Ixekizumab Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results from the Coast-X Trial

Atul Deodhar, Philip Mease, Proton Rahman, Victoria Navarro-Compán, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Theresa Hunter, David Sandoval, Andris Kronbergs, Luis Leon, Mingyang Shan, Ann Leung, Kurt De Vlam, Vibeke Strand, Atul Deodhar, Philip Mease, Proton Rahman, Victoria Navarro-Compán, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Theresa Hunter, David Sandoval, Andris Kronbergs, Luis Leon, Mingyang Shan, Ann Leung, Kurt De Vlam, Vibeke Strand

Abstract

Introduction: Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A antibody, has shown efficacy in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). The objectives of this analysis were (a) to measure improvement in ixekizumab-treated patients in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) response domains and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and (b) to determine how ASAS responses were associated with changes in patient global disease activity (PtGA), spinal pain, function, stiffness, fatigue, and spinal pain at night.

Methods: COAST-X was a phase 3, 52-week multicenter, randomized, controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of 80-mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) and every 4 weeks (Q4W) in patients with active nr-axSpA. Changes from baseline in PROs were analyzed via mixed-effects models for repeated measures. Association analyses for ASAS responses used analysis of covariance with Scheffé's method.

Results: Patients treated with ixekizumab Q2W and Q4W reported significantly greater improvements in PtGA, spinal pain, function, and stiffness at week 1, when these measures were first assessed, compared with placebo (p < 0.05). ASAS40 responders, in comparison to ASAS20 non-responders, had the highest correlations with improvements in all response domains (PtGA, spinal pain, function, and stiffness) as well as fatigue and spinal pain at night (p < 0.001). ASAS40 responses were associated with 3.5- to 48.0-fold greater improvements in these PROs, with the highest values for PtGA and function, compared to ASAS20 non-achievement.

Conclusions: As early as week 1, patients with nr-axSpA treated with ixekizumab reported significant improvements in PtGA, spinal pain, function, and stiffness compared with those taking placebo. ASAS40 responders reported significantly greater improvements in all ASAS response domains (PtGA, spinal pain, function, and stiffness) as well as fatigue and spinal pain at night than ASAS20 non-responders. Improvements in PtGA and function appear to be major drivers in achieving ASAS40 response in patients with nr-axSpA.

Trial registration: NCT02757352.

Keywords: Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) response; Biological therapy; Ixekizumab; Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis; Patient-reported outcomes.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Changes from baseline in patient global disease activity (a), spinal pain (b), function (BASFI) (c), and stiffness (BASDAI questions 5 and 6) through week 52 (d). Values are LSM from MMRM. Week 1: PBO, Nx = 103; IXE Q4W, Nx = 95; IXE Q2W, Nx = 99. Week 2: PBO, Nx = 102; IXE Q4W, Nx = 96; IXE Q2W, Nx = 102. Weeks 4 and 8: PBO, Nx = 101; IXE Q4W, Nx = 96; IXE Q2W, Nx = 101. Weeks 12 and 16: PBO, Nx = 99; IXE Q4W, Nx = 96; IXE Q2W, Nx = 98. Week 20: PBO, Nx = 55; IXE Q4W, Nx = 68; IXE Q2W, Nx = 73. Week 24: PBO, Nx = 50; IXE Q4W, Nx = 64; IXE Q2W, Nx = 64. Week 28: PBO, Nx = 43; IXE Q4W, Nx = 63; IXE Q2W, Nx = 61. Week 32: PBO, Nx = 43; IXE Q4W, Nx = 59; IXE Q2W, Nx = 60. Week 36: PBO, Nx = 39; IXE Q4W, Nx = 56; IXE Q2W, Nx = 58. Week 44: PBO, Nx = 36; IXE Q4W, Nx = 54; IXE Q2W, Nx = 56. Week 52: PBO, Nx = 34; IXE Q4W, Nx = 53; IXE Q2W, Nx = 52. P values were from MMRM (treatment vs. placebo). *p < 0.05, ‡p < 0.01, †p < 0.001. BASDAI Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASFI Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, IXE Q2W = 80-mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks, IXE Q4W 80-mg ixekizumab every 4 weeks, IXE Q2W 80-mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks, LSM least squares mean, MMRM mixed-effect model for repeated measures, Nx number of patients with non-missing values, PBO placebo
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes from baseline in fatigue as measured by Fatigue NRS (a) and BASDAI fatigue (b), as well as spinal pain at night through week 52 (c). Values are LSM from MMRM. Fatigue NRS—week 8: PBO, Nx = 101; IXE Q4W, Nx = 95; IXE Q2W, Nx = 101. Week 16: PBO, Nx = 99; IXE Q4W, Nx = 96; IXE Q2W, Nx = 98. Week 36: PBO, N = 39; IXE Q4W, Nx = 56; IXE Q2W, Nx = 58. Week 52: PBO, Nx = 34; IXE Q4W, Nx = 53; IXE Q2W; Nx = 52. BASDAI Fatigue and Spinal Pain at Night—week 1: PBO, Nx = 103; IXE Q4W, Nx = 95; IXE Q2W, Nx = 99. Week 2: PBO, Nx = 102; IXE Q4W, Nx = 96; IXE Q2W, Nx = 102. Weeks 4 and 8: PBO, Nx = 101; IXE Q4W, Nx = 96; IXE Q2W, Nx = 101. Weeks 12 and 16: PBO, Nx = 99; IXE Q4W, Nx = 96; IXE Q2W, Nx = 98. Week 20: PBO, Nx = 55; IXE Q4W, Nx = 68; IXE Q2W, Nx = 73. Week 24: PBO, Nx = 50; IXE Q4W, Nx = 64; IXE Q2W, Nx = 64. Week 28: PBO, Nx = 43; IXE Q4W, Nx = 63; IXE Q2W, Nx = 61. Week 32: PBO, Nx = 43; IXE Q4W, Nx = 59; IXE Q2W, Nx = 60. Week 36: PBO, Nx = 39; IXE Q4W, Nx = 56; IXE Q2W, Nx = 58. Week 44: PBO, Nx = 36; IXE Q4W, Nx = 54; IXE Q2W, Nx = 56. Week 52: PBO, Nx = 34; IXE Q4W, Nx = 53; IXE Q2W, Nx = 52. P values were from MMRM (treatment vs. placebo). *p < 0.05, ‡p < 0.01, †p < 0.001. BASDAI Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, IXE Q2W 80-mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks, IXE Q4W 80-mg ixekizumab every 4 weeks, LSM least squares mean, MMRM mixed-effect model for repeated measures, NRS numeric rating scale, Nx number of patients with non-missing values, PBO placebo
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Association between ASAS response and changes from baseline in measures of patient global disease activity (a), spinal pain (b), function (c), and stiffness (d) (BASDAI questions 5 and 6) at weeks 16 and 52. Values are LSM (SE) from ANCOVA. Only observed data were used in this analysis. P values were from ANCOVA after correcting for baseline value, age, gender, and ASAS response category. §p < 0.001, ASAS20 responder vs. ASAS20 non-responder; **p < 0.001, ASAS40 responder vs. ASAS20 non-responder; †p < 0.001, ASAS40 responder vs. ASAS20 responder. ANCOVA analysis of covariance, ASAS Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society, BASDAI Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASFI Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, LSM least squares mean, Nx number of non-missing observations, SE standard error

References

    1. Deodhar A, Reveille JD, van den Bosch F, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, Caplan L, et al. The concept of axial spondyloarthritis: joint statement of the spondyloarthritis research and treatment network and the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society in response to the US Food and Drug Administration's comments and concerns. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(10):2649–2656. doi: 10.1002/art.38776.
    1. Sieper J, Holbrook T, Black CM, Wood R, Hu X, Kachroo S. Burden of illness associated with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a multiperspective European cross-sectional observational study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016;34(6):975–983.
    1. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J, et al. The development of assessment of spondyloarthritis international society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):777–783. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.108233.
    1. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(4):361–368. doi: 10.1002/art.1780270401.
    1. Deodhar A, van der Heijde D, Gensler LS, Kim T-H, Maksymowych WP, Østergaard M, et al. Ixekizumab for patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (COAST-X): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10217):53–64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32971-X.
    1. Boonen A, Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Bukowski JF, Valluri S, et al. The burden of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015;44(5):556–562. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.10.009.
    1. Kiltz U, Essers I, Hiligsmann M, Braun J, Maksymowych WP, Taylor WJ, et al. Which aspects of health are most important for patients with spondyloarthritis? A Best Worst Scaling based on the ASAS Health Index. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;55(10):1771–1776. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew238.
    1. Ghosh N, Ruderman EM. Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis: clinical and therapeutic relevance. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1493-8.
    1. Ward MM, Deodhar A, Gensler LS, Dubreuil M, Yu D, Khan MA, et al. 2019 Update of the American college of rheumatology/spondylitis association of America/spondyloarthritis research and treatment network recommendations for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(10):1599–1613. doi: 10.1002/art.41042.
    1. Robinson PC, Bird P, Lim I, Saad N, Schachna L, Taylor AL, et al. Consensus statement on the investigation and management of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) Int J Rheum Dis. 2014;17(5):548–556.
    1. Robinson PC, Sengupta R, Siebert S. Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA): advances in classification, imaging and therapy. Rheumatol Ther. 2019;6(2):165–177. doi: 10.1007/s40744-019-0146-6.
    1. Deodhar A, Poddubnyy D, Pacheco-Teno C, Salvarani C, Lespessailles E, Rahman P, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in the treatment of radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: sixteen-week results from a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with prior inadequate response to or intolerance of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(4):599–611. doi: 10.1002/art.40753.
    1. van der Heijde D, Cheng-Chung Wei J, Dougados M, Mease P, Deodhar A, Maksymowych WP, et al. Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A antagonist in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis or radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in patients previously untreated with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (COAST-V): 16-week results of a phase 3 randomised, double-blind, active-controlled and placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10163):2441–2451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31946-9.
    1. Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. (2009) The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 68(Suppl 2):ii1–44.
    1. Mease P, Walsh JA, Baraliakos X, Inman R, de Vlam K, Cheng-Chung Wei J, et al. Translating improvements with ixekizumab in clinical trial outcomes into clinical practice: ASAS40, pain, fatigue, and sleep in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Ther. 2019;6(3):435–450. doi: 10.1007/s40744-019-0165-3.
    1. Rudwaleit M, Jurik AG, Hermann KG, Landewe R, van der Heijde D, Baraliakos X, et al. Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(10):1520–1527. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.110767.
    1. Naegeli AN, Flood E, Tucker J, Devlen J, Edson-Heredia E. The patient experience with fatigue and content validity of a measure to assess fatigue severity: qualitative research in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:192. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-192.
    1. Scheffé H. A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance*. Biometrika. 1953;40(1–2):87–110.
    1. van der Heijde D, Cheng-Chung Wei J, Dougados M, Mease P, Deodhar A, Maksymowych WP, et al. Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A antagonist in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis or radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in patients previously untreated with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (COAST-V): 16 week results of a phase 3 randomised, double-blind, active-controlled and placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatol Ther. 2018;392(10163):2441–2451.
    1. van Lunteren M, Scharloo M, Ez-Zaitouni Z, de Koning A, Landewé R, Fongen C, et al. The impact of illness perceptions and coping on the association between back pain and health outcomes in patients suspected of having axial spondyloarthritis: data from the SPondyloArthritis caught early cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018;70(12):1829–1839. doi: 10.1002/acr.23566.
    1. Stebbings SM, Treharne GJ, Jenks K, Highton J. Fatigue in patients with spondyloarthritis associates with disease activity, quality of life and inflammatory bowel symptoms. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(10):1467–1474. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2445-6.
    1. Sieper J, Hu X, Black CM, Grootscholten K, van den Broek RWM, Kachroo S. Systematic review of clinical, humanistic, and economic outcome comparisons between radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017;46(6):746–753. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.09.002.
    1. Rudwaleit M, Sieper J. Referral strategies for early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(5):262–268. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.39.
    1. Lockwood MM, Gensler LS. Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2017;31(6):816–829. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2018.08.008.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner