [USA] Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2004. Calverton, Maryland: NSO and ORC Macro; 2005. p. 578.
    1. Baumann C, Erpelding ML, Régat S, Collin JF, Briançon S. The WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire: French adult population norms for the physical health, psychological health and social relationships dimensions. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2010;58(1):33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2009.10.009.
    1. Hanestad BR, Rustøen T, Knudsen OJ, Lerdal A, Wahl AK. Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire for the Norwegian general population. J Nurs Meas. 2004;12(2):147–159. doi: 10.1891/jnum.2004.12.2.147.
    1. Noerholm V, Groenvold M, Watt T, Bjorner JB, Rasmussen N-A, Bech P. Quality of life in the Danish general population—normative data and validity of WHOQoL-BREF using Rasch and item response theory models. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:531–540.
    1. Saxena S, Carlson D, Billington R, Orley J, Group W. The WHO quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-Bref): The importance of its items in cross-cultural research. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:711–721. doi: 10.1023/A:1013867826835.
    1. Pinquart M, Sorensen S. Differences Between Caregivers and Noncaregivers in Psychological Health and Physical Health: A Meta-Analysis. Psychol Aging. 2003;18(2):250–267.
    1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge: Harvard School of Public Health on behalf of the World Health Organisation and the World Bank; 1996.
    1. Bonomi AE, Patrick DL, Bushnell DM, Martin M. Validation of the United States’ version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00123-7.
    1. Ng N, Hakimi M, Byass P, Wilopo S, Wall S. Health and quality of life among older rural people in Purworejo District, Indonesia. Glob Health Action 2010. 2010;3(Supplement 2) doi:10.3402/gha.v3i0.2125.
    1. Gomez-Olive FX, Thorogood M, Clark BD, Kahn K, Tollman S. Assessing health and well-being among older people in rural South Africa. Glob Health Action. 2010;3(Supplement 2) doi:10.3402/gha.v3i0.2126.
    1. Van Minh H, Byass P, Chuc NTK, Wall S. Patterns of health status and quality of life among older people in rural Viet Nam. Glob Health Action 2010. 2010;3(Supplement 2) doi:10.3402/gha.v3i0.2124.
    1. Razzaque A, Nahar L, Khanam AM, Streatfield K. Socio-demographic differentials of adult health indicators in Matlab, Bangladesh: self-rated health, health state, quality of life and disability level. Glob Health Action 2010. 2010;3(Supplement 2) doi:10.3402/gha.v3i0.4618.
    1. Ng N, Kowal P, Kahn K, Naidoo N, Abdullah S, Bawah A, Binka F, Chuc NTK, Debpuur C, Egondi T. et al.Health inequalities among older men and women in Africa and Asia: evidence from eight Health and Demographic Surveillance System sites in the INDEPTH WHO-SAGE Study. Glob Health Action 2010. 2010;3(Supplement 2) doi:10.3402/gha.v3i0.5420.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner