A Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Between Fimasartan and Linagliptin in Healthy Volunteers

Woo Youl Kang, Hae Won Lee, Mi-Ri Gwon, Seungil Cho, Wang-Seob Shim, Kyung-Tae Lee, Dong Heon Yang, Sook Jin Seong, Young-Ran Yoon, Woo Youl Kang, Hae Won Lee, Mi-Ri Gwon, Seungil Cho, Wang-Seob Shim, Kyung-Tae Lee, Dong Heon Yang, Sook Jin Seong, Young-Ran Yoon

Abstract

Objective: Fimasartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, and linagliptin, a dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor, are frequently coadministered to treat patients with hypertension and diabetes, respectively. This study sought to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions between fimasartan and linagliptin after co-administration in healthy Korean subjects.

Methods: The overall study was divided into two separate parts, with each part designed as an open-label, multiple-dose, two-period, and single-sequence study. In Part A, to investigate the effect of linagliptin on fimasartan, 25 subjects received 120 mg fimasartan alone once daily for seven days during Period I, and 120 mg fimasartan with 20 mg linagliptin for seven days during Period II. In Part B, to examine the effect of fimasartan on linagliptin, 12 subjects received only linagliptin once daily for seven days during Period I, followed by concomitant administration of fimasartan for seven days during Period II, at the same doses used in Part A. Serial blood samples were collected at scheduled intervals for up to 24 h after the last dose to determine the steady-state pharmacokinetics of both drugs.

Results: Thirty-six subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals for maximum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) and area under the concentration-time curve at steady state (AUCτ,ss) of fimasartan with or without linagliptin were 1.2633 (0.9175-1.7396) and 1.1740 (1.0499-1.3126), respectively. The corresponding values for Cmax,ss and AUCτ,ss of linagliptin with or without fimasartan were 0.9804 (0.8480-1.1336) and 0.9950 (0.9322-1.0619), respectively. A total of eight adverse events (AEs) were reported and the incidence of AEs did not increase significantly with co-administration of the drugs.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that there are no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between fimasartan and linagliptin when co-administered. Treatments were well tolerated during the study, with no serious adverse effects.

Clinical trial registry: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03250052" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov">NCT03250052.

Keywords: drug–drug interaction; fimasartan; linagliptin; pharmacokinetics; safety.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest regarding the content of this article.

© 2020 Kang et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A and B) Study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean plasma concentration–time profiles in healthy subjects (A) for fimasartan after 7-day multiple oral administrations of fimasartan (120 mg) alone or coadministration of fimasartan (120 mg) and linagliptin (5 mg), (B) for linagliptin after 7-day multiple oral administrations of linagliptin (5 mg) alone of coadministration of linagliptin (5 mg) and fimasartan (120 mg).

References

    1. Kim JH, Lee JH, Paik SH, Kim JH, Chi YH. Fimasartan, a novel angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Arch Pharm Res. 2012;35(7):1123–1126. doi:10.1007/s12272-012-0700-z
    1. Kanarb® (fimasartan) tablets [Investigator’s Brochure]. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Boryung Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; 2018.
    1. Ghim JL, Paik SH, Hasanuzzaman M, et al. Absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist fimasartan in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56(5):576–580. doi:10.1002/jcph.618
    1. Kang WY, Kim EH, Seong SJ, et al. Pharmacokinetic drug interaction study using fimasartan and rosuvastatin in healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;54(12):992–1003. doi:10.5414/CP202615
    1. Kim TH, Shin S, Bashir M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolite profiling of fimasartan, a novel antihypertensive agent, in rats. Xenobiotica. 2014;44:913–925. doi:10.3109/00498254.2014.915359
    1. Jeong ES, Kim YW, Kim HJ, et al. Glucuronidation of fimasartan, a new angiotensin receptor antagonist, is mainly mediated by UGT1A3. Xenobiotica. 2015;45:10–18. doi:10.3109/00498254.2014.942810
    1. Kim JW, Yi S, Kim TE, et al. Increased systemic exposure of fimasartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, by ketoconazole and rifampicin. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53:75–81. doi:10.1177/0091270011433328
    1. Tradjenta® (linagliptin) tablets [prescribing information]. Binger Strasse, Germany: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc; Available from: . Accessed October18, 2019.
    1. Langley AK, Suffoletta TJ, Jennings HR. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors and the incretin system in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27(8):1163–1180. doi:10.1592/phco.27.8.1163
    1. Ceriello A, Inagaki N. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics evaluation of linagliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, with consideration of Asian patient populations. J Diabetes Investig. 2017;8(1):19–28.
    1. Hong KN, Fuster V, Rosenson RS, Rosendorff C, Bhatt DL. How low to go with glucose, cholesterol, and blood pressure in primary prevention of CVD. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(17):2171–2185. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.001
    1. Ali MK, Bullard KM, Saaddine JB, et al. Achievement of goals in U.S. diabetes care, 1999–2010. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1613–1624. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1213829
    1. Cooper ME, Perkovic V, Groop P-H, et al. Hemodynamic effects of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin with renin–angiotensin system inhibitors in type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria. J Hypertens. 2019;37(6):1294–1300. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000002032
    1. Qiu DD, Liu J, Shi JS, et al. Renoprotection provided by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in combination with angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2018;131(22):2658–2665. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.245277
    1. Yang YS, Lim MH, Lee SO, et al. Fimasartan increases glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension compared with amlodipine. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(7):1670–1677. doi:10.1111/dom.13282
    1. Friedrich C, Metzmann K, Rose P, Mattheus M, Pinnetti S, Woerle HJ. A randomized, open-label, crossover study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin and linagliptin after coadministration in healthy male volunteers. Clin Ther. 2013;35(1):A33–A42. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.12.002
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. [webpage on the Internet] Clinical drug interaction studies – study design, data analysis, and clinical implications guidance for industry; 2017. Available from: . Accessed March4, 2020.
    1. Yi S, Kim TE, Yoon SH, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction of fimasartan, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, with amlodipine in healthy volunteers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2011;57(6):682–689. doi:10.1097/FJC.0b013e31821795d0
    1. Cao CQ, Xiang YF, Zhou ZG. The clinical application of linagliptin in Asians. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:1409–1419. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S64402
    1. Shin KH, Kim TE, Kim SE, et al. The effect of the newly developed angiotensin receptor II antagonist fimasartan on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin in relation to OATP1B1 in healthy male volunteers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2011;58:492–499. doi:10.1097/FJC.0b013e31822b9092
    1. Gu N, Kim BH, Lim KS, et al. The effect of fimasartan, an angiotensin receptor type 1 blocker, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy Korean male volunteers: a one-sequence, two-period crossover clinical trial. Clin Ther. 2012;34:1592–1600. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.004
    1. Mudra DR, Desino KE, Desai PV. In silico, in vitro and in situ models to assess interplay between CYP3A and P-gp. Curr Drug Metab. 2011;12(8):750–773. doi:10.2174/138920011798356999
    1. Akamine Y, Yasui-Furukori N, Uno T. Drug-drug interactions of P-gp substrates unrelated to CYP metabolism. Curr Drug Metab. 2019;20(2):124–129. doi:10.2174/1389200219666181003142036

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner