British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines

Matthew D Rutter, James East, Colin J Rees, Neil Cripps, James Docherty, Sunil Dolwani, Philip V Kaye, Kevin J Monahan, Marco R Novelli, Andrew Plumb, Brian P Saunders, Siwan Thomas-Gibson, Damian J M Tolan, Sophie Whyte, Stewart Bonnington, Alison Scope, Ruth Wong, Barbara Hibbert, John Marsh, Billie Moores, Amanda Cross, Linda Sharp, Matthew D Rutter, James East, Colin J Rees, Neil Cripps, James Docherty, Sunil Dolwani, Philip V Kaye, Kevin J Monahan, Marco R Novelli, Andrew Plumb, Brian P Saunders, Siwan Thomas-Gibson, Damian J M Tolan, Sophie Whyte, Stewart Bonnington, Alison Scope, Ruth Wong, Barbara Hibbert, John Marsh, Billie Moores, Amanda Cross, Linda Sharp

Abstract

These consensus guidelines were jointly commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and Public Health England (PHE). They provide an evidence-based framework for the use of surveillance colonoscopy and non-colonoscopic colorectal imaging in people aged 18 years and over. They are the first guidelines that take into account the introduction of national bowel cancer screening. For the first time, they also incorporate surveillance of patients following resection of either adenomatous or serrated polyps and also post-colorectal cancer resection. They are primarily aimed at healthcare professionals, and aim to address:Which patients should commence surveillance post-polypectomy and post-cancer resection?What is the appropriate surveillance interval?When can surveillance be stopped? two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia); or five or more premalignant polyps The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument provided a methodological framework for the guidelines. The BSG's guideline development process was used, which is National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) compliant.two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia); or five or more premalignant polyps The key recommendations are that the high-risk criteria for future colorectal cancer (CRC) following polypectomy comprise either:two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia); or five or more premalignant polyps This cohort should undergo a one-off surveillance colonoscopy at 3 years. Post-CRC resection patients should undergo a 1 year clearance colonoscopy, then a surveillance colonoscopy after 3 more years.

Keywords: colonic polyps; colonoscopy; colorectal adenomas; colorectal cancer; surveillance.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JE – Clinical advisory boards: Lumendi, Boston Scientific; Speaker fees: Olympus, FalkColin Rees – Research grant: ARC medical, Norgine, Olympus. Expert witness: ARC medical Matt Rutter – Speaker fees: SwissSCWeb, Pentax; Research Grant: Olympus; Consultancy: Norgine DJMT – Speaker fees: Bracco, Guerbet.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England (BSG/ACPGBI/PHE) post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guideline algorithm. LNPCP, large non-pedunculated colorectal polyp; NPCPs, non-pedunculated colorectal polyps; y, years.

References

    1. Cancer Research UK, 2019. Available:
    1. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 1990;61:759–67. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90186-I
    1. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, et al. . Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012;366:687–96. 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370
    1. Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, et al. . Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 2005;129:34–41. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.05.012
    1. Cottet V, Jooste V, Fournel I, et al. . Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after adenoma removal: a population-based cohort study. Gut 2012;61:1180–6.
    1. East JE, Atkin WS, Bateman AC, et al. . British Society of Gastroenterology position statement on serrated polyps in the colon and rectum. Gut 2017;66:1181–96. 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314005
    1. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. . Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. NEnglJMed 2000;343:162–8.
    1. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, et al. . Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2000;343:169–74. 10.1056/NEJM200007203430302
    1. Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, et al. . Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2006;355:1863–72. 10.1056/NEJMoa054967
    1. Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. . Systematic review: distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31:210–7. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04160.x
    1. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 1992;326:658–62. 10.1056/NEJM199203053261002
    1. Martínez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. . A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2009;136:832–41. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.007
    1. Cancer Research UK. Scoping the future: an evaluation of endoscopy capacity across the NHS in England. Cancer Research UK publication 2015.
    1. Atkin WS, Saunders BP, et al. , British Society for Gastroenterology . Surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps. Gut 2002;51 Suppl 5:v6–9. 10.1136/gut.51.suppl_5.v6
    1. Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, et al. . Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut 2010;59:666–89. 10.1136/gut.2009.179804
    1. Monahan KJ, Bradshaw N, Dolwani S, et al. . Guidelines for the management of hereditarycolorectal cancer from the British Society ofGastroenterology (BSG)/Association ofColoproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG). Gut 2019:gutjnl-2019-319915.
    1. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. . Agree II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ 2010;182:E839–42. 10.1503/cmaj.090449
    1. Tham TCK, Gleeson D, Greenfield SM, et al. . British Society of Gastroenterology policy and processes for the development of guidelines. Gut 2015;64:1184–5. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309164
    1. Rutter MD, Chattree A, Barbour JA, et al. . British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines for the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut 2015;64:1847–73. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309576
    1. Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau J-M, et al. . Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2013;45:842–64. 10.1055/s-0033-1344548
    1. Guyatt GH, Schünemann HJ, Djulbegovic B, et al. . Guideline panels should not grade good practice statements. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68:597–600. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.011
    1. Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP, et al. . Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy--results of the Complete Adenoma Resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology 2013;144:74–80. 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.043
    1. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. . Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1298–306. 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086
    1. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. . Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2010;362:1795–803. 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667
    1. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, et al. . Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:225–32.
    1. Mangas-Sanjuan C, Zapater P, Cubiella J, et al. . Importance of endoscopist quality metrics for findings at surveillance colonoscopy: the detection-surveillance paradox. United European Gastroenterol J 2018;6:622–9. 10.1177/2050640617745458
    1. Tierney M, Bevan R, Rees CJ, et al. . What do patients want from their endoscopy experience? the importance of measuring and understanding patient attitudes to their care. Frontline Gastroenterol 2016;7:191–8. 10.1136/flgastro-2015-100574
    1. Brown S, Bevan R, Rubin G, et al. . Patient-derived measures of Gi endoscopy: a meta-narrative review of the literature. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:1130–40. 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.047
    1. Foss FA, Milkins S, McGregor AH. Inter-observer variability in the histological assessment of colorectal polyps detected through the NHS bowel cancer screening programme. Histopathology 2012;61:47–52. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04154.x
    1. Mahajan D, Downs-Kelly E, Liu X, et al. . Reproducibility of the villous component and high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas <1 cm. Am J Surg Pathol 2013;37:427–33. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31826cf50f
    1. Atkin W, Brenner A, Martin J, et al. . The clinical effectiveness of different surveillance strategies to prevent colorectal cancer in people with intermediate-grade colorectal adenomas: a retrospective cohort analysis, and psychological and economic evaluations. Health Technol Assess 2017;21:1–536. 10.3310/hta21250
    1. Atkin W, Wooldrage K, Brenner A, et al. . Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:823–34. 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30187-0
    1. Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. . Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1095–105. 10.1056/NEJMoa1301969
    1. Adler J, Toy D, Anderson JC, et al. . Metachronous neoplasias arise in a higher proportion of colon segments from which large polyps were previously removed, and can be used to estimate incomplete resection of 10-20 mm colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019.
    1. Chaptini L, Chaaya A, Depalma F, et al. . Variation in polyp size estimation among endoscopists and impact on surveillance intervals. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;80:652–9. 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.053
    1. Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee JH, et al. . Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size? World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:3220–6. 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3220
    1. Rex DK, Rabinovitz R. Variable interpretation of polyp size by using open forceps by experienced colonoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:402–7. 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.030
    1. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Halligan S, et al. . CT colonography polyp matching: differences between experienced readers. Eur Radiol 2009;19:1723–30. 10.1007/s00330-009-1328-3
    1. Gupta S, Durkalski V, Cotton P, et al. . Variation of agreement in polyp size measurement between computed tomographic colonography and pathology assessment: clinical implications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:220–7. 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.11.007
    1. Turner JK, Wright M, Morgan M, et al. . A prospective study of the accuracy and concordance between in-situ and postfixation measurements of colorectal polyp size and their potential impact upon surveillance. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;25:562–7. 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835d1f2d
    1. Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975;36:2251–70. 10.1002/cncr.2820360944
    1. Martínez ME, Thompson P, Messer K, et al. . One-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia: U.S. versus U.K. risk-stratification guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:856–64. 10.7326/0003-4819-157-12-201212180-00005
    1. von Karsa L, Patnick J, Segnan N. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition-executive summary. Endoscopy 2012;44:SE1–8.
    1. Plumb A, Nickerson C, Wooldrage K, et al. . Terminal digit preference biases polyp size measurements at endoscopy, computed tomographic colonography, and histopathology. Endoscopy 2016;48:899–908. 10.1055/s-0042-108727
    1. Strum WB, Adenomas C. Colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1065–75. 10.1056/NEJMra1513581
    1. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, et al. . Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 1987;93:1009–13. 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90563-4
    1. Sekiguchi M, Otake Y, Kakugawa Y, et al. . Incidence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in individuals with untreated diminutive colorectal adenomas diagnosed by magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2019.
    1. National life tables, UK: 2015 to 2017: Office of National Statistics. Available:
    1. Tran AH, Man Ngor EW, BU W. Surveillance colonoscopy in elderly patients: a retrospective cohort study. JAMA internal medicine 2014;174:1675–82.
    1. Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Anderson WF, et al. . Colorectal cancer incidence patterns in the United States, 1974–2013. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017;109 10.1093/jnci/djw322
    1. Vuik FE, Nieuwenburg SA, Bardou M, et al. . Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in young adults in Europe over the last 25 years. Gut 2019;68:1820–6. 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317592
    1. Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR, et al. . Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:250–81.
    1. Jeffery M, Hickey BE, Hider PN, et al. . Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;3 10.1002/14651858.CD002200.pub3
    1. Rosati G, Ambrosini G, Barni S, et al. . A randomized trial of intensive versus minimal surveillance of patients with resected Dukes B2-C colorectal carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2016;27:274–80. 10.1093/annonc/mdv541
    1. Verberne CJ, Zhan Z, van den Heuvel E, et al. . Intensified follow-up in colorectal cancer patients using frequent Carcino-Embryonic Antigen (CEA) measurements and CEA-triggered imaging: Results of the randomized “CEAwatch” trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015;41:1188–96. 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.06.008
    1. Wille-Jørgensen P, Syk I, Smedh K, et al. . Effect of more vs less frequent follow-up testing on overall and colorectal cancer-specific mortality in patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer: the COLOFOL randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;319:2095–103. 10.1001/jama.2018.5623
    1. Pita-Fernández S, Alhayek-Aí M, González-Martín C, et al. . Intensive follow-up strategies improve outcomes in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer patients after curative surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 2015;26:644–56. 10.1093/annonc/mdu543
    1. Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY. Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1783–99. 10.1007/s10350-007-9030-5
    1. Mulder SA, Kranse R, Damhuis RA, et al. . The incidence and risk factors of metachronous colorectal cancer: an indication for follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2012;55:522–31.
    1. Bouvier A-M, Latournerie M, Jooste V, et al. . The lifelong risk of metachronous colorectal cancer justifies long-term colonoscopic follow-up. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:522–7. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.01.007
    1. Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. . Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1865–71. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.013
    1. Green RJ, Metlay JP, Propert K, et al. . Surveillance for second primary colorectal cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy: an analysis of intergroup 0089. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:261–9. 10.7326/0003-4819-136-4-200202190-00005
    1. Yang J, Du XL, Li S, et al. . The risk and survival outcome of subsequent primary colorectal cancer after the first primary colorectal cancer: cases from 1973 to 2012. BMC Cancer 2017;17:783 10.1186/s12885-017-3765-8
    1. Samadder NJ, Curtin K, Wong J, et al. . Epidemiology and familial risk of synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancer: a population-based study in Utah. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;84:e1–2.
    1. le Clercq CM, Winkens B, Bakker CM, et al. . Metachronous colorectal cancers result from missed lesions and non-compliance with surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 2015.
    1. Fuccio L, Rex D, Ponchon T, et al. . New and recurrent colorectal cancers after resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic surveillance studies. Gastroenterology 2019;156:1309–23. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.006
    1. Rulyak SJ, Lieberman DA, Wagner EH, et al. . Outcome of follow-up colon examination among a population-based cohort of colorectal cancer patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:470–6. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.11.027
    1. Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Zullo A, et al. . Cost-effectiveness of early colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection. Dig Liver Dis 2009;41:881–5. 10.1016/j.dld.2009.03.016
    1. Wang T, Cui Y, Huang W-S, et al. . The role of postoperative colonoscopic surveillance after radical surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:609–15. 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.017
    1. Hassan C, Wysocki PT, Fuccio L, et al. . Endoscopic surveillance after surgical or endoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO) guideline. Endoscopy 2019;51:266–77. 10.1055/a-0831-2522
    1. Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, et al. . Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2017;49:270–97. 10.1055/s-0043-102569
    1. Belderbos T, Leenders M, Moons L, et al. . Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2014;46:388–402. 10.1055/s-0034-1364970
    1. Tate DJ, Desomer L, Klein A, et al. . Adenoma recurrence after piecemeal colonic EMR is predictable: the Sydney EMR recurrence tool. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:647–56. 10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.027
    1. Oka S, Tanaka S, Saito Y, et al. . Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:697–707. 10.1038/ajg.2015.96
    1. Akintoye E, Kumar N, Aihara H, et al. . Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2016;04:E1030–44. 10.1055/s-0042-114774
    1. Toyonaga T, Man-i M, East JE, et al. . 1,635 endoscopic submucosal dissection cases in the esophagus, stomach, and colorectum: complication rates and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2013;27:1000–8. 10.1007/s00464-012-2555-2
    1. Rees CJ, Thomas Gibson S, Rutter MD, et al. . UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy. Gut 2016;65:1923–9. 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312044
    1. Regge D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 2009;301:2453–61. 10.1001/jama.2009.832
    1. Chaparro M, Gisbert JP, del Campo L, et al. . Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of polyps and colorectal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Digestion 2009;80:1–17. 10.1159/000215387
    1. Obaro AE, Plumb AA, Fanshawe TR, et al. . Post-imaging colorectal cancer or interval cancer rates after CT colonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;3:326–36. 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30032-3
    1. Porté F, Uppara M, Malietzis G, et al. . CT colonography for surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy. Eur Radiol 2017;27:51–60. 10.1007/s00330-016-4319-1
    1. Amitai MM, Fidder H, Avidan B, et al. . Contrast-enhanced CT colonography with 64-slice MDCT compared to endoscopic colonoscopy in the follow-up of patients after colorectal cancer resection. Clin Imaging 2009;33:433–8. 10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.01.002
    1. Kim HJ, Park SH, Pickhardt PJ, et al. . CT colonography for combined colonic and extracolonic surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Radiology 2010;257:697–704. 10.1148/radiol.10100385
    1. Neri E, Vagli P, Turini F, et al. . Post-surgical follow-up of colorectal cancer: role of contrast-enhanced CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2010;35:669–75. 10.1007/s00261-009-9596-6
    1. Pickhardt PJ, Edwards K, Bruining DH, et al. . Prospective trial evaluating the surgical anastomosis at one-year colorectal cancer surveillance: CT colonography versus optical colonoscopy and implications for patient care. Dis Colon Rectum 2017;60:1162–7.
    1. Weinberg DS, Pickhardt PJ, Bruining DH, et al. . Computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy for colorectal cancer surveillance after surgery. Gastroenterology 2018;154:927–34. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.025
    1. Liedenbaum MH, Venema HW, Stoker J. Radiation dose in CT colonography–trends in time and differences between daily practice and screening protocols. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2222–30. 10.1007/s00330-008-0994-x
    1. Boellaard TN, Venema HW, Streekstra GJ, et al. . Effective radiation dose in CT colonography: is there a downward trend? Acad Radiol 2012;19:1127–33. 10.1016/j.acra.2012.04.013
    1. Perisinakis K, Seimenis I, Tzedakis A, et al. . Screening computed tomography colonography with 256-slice scanning: should patient radiation burden and associated cancer risk constitute a major concern? Invest Radiol 2012;47:451–6. 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318250a58c
    1. de González AB, Kim KP, Knudsen AB, et al. . Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a risk-benefit analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:816–23. 10.2214/AJR.10.4907
    1. de Gonzalez AB, Iulian Apostoaei A, Veiga LHS, et al. . RadRAT: a radiation risk assessment tool for lifetime cancer risk projection. J Radiol Prot 2012;32:205–22. 10.1088/0952-4746/32/3/205
    1. Cross AJ, Wooldrage K, Robbins EC, et al. . Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) versus colonoscopy for surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study. Gut 2019;68:1642–52. 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317297
    1. van Enckevort CC, de Graaf AP, Hollema H, et al. . Predictors of colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy: based on initial and consecutive findings. Netherlands J Med 2014;72:139–45.
    1. Fairley KJ, Li J, Komar M, et al. . Predicting the risk of recurrent adenoma and incident colorectal cancer based on findings of the baseline colonoscopy. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2014;5:e64 10.1038/ctg.2014.11
    1. Huang Y, Gong W, Su B, et al. . Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population. J Gastroenterol 2010;45:838–45. 10.1007/s00535-010-0227-3
    1. Facciorusso A, Di Maso M, Serviddio G, et al. . Development and validation of a risk score for advanced colorectal adenoma recurrence after endoscopic resection. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:6049–56. 10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.6049
    1. Facciorusso A, Di Maso M, Serviddio G, et al. . Factors associated with recurrence of advanced colorectal adenoma after endoscopic resection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:1148–54. 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.017
    1. Park S-K, Kim NH, Jung YS, et al. . Risk of developing advanced colorectal neoplasia after removing high-risk adenoma detected at index colonoscopy in young patients: a KASID study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;31:138–44. 10.1111/jgh.13167
    1. Lee TJW, Nickerson C, Goddard AF, et al. . Outcome of 12-month surveillance colonoscopy in high-risk patients in the National Health Service bowel cancer screening programme. Colorectal Dis 2013;15:e435–42. 10.1111/codi.12278
    1. Cubiella J, Carballo F, Portillo I, et al. . Incidence of advanced neoplasia during surveillance in high- and intermediate-risk groups of the European colorectal cancer screening guidelines. Endoscopy 2016;48:995–1002. 10.1055/s-0042-112571
    1. van Heijningen E-MB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Kuipers EJ, et al. . Features of adenoma and colonoscopy associated with recurrent colorectal neoplasia based on a large community-based study. Gastroenterology 2013;144:1410–8. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.03.002
    1. Huang Y, Gong W, Su B, et al. . Risk and cause of interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polypectomy. Digestion 2012;86:148–54. 10.1159/000338680
    1. Bonnington SN, Sharp L, Rutter MD. Post-polypectomy surveillance in the English bowel cancer screening programme: multivariate logistic regression of factors influencing advanced adenoma detection at first surveillance (Abstract). Endoscopy 2019;51:S153.
    1. Bonnington SN, Sharp L, Rutter MD. Post-polypectomy surveillance in the English bowel cancer screening programme: results of first surveillance (Abstract). Endoscopy 2019;51:S116.
    1. Bonnington SN, Sharp L, Rutter MD. Post-polypectomy surveillance in the English bowel cancer screening programme: results of second surveillance (Abstract). Endoscopy 2019;51:S138.
    1. Laiyemo AO, et al. Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:419–26. 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00004
    1. Nusko G, Hahn EG, Mansmann U. Risk of advanced metachronous colorectal adenoma during long-term follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23:1065–71. 10.1007/s00384-008-0508-y
    1. Laish I, Seregeev I, Naftali T, et al. . Surveillance after positive colonoscopy based on adenoma characteristics. Dig Liver Dis 2017;49:1115–20. 10.1016/j.dld.2017.05.005
    1. Solakoğlu T, Köseoğlu H, Özer Sarı S, et al. . Role of baseline adenoma characteristics for adenoma recurrence in patients with high-risk adenoma. Turk J Med Sci 2017;47:1416–24. 10.3906/sag-1502-105
    1. Coleman HG, Loughrey MB, Murray LJ, et al. . Colorectal cancer risk following adenoma removal: a large prospective population-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24:1373–80. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0085
    1. Emilsson L, Løberg M, Bretthauer M, et al. . Colorectal cancer death after adenoma removal in Scandinavia. Scand J Gastroenterol 2017;52:1377–84. 10.1080/00365521.2017.1377763
    1. Løberg M, Kalager M, Holme Øyvind, et al. . Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal. N Engl J Med 2014;371:799–807. 10.1056/NEJMoa1315870
    1. Huang Y, Li X, Wang Z, et al. . Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after normal baseline colonoscopy in asymptomatic Chinese Mongolian over 50 years of age. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27:1651–6. 10.1007/s00384-012-1516-5
    1. Jang HW, Park SJ, Hong SP, et al. . Risk factors for recurrent high-risk polyps after the removal of high-risk polyps at initial colonoscopy. Yonsei Med J 2015;56:1559–65. 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.6.1559
    1. Lee JL, Cha JM, Lee HM, et al. . Determining the optimal surveillance interval after a colonoscopic polypectomy for the Korean population? Intest Res 2017;15:109–17. 10.5217/ir.2017.15.1.109
    1. Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Risk of advanced lesions at first follow-up colonoscopy in high-risk groups as defined by the United Kingdom post-polypectomy surveillance guideline: data from a single U.S. center. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;80:299–306. 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.1029
    1. Jung YS, Park DI, Kim WH, et al. . Risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia according to the number of high-risk findings at index colonoscopy: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (KASID) study. Dig Dis Sci 2016;61:1661–8. 10.1007/s10620-016-4038-0
    1. Cottet V, Jooste V, Fournel I, et al. . Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after adenoma removal: a population-based cohort study. Gut 2012;61:1180–6. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300295
    1. Pinsky PF, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, et al. . The yield of surveillance colonoscopy by adenoma history and time to examination. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:86–92. 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.07.014
    1. Morelli M, Glowinski E, Juluri R, et al. . Yield of the second surveillance colonoscopy based on the results of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2013;45:821–6. 10.1055/s-0033-1344582
    1. Imperiale TF, Juluri R, Sherer EA, et al. . A risk index for advanced neoplasia on the second surveillance colonoscopy in patients with previous adenomatous polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;80:471–8. 10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.042
    1. Tae CH, Moon CM, Jung S-A, et al. . Higher body mass index is associated with an increased risk of multiplicity in surveillance colonoscopy within 5 years. Sci Rep 2017;7:14239 10.1038/s41598-017-14163-9
    1. Kim HG, Cho Y-S, Cha JM, et al. . Risk of metachronous neoplasia on surveillance colonoscopy in young patients with colorectal neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;87:666–73. 10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.053
    1. Holme Øyvind, Bretthauer M, Eide TJ, et al. . Long-term risk of colorectal cancer in individuals with serrated polyps. Gut 2015;64:929–36. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307793
    1. He X, Hang D, Wu K, et al. . Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after removal of conventional adenomas and serrated polyps. Gastroenterology 2019. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.039
    1. Erichsen R, Baron JA, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, et al. . Increased risk of colorectal cancer development among patients with serrated polyps. Gastroenterology 2016;150:895–902. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.046
    1. Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Robinson CM, et al. . Risk of metachronous high-risk adenomas and large serrated polyps in individuals with serrated polyps on index colonoscopy: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Gastroenterology 2018;154:117–27. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.011
    1. Symonds E, Anwar S, Young G, et al. . Sessile serrated polyps with synchronous conventional adenomas increase risk of future advanced neoplasia. Dig Dis Sci 2019;64:1680–5. 10.1007/s10620-019-5454-8
    1. Schreiner MA, Weiss DG, Lieberman DA. Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2010;139:1497–502. 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.074
    1. FI L, van Niekerk de W, Owen D, et al. . Longitudinal outcome study of sessile serrated adenomas of the colorectum: an increased risk for subsequent right-sided colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2010;34:927–34.
    1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. . Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 1993;329:1977–81. 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701
    1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O'Brien MJ, et al. . Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 1993;328:901–6. 10.1056/NEJM199304013281301
    1. Chung SJ, Kim YS, Yang SY, et al. . Five-Year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans. Gut 2011;60:1537–43. 10.1136/gut.2010.232876
    1. Miller J, Mehta N, Feldman M, et al. . Findings on serial surveillance colonoscopy in patients with low-risk polyps on initial colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010;44:e46–50. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181a7ed2a
    1. Gavin DR, Valori RM, Anderson JT, et al. . The National Colonoscopy Audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK. Gut 2013;62:242–9. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301848
    1. Nelson DB, McQuaid KR, Bond JH, et al. . Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:307–14. 10.1067/mge.2002.121883
    1. Silvis SE, Nebel O, Rogers G, et al. . Endoscopic complications. Results of the 1974 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy survey. JAMA 1976;235:928–30. 10.1001/jama.235.9.928
    1. Rutter M, Nickerson C, Rees C, et al. . Risk factors for adverse events related to polypectomy in the English bowel cancer screening programme. Endoscopy 2014;46:90–7. 10.1055/s-0033-1344987
    1. Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B, et al. . The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50-64 years. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003;38:635–42.
    1. Heldwein W, Dollhopf M, Rösch T, et al. . The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic SNARE polypectomies. Endoscopy 2005;37:1116–22. 10.1055/s-2005-870512
    1. Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, et al. . Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:880–6. 10.7326/0003-4819-145-12-200612190-00004
    1. Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:620–7. 10.1067/mge.2001.114422
    1. Panteris V, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ, et al. . Mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2009;41:941–51.
    1. Rosen L, Bub DS, Reed JF. Hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:1126–31.
    1. Wang L, Mannalithara A, Singh G, et al. . Low rates of gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal complications for screening or surveillance colonoscopies in a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2018;154:540–55. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.006
    1. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Hilsden RJ, et al. . Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1899–906. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.058
    1. Singh H, Penfold RB, DeCoster C, et al. . Colonoscopy and its complications across a Canadian regional health authority. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:665–71. 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.046
    1. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, et al. . Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:849–57. 10.7326/0003-4819-150-12-200906160-00008
    1. García-Albéniz X, Hsu J, Bretthauer M, et al. . Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy to prevent colorectal cancer among Medicare beneficiaries aged 70 to 79 years. Ann Intern Med 2017;166:18–26. 10.7326/M16-0758
    1. Djinbachian R, Dube AJ, Durand M, et al. . Adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2019;51:673–83.
    1. National Health Service No. 26A: NHS bowel scope screening programme: Public Health England, 2018. Available:
    1. Kamiński MF, Hassan C, Bisschops R, et al. . Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2014;46:435–57. 10.1055/s-0034-1365348
    1. Bisschops R, East J, Hassan C, et al. . Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: updated ESGE guidelinein press. Endoscopy 2019.
    1. Vleugels JLA, Dijkgraaf MGW, Hazewinkel Y, et al. . Effects of training and feedback on accuracy of predicting rectosigmoid neoplastic lesions and selection of surveillance intervals by endoscopists performing optical diagnosis of diminutive polyps. Gastroenterology 2018;154:1682–93. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.063
    1. East JE, Wang LM. Response. Gastrointest Endosc 2016;83:675–6. 10.1016/j.gie.2015.11.034
    1. Mori Y, Kudo S-ei, Misawa M, et al. . Real-time use of artificial intelligence in identification of diminutive polyps during colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:357–66. 10.7326/M18-0249
    1. Byrne MF, Chapados N, Soudan F, et al. . Real-time differentiation of adenomatous and hyperplastic diminutive colorectal polyps during analysis of unaltered videos of standard colonoscopy using a deep learning model. Gut 2019;68:94–100. 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314547
    1. Vleugels JLA, Hassan C, Senore C, et al. . Diminutive polyps with advanced histologic features do not increase risk for metachronous advanced colon neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2018.
    1. Sano W, Fujimori T, Ichikawa K, et al. . Clinical and endoscopic evaluations of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps with cytological dysplasia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;33:1454–60. 10.1111/jgh.14099
    1. Atkinson NS, East JE. Optical biopsy and sessile serrated polyps: is discard dead? Long live DISCARD-lite! Gastrointest Endosc 2015;82:118–21. 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.059
    1. von Renteln D, Kaltenbach T, Rastogi A, et al. . Simplifying resect and discard strategies for real-time assessment of diminutive colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;16:706–14. 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.036
    1. Moss S, Mathews C, Day TJ, et al. . Increased uptake and improved outcomes of bowel cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: results from a pilot study within the National screening programme in England. Gut 2017;66:1631–44. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310691

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner