Tumor angiogenesis in advanced stage ovarian carcinoma

H C Hollingsworth, E C Kohn, S M Steinberg, M L Rothenberg, M J Merino, H C Hollingsworth, E C Kohn, S M Steinberg, M L Rothenberg, M J Merino

Abstract

Tumor angiogenesis has been found to have prognostic significance in many tumor types for predicting an increased risk of metastasis. We assessed tumor vascularity in 43 cases of advanced stage (International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians stages III and IV) ovarian cancer by using the highly specific endothelial cell marker CD34. Microvessel counts and stage were associated with disease-free survival and with overall survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The plots show that higher stage, higher average vessel count at 200x (200x avg) and 400x (400x avg) magnification and highest vessel count at 400x (400x high) magnification confer a worse prognosis for disease-free survival. Average vessel count of less than 16 (400x avg, P2 = 0.01) and less than 45 (200x avg, P2 = 0.026) suggested a better survival. Similarly, a high vessel count of less than 20 (400x high, P2 = 0.019) conferred a better survival as well. The plots suggest that higher stage, higher average vessel count at 200x and 400x, and highest vessel count at 200x and 400x show a trend to worse overall survival as well. With the Cox proportional hazards model, stage was the best predictor of overall survival, however, the average microvessel count at 400x was found to be the best predictor of disease-free survival. These results suggest that analysis of neovascularization in advanced stage ovarian cancer may be a useful prognostic factor.

References

    1. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Mar;12(3):441-3
    1. Cancer Res. 1994 May 15;54(10):2800-2
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 Jun;57(6):1534-9
    1. Lab Invest. 1963 Feb;12:131-55
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1965 May;34:571-8
    1. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966 Mar;50(3):163-70
    1. Cancer. 1980 Feb;45(3):572-81
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 May;59(5):576-82
    1. Adv Cancer Res. 1985;43:175-203
    1. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1986 Oct;22(10):1205-9
    1. Lab Invest. 1987 May;56(5):461-74
    1. Am J Pathol. 1988 Nov;133(2):419-23
    1. Nature. 1989 May 4;339(6219):58-61
    1. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1989;9(3):197-242
    1. Blood. 1990 Jun 15;75(12):2417-26
    1. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jan 3;324(1):1-8
    1. Cell. 1991 Jan 25;64(2):327-36
    1. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1990 Nov;9(3):171-4
    1. Haematologica. 1991 Jul-Aug;76(4):311-20
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1992 May;10(5):727-34
    1. Hum Pathol. 1992 Jul;23(7):755-61
    1. Lancet. 1992 Jul 18;340(8812):145-6
    1. Semin Cancer Biol. 1992 Apr;3(2):65-71
    1. Lancet. 1992 Nov 7;340(8828):1120-4
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Dec 16;84(24):1875-87
    1. J Pathol. 1992 Nov;168(3):257-62
    1. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1993 Apr;15(2):88-92
    1. Am J Pathol. 1993 Aug;143(2):401-9
    1. Int J Cancer. 1993 Sep 30;55(3):371-4
    1. Surg Oncol. 1992 Jun;1(3):223-9
    1. Cancer. 1994 Feb 1;73(3):678-87

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner