Anaesthetic protocol for paediatric glaucoma examinations: the prospective EyeBIS Study protocol

Nina Pirlich, Franz Grehn, Katja Mohnke, Konrad Maucher, Alexander Schuster, Eva Wittenmeier, Irene Schmidtmann, Esther M Hoffmann, Nina Pirlich, Franz Grehn, Katja Mohnke, Konrad Maucher, Alexander Schuster, Eva Wittenmeier, Irene Schmidtmann, Esther M Hoffmann

Abstract

Introduction: Neonates and young infants with diagnosed or highly suspected glaucoma require an examination under anaesthesia to achieve accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, since crying or squinting of the eyes may increase IOP and lead to falsely high values. IOP considerably depends on perioperative variables such as haemodynamic factors, anaesthetics, depth of anaesthesia and airway management. The aim of this paper is to report the design and baseline characteristics of EyeBIS, which is a study to develop a standardised anaesthetic protocol for the measurement of IOP under anaesthesia in childhood glaucoma, by investigating the link between the magnitude of IOP and depth of anaesthesia.

Methods and analysis: This is a single-centre, prospective cohort study in 100 children with diagnosed or highly suspected glaucoma all undergoing ophthalmological examination under general anaesthesia. 20 children, who undergo general anaesthesia for other reasons, are included as controls. The primary outcome measure is the establishment of a standardised anaesthetic protocol for IOP measurement in childhood glaucoma by assessing the relationship between IOP and depth of anaesthesia (calculated as an electroencephalography variable, the bispectral index), with special emphasis on airway management and haemodynamic parameters. The dependence of IOP under anaesthesia on airway management and haemodynamic parameters will be described, using a mixed linear model. Restricting the model to patients with healthy eyes will allow to determine a 95% reference region, in which 95% of the measurement values of patients with healthy eyes can be expected.

Ethics and dissemination: The study has been approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Association of Rhineland-Palatine (Ethik-Kommisssion der Landesaerztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz), Germany (approval number: 2019-14207). This work will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at national and international scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03972852).

Keywords: anaesthesia in ophthalmology; glaucoma; paediatric anaesthesia; paediatric ophthalmology.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) with inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as outcome measures.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schedule of study enrolment and interventions. BIS, bispectral index; IOP, intraocular pressure; i.v., intravenous; SpO2, oxygen saturation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
EyeBIS worksheet. Detailed layout of all steps on the interventional time scale. BIS, bispectral index; etCO2, end tidal carbon dioxide; FiO2, fractional inspired oxygen; HR, heart rate; IOP, intraocular pressure; i.v., intravenous; PEEP, Positive End-Expiratory Pressure; Pinsp, Inspiratory pressure; RR, blood pressure; SpO2. oxygen saturation; TIVA, total intravenous anaesthesia; VT, tidal volume.

References

    1. Sihota R, Tuli D, Dada T, et al. . Distribution and determinants of intraocular pressure in a normal pediatric population. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2006;43:14–18. 10.3928/01913913-20060101-01
    1. Oberacher-Velten I, Prasser C, Rochon J, et al. . The effects of midazolam on intraocular pressure in children during examination under sedation. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:1102–5. 10.1136/bjo.2009.173641
    1. Mikhail M, Sabri K, Levin AV. Effect of anesthesia on intraocular pressure measurement in children. Surv Ophthalmol 2017;62:648–58. 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.04.003
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . Spirit 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. Montazeri K, Dehghan A, Akbari S. Increase in intraocular pressure is less with propofol and remifentanil than isoflurane with remifentanil during cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Adv Biomed Res 2015;4:55. 10.4103/2277-9175.151583
    1. Hanna SF, Ahmad F, Pappas ALS, et al. . The effect of propofol/remifentanil rapid-induction technique without muscle relaxants on intraocular pressure. J Clin Anesth 2010;22:437–42. 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.12.004
    1. Termühlen J, Gottschalk A, Eter N, et al. . Does general anesthesia have a clinical impact on intraocular pressure in children? Paediatr Anaesth 2016;26:936–41. 10.1111/pan.12955
    1. Barclay K, Wall T, Wareham K, et al. . Intra-ocular pressure changes in patients with glaucoma. Comparison between the laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube. Anaesthesia 1994;49:159–62. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03378.x
    1. Deramoudt V, Gaudon M, Malledant Y, et al. . [Effects of propofol on intraocular pressure in surgery of strabismus in children]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1990;9:1–5. 10.1016/s0750-7658(05)80028-0
    1. Derbyshire DR, Smith G, Achola KJ. Effect of topical lignocaine on the sympathoadrenal responses to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1987;59:300–4. 10.1093/bja/59.3.300
    1. Watcha MF, Chu FC, Stevens JL, et al. . Intraocular pressure and hemodynamic changes following tracheal intubation in children. J Clin Anesth 1991;3:310–3. 10.1016/0952-8180(91)90226-D
    1. Watcha MF, White PF, Tychsen L, et al. . Comparative effects of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube insertion on intraocular pressure in children. Anesth Analg 1992;75:355–60. 10.1213/00000539-199209000-00007
    1. Patel A, Clark SR, Schiffmiller M, et al. . A survey of practice patterns in the use of laryngeal mask by pediatric anesthesiologists. Paediatr Anaesth 2015;25:1127–31. 10.1111/pan.12727
    1. Agrawal G, Agarwal M, Taneja S. A randomized comparative study of intraocular pressure and hemodynamic changes on insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and conventional tracheal intubation in pediatric patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2012;28:326–9. 10.4103/0970-9185.98325
    1. Schäfer R, Klett J, Auffarth G, et al. . Intraocular pressure more reduced during anesthesia with propofol than with sevoflurane: both combined with remifentanil. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:703–6. 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460612.x
    1. Dominguez A, Garcia-Miguel FJ, Alsina E, et al. . Intraocular pressure measurement in children under general anaesthesia with sevoflurane. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009;26:801–3. 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832bccb6
    1. Piepho T, Cavus E, Noppens R, et al. . S1 guidelines on airway management : Guideline of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Anaesthesist 2015;64:27–40. 10.1007/s00101-015-0109-4
    1. Lenoir RJ. Venous congestion of the neck; its relation to laryngeal mask cuff pressures. Br J Anaesth 2004;93:476–7. 10.1093/bja/aeh603
    1. Lopes JE, Wilson RR, Alvim HS, et al. . Central corneal thickness in pediatric glaucoma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2007;44:112–7. 10.3928/01913913-20070301-05
    1. Levy J, Lifshitz T, Rosen S, et al. . Is the tono-pen accurate for measuring intraocular pressure in young children with congenital glaucoma? J Aapos 2005;9:321–5. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.02.006
    1. Perkins ES. Hand-held applanation tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol 1965;49:591–3. 10.1136/bjo.49.11.591
    1. Esmael A, Ismail YM, Elhusseiny AM, et al. . Agreement profiles for rebound and applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous children. Eur J Ophthalmol 2019;29:379–85. 10.1177/1120672118795060
    1. Nakakura S. Icare® rebound tonometers: review of their characteristics and ease of use. Clin Ophthalmol 2018;12:1245–53. 10.2147/OPTH.S163092

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner